Toyota can't make Trucks Thats for sure!!!

1234579

Comments

  • mmcbride1mmcbride1 Member Posts: 861
    Is going to be priced between 4Runner Limited and Land Cruiser. 4Runner Limited tops out around $40k, LC starts around $50k. My 4Runner cost $29,500. There's a big difference between that and $40k. And not everyone wants such a big truck.

    Why don't you have an F150, Vinny? It trounces the Ranger in room, power...it's got a V8, Vinny! Probably because you didn't want such a big truck.

    Same goes for a lot of 4Runner owners (me included). Like I said in my previous post, I liked the Expedition, but it is too big for me. Sequioa will be very similar in size. Expedition/Tahoe owners are the ones Toyota is targeting with the Sequoia, not 4Runner owners.

    And why would the Sequoia be any more refined or higher quality? They are both made by Toyota...sometimes I just don't understand your logic, Vinny.
  • rwhogrwhog Member Posts: 1
    ...that is what I’m seeking in the purchase of a Tacoma this fall. I owned an 85 model 4WD extra-cab Toyota with a 22R four cylinder/auto. When I traded it 6 years ago for a Chevy S-10 it had 213,000 trouble free miles. This is what I’m hoping to buy once again as my 94 S-10 (136,000) recently had to have the transmission rebuilt (ouch!).

    One concern of mine in purchasing another Toyota is power. The 4 cylinder that I owned years ago seems to have had far more power than those they are making today do. Am I right in this assessment? I remember being pleasantly surprised at the ability of my Toyota to get up and go, but when I’ve test-drove those on the car lots today with essentially the same setup (4WD/Auto) they seem a bit lethargic in power department. However, the V6 Toyota seems to be equivalent in power to the S-10 I currently drive, which I consider to be a pretty powerful setup for a small truck.

    Does anyone the breakdown between the old 22R 4 cylinders vs. those they are making today?
  • tundradudetundradude Member Posts: 588
    I have had both the 22R-E and the 2.7. Both had plenty of power for their applications. They were both manuals also. I have a friend who has the 2.7 auto and it was quite faster than i expected.
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    Torque for the 2.7 is 177ft/lbs and 150HP, now go check the weight to power ratio of competitors, I won't post them..... I'll let you do the footwork on whether you think the 2.7 has "plenty of power".
  • rsmtomrsmtom Member Posts: 28
    I had an '85 4X4 with the 22RE. Mine was a 5sp reg cab, and was absolutely dead-nuts reliable. It was the ride that wore me out. Actually, I needed a bit more leg room than the reg cab had, so I went with a '90 Ext cab (now has over 218,000). I don't remember the '85 as anything more than adequate in terms of power, but it was very good on mileage--everything's a compromise. Today's 4 cyl's are significantly better for power output by virtue of more sophisticated tuning. Remember that your '85 was two generations ago in Toyota trucks, so the Tacoma is different in many ways. That likely has a lot to do with your perception of driving feel. You've also been driving that S10 for some time, so your memory of what the '85 was like might be a little "colored". As I recall, the 22RE in '85 made 116hp, and the current 2.7 makes 150hp. I'd bet if you could drive your old '85, and then get right in a 4 cyl Taco that your impressions would be somewhat different. I do think that if you can swing it financially you'd very happy with the V6. I have been out shopping 4X4 Ext cabs the past couple of weekends, and the V6 Taco is at the top of my list right now. The particular combination of features I'd like is kind of hard to find lately, so I'm content to wait a while. In the meantime I'm going to continue to test competing models (as long as they'll let me) to get thorough driving impressions. I've been in a couple of Rangers (4.0 w/auto, supercab 4door) and found them disappointing--build quality was subpar (ill-fitting doors/tailgait, suspension noises), crude-feeling noisy engine, very twitchy steering just off center, kind of mushy ride ("Off Road Package"), cheap-feeling interior materials, and compromised outward vision due to oversized "B" pillars and small rear quarter windows. The center rear-view mirror was mounted annoyingly low, right in my line of sight instead of slightly above, so I found myself having to duck around it to see in front when taking a sweeping righthand-turning off-ramp. I'm only 5-11, so I don't think I was sitting "too high"--it's just weird mirror positioning compared to what I'm used to. For all the noise it was making the 4.0L was strangely short on power (and with 4.10 gears), which is surprising given its displacement. It was just me, the saleman (not a big guy by any means) and the A/C on (hot weather), so I figure with my tools on board and full tank of gas I would not be too impressed (I actually wasn't too impressed as it was). Consumer Reports describes the "big" V6 as merely "adequate", and this is one time when I have to agree with their assessment. On the plus side the tranny is smooth, and the general layout of controls and accessories is good. The only feature which compels me to consider the Ranger as a contender for my use is the four-door option. I carry lots of stuff behind the seats, and those doors would make it easier to get to things.

