Ford Focus 2005 release date
Have just seen the new Ford Focus 2005 preview at http://www.Fordvehicles.com/2005focus and it looks amazing... completely different from the old Sedan SE or ZX3 or ZX5. It looks like an Acura Integra or Acura RSX.
Does anyone know what date it will be released? All the site says is a vague "Spring 2004"... I was planning on buying a car in the next 2 weeks, but will wait if it's just a matter of a month to 6 weeks. Any ideas based on Ford's track record?
Also, any sneak previews on financial incentives for this new car?
Does anyone know what date it will be released? All the site says is a vague "Spring 2004"... I was planning on buying a car in the next 2 weeks, but will wait if it's just a matter of a month to 6 weeks. Any ideas based on Ford's track record?
Also, any sneak previews on financial incentives for this new car?
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Not that that is all bad. The Focus is a good solid platform, generally regarded as best in its class, and now that its initial teething pains are taken care of, even Consumer Reports rates it best in class, since reliability has now improved to average. Makes sense for Ford not to mess with a good thing.
Unless you think this freshening is a must have for you, I doubt you will be unhappy with a 2004, and if you wait till the 2005's are introduced, you might even get a better bargain on a 2004.
Of course, we in Ford's home market apparently aren't sophisticated enough to appreciate the real, completely redone Focus that will be in Europe on the same platform that underpins the Mazda 3 and Volvo S40.
- Bret
New front clip looks nice though. Looks sharp. I'm not sure I understands Ford's decision to only offer the sport package on the sedan. Seems like the sporty segment would really prefer the hatches. (of course the car lover in me says that the sport package should be available on all the Focus models including the wagon, but what do I know?)
Does Spring mean April/May? Or June?
Does Spring mean April/May? Or June?
The newer "Focus" -- Focus II, Mazda3 & S40 -- don't got no belt-driven hydraulic steering assist, so the old SVT steering is still the best.
Only the Beemer...
creakid1 "BMW 1-Series - 2005" Mar 27, 2004 2:33am
The last Euro-tuned-suspension Focus I drove was the Street Edition sedan/wagon in tacky yellow/blue/red choices. & its steering assist sucks -- just like the ordinary American Focus.
The new taillights make the shape of the whole car looking kind of awkward. Besides, it's so Tercel/Accent/Accord from the mid '90's.
Today, I was in Mexico & saw the Mondeo w/ nearly identical front end as this '05 American Focus. I can probably own one here in S. California & be as unique as can be, but do have to cross the border for service though.
http://www.fordvehicles.com/americanidol3/index.asp?bhcp=1
Whether that's early or late may I don't know. I was told May was the anticipated launch at the Detroit show too.
Not sure creakid what you're talking about in regards to the Focus's steering.
The N.A.-spec non-SVT Focus has a stronger steering boost than the Euro spec, but the SVT has less assist along w/ a quicker rack. C&D couldn't stand the N.A. non-SVT Focus's nervous steering when going in a straight line if the car is equipped w/ 16"s.
Ford claimed a re-tuning in the steering for '04(?), so I wonder if it's now similar to the SVT's setting.
I'll admit that the '05 Focus is one good lookin' piece of work.
However, that front end has that Ford signature all over it. Looks like an Integra?? ahhh....NO. Taurus/Mondeo/500....Yeah.
Those taillights, as clean as they are (the shape), should have amber turn-signal sections. In my opinion, it takes another step
toward eliminating confusion in heavy traffic.
One thing for certain....FoMoCo is gonna throw those incentives out there, along with those rental-fleet sales like always. The result: easy to focus on a Focus. Low prices all-the-way!
It just seems pathetic on Fords part to make such a big deal about a new nose. And how is a 150hp ST edition supposed to make up for the loss of the SVT?!?!? It has to cost a similar amount as the SVT, and that makes it the lame duck of it's segment.
http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=13626
As for why some people wouldn't want to drive a amnual transmission, I can't speak for everyone but from personal experience I can give a few reasons why I'm still undecided whether or not my next vehicle will come with an auto or a manual tranny:
Ever try to use a clutch when your left great toe was broken?
