Has Honda's run - run out?

1126127129131132153

Comments

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I guess we all go back to our high school days, but IMO that was the Civic that really established Honda in the minds of Gen X.

    For you it was Gen Y, maybe?

    Any how, the Fit almost begins to sound like the Civic Si from the late 80s, with about the same power and weight. Well, maybe a little more weight, but not much.

    -juice
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    my high school days ended in 1986, so yes I remember the early Civics. I went years and years having at least one of those. Weight on the Fit is up 20% or more over those early Civics, but power is too, so it's a wash.

    The magic of the Civic SI of those early days was EFI when most cars in that class had carbs - not an advantage of the Fit - and wonderful 4-wheel independent suspension with larger tires and rims - not an advantage of the Fit, as even the "Fit Sport" has a torsion beam in the rear. At least it has 15s, which still aren't that big in today's world (although big enough I guess). Consider that back then the '86 SI had 14s, in a world of compact cars where most had 13s, some still had 12s (?), and 14" and up were very rare. Fast forward to today, and there are sporty small cars with 16s, 17s, and what have you, while the sportiest Fit uses 15s.

    Actually, with the revised 2006 model, today's SI is the proper successor to that 80s SI. The Fit isn't close. But I wasn't looking for sport with my remarks, I was looking for a bargain. While the base Fit is a good VALUE, it is not a BARGAIN. There are a lot of cars in the $13-15K price range, not so many in the $10-12K range.

    And I know Honda hasn't forgotten how to put out very basic cars - the Civic DX is as stripped as you get while maintaining a full complement of safety equipment. What happened to the Fit "DX"?

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    The new Si has raised the bar, though, in terms of lateral grip, acceleration, safety features, and content, but also weight and cost.

    Fit only has to be sporty within its class. The Scion xA and Versa also have torsion beams in the back, right? Not sure about the Yaris, but I think it does also.

    So the Fit only needs to be tuned a tad sportier than those. Keep the steering ratio quick and keep weight down, it could be fun.

    The new Si is over $20 grand and drinks premium fuel. It's not the low-budget enthusiast vehicle that it used to be.

    -juice
  • carlisimocarlisimo Member Posts: 1,280
    The first curvy Civic, '92-'95, had a 70hp base engine (in the CX). Pretty low for the day, but it didn't feel as bad as say, the 80hp Tercel. I think it had 5 speeds. No tach.

    I think the Si of the day had 125hp, and the type-R (Japan only) 170. I'm surprised by how long ago Honda reached 100hp/liter... 1988. Did engine development already reach a plateau way back then?
  • gee35coupegee35coupe Member Posts: 3,387
    I actually owned a total of 3 of them. It was still a hoot even though the reviewers hated it. I will not own this version of the Si though. The red gauges and premium fuel requirement have convinced me to get a Ex-Nav coupe instead. Honda is still the only car the hita all my hot-buttons. The new Jetta is close though. I just don't trust em.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    I don't necessarily disagree, but I felt I should point out the SI was only a low-budget enthusiast car when we look back with nostalgia. Fact is, the Civic SI was every penny of the cost of many other manufacturers' sporty models (Celica comes to mind, Mustang too), and weighed 10 or 15% more than the "regular" Civics.

    By comparison, $20K may seem like a lot for a Civic today, but in 1986 dollars it is cheaper than the '86 Civic SI, and thousands of dollars less than cars it is now being compared to in terms of level of sport. Certainly it can now keep the company of cars like the WRX, at $5K more, the American go-fast cars like the Cobalt SS S/C and Ion Redline, which both cost a couple of thousand more, and others in the $20-25K range.

    All those use premium fuel too. :-)

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    That's just it, though, the Si has moved up to the premium compact segment. A lot of people are happy about that, and slotting the Fit below makes sense.

    How much was an '86 Si? I seem to recall prices right around $10 grand. I don't think that's more than the Si costs today, adjusted for inflation.

    -juice
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    OK, you may have a point there, juice. I just looked it up in the blue book, and my memory was off: the SI was $9250 list, and $9750 list for the CRX SI. In 1988 it jumped up about $1000 because of the model revision.

    Compare it to base prices for the other trims though:

    On the four-seat Civic, base hatch listed at $6000, with the DX at $7800, so the SI cost a lot more relative to the rest of the Civic line than it does today.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Those were the days, eh? :cry:

    The $6000 model was very de-contented, of course, as discussed above, and even the DX did not have A/C. I remember dealers wanted $1800 for A/C back then, so the DX made no sense. You went stripped or fully equipped.

    It is a 50% or so premium over the base model, though, wow.

    The Fit perhaps tries to be that old DX with A/C. The Fit Sport isn't quite an old Si, though.

