Hyundai Santa Fe vs Toyota RAV4 vs Mazda CX-7 vs Ford Edge

1356716

Comments

  • choe13choe13 Member Posts: 348
    Worst comparison ever alive. If this guy basis every samll suv only on engine power and athletism yes i will even admit the cx 7 is your suv.

    But i thought a small suv was suppose to be about practicality, fair mpg, decent engine, looks, interior etc

    Absolutely no comparison on any of those things other than their "sport" factor

    The rav 4 edges out by having a good resale value, "lightness" factor, reliable engine, decently all around made and of course "toyota embelem"(costs 10 k of the car alone)

    The cx7 is the athlectic one of the group but it has a nasty mpg rating, low practicality factor, decent overall package otherwise

    There is no way in my books the cx7 nor rav 4 can hang with the santa fe in overall package. Interior, safety, practicality, imo looks, more than good enough engine, should cost more than it should factor(almost luxury league) all go to the santa fe.

    There is no doubt overall consumer satisfaction will prove that the santa fe is the best small suv
  • sssfegysssfegy Member Posts: 132
    I just spoke to a Mazda rep and stated Motor Trend did the same as when they compared the Mazda6 speed, they used a preproduction vehicle! Very different than what you drive now! I understand why they do, it's there business. Thanks Edmunds for being honest!
  • sssfegysssfegy Member Posts: 132
    Very interesting view, if size and practicality is what matters why not consider minivans? Or wagons?
    Why would I buy a vehicle with the intention to sell it when I am tired of it? Why does resale matter at this point? Same as mpg if it is within hundreds of $ a year? I think sporty/ fun to drive is a very critical factor on safety and satissfaction (being able to control the car in emergencies and stopping when I need it to, and ofcourse looking forward to driving it would make me satissfied for a longer ownership interval, instead of going for value that you get tired of in a couple of years).
  • choe13choe13 Member Posts: 348
    If i wanted a sportier car why wouldn't i go for the mazda 6.

    Suvs and sport in regards to performance(0-60 and handling) does not mix very well

    suvs and sport in regards to capable to handle rough roads does though

    Practicality in a suv sure it matters. Why can't you get the best of a minivan(75 percent of space) style, better fuel economy in one package?

    My point is performance is fine to compare but why not do a all out comparison?? The santa fe would win
  • allen53flallen53fl Member Posts: 41
    "If i wanted a sportier car why wouldn't i go for the mazda 6."

    Even though a MZ6 is a awesome car, w/plently of power, etc, we wanted something 'different' and wanted to sit higher up, and we also felt a tiny bit cramped in the 6.

    "Suvs and sport in regards to performance(0-60 and handling) does not mix very well"

    Uh, I guess you better contact Porsche, Acura, and yes, even Mazda, and let them know, because whether you realize it or not, there IS a new breed of SUV out now, which actually puts the SPORT back into the mix of things. And btw, these new utes are handling the sport part quite well, and they handle that part MUCH better than the SF.

    "Practicality in a suv sure it matters. Why can't you get the best of a minivan(75 percent of space) style, better fuel economy in one package?"

    Because I wanted something different, looks sharp, handles well, is comfortable and most of all, FUN to drive.

    "My point is performance is fine to compare but why not do a all out comparison?? The santa fe would win"

    Umm, maybe in JYHO, but JMHO thinks the SF is too big for us. I must admit, when I first saw one in the showroom, I was really impressed! It's a BIG improvement over the prev gen. We didn't want something that big, and the biggest drawback with the SF were the brakes, 143ft vs CX-7's 123ft. In a panic stop you will be picking glass out of your eyeballs and teeth, because in a SF you will NOT be able to stop in time! 143ft UGH! Not safe at all in my book.

    We got a CX-7 Sport last week, and absolutely love it! I'm glad you are happy w/your SF, more power to you, because that's what counts. But please! Your 'practical idealogies' do not fit for everyone.

    I prefer driving with a smile on my face, and the Mazda succeeds in every way that we can think of. Thank you.
  • choe13choe13 Member Posts: 348
    Please tell me how in earths logic an suv can corner from a 90 degree like a car at a nice speed(considering sport factor). If you like to try and not worried about tipping over be my guest.

    You have your opinion why the cx-7 is the suv choice , but in my books hyundai absolutely nailed what the top priority of an suv should be assembled and they started with comfort, quietness, interior luxury etc

    On another note, i know the 07 CRV is not in this comparison. But honestly what is honda thinking? such an ugly suv(out and in), underpowered and priced at a premiun still. you must be crazy to buy it. I rather buy first any of these three suvs listed, even heck i rather buy a suzuki vitara first.
  • tidestertidester Member Posts: 10,059
    how in earths logic an suv can corner from a 90 degree like a car at a nice speed

    Maybe I missed it but I don't recall anyone making that claim.

    tidester, host
  • carlitos92carlitos92 Member Posts: 458
    Please tell me how in earths logic an suv can corner from a 90 degree like a car at a nice speed(considering sport factor).

    ...How about because it's not an SUV - it's a crossover, based on a car-like platform? :P
  • allen53flallen53fl Member Posts: 41
    Oh choe13,

    I wasn't talking about SUV's in general, I was talking about SPORT CUV/SUV's, (what part of Porsche, Acura and Mazda did you not understand?!). The Cayenne, RDX and CX-7 handle those curves better than some top sports cars. How blonde Are you, btw? Geesh. :)

    I noticed you didn't comment on SF's 60-0 POOR stopping distance. You are ignoring a big part of the equation. That alone would keep me from a SF.

