Mazda3 Real World MPG

17810121320

Comments

  • stallionrestallionre Member Posts: 205
    I get on my new 2007 3 S Grand Touring 28/33 MPG. Awesome!!! I love this car. :)
  • chavis10chavis10 Member Posts: 166
    I'll have to listen for that noise too. I have heard a slight ticking noise when I first start the car that sounds like something is catching/rubbing the serpentine belt. I'm only averaging 17 mpg. I even took a trip to the Baltimore Aquarium a few weekends back (about 100 miles each way from Philly) and only got 22 mpg for that tank. This is f@cking ridiculous as I have 28k miles on the odometer and haven't averaged anywhere near EPA figures in 27 months of driving. This car has the worst most unrefined transmission I have ever experienced. It whines like a poorly installed aftermarket audio system- jerks me intermittently on the 1 - 2 upshift- makes all kinds of weird noises, hesitates, etc. I will NEVER drive another Mazda again. I've even written Mazda USA to complain and all they did was send me a $50 coupon to use at one of their dealerships.

    If anyone wants to buy this car I'll be glad to sell it, lol. 20% tint, factory HIDs/TPMS, autodimming mirror w/compass, LED rear brake light, leather, sunroof, brand new Continental ContiProContacts (stock size), brand new Valeo frameless wipers, etc. titanium Grey Hatch, 2.3L 4spd auto. :shades:
  • stallionrestallionre Member Posts: 205
    I get on my new 2007 3 S Grand Touring 28/33 MPG. Awesome!!! I love this car. :)
  • z71billz71bill Member Posts: 1,986
    The manual tranny Mazda3 seems to get MUCH better MPG than the auto.

    If MPG is very important to you and you want an auto tranny I would look at other cars.
  • duff333duff333 Member Posts: 41
    I have an '06 2.0i with the 5 speed. The car has been excellent through 11,000 miles of driving. no problems at all and quite fun to drive. I unlocked the message center that gives MPG, avg speed, etc. per the instructions listed in earlier posts here and found that my car had an average of 33.8 mpg for the 1st 10,500 miles - - which was within .1 (33.9) of my hand calculations. Not bad.

    I just drove 500 miles, alot of it highway, recently and averaged 35.1 MPG. The mileage indicator even said that on a 95 mile jaunt down I-295 then I-95 from Philly to Baltimore I average 39.8. I was going only 60-65 MPH (a friend was following me in an older vehicle) and it was ALL highway and a warm day but still pretty impressive.
  • smallcar1smallcar1 Member Posts: 76
    Bill,

    Did your mileage improve a lot after the manifold valves was fixed?
  • z71billz71bill Member Posts: 1,986
    Well - if I did not have bad luck I would have no luck at all!

    On the way home from the dealership after having the intake manifold replaced - I stopped and filled up with gas - I know that the dealerships need to let the cars idle for a long time while they are testing things out - I wanted a full tank of normal driving - so I would have a valid MPG calculation. It only took a few gallons to fill up - so rather than write the odometer reading down - I just reset trip odometer B back to zero - figured when I filled up I could sort out the numbers.

    After a few weeks of driving the battery went dead - 100% - dome light would not even come on - dead -

    When I put a new battery in my trip odometers went back to ZERO. So I lost all my numbers.

    When I fill up again I will post the results - my daughter thought the mileage was better - we were getting 200 miles between fill ups - around 12 gallons - she had over 200 miles on the car and the gas gauge was still between 1/4 and 1/2 a tank.

    I will guess - the MPG went from 16-17 before - to 20-21 now. The fluttering clicking noise is also gone.
  • stallionrestallionre Member Posts: 205
    Sorry for all your bad luck. The gas mileage seems kind of low to me still after you all that work on the car. I am getting 28/32. Hey like you said having some bad luck is better than having none at all.