    -juice
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    have gone DX, LX, and Sport with the Fit though? Imagine a DX at $11,5 with A/C (or not, although leaving it out would make them less competitive), the safety equipment, and nothing else except a radio (I wouldn't expect a CD at that price).

    As for the Civic DX, Honda has GOT to stop trying to sell cars without A/C. This is 2006, not 1986!

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 21,020
    i guess it depends where you live. i bought a black vw scirocco back in 1980. i didn't miss the fact that it did not have air. my kids are confounded by roll-up windows.
    putting a key in the door to unlock it really cracks them up, too. :surprise:
    2024 Ford F-150 STX, 2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    it is so useful for defrosting the windows, especially in humid environments!

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • boomchekboomchek Member Posts: 5,516
    We are actually getting a Fit DX, LX, and a Sport.

    All models will feature power windows, mirrors, ABS, And airbags all around.

    And in terms of the current Si, at least in CDN $$$ it is a 50% jump from a base DX coupe to an Si ($18405 vs. $27025).

    2016 Audi A7 3.0T S Line, 2021 Subaru WRX

  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    you Canadians are lucky, you always get more choices in Hondas than we do in the U.S.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • PF_FlyerPF_Flyer Member Posts: 9,372
    Be sure to join the Eagle One team in a live chat event tonight to find out how nanotechnology is changing the future in car appearance products.

    The chat gets underway at 9PM ET/6PM PT.

    There's also going to be a special offer available only to those attending the chat, so don't miss this one.

    Eagle One Team Chat
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060131/UPDATE/601310429/1148- /AUTO01

    It's worth noting that the profit losses are due to losses through investments and fluctuations in the exchange rates.
  • ctalkctalk Member Posts: 646
    The Civic seems to be the best seller in the Honda line now.

    Click here
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    Holy crap! You think they did a good job of the Civic update?! :-P

    A FIFTY PERCENT increase in sales month over month? Actually, 56%. That's quite startling, and I was expecting good sales results from the new Civic already.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    And it doesn't appear to have cut into Accord sales.
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 54,033
    Actually, it might end up selling a few more Accords. That's pretty much what happened to me. I was at the dealer checking out the Civic, and since I was there anyway, tried out the Accord. Then, when I brought the family back, we all test sat the Accord too.

    Well, turns out the Accord worked better for the family (and my wife liked it a lot more). Plus the EX-L had all the goodies the Civic was lacking. Plus, the MPG was not that much lower (26/34 vs. 30/38) manual/manual, and the Accord was a lot more relaxing and comfy to drive (although not quite as "sporty").

    The kicker, hte A wasn't really much more expensive (especially when they were at invoice + and the Civic was at MSRP). If you weren't married to the smaller size, it was a fairly logical upsell to many people.

    So, it's quite possible that people who were not originally thinking about an Accord ended up with one. IMO, more people came in to look at a Civic and left with an Accord than the other way around.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    Yet it seems now, Honda no longer wants to draw the entry-level buyer with its least expensive model, preferring instead to make a very well equipped model the lowest-priced Fit, thereby ensuring they can't go lower than $13K for the base price

    Nippononly, do you really believe, had Honda offered stripped Civic (CX) of 2000 for MY2007, it would still be priced at $10,750 that MY2000 was?
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    well, let's see, Toyota can offer a Yaris at $11,000, and I was only suggesting that Honda offer an $11,500 version of the Fit. So, the answer to your question is no. I believe they could offer a Fit "CX" at $11,5, and probably should have.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    It's boosted by higher gas prices, but I think the real reason they succeeded is that they finally took some risks this time around.

    Yaris hatch is de-contented compared to the Yaris sedan. Even the interior is more spartan. Perhaps they saw the hatch was destined to be perceived as "cheap" no matter what they did to it, so they went ahead and made it look cheap, too.

    -juice
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    What did you guys think of the super bowl ad for the Ridge?

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1140916555945901184

    Kind of misses their demographic, no?

    -juice
  • ctalkctalk Member Posts: 646
    It's boosted by higher gas prices, but I think the real reason they succeeded is that they finally took some risks this time around.

    Agreed.

    From what I see, the main reason may be because Honda told a bold step. When I visit the Honda dealer, I notice that a lot of people are liking Honda's futuristic interior/exterior. This a design you either hate, or like.
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    Which demographic, cartoon gunslingers or tacky mud flap icons?

    I don't think you can find a single demographic for tongue-in-cheek humor. You don't have to be blonde to smile at a blonde joke. I think that's the sort of thing they were counting on.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    It just seems targeted at truckers that probably would call it a "girly truck".

    Heck, or NRA card-carrying pickup drivers that wouldn't be caught dead in a Forrin Car.

