Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I could not agree MORE with some of the other consumer side posts just above mine... What offends me, personally, the most is when I am treated like a total idiot when I even email but particularly when I walk-up. I have tried a few things: disclose nothing and everything but the treatement I get is basically the same. Driving up in a decent newer vehicle or a 15 year old off-roader gets equally bad treatement. Either way, I feel like someone is trying to "vacuum the cash" right out of my pocket. Online, I feel safer because I get to CONTROL every bit of information that I release.
Like in the rest of one's life: "Information is to be disclosed on a need-to-know basis, and most people just do not NEED to know". In truth, information disclosure is probably highly advantageous to both parties but if one is to abuse it, the pain to the opponent will be severe! WRT dealers, I choose to avoid pain, because there is zero honesty and disclosure with the majority of them.
i think the issue here is that consumers want to take ALL those funds into consideration, but you shouldnt. they aren't guaranteed to anyone, and they certainly shouldn't have to give any of it to you. however consumers see the extra money, and they want it.
of course, a deal is made if both the consumer and dealer are ok with the selling price, but that doesnt mean that its RIGHT for consumers to start pointing at all these bonuses and holdbacks because invoice is not the "true cost" of the car.
i think people have gotten to analytical in these things. and life is too short to spend stressing whether a dealer has mfgr to dealer rebates, holdback, bonuses, etc and try to get pieces of that. in all honesty, an invoice deal, or a hundred or two over invoice, is a reasonably good deal (obviously if there are rebates available, they are added on after that - not an invoice deal WITH rebates).
those who want to fight and point and finagle and accuse and scream after that because "invoice" isnt real to them, well - i feel sorry for them. i have better things to do with my life than worry about whether the dealer is making a buck on me. thats the reason a business exists right?
i know i can go on about this forever, and many will and wont agree, but thats what i think on the matter...
life's too short (like isell says...)
-thene
On AVERAGE you see "some" of those incentives and they are a huge part of the PROFIT picture as profit=sales-cost. Please do not snow us!
BUT I agree that invoice or even 2% over that would be ok if the real cost was trully a couple of percentage points below invoice.
I spoke with a Honda SM yesterday. He told that his average selling price Odyssey EXL with DVD and NAV is $33800 plus $300 in junk fees. Invoice on that van $32000. That’s 6% profit over invoice, and that is before factory to dealer incentives, volume bonuses and holdback. He said that some people who know what they are doing pay much less than that and others pay MSRP. So you guys do get that profit margin on average, but you still are whining about deals that are under 3-5% range.
The problem is that you want every deal to be at least 3-5% percent, while preserving your ability to score homeruns on stupid people. You are whining about Accords that you have to sell at invoice saying that you can’t feed your families on that, but you couldn’t care less about families of Fit buyers that pay over MSRP. I have zero sympathy for the salespeople. You would suck the last dollar out of anybody and won’t even think twice about it. If you look at statistics, the poorest and least educated people are the ones who pay the most for their cars.
Also, there is no such thing as an easy deal. If someone comes in and offers MSRP, that customer will be classified as a “laydown”, and all the junk like overpriced accessories, mop and glow and insurance will be pushed even harder. So, if I am going to be forced to fight no matter what, I’ll fight to the bitter end and get the best deal possible so that I could feed my family, not yours. Your family is your problem, not mine.
Car sales industry chose to do it different way - make every deal "from scratch", even when the same components are involved. It's a jackpot mentality - hit everybody with ridiculous demands and see what sticks. Mud the water so no one can see what is reasonable what is not. Hitting back with equally ridiculous demands is just one of defense tactics developed to combat it. I don't use it, but I can see why others do.