    I was satisfied with the performance of a V6 auto Taco TRD. Again, it was just me, a scrawny salesman, and the A/C on. No, it is not a "rocketship", but it drove very well for the engine's size. I was a bit surprised to find I had gotten to 85 after a short on-ramp run. I am sure that the auto trans saps some power (normally do), but I have had my fill of manuals after 22 years and won't buy another. The steering feel was much better than on the Ford, but that kind of thing is a matter of what you're used to. The Taco felt very tight--no noises, rattles, squeakes. Build quality was excellent, and the interior layout was very good (again, personal opinion). Interior materials aren't what you'd find in a Lexus, but were still quite good for a truck and had a quality feel. Minuses include no optional extra doors, and the bucket seats were a tad less comfortable than I'd like (another personal thing--your butt may differ). I'd wanted buckets so as to get the center console for extra storage and a little easier reach into the back area when sitting up front. I've also noticed that Toyota has softened suspensions somewhat, but that most likely is a characteristic of the TRD option as compared to the standard suspension--again, something I'm not used to in a 4X4 and another one of those personal preferences.

    What it comes down to is determining your needs and wants. Personally, I don't much care for pickups after 15 years of driving them--I simply need one for the work I do (finish carpenter). Having a 4X4 allows me the luxury of getting out and into the desert in the winter months--a good excuse to keep my geological education sort of fresh in my mind, and an opportunity to get away from the crowds. Do you really want/need a 4X4? If not, how about looking at a "Pre-runner" type truck? They're cheaper, use less fuel, and should perform better with the same engine-tranny combo as compared to a 4X4 due to less weight. Spend as much time behind the wheel as you can, and in as many competitive brands as you can find in your area. If necessary, tell the salesperson to "shut up" during a test drive so as to have minimal distractions in a vehicle you're not used to. You probably won't find the "perfect" truck, so what you're after is the best combination of features, design, price, quality and etc. for your own requirements. Good luck!
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    The Ranger interior is so cheap that most reviews rate it over the Tacoma!! All I can say is EDUCATE yourself, Toyota's are HYPE. Go to www.carpoint.msn.com and do the research for reliability/quality data and check pre Tacoma Toyota's you may be surprised. Go to www.crashtest.com and look at the crashtest data along with crashtest data at carpoint. Go to www.JDpowers.com and see where the Ranger sits as far as quality goes.... I'm on my second Ranger, first went 96K with NO PROBLEMS whatsover, I used it as a 4x4 inthe Cascade Mountains, I am now on my second and it has over 30K trouble free miles on it... Before you go Ford Ranger bashing, the Ranger doesn't outsell the Tacoma almost 4 to 1 for no reason at all....
  • rsmtomrsmtom Member Posts: 28
    Ranger "bashing" he says! Geeze, how sensitive, and about what afterall--a stinkin' truck! And isn't this the clown whose always bashing Toyotas in Toyota forums where Toyota owners go to exchange information? I don't know what's worse, hypocrisy or idiocy--I guess it would be hypocritical idiocy, and the more time passes the less tolerant I find myself of such behavior in a world filled with it.

    "Toyotas are hype" he says. So let's see...I'm on my second Toy 4X4 (in 15 years), with 308,000 trouble-free miles between them. Somehow, along the way I missed out on all the "hype" while I was racking up those 308,000 miles. And these weren't/aren't grocery-getter image-buyer trucks either. Both have been work trucks first and recreational vehicles a distant second--there's just never enough time for hunting and desert exploration (my justification for owning a 4X4).