    I don't get who they were targeting. Maybe they just wanted to make fun of both? :confuse:

    To me it seemed like they tried to copy what Nissan did (successfully) when GI Joe stole Barbie from Ken.

    -juice
  • stockmanjoestockmanjoe Member Posts: 353
    Honda has really taken its customers for granted it is missing so many things:

    1) A decent warranty
    2) Doors that lock auto
    3) Std rear disc brakes
    4) ESC/TC
    5) Roadside assistance
    6) Price way too high for what you get
    7) Some of its safety ratings have fallen behind:
    Sonata rceived a 5 Star rating for frontal crash Driver and passenger and 5 Star rating for side crash for front and back passengers.

    Accord got a 5 star rating for frontal crash both driver and passenger and a FOUR (4) star rating for side crash for both front AND rear.

    You should also read Edmund's comparison it shows Sonata well ahead as well.

    I see Hyundai taking past them in the next few years.
  • ctalkctalk Member Posts: 646
    Their sales are up 24.4%.
    2006 January Sales

    The Honda Civic had a Gold rating from IIHS.
    The Accord had (2/3 lower injuries than Sonata)
    The Accord won the CR/C&D/MT comparison.
  • carlisimocarlisimo Member Posts: 1,280
    Rumor has it they're announcing the Civic Si sedan tomorrow. If it's true, I'd like to see how insurers decide to price their premiums on it.
  • ctalkctalk Member Posts: 646
    Also, if the SI comes out in Canada, what will happen to the CSX?

    Will the SI be priced more than the CSX?
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 54,033
    Why would they go and make an Si sedan, 6 weeks after I bought an Accord?

    I did like the seats in the Si better (by a lot) than the ones in the EX, which were a deal breaker for me.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • carlisimocarlisimo Member Posts: 1,280
    They've done it before... before 2004 they had the SiR and the CSX, but I don't know about their prices.

    They really should just switch over to American trim levels, instead of their Si being our EX and their SiR being our Si.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    the SI sedan is Canada only, right? I am sure they won't bring an SI sedan to the States.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    Sounds like its premiere is going to be at Chicago. Word has been that it is for the U.S. market.

    I predict this to be a successful model for the Civic lineup. :D
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I agree about the warranty (now the shortest in the biz basically) and the lack of roadside assistance, but not the others.

    Auto locking doors are annoying. You reach for the handle and you're locked in. Just hit the power locks if you really want that.

    OK, rear discs, maybe, but you can't complain about that *and* cost, because you just added $200 to the price.

    Their SUVs have VSC, all except the Element.

    Price is definitely not too high - consumers are willing to pay MSRP or close for a Civic. If prices were too high noone would be buying them at all, even at invoice.

    As mentioned above, Civic is the Gold award winner by IIHS, and I don't believe any Hyundais made that list.

    -juice
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    I have been reading in various places that Honda has increased its warranty for all 2006 models to match Nissan/Toyota/Subaru: 3/36 B2B and 5/60 powertrain.

    I have also read in one or two places that it remains 3/36, period. I would love to know which is true. If it has in fact increased to include 5/60 powertrain, it is about on par with the market, I would say, and certainly ahead of Chevy/Ford/Dodge.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    The very newest Hyundai cars and trucks may be earning higher safety marks than the older Hondas. That's true enough. But when you compare something from the same time frame (CR-V vs Santa Fe perhaps), you'll find the Hyundai lacking.

    I do see Hyundai as THE up and coming company in the US market, though. They began improving their quality years ago. They starting designing interesting vehicles about 8 years ago. And they've recently begun fixing the most glaring issue with their mid-size cars... the last generation of engines were stinky. The new ones are much better.

    They come along much farther and faster than the domestics or the 2nd tier Japanese companies (Suzuki, Mitsubishi, Subaru, etc.).
  • gee35coupegee35coupe Member Posts: 3,387
    If you could get a loaded 5 speed manual version. The stick only comes in the base models.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    They come along much farther and faster than the domestics or the 2nd tier Japanese companies (Suzuki, Mitsubishi, Subaru, etc.).

    *GASP* :surprise: *cough* :cry: EEK! :mad:

    You didn't think I'd let that slide by without comment, did you?

    We're on the subject of safety, so while the Civic rightfully deserves respect, so does the Gold winning Subaru Legacy, which beat any and all Acuras and Hondas in its class by the way.

    Therefore I see it this way:

    Gold (1st Tier): Legacy, Civic, 9-3, etc.
    Silver (2nd Tier): Passat, Jetta, etc.
    Need Improvement (3rd Tier): other Hondas, Acuras.

    :P

    http://www.iihs.org/news/2005/iihs_news_120405.pdf

    The explanation is surprisingly simple - a lack of active head rests, with the exception of the Civic, of course.

