2016 Toyota Prius Long-Term Road Test - Introduction
Edmunds.com
Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 10,316
2016 Toyota Prius Long-Term Road Test - Introduction
Edmunds.com has purchased a 2016 Toyota Prius Four Touring to test over the course of 12 months and at least 20,000 miles. We will be testing its fuel economy, interior, comfort, performance, cargo capacity, audio and technology, along with cataloguing any maintenance or repairs that are needed.
Tagged:
1
Comments
There's one born every minute.
Styling theme here appears to be the boomerang. One aspect of fun-to-drive is being attractive enough that drivers want to be seen driving it.
Twitter: @Edmunds_Test
Compare this: https://wbfontenot.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/936full-salvador-dali.jpg with this: http://autocontentexp.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/2016-Toyota-Prius-2.jpg
But then, suddenly, they released this Prius. I do not like the styling personally, but I am so glad that Toyota tried...something. I can respect an interesting failure so much more than yet another unimaginative clone.
So, simply complaining about the styling -- after 20 years of complaining about the lack of styling -- would make me a hypocrite, I think.
But, like a previous poster said, at least, Toyota is TRYING. That's more than what could be said about everything they've styled in the last 20 years. And, that's great that they've tried to make it more rewarding to drive, since that's my - and everyone else's - other complaint: Toyotas tend to be very dull to drive.
@longtimelurker: I'm glad you mentioned the Civic, too! At first, in pics and commercials, I thought it was really good-looking. But, then, in person, it didn't work as much. And, like you said, it's definitely over-styled. But, the Prius, still, is MUCH uglier.
The interior bugs me more than the exterior.