    Glad your car is not sick anymore. :sick:
  • sshprsshpr Member Posts: 13
    My daughter has been driving the 07 3sGT auto mostly and we now have about 3500 miles. She is avg. 20-21mpg with an avg. speed of 25-26mph. A got 32mpg hiway on a 30 mile trip with a tail wind and then 27mpg on the way back going 65-70mph. No real complaints with the car other than I wish it was getting 2-3 mpg better on avg. Would like to know if anyone has seen a difference with tires other than the Goodyear RSAs that are already showing significant wear (even) on the fronts.
  • stallionrestallionre Member Posts: 205
    Only 3500 miles on the tires and already showing wear. This is not good. Ouch!! I am not even close to 3500 yet. :cry:
  • eldainoeldaino Member Posts: 1,618
    the goodyears do stink. Slap some good bf goodrich's or bridgestones and you'll be good. If you want some good cheap, more performance oriented tires, try out khumo.
  • stallionrestallionre Member Posts: 205
    What about Michelin's? I have been buying Mich's for over 10 years now and love them. Great tread wear and traction control. Expensive though!!! :(
  • stallionrestallionre Member Posts: 205
    I am still in the break-in period of my car and I get 28MPG, will this go down after the break-in period?
    Does it help that I only use Chevron gas 89 octane, and once a month, I will put in Premium.

    I also use that chemical call Z-Max, that sure is an awesome product. I have been using this product for 7 years now. I have added Z-Max to the engine and trans.

    What do you all think about that? Ideas?
  • mrblonde49mrblonde49 Member Posts: 626
    the goodyears do stink. Slap some good bf goodrich's or bridgestones and you'll be good. If you want some good cheap, more performance oriented tires, try out khumo. "

    I've seen that most people weren't happy with the Goodyears, but mine have been great. Handle well in dry weather, never noticed problems in rain, and I've rarely had to use them in the snow, which limits their biggest weakness (I can work from home when it gets bad out). I have almost 27K, and still some decent tread left. I figure I'll upgrade in November before the winter.

    Gonna get the Falken Ziex 512. Can't beat them for the price ($64 online). Had them on my Saab 9-3, very good tire at an amazing price
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    I had the Falkens on my Integra. They are very nice. Not the longest lasting tread though, but the price makes up for that.
  • stallionrestallionre Member Posts: 205
    What about Michelin's? Any luck?
  • eldainoeldaino Member Posts: 1,618
    i like pilot exalto's, but like you said...EXPENSIVE. Nice tires, but the same quality and traction etc can be had for cheaper. The name has a lot to do with it.
  • stallionrestallionre Member Posts: 205
    Awesome thanks. I will keep that in mind. ;)
  • mazdaboy2mazdaboy2 Member Posts: 12
    We took the first all-highway trip this month in the 2006 Mazda 3i Touring 5-speed. The car had about 15K miles at the time. We did about 600 miles on I-81, I-77, I-85, I-95 with a full load (4 riders + gear, about 650 lbs). The outside temp ranged between 45 and 70 deg. The cruise control speeds ranged from 63 to 69. The result: 39 mpg, which I am very happy with, considering the full load.
  • eldainoeldaino Member Posts: 1,618
    39? that sounds a bit...well impossible. Maybe on a warm spring day, no ac, nothing but highway and NO ONE in the car. But with 650lbs of gear and people? Right... :blush:

    how far did you go on one tank?
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Impossible?

    CR got the 3 stick at 42 mpg going 65 mph. I would say 39 could be improved on if the speed was right.
  • cchicagocchicago Member Posts: 8
    I am getting about 22mpg overall. This may seem low but it is due the nature of my driving. Most of my trips are very, very short 2-3 miles so the engine does not get fully warm. I have taken one longer trip and averaged got 31 mpg on that trip my average speed was about 65mpg.

    My old '94 Infiniti G20 got about the same mileage but with much less performance.
  • bigfurbigfur Member Posts: 649
    Same basic set up. Bought mine in Oct, have averaged about 27-29 thru the winter. Since spring kinda sorta hit here in MN without using heat and defrost, the last two tanks were 29 and 31.5. Liking this mileage much better then the 13-15 my 01 Silverado got lol.
  • acdacd Member Posts: 11
    With my '07 M3 5- :) manual, the MPG for the last four tanks of gas were 32 mpg, 32 mpg, 28 mpg and 29 mpg. I had more highway miles in the first two tanks. The last two are mostly trips under 10 miles with some stop and go traffic. I'm still pleased with the mileage. The lowest so far has been 26.5 mpg and the highest was maybe 34 mpg. I now have over 8,000 miles on the car. It is a joy to drive!
  • eldainoeldaino Member Posts: 1,618
    maybe on the 2.0 (and this is still a bit far fetched) but not on the 2.3.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    We were talking about the 2.0. Go to the library and look it up. 42 mpg highway with the stick shift on the 2.0 in Consumer Reports.