    I'm sure next model year Honda and Acura will move up to 2nd or 1st tier and join Subaru among the elite in terms of safety. ;)

    Funny thing? Volvo is MIA from the list, not one on there!

    -juice
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Here is Honda's report card on head restraints - mostly failing grades, but newer designs score well:

    http://www.iihs.org/ratings/head_restraints/head_honda.html

    -juice
  • carlisimocarlisimo Member Posts: 1,280
    In the US, anyway. No mention of Canada yet. I'd expect them to sell it there too...

    Probably great news to people who like cars with trunks.
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    We're on the subject of safety, so while the Civic rightfully deserves respect, so does the Gold winning Subaru Legacy, which beat any and all Acuras and Hondas in its class by the way.

    Sorry, not what I meant. In the second paragraph of my post, I was no longer talking about safety. I was talking about the success Hyundai has achieved as a result of improvements they've made to quality, engines, interiors, and design. I'm talking about success, not any one feature.

    In recent year, Hyundai's moves have allowed them to earn more and more buyers. Their increases in market share are as large as those by Toyota (relatively speaking). The changes they've made have earned them customers.

    Subaru, Mitsubishi, and Suzuki have not been nearly as successful. Subaru, for example, has been hovering around the 1.1% marketshare line for about a decade. I do not dispute that Subaru makes safe, efficient, quality products. In general, I greatly prefer them to the Hyundais. But my preferences, your preferences, and how good their cars may really be does not change the fact that Hyundai is making more headway.
  • stockmanjoestockmanjoe Member Posts: 353
    I pretty much agree with everyones comments. I own a Pilot and it has been a pretty decent car (not perfect mind you) like the salesman swore it would be.

    Honda does need to make the improvements I recommended and I bet they will.

    I paid MSRP for my Pilot in summer 2003 because my wife had to had that car nd they were hot then. I really wanted a 2006 Civic EX bad but I refused to pay MSRP so at least one person was turned off by the price. I bought a 2006 Hyundai Sonata and really like it alot.

    Also,I meant their MSRP price in general is a bit high.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Gotcha...

    We should not overlook the fact that Hyundai really struggled for a while there, in fact I consider this their 2nd wave of success.

    Shortly after their launch in the US market, the Excel was the best selling import car, bar none. What followed was a mess of poor quality and customers that left the brand in droves, and that resulted in them shuttering up their Canadian plant and leaving the government of Canada to foot the bills. It was a PR disaster.

    This 2nd wave is really sort of a come back, and I agree that they are on quite a roll right now, this time backed up by substantial product, and for that they deserve to be commended. Finbarr O'Neil's warranty strategy got the buying public's attention, but it's good product that has sustained their current march upward (even though Finbarr is long gone).

    Are they are major threat to Honda? Not so much, I think whatever market share they've stolen has come mostly at the cost of Ford and GM.

    -juice
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Looks great IMO...

    They got rid of my least favorite thing on the sedan - the tacky chrome grille. This one appears to be body color (silver).

    The rims and spoiler should go, also. And leave the carbon fiber hood to the aftermarket.

    The overall package looks great, though. I bet it sells very well.

    Here's Edmunds coverage:

    http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/AutoshowArticles/articleId=109250

    -juice
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    I like it too. A "delete wing" option would be welcomed. :)
  • carlisimocarlisimo Member Posts: 1,280
    On the coupe at least, the wing is said to reduce drag by a few percent and reduces lift on the rear end by 60%. I'd want it for high speed turns. The sedan seems to have the same wing with different attachment points to the trunk.

    The rims seem concept-sized (beautiful shape though), and a lot of that body work will probably be a very expensive option, which is too bad. Same with those brakes. They should've just shown the production car.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    says that the wing will almost certainly be gone on the production car, if it follows the precedent of all of Honda's other "concept" cars. That jibes with my recollection too. Anyway, they are not going to give the sedan a wilder spoiler than the coupe.

    I like the rims, downsized a little for the street. But I bet the production car gets the same rims as the coupe.

    This will make a natural competitor to the GLI, as the Edmunds review mentions, as well as the Cobalt SS S/C, and will now leave Toyota's sad little Corolla XRS squarely in the dust. Plus, I hear there will be a Caliber SRT4 a year from now - another natural competitor in size, power, and price, even if it is not a sedan.

    I bet the SI sedan will sell better than the SI coupe, but I am still shocked Honda made the move to offer one. Talk about shredding the SI hatch tradition, eh?! :-)

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    I agree the Sedan body style is going to appeal to a lot more buyers than the coupe. Functional, yet performance oriented. Anxious to see where the next TSX goes from here...
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.