    "Educate yourself" he crows. Well, let's see...I think I've done enough time behind the wheel of a Toyota to have earned the right to an informed opinion. And since I'm in the market for a new truck I took the time to go out (twice now) and look over/test drive what I feel to be the best competition in the segment in which I'm interested. I'm not sitting around at home "bashing" a truck I haven't bothered to honestly check out. What I did do was offer my experiences and impressions based upon time spent behind the wheels of two examples of the truck over which our resident accuser is so emotionally wrought. How in the hell can someone get so bent out of shape over something as disposable as a compact truck, no matter the brand? For crying out loud, what do people do with their time any more?

    Hmmm....I thought I made the point (more than once) that I was offering views based upon personal preferences, in some instances, rather than some kind of indisputable judgement-for-all-time concerning attributes of two brands of freakin' little trucks. I don't believe in such stupid notions as "brand loyalty". I buy what I think best suits my needs and wants (and I know the difference) at any given time. I don't give a damn about what's popular, best-selling, or the current herd mentality. I buy for me and no one else. If you're offended, then that's your problem. I don't think any more or less of anyone because of the vehicle they like. Instead of big and important things like that, I concern myself with trivial little things like what people say and do. Amazing how life's events (good and horrible) can really set one's priorities straight, and you can damn well be sure that being in love with a brand of truck isn't anywhere in my own list of priorities. Shoulda' been kind of obvious given that I've made time (twice, get it, twice, and likely again) to go and lay my hands on the "world's best little truck", but then some things can't be made obvious enough for some people.

    So the basher fluffs his feathers and calls ME a basher. I said I wasn't impressed with the TWO Rangers I DROVE and carefully LOOKED OVER. Did I say "All Rangers are crap"? DID I? Didn't I say I was even still considering the Ranger. I did neglect to say that I saw plenty of rusty driveline and chassis parts underneath. I forgot to mention that I heard a loud and irritating wind leak/road noise coming through the driver's side doors (which DID fit right, well, mostly right. It was the passenger side doors which were crooked and nearly hitting each other on a fresh-out-of-the-factory truck stickering for over $24K). I guess that REALLY makes me a "basher" now, comments concerning the tranny performance and dash layout notwithstanding. And yes, I actually did take time out of two of my weekends to go and look at the Ranger, and with a very open mind, believe it or not (lemme guess which!). And I plan on going again soon, too. It would be sooo much easier to sit at home "bashing" a truck I haven't bothered with, but then that would be sort of a juvenile thing to do, and life is way too short for that kind of nonsense.

    How come I'm not a Toyota "basher" for not totally liking the seating, or not being happy with no option for four doors? Found myself saying the engine's performance was satisfying, but certainly not stellar (as some might claim). How's this...I think the Taco is overpriced, and I don't even remotely like my local Toyota dealers, for sales or service. Am I a Toyota "basher" yet? Funny, but the Ford dealer within walking distance of my home (that would be convenient for maintenance or warranty service) has so far been the most comfortable place to shop--and I made a point of thanking them for all of their time and effort. What, still not a Toyota "basher"? But, those experiences have no bearing whatsoever on the competing trucks themselves, and instead of sitting on my [non-permissible content removed] at home reading fluff pieces I went out and spent time driving, asking questions, and carefully looking over the trucks-in-question. Maybe that wasn't obvious enough....

    "Bashing" he says! Normally, I wouldn't deign to respond to such childish rants, but don't you know it's a bit irritating for someone who know's nothing about oneself to even begin to cast aspersions, implying I'm somehow stupid or in need of "education" (LOL!!) because I didn't have only great things to say about his all-important, world-beater, favorite brand of small truck. Maybe someday a little maturity will set in, and a certain kind of truck won't be so important anymore--I'm not waiting, holding my breath in anticipation! I've seen enough of these kinds of posts throughout Edmunds to know it will continue to degrade what is otherwise a terrific forum for communication.

    There's too much useful commentary at Edmunds to just blow it all off, so I do what I learned to do long ago, thanks to an employer. Sometimes you cannot just filter out certain people in life, as much as you might want to. I resolved to let them serve a purpose as "negative role models", perfect examples of how NOT to be in daily life. It's sort of a way to find an upside in anything life throws at you, and it sure never seems to stop coming. Lest the peanut gallery start hurling accusations my way again, I'll just say that standing up for oneself, and calling a basher a basher, or a hypocrite a hypocrite, is certainly no sin.