Ever try driving a manual with an arm in a sling?
Dealing with 3 pedals in a narrow footwell while wearing size 12B insulated workboots during a lovely Northern Michigan winter is quite interesting.
Short, and very steep hills, especially when you've parallell parked on them, Ann Arbor has lots of those.
I still like manuals, especially with small engines cars, but there are some legitimate reasons to choose an auto, though I would really rather have a manual with an automatic clutch, Ford offers that option on some euro models, and get the best of both worlds.
The 2.3l PZEV is gone for 2005, replaces by the Duratec 20e on CA, NY,NH etc. cars, it's slightly less powerful than the standard Duratec 20 but a little cleaner. The engines are about the same in pwer/displacement ratio as most other Japanese and European engines, except for some high output units like some Honda VTECs and the Yamaha built engine in the Toyota Matrix and Corolla. The Duatec 20 puts out 136 HP and 133 lb-ft of torque v. the Corolla's 1.8l putting out 130 HP and 123 lb-ft, mileage is 26/35 v. 32/40 with manuals respectively. The Toyota may have some advantage in efficiency, but Foci are a bit larger and heavier. The Focus is significantly roomier, especially in the rear seat and luggage area, and comes in a variety of body styles. Pick what fits you best.
Thanks.
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/openpic.php?name=../picture_library/- - - - dir_30/car_portal_pic_15160.jpg
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/openpic.php?name=../picture_library/- dir_30/car_portal_pic_15157.jpg
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/openpic.php?name=../picture_library/- dir_30/car_portal_pic_15158.jpg
Paul
Maybe around '08, when the facelift Focus II or the Focus III comes out.
Anyway, Volvo's 5-cyl turbo engine will be available on the Focus II.
Also, I hope the DSG transmission similar to Audi TT's will be available w/ various engine choices.
Although Ford Motor Co. wants to develop more cars and trucks from global platforms, it’s making an exception for the next-generation Ford Focus. When the re-engineered Focus is introduced to the United States in 2007, it will not share mechanicals with the C1 version of the Focus sold in Europe.
Headline on Article today from Automotive News, however paid subscribtion required to read. Not in ORF's budget! I just wonder if this means no CR diesel, hope not Ford that would be a bad move. I'm amazed and glad with the amount of people that are warming up to CR diesel benefits. Good for the US economy, more importantly their personal budget.
Paul
What I don't understand is that since the C1 Focus is already derived from the C170 platform, but with a number of enhancements,e.g. AWD capability, improved crashworthiness, especially for side impacts, and the next NA Focus redesign will have to accomadate new side impact standards, would it really cost that much more to use the C1 platform than to engineer a separate update of the the C170 platform? I wonder what's really behind this decision.
Paul
"The 217bhp 2.5-litre V6 powerplant, sourced from the Mondeo, will appear in a hot ST, but this model is likely to be offered in hatchback form only when it joins the line-up late next year."
Paul
A spokeswoman explained: "The new car takes another step forward in terms of driving dynamics." As it uses the same platform as the Mazda 3 and Volvo S40, we've already had a glimpse of what to expect from behind the wheel - but engineers have carried out extensive development work to ensure class-leading handling and even better refinement."
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/ae_news_story.php?id=49690
So the future is here. Well, not really.
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/openpic.php?name=../picture_library/- - - - - - - - dir_32/car_portal_pic_16282.jpg
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/openpic.php?name=../picture_library/- dir_32/car_portal_pic_16294.jpg
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/openpic.php?name=../picture_library/- dir_32/car_portal_pic_16294.jpg
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/openpic.php?name=../picture_library/- dir_32/car_portal_pic_16317.jpg
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/ae_news_story.php?id=49717
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/ae_news_story.php?id=49712
A spokeswoman explained: "The new car takes another step forward in terms of driving dynamics." As it uses the same platform as the Mazda 3 and Volvo S40, we've already had a glimpse of what to expect from behind the wheel - but engineers have carried out extensive development work to ensure class-leading handling and even better refinement."
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/ae_news_story.php?id=49690
So the future is here. Well, not really.