2018 430i Gran Coupe
consumers constantly say "you aren't gonna feed your family off of me"...i wonder why you don't say that to bestbuy, target, walmart, or any other place of business. sam walton can feed his family off of you...what makes car dealerships different?
i am not saying that you should have to pay MSRP, and the market will not support a fixed price system anytime soon. unfortunately, there are still too many crappy dealers out there who will undercut and undersell anyone out there. what i am saying is in all honesty, to poke and prod and fight to get all that money that is given to the dealer in mfgr to dealer incentives is none of your business. and consumers who pull that crap and tell dealers "well i know you're making $xxx from holdback and $yyy from mfgr to dealer incentives deserve to be thrown out of the dealership. On the other hand, dealers who pull the "we're not making money" crap should have their customers up and leave right then and there.
bottom line - both sides now contribute to the mess that is car purchasing/sales. to blame one side only is, in my opinion, closed minded.
anyways, agree or disagree as you wish - i've been on both sides of the table, and these are my thoughts...
-thene
I'll never understand why some people try to determine in their own minds what is a "fair" profit for a dealer to make. They talk about holdback like it magically falls to the bottom line as profit. They don't give a thought or care about the tremendous OVERHEAD it takes just to open the doors every month. I don't want my customers to think about that, but these costs are very real.
Instead of investing 20 Million dollars to open a car dealership a person could find some good mutual funds and average 10% a year growth that way instead.
For the umpteenth time, it is the MARKET that determines what a dealer will sell a car for and not what some shopper thinks is "fair"!
You forgot to say: there are still too many crappy dealers out there who will OVERCHARGE and OVERsell anyone out there!
Quick question: which side initiated the current practices? Who likes to exhibit CONTROL over the deal?
consumers who pull that crap and tell dealers "well i know you're making $xxx from holdback and $yyy from mfgr to dealer incentives deserve to be thrown out of the dealership. On the other hand, dealers who pull the "we're not making money" crap should have their customers up and leave right then and there.
There is small different between these two contrasting scenarios: one is "not" nice, the other is misrepresentation or lying? Personally, I prefer to be "not" nice than a liar!
My prediction: over time new auto sales will have almost no profits because vehicles are almost PURE commodities and all the PROFITS will be coming via service, used sales, etc. The information age has made that a near term reality!
MARKETs are only efficient under the conditions of perfect information. As long as there is no perfect information or the true information is expensive to aquire, we will have variations in pricing (discriminatory pricing) and people will whine about it! Buyers have a case only if lying or mis-information are actively propogated by the seller...
and can you prove which side initiated the current practices? can you also prove thats its the dealers and ONLY the dealers that like to exhibit control? were you there when this whole thing started?
and please, don't tell me what i forgot to say, and what i SHOULD be saying. you didnt even answer any of my questions, you just turned it back around. usually that happens when there isn't an answer to be had...
either way, i am just expressing my opinions...im not gonna change your mind, thats for sure...
-thene
Exactly! Then why salespeople continue to come here and say that the fair price is 3-5% over invoice. If they don’t get that, they can’t pay their bills. I am referring to this post by cobraboy1 here. If your SM is willing to sell that car at $100 under invoice, then guess what, it’s the market price for that car.
Having said that, Isel, haven’t you ever try to sell a car above market using your skills and training? Please, don’t tell me that you haven’t, because that would make your store a no haggle store. Therefore, if you have the right to try to sell cars above market, then we as consumers have the right to try to buy below market using any information we could get our hands on.
I just don't like it when a person makes an offer based on what they THINK we might be making. It's like they feel we are a charity that they might throw a few crumbs at.
I don't know who gave out those percentages, it sure wasn't me. I also don't think salespeople should complain about not being able to pay their bills in these forums. If that is the case, they really need to find a different store or a different profession!
That is easy. If consumers were the initiators, you will have SEARS and Best Buy crawling with people "making their offers" for this fridge or i-whatever, having invoices from "edmunds-like" websites telling them exactly how much they should expect to pay, angry walkouts, etc. You don't, so it seems people can live without that if the marketplace is set differently.
Truth of the matter is that it's dealers who strongly believe that current system is working for their advantage. Or at least has worked for long while. It's just recent few years when information got way more accessible, but minds of both sides still sit deeply entrenched in old assumptions and ideas.
It will take several major changes, like further consolidation, trimming nominal new car profits before some major player, like say Autoway, elects into trully one fixed price setting. Not tomorrow yet, but I think it is going to happen.
