By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Fill-up at Gorman (in the Tehachapi range)...
297 miles strait north to Thornton Chevron (just north of Lodi)
7.760 pump reading.
That calc's to over 38 MPG.........
..and that's a J30A4 thru a 6M (top two gears are overdrives)
No complaints from this sailor.
ez sends.........
For example, if the pump clicked off a little early, say only 2 tenths of a gallon, that would throw your average off by 1.6 MPG (147/4.2=35.0).
If you waited longer, until say, 10 gallons (still barely more than half a tank used, and not preferable for calculating specific mileage), that .2 gallon difference (over 300 miles, shall we say) makes a difference of .6 gallons instead of 1.6 gallons.
Just trying to help. Glad you're enjoying your Accord!
My car is still loving the summer. Up to 34.24 lifetime now with 67,000 miles on the car. My 10 tank rolling average is now at 38.0 mpg and I added a 50 tank rolling average to my spreadsheat and that comes out to 35.1 mpg. Recently had a 44 mpg tank with 630 miles (that really helps the averages). I was luck as there were no headwinds and mostly tailwinds and it was cool enough that I didn't need the a/c too much. Lots of slow driving during the summer construction also helps the mpg.
I love having such a long range as I could get cheap gas in Missouri, drive down to Kansas and back up to more cheap gas in South Dakota - avoiding Iowa and Nebraska entirely.
2007 I4 MT SE
0w-20 mobil 1
40 psi tires.
Is the installation procedure adequately covered by the "directions" in the box? Sounds like a good addition for a fuel economy (V-6 chapter) aware dude like me........................
I suppose a good auto electrician could do it for about an hour's labor ($90 at my favorite place).........
Thanks (and all the best), ez....
The only complicated part is if you route it out of the way. I mounted mine in the cubby below the radio. I just used a bent piece of aluminum and some two sided tape. I have pics in the carspace area.
7/26 285mi / 11.099gal = 25.7mpg (first half tank, dealer filled, break in period).
8/2 457mi / 15.670gal = 29.2mpg
8/7 210mi / 7.549gal = 27.8mpg
8/15 423.4mi / 14.892gal = 28.43mpg
I have a pretty consistent usage pattern of 70% hwy and 30% city.
I must say I made the right choice for a vehicle. After getting used to the car, and learning it's shifting patterns and when to force it to upshift, I'm getting lots of power and great mileage.
Enjoy your new car! My next one will probably be mid Gen IX or early Gen X. I have no reason to replace it now.
A while back I read on some gas saving pamphlet to do this. Maybe it's incorrect?
I'll have to start paying more attention so I might be able to make use of the same technique.
I find it amazing how slight variances in the gearing of a given car can produce such differing amounts of rpm. My brother's car, a 94 Corolla 5-speed manual, pushes 4,000 rpm at 75 mph, while mine, 03 Accord LX Coupe 4-cyl, is only running about 2500 at 75 mph and barely 2750 at 80. (/random tangent over)
Thanks in advance
That being said, 22-23MPG seems low. Check your tire pressure, make sure you shift into D and not D3 (easy to do), and use decent quality gasoline.
High speeds kill mileage, especially if you are using AC.
Technically, every time you use the brakes, you are wasting that energy. (Yes, I know that you have to be reasonable about this.) I wonder how much better mileage might be for some folks if they just could learn some different driving techniques.
I also understand the fun in quick acceleration. And there are plenty of folks who couldn't care less about mileage.
I'll bet EZ and Dudley go easy on the brakes. :shades: Of course, like me, they have manuals with the increased engine braking.
Yes, my brakes tend to last forever - my last car ('90 Integra MT) the front brakes lasted until 190,000 miles.
My 06 EX-L has over 73k miles and I'm down to 3mm on the rear brakes. Fronts are at 6. Lots of highway miles though.
I hate entrance ramps that are on hills. 6k starts are necessary if you want to have a complete back end.
I'm still working on cracking the 35 barrier, but I never go on trips long enough to get good mileage.
They should start testing cars with E10 for the EPA since it's becoming standard and it has a slightly lower energy content. With that being said I'm still averaging the combined total, as set by the EPA, for over a year which is a good thing.
You see the brake lights,see the nose pitch down and wonder why? Not too swift!!
ez....
Actually, the brake pedal is in the middle... the clutch pedal is on the left. :shades:
I wish there was an avoid dumb people pedal so that you could fly over most of the drivers on the road thereby getting excellent mileage.
Been testing my range lately and set a personal record with 665.5 miles on one tank. This was over 3 days of mostly highway driving with taking kids to school in the morning and going to work thrown in. Used 16.23 gallons for 41.0 mpg - 41.5 on the scanguage. The needle was completely below the red line and I still had a gallon left. I drove about 85 or 90 miles after the light came on.
Lifetime mpg is now at 34.46 (up from 33.4 in the spring)
10 tank average is at 37.6
50 tank average (somewhere around a year of driving) is at 35.9
Car now has 73,000 miles in 2.5 years.
mpg is still going up overall. I expect to be at 35 mpg lifetime by this time next year.
2007 I4 SE MT
Just as an aside. If I was driving a midsize V-6 suv and averaging 17.5 mpg I would have used an additional 2,100 gallons of gas over the same period. At about $2.80 per gallon average over that time that is about $5,900 in savings, or just under $200 per month saved in gasoline alone.
It is just beyond me why some people choose the vehicles they drive. We should be happy with our Accords.
Right now the leaders for mpg are probably the Camry with 32 mpg highway with the 4 cyl. and the Sonata and Altima. Honestly I don't even consider looks, but I think the Camry looks fine - better than the current Accord. The Sonata and Altima also are not so bad, but the Altima has absolutely no rear headroom with the super slanted roof.
I would drive a 4 cyl before ruling them out completely.