Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
But Cadillacs have been pretty good cars over the years, (except the Cimmaron, Allante, 1st gen Escalade) so I guess brand loyalty happens when the cars are of good quality.
Although what really is sad is that Lincoln is getting whipped in the luxury segment because of their small and incomplete model lineup.
Forgive me. I like the interior of my car to be, well, like a bordello. Give me a spectacular looking dash (one of my favorites is from the -64-'66 T-birds, but generally speaking, GM lead the pack here in those years. And could one ever forget the glorious deep-dish steering wheel of a '62 Olds? ) not one that looks like something from a steam boiler. And give my seats and door panels tuffs and tucks and pleats and chrome accents. It doesn't mean the seats can't be comfortable too.
Forgive me. But when did we loose our sense of "pretty"? Back in the '50's and '60's we'd look at a tire and say: Butt ugly. So we'd spend 50 bucks and put on a flashy hubcap and a white ring and suddenly it wasn't butt ugly anymore. Then came the '70s and some new advertising whizbang decided that the Europeans had the edge on style (apparently never having seen an early BMW or a Peugeot 404) and they didn't have whitewalls or hubcaps. So we did without the whitewalls until we opened our eyes again and realized that tires are in fact butt ugly. Only now there are no more whitewalls...so we spend 1000 bucks to put on chrome wheels. Are we better off? I still think whitewalls do a better job.
But I'm digressing. Cadillac was always a goal--as was a salary to be able to afford one. Then something happened. My salary was there but the car I aspired to wasn't. I also think Cadillac is missing the mark with this new styling theme. Someone who is looking at a BMW or Mercedes is not going to look at a Cadillac no matter how it looks (nor will he be turned away by a BMW no matter how bad it looks--for example the 700 series with the bustle trunk it now sports). But the new Cadillac look has turned me away from the car of my dreams. I try to like the new STS and CTS but it just looks like a series of incongruous slabs slapped together. Perhaps it's an improvement over the totally bland, taxi-cab look of the 2000 Devilles. But that's not saying much. Chrysler did a much better job with their 300, and Ford with their 500. Almost the same comments apply to the Cadillac's interior. It just looks incongruous and plain jane. The last decent looking Caddy was the 1999...because it looked like a Caddy. You could trace the styling cues back to the glorious ones of the early 60's.
I feel that GM has let me down. It "un-idoled" the car of my dreams. Alas, this is one customer Cadillac has lost.
The 2006 Cadillac DTS will be priced more than $5,000 lower than its predecessor, the DeVille.
Seems like the discounts are already built into the price...
Not sure the target market for the Deville/DTS is so big on posting online, however.
I was thinking about it as a replacement for my 2003 M45...
e
Buick has no more vehicles coming, just possible a crossover to replace the Rendezvous. It's anyone's guess what will happen to the Rainier.
If you live near Dallas, I know Sewell Cadillac had one outside two weeks back - I did not have time to stop, but it looked very nice from a distance.
Much better exterior fit and finish (although I wish they would finally get rid of those door handles) - but like the Escalade, Caddy is now putting dinner-plate size wreath & crests on front and back. I understand that you can order from the factory a hood ornament, although I'm not sure if it deletes the front grille wreath. Interior is night and day compared to 2000-2005 DeVille - it now has the quality of a Lexus, but still looks recognizable as a Caddy and very classy - especially the A/C controls and the new analog clock in the upper center of the dash - both surrounded by chrome trim. Interior is as roomy as before, but upholstery much higher quality, still with that leather smell that only a Cadillac has. The only real disappointment was with the exhaust/engine noise, both at idle and under acceleration. My last Northstar (2000 STS) idled like glass, and was very smooth and quiet under full throttle. This one seems to only be quiet when your foot is off the gas. Hopefully, this was a problem related to this particular car. It's just that the salesman made such a big deal about how Cadillac put more insulation, laminated glass, etc. into the DTS to make it quieter! Ride feels a tad bit firmer, though still a Caddy. Overall, I would give it an A-. And Cadillac - can you give us some new colors??? I remember 20 years ago, when the Cadillac color brochure listed something like 15 colors, firemist paints, etc. Now, the colors look like every other GM car.
I am warming up the the new grille, looks like its chrome this time around. Thats good beacuse i don't understand how a 50-60K car (STS) can come with a plastic grille.
They could have made the DTS front end look better though, it seems that the grille is a bit oversized but I have not yet seen one in person (only pass by).
Its odd that the new DTS is louder than the old one, meybe on the higher trims its quieter. Seems like a very good car from the inside though.
That is one reason I have avoided used Caddys (could never afford new, but a $52K new Caddy is $25-30K after 1-2 years...they depreciate like rocks falling from the sky)...I am scared to death that the AC, probably the same used on the cheapest Chevy, just will not work...probably just paranoia on my part, but I want to be cool in the Georgia summers, and Ford and Dodge AC compressors do the job for me...
But that midnight blue leather, almost 300 HP, reg fuel, 25+ mpg highway, super lumbar support
Which exterior colors are paired with the midnight blue interior??? :confuse: :confuse:
Another thing to bear in mind is that a vehicle's A/C performs best when set to recirculate mode...
--Robert
It will freeze you out if you want it to. Also , the tri-zone temp. controls are great for people who want a different temp. and back seat can have own blower speeds. I bought this car new because of the GM EMP. Discount + 5000 rebate. It was 46, 860 window sticker. Bought for 36,616 + Tax. They also have some very nice certified used with 100K/6year WAR. With this WAR. , I don't think you can go wrong.
Accordng to the gmfleet.com web site. The DTS midnight blue interior is only available with the 6 passenger Front, 40/20/40 Split Bench seat and not with the bucket seats. Available exterior colors with a midnight blue interior are : Blue Chip, Black Raven, Light Platinum, Blue Ice, Glacier White (extra cost color) and White Lightning (extra cost color).
Thanks
Of course you could always get a 2005 Deville for a low price now.
The 2006 DTS is a totally different car. The car you have is a Deville DTS, so post your message in the Cadillac Deville forum.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
I drove a blue chip luxury III version, and that real wood trim in the interior was very nicely done. The leather seats were very comfortable and soft, and they finally have interior lighting and styling that have a bit of pizazz to them.
I was also impressed by how it drove...the sound isolation has been markedly improved over the old Deville. There is a quiet refined hush while driveing. No squeeks, creeks or rattles in the one I drove either.
I owned an 04 CTS from 3/04 until I traded it in on an 04 Lexus GX470 in 10/01/04, and the DTS would be my choice over the CTS real easily