2018 430i Gran Coupe
I agree with you completely. Aside special purchase programs, invoice or real cost if you will, profit and other figures are only relevant for me "internally", as to make an educated guess what price you may accept, not as for me telling you how much you should make. My actions actually will say that, but it does not need to be said. Conversely, whether you eat today or not is not really my concern, either (well, not as a customer anyway - perhaps as a fellow human).
2018 430i Gran Coupe
YOur right there are a lot of people that are pretty reasonable most of the time. and yet what bothers me is that I try to be as upfront and honest (seriously) as possible. I try to explain everything in detail so that there are no holes left over for other people to not understand. If there are then I try to answer them in a way that they can understand so that there is no confusion.
The thing that makes me the most angry is that my job here is to assist the customer as best as I can, I have absolutely no incentive whatsoever to lie to my client. Anyway what bothers me is the fact that a lot of people automatically think that I'm getting oone over on them simply because I'm a salesman.
I know that everyone wants to get a good deal, I like getting a good deal when I buy a tv. I will shop around for the best deal at different stores and different brands for a good deal, but at the same time I am not going to walk up to the salesman and ask that I get invoice on a big screen.
It sucks, I know - but that's the cost of being "one of them".
2018 430i Gran Coupe
That could be rephrased as:
"For the umpteenth time, it is the MARKET that determines what a shopper will buy a car for and not what some dealer thinks is "fair!"
tidester, host
It works both ways.
Precisely!
tidester, host
How about a finance person that shows the consumer a list of interest rates they have available based on credit score and length of financing. No BS.
This won't happen because the dealers are afraid to lose their fat profit margins. They could no longer take advantage of uninformed consumers. They could no longer underpay a salesperson for having a bad month. I don't need someone to "sell" me a car. I need a customer service agent (salesperson) to answer my questions. Someone who actually knows the product and leaves the BS out of the conversation.
This won't happen because the manufacturers can't bring themselves to stop producing cars that aren't selling. They stick the dealers with these unwanted vehicles and force them to sell them.
This won't happen because the UAW wants the people they represent to keep working regardless of how much the public will buy of the product they produce.
Maybe every new car should be custom ordered! Rant over.
:sick:
That MARKET is printed and updated daily. It's called EDMUNDS.
Both patries should try using it. It's even broken down into Trade-for the dealer and Retail-for the consumer. How convenient can it get?
2006 Yellow Vette base used lists for $38,600 and I offer $40,000 including trade (at Edmunds numbers) expecting to drive it home. He says no and wants $4,000 more. To him there isn't enough profit...to me he's being greedy. I didn't write the MARKET PRICE. I'm just trying to make use of it. ps I'm still bucks up and he still has a car sitting in the snow. Oh Well You'll have that. Dealers are being used by the manufacturers as holding lots and consumers are trying to stay out of the way and scare up a car at a decent price once in a while. Maybe Walmart should start selling cars. Just my opinion.
2013 Mustang GT, 2001 GMC Yukon Denali
That is the case in many parts of the world such as Europe: pull vs push. American dealerships/system prefer "push" because US consumers want instant gratification....
That would be mikethecarguy who happened to be a car salesman and who posted precisely one message to the very topic he created. We haven't seen him since.
tidester, host
While that sounds like a great idea, I would be very careful what I wished for. Sure flat pricing would be cheaper for the uneducated but for the informed consumer it would be much more expensive. There is no way a dealership would sell cars at invoice or a couple of hundred over. The only reason they are doing it now is because there are enough others to make up the difference. I know Fitzmall is doing it but they don't have the competition and do lots of volume.
Very true.
Much like when people try to critcize companies for record profits.....um, that's why they're in the business in the first place. The ultimate goal of any business is to make money. Period. All other considerations are in relation to making more money. What keeps it in check? Competition.
So the rest of this message is for those of you who think you deserve to run the dealership YOUR way because you don't like the way dealers run it their way.
If a customer is unhappy at a dealership, rather than take the abuse why not shop around for a better deal and better service? Or is it simply easier to gripe about the whole episode than it is to actually DO something about it!?! Oh, and by the way... the "do something" part does not include thinking you can slap regulations on dealership profits or otherwise dictate a dealership's (or any other type of business) legal business practices, other than by your own consumerism.
