By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Volvo - fast but engine sounds harsh when pressed; plenty of room at the back but car looks like the old days' station wagon.
Audi - Very good, but discouraged by CR's poor reliability rating.
Heard the new 2005 Subaru models, due out any time now, are much improved in looks and performance and have good reliability record, but can't seem to be able to get over its brand image. So, likely to go with the RX. Jason
Thanks.
I'm not exactly sure about smog sensors. Perhaps they warn you to switch to re circulating mode, when air quality is poor?
I also miss that and the Park Distance sensors. They are available on the LS.
I checked that out and it's a big improvement over my 2000 RX. There are two units on the back of the console with volume and angle adjustments. Should work nicely for back seat riders.
I finally got the right Lexus hitch and towed my bass boat with the RX330. Although I decided not to tow it the 110 miles back home to the Bay Area, I did tow it the short distance from our place in Clear Lake, to the boat ramp nearby.
The boat, motor, and trailer package is about 2500 lbs. I did not notice any undue lowering of the back end when I hitched the boat. The whole rig was very stable, although the fastest I went was 30mph. Although I did have to press a mite harder on the brake pedal, I thought the brakes handled the extra load quite well.
I am planning to use the RX330 to tow the boat back to the Bay Area in June, for maintenance. I will post my adventures in highway boat towing then. In the meantime, happy hitching and safe towing to you!
I'm really either going to get an RX, or the '06 GS300. Those are my two options. The GS will definitely be more expensive, but I get the stability of a sedan, with a comfortable seat. The RX seat cushion seems a bit too short.
My RX330 is the first SUV I have owned and I was worried about the rear visibility. But, I have learned to adapt. And after thinking about it for awhile, I realized I had to adapt to each new car I have ever owned. Now...there may well be a difference between the 300 and the new 330...but I can't comment on that because I've never driven a 300.
For the record, I do not have the navigation system with the rear camera.
Also wondering about how people feel about the exclusion of a hitch with the trailer/towing package? Wish they'd work that in there somehow.
Thanks in advance! I really do like the looks of the RX330 over the 300. Just like the more aggressive look (coming from a guy's perspective). May buy an RX now and wait on a hybrid for the future. The mix of car ride and more carlike MPG with a partial SUV stature and room just seems too good to be true.
What would you change about your RX?
If you contact the sales person who sold you the RX330, he/she should be able to get you a nice deal on a second set of floor mats. We purchased our set at the dealer's cost.
Asked a little about the 400h and the dealer said not to expect them until around January 1st ... maybe this has already been said. Again, who knows? The salesman said he heard 48mpg in town and 36mph highway ... but I think he's a little ahead of himself.
I think I'll end up getting a RX330, but don't know if I'll do it this summer or wait for the 2005s to come out ... any suggestions?
Sales manager said Lexus doesn't necessarily increase price from year to year, but rather intermittently through the year ... there was a $100 difference b/t 2 RX's on the lot that were equipped the same.
Also an updated correction on fuel economy for the upcoming 400h -- 36mpg in town, 31mpg on highway. Most probably knew that anyhow.
thanks
RX330 AWD - Premium gas, 19-20 MPG, mixed
RX330 AWD - Premium gas, 23-24 MPG, 99%(had to get off/on the freeway) Freeway, avg speed 70 MPH
Obviously, there is a big difference in fuel costs between an RX330 and a Navigator or Suburban. But here's the real surprise: If we are to believe the EPA mileage ratings, at least as a basis for comparing automobiles, then the fuel costs for an RX330 FWD are lower than fuel costs associated with the GS300 or the smaller IS300!
Here are the EPA ratings:
2004 RX330 FWD: 20/26
2004 GS300: 18/25
2004 IS300 (E-shift): 18/24
Also keep in mind that we can use regular (87) octane with the RX330. That is what we typically use in our RX330, but we occasionally fill up with 91. We are now averaging about 22mpg with about 60% highway (at 75mph), 20% urban, and 20% extremely short neighborhood trips of about 2-3 miles.
There are a few 6-cylinder sedans that are rated to provide up to 4mpg better fuel efficiency than our RX330 FWD, but many of the premium/luxury sedans offer no savings at all (such as the GS300). Many of these premium sedans also require Premium 91 octane.
Let's say you were to purchase a sedan that averages 3mpg better gas mileage than the RX330, such as an ES330 or an Acura TL. In this case, there would be some difference in annual fuel costs, but it wouldn't be very significant. If we assume 15,000 miles/year, with the RX300 FWD averaging 22mpg, and an ES330 averaging about 25mpg, you would save about 80 gallons per year with the ES330. At fuel prices of $2.50/gallon, the annual savings would be $200.
Of course, any small hybrid car will significantly increase your fuel savings, but at a major price in terms of features and comfort. A 4-cylinder model (Accord, Camry, VW Passat 1.8T, Mercedes C230, etc), or even one of those 5-cylinder Volvo models (S60, new S40), should save you closer to $400 per year in fuel (at 15K/yr, $2.50/gallon).
Note: I did not use the AWD (18/24 mpg) for comparisons because we were comparing the RX330 to other sedans, not to SUVs.
Using Toyota's own design Ford is marketing the Escape with an I4 engine for fuel economy. I haven't been a big fan of Ford since I switched to Lexus in 91 but I think, given a choice between only these two, I would buy a hybrid Escape over a GAS-GUZZLING RX400h.
But I'm much more likely to simply purchase a new RX330 or a Lexus minivan if the AWD Sienna is Lexurized.
Unless the continuous delay in the RX400h delivery date is due to a rethink and it will have the I4 with the current V6 level of performance.
I chose one with the NAV, no Mark Levinson, Premium Plus, Heated Seats, HID, Mats and Locks, 18" wheels, all pretty much standard for the cars being delivered to FL. I got over $3k off of MSRP, so I am really happy.
Now, I just need to sell my 99 RX, any advice on that would be appreciated.
Will the RX400h be available as a FWD model? With its added torque, I almost wonder if Lexus should limit it to AWD only.
Willard: No more plans to purchase the X3?
BTW This car would not be used for business. It would be a pleasure car only averaging about 7K - 8K miles/yr.
You can probably search previous posts for details.
You can probably search previous posts for details.
If there were a way to shut down that yammering woman's voice with a default OFF setting, I'd like to hear (or not hear) it. I still would like to see some file compatibility with notebook GPS systems and a card slot near the display so that you could build an itinerary on the notebook, save it to a card, then plug it into the nav system in the car. That would eliminate much of the button-pushing on a seemingly deliberately-obtuse nav system.
On balance, I guess it's worth it - but only if you spend a significant amount of time exploring new places. I'll probably order it on my next RX too.