    Now the automatic only got 38 in the same test. 40 would be a stretch for that.
  • jgill2jgill2 Member Posts: 5
    2007 Mazda3 i Touring, automatic, with 12,500 miles. I drive a mix of city and highway, heavy on the city, and I have a fun-loving right foot. Interstate runs are usually 75-80 mph.

    I was doing calculations every fill-up for a while and was pleasantly surprised at results nearly always exceeding 30 mpg US. Then, at ~9000 miles, I unlocked the Driver Information System and found I had averaged 30.2 mpg to that point. Since then, it hasn't varied by more than .1 mpg cumulatively. On a recent out-of-state trip, I set the cruise at 70 for almost 50 miles, and the DIS showed a fairly constant 39.8 mpg. At 80 mph, I get 29-31 mpg. I'm a happy owner.
  • smogdungsmogdung Member Posts: 349
    Anyone check the mpg on their MS3 at a steady 70 mph in 6th?
  • sandman46sandman46 Member Posts: 1,798
    Do we have this Driver Information thing on our 3s model? If so, can someone please give me step by step directions on how to get to this and how to use it? I'm the kind of person who needs those "For Dummies" manuals. My kids even had to write out directions from turn on/turn off the power button for me to learn how to use the computer way back in 1999!
    Thanks in advance for any help with this.

    The Sandman :confuse:
  • mazdaboy2mazdaboy2 Member Posts: 12
    Yo Sandman, check msg #424 on this thread for the DIS instructions. But somewhere I was told that it only works on 2006 and 2007 models.
  • missyc1missyc1 Member Posts: 17
    re-post:

    Thanks for Andreas of Mazda3Forums I was able to unlock my trip computer on my 07 Mazda 3. It works for 06 too!

    1. Press and hold down CD and AM/FM buttons
    2. Start your car while still pressing down on those buttons
    3. The display will read, "DIS ON" which means Driver Information System On.
    4. Release the CD and AM/FM buttons
    5. Turn off and restart the car
    6. Now press the Set button and cycle through your avg. mpg, miles until empty, current mpg!

    Now you can truly know your Real MPG numbers!

    Please pass this info to others!

    JC
  • igozoomzoomigozoomzoom Member Posts: 801
    I have an '06 s 5-door 'base' (meaning, not the Touring or Grand Touring model). I tried these steps and now I have the Driver Information System functioning! How cool is that!

    FYI, mine was built in 10/05 so it is a fairly early '06 model. Also, I found that if you press the CLOCK button it will revert back to the clock and then SET again to return to the DIS.

    I wasn't thrilled with my overall MPG. I have just over 34k miles on it and the average is 23.5 mpg. Most of that is crawling thru Atlanta rush hour every day, so it's truly city driving. When I am on the highway, it is usually at 80-85 mph. Not the kind of MPG I got in my previous car, '02 Accord V6, but could be worse.

    So, what's up with this 'hidden' trip computer? They just build it in to all models but only tell customers who buy the GT that it's there?
    2015.5 Volvo S60 T6 Drive-E Platinum, 2012 Mazda CX-9 GT
  • missyc1missyc1 Member Posts: 17
    I have an 07' 3 "S" touring and I tried those steps and it didn't work at all :cry: Maybe I'm doing something wrong? Anyone????
  • missyc1missyc1 Member Posts: 17
    ok....I need to retract my message above. Apparently I did not hold the CD and AM/FM buttons down long enough. It works! BUT, how do you delete previous miles that have been set before you actually activate the gage? Mine keeps saying something like "Miles Remaining 211" and I can not figure out how to delete it.
  • tomkozskitomkozski Member Posts: 39
    The 'Miles Remaining 211' shows how many miles you can drive until your gas tank is empty. You can't clear that, unless you run out of gas to get '0 miles' or refill that tank to start anew.

    You can reset the avg mpg and avg mph. Just cyle through the displays by pressing 'Set' until avg mpg is displayed. Then hold down the 'Set' button for about 5 secs, you'll hear a beep. To reset the avg mph display, cycle through to get to avg mph and press and hold the 'Set' button.
  • psypsy Member Posts: 122
    And it is my real world.

    Im a work week hypermiler. I just traded my Civic cause it was a first year lemon. I now have a 07 MZ3 S Touring, 5MT.

    Heres my Civic and I on the local news.
    http://www.kotv.com/e-clips/?id=6090

    I just logged my first tank in the MZ3 today for 43.15 mpg. And I did fight headwinds for the drive home this week.

    Do not sell a MZ3 short driven right. I expect near if not = mpg out of the Mazda I was getting in the Honda.