    So, if you like your Ranger (or whatever), then good for you--you've got what you want. My impressions still stand--if the Ranger is the pinnacle of small truck engineering, well then, thanks, but no thanks. No need to get a bee in your bonnet because someone else has a different opinion that comes from experience. Just don't go and do anything stupid in it whether in the Cascades (beautiful country) or anywhere else. We've already lost too much access to public lands in our southern deserts thanks to the combined efforts of eco-idiots and immature off-roaders. These are very tiring times in which to be living....
  • mmcbride1mmcbride1 Member Posts: 861
    Ditto. Vinny never has nor ever will change.
  • rwellbaum2rwellbaum2 Member Posts: 1,006
    Yeah those cheap Toyota's have let me down plenty. I only got 280,000 miles on my 78 Toyota when the piece of crap started burning half a quart of oil every thousand miles. I had to fork out $300.00 for a crate engine and I've got 380,000 on it now. Their just junk, I tell you!
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    You mixed up your decimal points.

    Should be $3000 for a crate engine, and 28,000 miles for the oil burner.

    Glad to be of help!
  • rwellbaum2rwellbaum2 Member Posts: 1,006
    No mix-up at all, the numbers stand. Sorry if that upsets you, but as your Daddy say's...."Just statin' them facts on this one"
  • mmcbride1mmcbride1 Member Posts: 861
    People might think he likes Toyotas!
  • rwellbaum2rwellbaum2 Member Posts: 1,006
    You'd think he loves Toyota's, considering the excessive amount of time he spends posting in Toy topics.
  • dbhulldbhull Member Posts: 150
    "You'd think he loves Toyota's, considering the
    excessive amount of time he spends posting in Toy
    topics."

    Gee, I think I have seen this posted somewhere about a 100 times before.
  • rwellbaum2rwellbaum2 Member Posts: 1,006
    More like your one hundred splintered personalities all saw it once! ;)
  • mmcbride1mmcbride1 Member Posts: 861
    I can think of brent, 2sly4u, unixgod, dbhull. How many more were there?
  • dbhulldbhull Member Posts: 150
    You all must have really liked ZBad, Unixgod, etc. You all are really fixated on that guy.

    It only takes about 30 seconds to confess and get right with your lives. Be rid of all that torment inside ya!

    See ya in my rearview mirror....:) hee heee!
  • RoclesRocles Member Posts: 982
    budlite and ZBAD71 come to mind...
  • rwellbaum2rwellbaum2 Member Posts: 1,006
    Don't forget unigomer
  • rwellbaum2rwellbaum2 Member Posts: 1,006
    You definetly haven't taken that 30 seconds and confessed. Your particular brand of torment is obvious to everyone. Get your life squared away with the man upstairs, take your meds, and please stop bothering us with your everchanging (but always annoying) personalities.
  • oldharryoldharry Member Posts: 413
    for a crate engine is about right for a serveral year old Toy. I get fliers for used [non-permissible content removed] engines all the time. They junk them early with very few miles in Japan. According to an article in "Motor Service Magazine", there is a law in Japan that every piece of rubber in a vehicle must be replaced every three years. That includes door and window gaskets, brake hoses, air conditioning hoses and every thing else. The cars there do not have to meet US safety and polution standards, or pay US taxes, so the average citizen looks at the price of the repair, the price of the new car, and the subsidised low interest loan to buy a new one, and trades. The good ones go to Australia, New Zealand, and Mayasia where they drive on the left as they do in Japan, (Brits don't allow import of used cars) the rest are disassembled and sold for parts. A complete engine with 10 to 30 K miles is often available a lot cheaper than you could find one for a domestic car or truck.

