Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
Comments
The turbo has more punch but the H6 is a bit smoother. Tough call.
As for reliability, I do know that an extended warranty carries a 50% surcharge for the turbo engines, but in practice they've been solid powertrains.
-juice
If deep snow is a concern, clearance helps.
That said, I have no idea if that is a concern for the original poster. It may be they need an AWD wagon.
Last big snow, a 626 and a Corolla got stuck in front of my house. My Forester only adds about 2" extra clearance, but I could get around them just fine.
-juice
Anyway, a vehicle can plow a certain amount of snow out of the way with the front bumper. Some will get pushed to the side. Some will get packed downward. Some will go for a ride on the top of your bumper. As long as you maintain enough momentum to keep plowing, you're good. (This is not always easy as you will likely be slipping, too.)
That act of moving the snow clears space for the suspension, exhaust, and differentials underneath. If the suspension, diff, and driveshafts are low to the ground, they will cause drag. This will increase slipping, which will prevent you from maintaining momentum, which will prevent you from being able to move the snow, which will result in the front bumper stopping you short.
I'm not saying that everybody encounters this kind of snowfall and needs good clearance. But IF YOU DO ground clearance is a big help.
-juice
-juice
The rear hatch was welded shut. The trim on the dash had some bubbles in it. The door locks had some exposed springs. It did look just like the photos or basically a rough mock up of them.
Size wise, I would say it is similar to a tall TSX.
The RDX was on a dais. I asked the Acura rep if the RDX had a telescoping wheel. He said he thought so. I then asked if we could go over to the vehicle and check and I was surprised as anyone when he said, "sure!"
Imagine my surprise when I asked if I could take a seat to see if I fit and he said "yes"!
I tried the back and front seat. I did notice when sitting in the passenger side front seat that the glove box was very close to my shins.
Again, this was a prototype so the actual car may be different. But it was nice enough and big enough for me to keep it on my list.
I asked at NAIAS last year, and that was during the Industry Preview days, and the Acura reps didn't let me in. It was on a turntable. Of course that was the concept itself.
-juice
I thought I might have a chance because the press was all over the prototype this year, at least in the videos I saw. So it seemed since they were closer to production, they were willing to show more.
This does have me wondering if the CR-V for 2007 will also have a telescoping wheel. Please - let this be the start of adding such a wheel to ALL Hondas!
Have I missed something..??
Of what good is the dead pedal while the e-brake is applied?
rm_ralston@yahoo.com
I know it sounds like a simple feature the but once you are used to it it grows on you, which makes it important and doubtful it adds much to the cost to manufacture... A little thing you end up using every day that reminds you why you like a particular car.
What about "privacy window tint"? The photos make it appear so, but I'm interested in what the folks who have seen it up close might know.
Thanks!
I'm mixed on this, VW has serious problems with window regulators. I think they need pinch protection if they're automatic and this adds cost and complexity to something that used to be pretty simple.
I guess as long as they're done right.
-juice
The only window I ever really open on the Forester is the driver windows, and not even for tolls any more. Just drive through stuff. I would like to have one-touch power up for the driver.
For the rest is just adds cost and complexity. Some VW guys have had to have window regulators fixed multiple times.
-juice
I hope the RDX has the cure with sporty handling to back up the marketing. A bit disappointing is that the only transmission is an automatic, and as Acura's sportiest wagon entry to the US, it's still a little dissapointing it needs to be yet another tall utility vehicle. I'm looking forward to seeing if it has a nice mixture of all the other features that make it an Acura, including low cost to own and value (including reliability-no broken window regulators).
I find it a practical impossibility to stop the window in mid-travel without overly concentrating on the task to the detriment of my attention to driving the car.
Try pushing (or pulling to roll the window up) the button just slightly to the first click, and it will only go as far as you want. It's also in the owners manual, if you want to go that far for info.
I hope you find the info helps!
Perhaps we will be lucky and they will amend it so all four will all be "auto" on the production models like the Lexus, Audis, etc. Maybe mfr.'s don't think anyone notices little things and only notice how a car looks and how fast it goes... But I tend to think sometimes they catch on.
Why not all "auto" up and down windows and moonroof? Can't be because the mfr is afraid it's relays and switches might break, or folks might not get used to a two-position window switch... I think it just adds a few extra bucks and they want to spend it where the consumer will notice it and buy.
Rarely does an enthusiast magazine report on the convenience of the window operation when you have a hot car in the sun and can lower and then later raise all the windows with one stroke. Or while driving with one of the rear windows partly open, just strike the key, and without distraction have it closed without holding on to a button.
rm_ralston@yahoo.com
The one in my 2001 Porsche is just above the inside rear view mirror.
BTW, did Acura down-rate the peak torque? I thought last time it came around with 260 lb-ft (in your post, and the album, you mention 250 lb-ft).
The RDX is really a sharp looking piece which seems to appeal to folks who will enjoy all the technology engineered into it. I'm really looking forward to seeing the real one here when it comes out.
Thanks for all the info, and looking forward to more.
I pride myself in reading the owners manuals cover to cover, most of the time even before I buy a car I will buy or borrow an owners manual.
Obviously I missed that one "feature".
Initially I was so cetain you were wrong I went to techinfo.toyota.com to see if each button had two contact sets for each direction.
They did.
So I hauled myself out to the garage, turned on the ignition key, and discovered just how easy it can be to precisely position the windows once one knows how to use the switches.
Insofar as my taking any offense at the way you informed me I am old enough that I have learned to accept new information, or criticism without taking offense.
So thank you very, VERY much for the information.
The back seat looks cozy, about Forester-sized I'd say. You're 5'9" and your knees almost touch the front seat. The CR-V is significantly roomier, but that's OK, it still looks functional.
The dash is a bit busy, too many buttons IMO.
I do like the wide center armrest between the two front seats. Seems like it would fit two elbows nicely, and those front seats seem like they'd be a lot more comfy than the CR-V's high-mounted buckets.
-juice
-juice
The dash is pretty full, but all the systems are operable by voice command. And, as with all honda products, the buttons are pretty intuitive in function and design...unlike some of the euro competition.
-juice
Likely with the turbo and AWD, they didn't plan on much towing (in heat) or ability to upgrade cooling systems, etc., but it's sure worth looking at.
Thanks again!