Again, a dealership should make as much as possible while providing the best service possible. In so doing, they serve themselves by ensuring a reward for their risk and work while at the same time serving their customers and community. If the dealership fails at either one of these goals they cannot be successful.
:P
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
However, market only works if it operates fairly: there must be a "reasonable" set of rules for engagement. No lying by either side. Both sides must keep their word. And there must be cost efficient legal remedies beyond BBB to keep everyone honest. If not, the bigger kids on the block will continue to beat the piss :sick: out of a few little brats on a regular basis. Good luck!
The dealership serves the community! You must be posting from a mental ward. :mad: They clearly serve themselves. You acknowledged that when you stated they should make as much money as they can. Most for-profit businesses have to pay taxes. Thats not considered giving back.
Don't get me wrong... a car-buying experience is often about as pleasant as a root canal, but nobody MAKES us do it.
I don't like to go to the DMV either but I don't exactly have a choice do I. If most people didn't have to go to a dealership for a test drive and to finalize the deal they certainly would not.
The process of car buying has been "unpleasant" for the consumer for a long time. Now that the tables are starting to turn the side that has benefitted for years is complaining. Consumers didn't just start complaining recently. What I was suggesting was a middle ground. If the attitude is all or nothing than I will take all. The profession of selling cars will change dramatically in years to come. While I acknowlege that there are good car salesmen in existance, it seems to be a fast way for people with little skill or knowledge to make a fast buck. Barely a step above a con artist. The public doesn't need car salesmen as they currently exist.
Friend, I am nowhere near as altruistic as you seem to be. You see, as a consumer I refuse to pay more for anything than absolutely necessary within the guidelines of also receiving what I consider good service. You, and others who share your opinions, are welcome to pay more. In fact, I want you to do so because I will be able to get an even better deal as a result! Gracias amigo!
Now, about the "mental ward" comment... Who told you that? When I signed the lobotomy papers they told me no one would find out. Okay, so now it's out, and you're correct! I'm absolutely crazy! But... I'm STILL paying less for my car (and apparently everything else) than you pay for exactly the same stuff.
Hey, there's a free straight-jacket hangin' right here. Come on over and give it a try. I bet anything it'll fit.
Adios mi amigo loco!
Try buying a high end car - it might change your mind - there are professional sales people out there. Don't generalize - it becomes a personal attack on those in the business who are real professionals.
it seems to be a fast way for people with little skill or knowledge to make a fast buck.
Those kind do not make a fast buck - they don't last long. In your low end slam store it is not the sales people - it's the managers who control them that sets the tone.
I guess I'm generally more concerned for the common good where most are concerned with themselves.
I take issue with SOME salepeople acting as if the consumer wanting them to take as small a profit as possible out of their pockets is a problem. It sickens me because I've purchased many cars and I've seen how shady they can be.
It appears your stance is all is fair in love and war and I can respect that.
My last 4 purchases were from Audi, Acura, Volvo, and Land Rover. Maybe I need to purchase a Maybach to have that great experience.
You're right about my generalizing. However, I've purchased many cars and have helped others purchase cars and my opinion is a result of all of those experiences as a whole.
In your low end slam store it is not the sales people - it's the managers who control them that sets the tone.
Again, I generally deal with high end brands. Those in the middle have to have some standards for themselves. They made me do it is not a good excuse.
I acknowledge in my post that there are good salesmen but perosnal experience and stories heard from others leads me to believe that most salesmen aren't professionals at all.
Fixed price retail does not mean same price everywhere and at all times. Sears price is usually higher than Wal-Mart's and lower than Kohl's or Dillard's. For the same merchandise. All of those stores have seasonal, weekend or even half-day sales when you can get the stuff cheaper than "every day" price. Same model can be easily adopted by car retailers (at least in area of new car pricing; there are other components of transaction not easily adaptable, such as financing and trade-in). Customers would have no trouble in adopting to it, either as they do it already in virtually every other retail. Buying strategies would shift from "beating up the salesman" to simply finding out the best place and time. Selling strategies would shift from "beating down the customer" to finding the "sweet spot" on most profitable price in given environment (location, time of the year, model demand, etc.). Pretty much the same as now, but in more global way rather than micro managing each deal.