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/openpic.php?name=../picture_library/- - - - - - - - - - - - - dir_32/car_portal_pic_16282.jpg
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/openpic.php?name=../picture_library/- dir_32/car_portal_pic_16294.jpg
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/openpic.php?name=../picture_library/- dir_32/car_portal_pic_16280.jpg
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/openpic.php?name=../picture_library/- dir_32/car_portal_pic_16317.jpg
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/ae_news_story.php?id=49717
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/ae_news_story.php?id=49712
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/ae_news_story.php?id=49863
I think the handling is class leading and the wagon is especially usefull. Best feature is how you can order it the way you want, and not be forced into packages. I don't like sunroofs, and so many cars force them on you these days along with other options that you do want.
http://www.cars.com/go/features/autoshows/story.jsp?autoshow=Pari- s&autoshowyear=2004&story=coverage_09_23_04&aff=natio- nal
"Comfort and refinement are marginally better, which is saying something given the high quality of the old model. Handling – the steering is now electro-hydraulic - seems to be just as agile and rewarding as the outgoing Focus."
http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3054033a30,00.html
"Concerned that electric power assistance could blunt the steering's communication and responsiveness, Ford bit the bullet and used a more complex and expensive electro-hydraulic system. There's no doubt that Ford got it right, for the steering is undoubtedly best in class, with a well-weighted, incisive feel from straight ahead to full lock, and no dead spot, just pure and linear tactility.
The steering wheel imparts the state of the road surface and the level of traction and purchase back to the driver with almost telegraphic detail. It works in that sweetspot where there's lots of feedback and responsiveness, but not a skerrick of kick-back or over-reaction. In the history of front-drive cars, the Focus's steering can find itself in regal company, with that of the Alfa Sud, Golf GTi series I and the Peugeot 306 – few others come close."
But we can't turn the clock back to this glorified, rose-tinted past."(p76, "BMW 120i vs VW Golf(series V)", August 2004, CAR)
http://www.thisisyork.co.uk/york/marketplace/YORK_MARKETPLACE_FIS- - HCARS2.html
"Most models will get electric-hydraulic power steering, producing a better response to input, because, unlike traditional hydraulic systems, the assistance is not dependent on engine speed."
So e.h. is better than h. as long as the e.h. is so well tuned to not lose any steering feel.
Nice, eh! More cool than 3-series' 2-tone Natural Brown Leather.
http://www.newstreet.it/home/foto.asp?img=/img/magazine/677/Ford-- Focus-12.jpg&[non-permissible content removed]=Ford%20Focus%2012
http://www.newstreet.it/home/article_id_677.html
http://www.infomotori.com/a_18_IT_3272_9.html
http://www.infomotori.com/a_18_IT_3272_2.html
"Ford's all-new 113bhp 1.6 Ti-VCT (Twin Independent Variable Camshaft Timing) petrol engine, which replaces the current 1.8. Easily the most advanced petrol unit in the range, the four-cylinder motor boasts 14bhp more than the conventional 1.6, but is claimed to return a five per cent improvement in fuel economy, resulting in 43.8mpg in the combined cycle - although we only managed 32.7mpg. Our only complaint with the new powerplant is its lacklustre performance at low revs. With the peak torque of 155Nm not arriving until 4,150rpm, the engine needs revving to get the best from it. Ford's official figures suggest 0-62mph takes 10.8 seconds, and the unit felt every bit as quick as that on a private test track."
"The good news is that despite the extra challenges presented by the UK's winding, potholed tarmac, Ford's high dynamic standards have been maintained. With immense front-end grip, the Focus is capable of carrying plenty of speed through corners, and has a superbly balanced chassis. Diehard fans will miss the pin-sharp steering and lively characteristics of the outgoing version, but the extra maturity and composure offered by the new model make this Focus a more complete package."
& being produced. That colored deep chin makes the car look Great-Wall tall:
http://220.134.86.68/focus.htm
"There's better suspension isolation and rebound - it doesn't thump over my test route like the Mazda 3 does and that's on the same chassis - and the really stratospheric sixth means that you can cruise quite comfortably at 80mph."