    Harry
  • rrichfrrichf Member Posts: 211
    I seriously doubt that you could import an engine that was not originally manufactured to meet U.S. emissions regulations.
    Rich
  • modvptnlmodvptnl Member Posts: 1,352
    Where in California are you?? There's a company called Watanabee(sp?) that always advertises in the Recycler in So. Calif. for those Japanese "take out motors" My friend did an early 90's Sentra with one of their motors. It was expensive, supposedly because of availability but still cheaper then a rebuild. There was a lot of swapping involved but overall it worked and ran well and passed the sniffer test.
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    In Japan they also have it setup where it gets more expensive to own your car as it gets older. When I was there I noticed most if not all vehicles were like new! I was told after about 5-6 years is when the costs really start to mount, for inspections, certifications, ect... The government made it this way because as car technology advances, auto's are supposed to become more effecient and cleaner. Along with the less likely chance of having leaks. In my opinion I think this is pretty smart way to go....
  • obyoneobyone Member Posts: 7,841
    in Japan could easily match your car payment.
  • z71billz71bill Member Posts: 1,986
    Every six years? How can this be the smart thing to do. I have an 81 Pontiac Turbo T/A. It only has 50K miles and runs as good as it did when it was new. Should the Government tell us what to drive? I have been to Japan. Every thing is controlled (or appears to be).

    It would also kill sales for Toyota products in the US. Who would be willing to pay more for the perceived reliability/longevity of Toyota if you had to junk them every 5-6 years. People need to value the freedom we have in the US - or move someplace else.
  • amoraamora Member Posts: 204
    love those American made Toyota pick-um ups, lets see, Ive owned '52 Chevy pick-up, '77 Landcruiser,'80 GMC pick-up, '83 F150 pick-up, '87 S10 4X4 pick-up, '91 S10 4X4, '94 F150 pick-up,'95 Ford Ranger, '00 S10 Xtreme Vortec booty spanker mini-pickups, Ahhh love those TOYOTAS...
  • ryanbabryanbab Member Posts: 7,240
    Most toyotas are made in the USA but look at the sticker. My mom was looking at 4 runners and i noticed 90% of the parts (components) are from japan the other 10% are made elsewhere.

    Assembled in USA yes but not of many USA parts

    Ryan
  • rwellbaum2rwellbaum2 Member Posts: 1,006
    You're right! For instance; the leaf springs on ford, chevy, dodge and toyota are made in mexico.
  • RoclesRocles Member Posts: 982
    Not Ford--leaf springs are made in PA.
  • tundradudetundradude Member Posts: 588
    4 runners come from Japan.
  • obyoneobyone Member Posts: 7,841
    n/m
  • mmcbride1mmcbride1 Member Posts: 861
    SFW?

    If they are made in Japan (all 4Runners are), the Japanese parts content will be kind of high, no?
  • seacrowseacrow Member Posts: 22
    Built in Japan:
    Landcruiser
    Celica
    4Runner
    RAV4
    MR2 Spyder
    Some Camrys (15%)
    All Lexus models

    Built in USA
    Tacoma
    Avalon
    Camry (most)
    Corolla
  • arkie6arkie6 Member Posts: 198
    Don't forget the Tundra, which is assembled in the USA with the drivetrain being built in Japan.
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    Tundra NOT built in USA according to content label. USA/Canada 35%, Japan 50%.

    Different situation on Avalon, where label reads USA/Canada 80%, Japan 20%.

    According to commerce department, USA/Canada content must be 51% or more. Not my rules. Just the rules the mfrs have to play by. Avalon = domestic, Tundra = import.
  • mmcbride1mmcbride1 Member Posts: 861
    Notice how Canada/Mexico sneaks in there with the USA. Canada and Mexico are foreign countries, if you haven't noticed. NAFTA didn't change that. Many, many "domestics" are built in Canada and Mexico, which are no less foreign than Japan.
  • arkie6arkie6 Member Posts: 198
    Notice in my post #410 that I said the Tundra is "assembled" in the USA, not "built" in the USA.
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    Yes Mmcbride1 I did notice. I won't argue your logic, with the exception that I do believe Canada and Mexico are "less" foreign, since they are our neighbors, both North Americans on the same continent.

    Arkie, you are right, I missed the semantics, but did note you were trying to group Tundra in there with Avalon which clearly qualifys as a domestic product due to its percent of North American content.