They just choose not to do so at this time. Part of their justification is that the customers wouldn't let them. An they are right, in a sense - if they trained people for decades to behave certain way, they cannot expect a sudden change in response just because they say they have a new business model.
2018 430i Gran Coupe
2013 Mustang GT, 2001 GMC Yukon Denali
Cars depreciate.
When you buy a new car for $20k, and some time later it's worth $10k, the dealers get blamed automatically. Why? Because it's the same group of people that told you $20k is a good deal, and then they tell you $10k it's all the car's worth. So the consumer automatically thinks "well the dealers ripped them off" from the start, and made sooooo much money on them, selling them a $10k car for $20k.
If houses were a depreciating asset, we'd all be blaming real estate agents. Electronics depreciate, yet we don't blame the electronics stores because they don't take our obsolete junk in on trade ins, if they would we'd be furious at them. We know electrnics depreciate, and we know prices go down from year to year, yet the reason we don't have any negativity towards them is because we don't go back to the same group of people and ask them what the stuff we bought it's worth, and we don't hear them tell us in our faces that it's worthless.
Depreciation is unfortunately dictated by, gulp, you the consumers.
Why are you losing a ton of money on a Cavalier? Because the car sucks, people have problems with it, and they told many other people about it, and therefore not many want to buy it, and therefore dictate what the car is worth. This is called market value, because you the consumers are the market, and you the consumers dictate what you will pay for it.
And because of that, the market (read: your fellow consumers) dictates what your car is worth, and how much you will lose on it if you sell it or trade it in.
The dealers are just brokers in this complex scheme, and we just want to get compensated for our time. Thank you.
2016 Audi A7 3.0T S Line, 2021 Subaru WRX
Most people have no first clue about economics of retail (or economics of anything, including their own households), so it's hard to explain to someone the risk-reward and markup factors (my Camry could have shot trasmission, it still needed a fair reconditioning, etc.). That definitely adds the negativity.
This definitely does not explain all negitivity, but definitely puts dealers uphill in their PR battle.
2018 430i Gran Coupe
You sound like a good person, and a person I would like to count among my friends. I agree that striving for the common good is incomparably greater than chasing personal gain. However, I do not necessarily trust others to feel the same way.
To be completely honest, my own charitable feelings often evaporate when I am presented with an opportunity that will benefit my family or myself. As a result, I usually stick to a consumer-based approach when buying and selling stuff, and work hard at developing a more altruistic side when it comes to personal matters.
Okay everybody... let loose a big sigh, why away the tear, and get ready for the Kodak Moment.
Now back to what we all love best... CARS!
"I'm willing to go to every dealer in the country to get what I want"
Wow...
Life is short....
Jblaze, this is a valid point, especially from your own experience, however, it is well known that people in general share more bad stories than good ones.
I think the saying is if you do a good job with someone, they'll tell one other person about it. If you do a crappy job, they'll tell ten other people.
2016 Audi A7 3.0T S Line, 2021 Subaru WRX
Also, independent used dealers will always sell for less as they do not have to recondition or certify used vehicles like franchised dealers do.
But once again the market dictates that. The market dictates that they will pay $15k for a Camry at a dealer, and only $10k privately. Because they trust dealers more, because they have something to fall back on if the car breaks down. If they didn't trust the dealer more they wouldn't be paying more.
2016 Audi A7 3.0T S Line, 2021 Subaru WRX
Well, it sickens some of us see how downright cheap SOME people can be in their zeal to save a very small amount of money!
Some people push it pretty far but it is their money.
There's no denying that most cars are depreciating assets. Anyone with sense realizes that going in. The question of being compensated for time is how much should the dealer be compenstated? Reading these posts gives the impression that dealers don't want consumers deciding what is fair compensation even though there seems to be a consensus that the consumer is the market.