    Please no flaming. I do have fun with my cars. I like to go two lane bashing at times in western arkansas or eastern oklahoma. And even enjoy a auto-x from time to time.

    A 2.3L MZ3 will do mpg. Just wait till I get it broken in,,, M1 0-20w and M1 in the gear box and get my tire psi up to 50 psi.

    psy
  • mrblonde49mrblonde49 Member Posts: 626
    A 2.3L MZ3 will do mpg. Just wait till I get it broken in,,, M1 0-20w and M1 in the gear box and get my tire psi up to 50 psi. "

    50? I don't get it. Please explain how this is beneficial...
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Hypermilers routinely run at 50 psi. More psi = less rolling resistance = better mpg.

    43.15 is a nice run. I wound up with an Accord (my better half thought that the MZ3 was too small), but am happy with the mpg - recent road trip gave me 43.8 mpg. I am not very extreme though - only 39 psi.
  • roadburnerroadburner Member Posts: 18,232
    (my better half thought that the MZ3 was too small)

    That's funny; my wife and I both prefer smaller cars. My Mazdaspeed3 is the biggest car we own(in terms of length and width).

    Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
    Wife's: 2021 Sahara 4xe
    Son's: 2018 330i xDrive

  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Having three kids and living in a state with lots of fast freeway driving (SD - where nothing is nearby, and long legged highway cruisers are welcome) makes a difference.

    The Accord replaces an Integra which was purchased in DINK phase.

    Still I probably would have gone with the 3 - now if the 3 hatch had the 2.0 engine I may have found that hard to resist. Hard to justify the smaller car, when it uses more gas (EPA).
  • eldainoeldaino Member Posts: 1,618
    no flaming intended, but wont the civic always get the slightly better mileage given its engine size and how its tuned for fuel economy, if you do the same things to it as you do with the mazda? i mean thats just common sense.
  • eldainoeldaino Member Posts: 1,618
    dudleyr:

    what does hypermilling totally consist of? i know the basics, but what is it that you do in particular?
  • mrblonde49mrblonde49 Member Posts: 626
    Hypermilers routinely run at 50 psi. More psi = less rolling resistance = better mpg. "

    That makes sense since underinflated tires cause less mpg. There has to be a downside though, or the mfg would just list it at 50. Less grip? More succeptible to blowouts?
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    The biggest downside is a harsher ride.
  • sandman46sandman46 Member Posts: 1,798
    At this pounds per square inch in the tires, won't that compromise the life of them...make them wear out much faster than the more conservative 35 psi? I'd also expect the tires to feel almost rock hard with an extremely harsh ride. I've had 42 psi in them due to dealer error and the ride wasn't the greatest, so I'd suspect 50 psi to be terrible.
    Any thoughts on this would be helpful as I'd like to eek out higher mileage in my '06 Civic. My commute is basically on just one road with lights and traffic for about 8.3 miles. I just hate the idea of ruining good tires with such a high inflation pressure and also having a uncomfortable ride quality.

    The Sandman :confuse:
  • pulgopulgo Member Posts: 400
    You can inflate tires up to the maximum pressure printed on the tire wall.

    Don't go any higher.

    Max pressure on the tires of my Sentra is 44PSI. I use them at 38, 6 more than Nissan recommends.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    The tires will actually last longer at higher pressure. They have less flex which means less heat, and heat is what wears out a tire - remember firestone.

    The tire boards have more information.

    As far as psi goes. I would not go over the sidewall reccomendation, and would not reccomend it either. Many people do, and I have not heard of a problem, but there may be a small risk.
  • autonomousautonomous Member Posts: 1,769
    The tires will actually last longer at higher pressure.

    Sorry, but I think this is inaccurate. Underinflating tires creates a risk, overinflating tires creates other risks.

    There are two numbers regarding tire pressure: the recommended tire pressure (e.g. 32 psi) and the maximum tire pressure (e.g. 50 psi). Exceeding the first (i.e. recommended number) may make your ride stiffer and wear out the centre threads quicker. Exceeding the maximum number is a recipe for disaster.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    The center does not wear out quicker the outer edges just wear out much slower.

    Call tirerack or check the tire boards.
  • smogdungsmogdung Member Posts: 349
    That's nonsense. If you've inflated to the point that the center of the tire is becomming most of the contact patch...that smaller patch is going to take all the load and wear quicker....the proper pressure would be where the tire wears evenly across the whole tire surface.
Sign In or Register to comment.