    Having said that, I don't have a problem with people buying import products, or non UAW products. I am not a union supporter, don't belong to one, and don't support their cause. What I am in favor of is correct labeling, and not mistating what something is, to mislead those to whom it does matter.
  • mmcbride1mmcbride1 Member Posts: 861
    I'd buy that MAYBE with Canada. Not Mexico. They are about as foreign as it gets. At least Canadians speak English, even if it does sound strange, eh?
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    English, French and Spanish are all derived from Latin. Not sure what state you are from, but several had the flag Mexico flying over them at one time, or Spain, or France, or Portugal, etc.
  • mmcbride1mmcbride1 Member Posts: 861
    And it's French, Spanish and Italian. They have very little in common with English (except their origins). I was fluent in Spanich many moons ago. Not only language, but also cultures and socio-economic differences (virtually no middle class in Mexico, you are either rich or poor) are what makes Mexico very different from USA & Canada.
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    I don't see what difference any of that makes. Modern Mexico bears little resemblance even to its own ancient history. They are our neighbors, share the same continent, and have been at peace with them since the battle of San Jacinto.
  • rwellbaum2rwellbaum2 Member Posts: 1,006
    Mexico has a terribly corrupt government, oppresses it's native indian tribes and has virtually no environmental protection controls in place for it's filthy manufacturing endevours. I for one do not support the notion that they are such great neighbors and they certainly do not deserve the quasi-status of "less foreign". As for unions...big business stands up for itself with an army of lawers and politicians in it's pockets. Why should workers be at the mercy of profiteers to provide them a decent wage.
  • obyoneobyone Member Posts: 7,841
    Just curious, you posted Tundra 35% US/Canada and 50% Japan....so where is the missing 15%? I agree that it is important to some and should be labeled as such AND Made in USA is Made in USA. Who speaks what language doesn't really matter as money is the universal language isn't it....
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    I posted the 35%/50%. And I don't know where the missing 15% is. Just stating what was on the label.
  • rcoosrcoos Member Posts: 167
    If I remember Canada has english & french. I believe that one of their states speaks french. I have only been to Alberta & British Columbia, and they speak english.
  • john111john111 Member Posts: 17
    I bought a 2000 tundra in July of 1999. It was in Nederland, Texas, about 200 miles from where I live. On the way home late that evening after stoping and starting off again (after closing doors) each time after a short distance I would hear a 'thump' in left rear door, and the open door light would come on then the doors would come unlocked. This was a problem that affected the security system in such a way that it got so we wouldn't dare use it expecially in town. We eventually got part of it corrected, but ocasionally the open door light still comes on, but the way they adjusted the doors at the Toyota dealer the wind noise is such that it sounds as though you might have the back door on the right side partly open. I have had this truck at two different dealers five different times. Was furnished a loaner car one day. (after traveling 200 miles one way) The other four times the dealer (about 40 miles away) my wife had to drive another vehicle along with me. Dealers have kept this truck as much as six days, and we were furnished no loaner car nor was a rental car available but two days. Does the lemon law apply to anything this 'minor'?? We have the repair orders. We dearly love this truck, the performance, gas mileage. But when you are parked side by side next to other vehicles, the two rear doors are usless. - - loading groceries etc.
  • f150rulesf150rules Member Posts: 195
    This has been a known issue with the Tundra Access Cab trucks. I think everyone that I have heard had the problem got it rectified somehow. I would check some of the other topics here and ask around. I don't know personally, but I have heard also that www.ToyotaSolutions.Com has some good info shared.

    It is unfortunate that you have had problems, but you won't get away from problems altogether with any vehicle. What makes it worse for you is that the Toyota dealers you have gone to for help have not gone the extra mile to take care of you and that will hurt their repeat dollars in the long run.
  • z71billz71bill Member Posts: 1,986
    Find out who the contact is one step above the dealer. If I remember correctly this information should be in your owners manual. It is a contact directly to customer service at Toyota. Explain your problem to them, they will contact the dealer and then you will get some action. I had to use this method - back in 1991- with a 1990 Toyota. After dealer service department tried several times to fix the problem with no luck they started telling me the standard - they all run that way BS. This method takes some time - three weeks before dealer called and ask me what they could do, but you have been living with this situation for over a year so what is a few more weeks. They even let me have a free loaner car while they tried to determine my problem - something they would not do before I got Toyota customer service involved.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.