    Again, I'm happy w/your SF choice, because you are happy w/your choice. I prefer better looks, handling, safety, much better brakes and a more prefered size, (for me).

    You should give it a rest, because I think your logic is flawed.
  • bigfootxx2bigfootxx2 Member Posts: 21
    Bottom line is this you dont need to buy cx-7 you can buy the SF but do us cx-7 owners a favor please get out of the way we are not going to hold you up.
  • choe13choe13 Member Posts: 348
    I wasn't talking about SUV's in general, I was talking about SPORT CUV/SUV's, (what part of Porsche, Acura and Mazda did you not understand?!). The Cayenne, RDX and CX-7 handle those curves better than some top sports cars. How blonde Are you, btw? Geesh.

    YOU MUST BE SERIOUS

    i have driven the cx7 and there is no way you could turn 90 degree corner at say 70 mph without worrying it will flip over etc.

    You try with your cx7 and i'll rent a mazda 6 basic and you tell me which car can turn the corner faster and without worry.

    Like i said sport and suv cuv whatever you call it is in my opinion once again not the best factor to buying one of these cars. I would be hard pressed to know, other than sport, other factors of these cars are not the reason why you have bought the cx 7. Its like saying i want to buy a m3 coupe for my family of 4.

    The whole point of this thread goes back to the laughable comparison made by edmunds. Finding ridiculous flaws on suvs to rank them. Overall grading was never considered, and in addition to pricing the santa fe is the winner.(btw i don't have this suv, but test driven it twice)
  • sssfegysssfegy Member Posts: 132
    If size what matters why not go with SUV's instead of CUV's? That was the whole point is to correct the flaw of high center gravity (safety issue), so know you don't have a high center gravity, and if you really define sporty, it would be more control over the vehicle at higher speeds!(again safety right?) that's why they are going to that more fun/safety! MAKES ALOT OF SENSE, and if you want more room get a trailler!lol
  • jerseygaljerseygal Member Posts: 1
    When the Ford Edge finally comes out I'm sure there will be a whole new discussion. Love the CX-7, but waiting for Edge. What do you all think? :)
  • allen53flallen53fl Member Posts: 41
    "Please tell me how in earths logic an suv can corner from a 90 degree like a car at a nice speed(considering sport factor). If you like to try and not worried about tipping over be my guest."

    and you also said:

    "I wasn't talking about SUV's in general..."

    It sure seemed like you were.

    "i have driven the cx7 and there is no way you could turn 90 degree corner at say 70 mph without worrying it will flip over etc."

    And why would you want to turn 90 degree at 70 mph? If you looked at the driving impressions from CX-7 drivers/owners, their FAVORITE part was the secure handling. And at Yahoo! auto reviews, there were several previous Mazda6 owners who said they thought the CX-7 handled BETTER than their 6. Btw, I'm not so sure that I'd want to drive ANY vehicle @ 90 degrees/70 mph. This discussion is bordering on the really ridiculous.

    "Like i said sport and suv cuv whatever you call it is in my opinion once again not the best factor to buying one of these cars. I would be hard pressed to know, other than sport, other factors of these cars are not the reason why you have bought the cx 7. Its like saying i want to buy a m3 coupe for my family of 4."

    I've already said why: It looks sharp, handles GREAT, the price was right, love all the features, it was the right size and the biggest factor of all was that it is FUN to drive! It met our needs, and we wanted something exciting, which the CX-7 definitely is.

    You brought up a CRV in a previous post, well, that doesn't float my boat, but it sells, because it has a niche in the market, people like them for their own reasons. Same goes for the CX-7, same for the SF.

    Today we followed a new SF after lunch today, it stills looks nice, but rather Boring to me, (yes, that's w/a capitol 'B'). But hey! Looks are subjective, and others might think it's beautiful. I think the CX-7 looks awesome just sitting still!

    I think you like to argue for arguments sake, and this thread is starting to get rather old, (Hint: I'm blue-in-the-face here). I'm done w/you.
  • carlitos92carlitos92 Member Posts: 458
    Agree 100%. Until Ferrari comes out with a 600HP V-12 CUV with a sexy Pininfarina body, that weighs as much as a Lotus Elise, has third row seating, AWD, good ground clearance, runs an 11-second 1/4 mile, tows 5,000 lbs, has over 100 cu. ft. of cargo capacity, AND costs less than $30,000... I guess we are all idiots for having to prioritize our desires and make a choice. ;)

    zoom-zoom. -c92
  • wjbushsrwjbushsr Member Posts: 135
    I love this board... :P

    ZOOM ZOOM BABY! :shades:
  • vivavegas99vivavegas99 Member Posts: 39
    Yeah this is funny. I don't even remember what the topic is, but how can anyone compare a HYUNDAI to anything else? Out of all the smaller SUVs the Hyundai's value dropped so fast. I can hate on these cars because I used to own 2 of them back in the day. And they SUCKED. Granted they have made many improvments and more power to those who want an "affordable" car. Just remember you get what you pay for yall. (Love my '06 RAV4)
  • joe97joe97 Member Posts: 2,248
    "how can anyone compare a HYUNDAI to anything else"

    Really? Funny I see lots of people do.

    Hyundai products have improved dramatically since the early-to-mid 90s. The Santa Fe itself is a fantasic car all around and has proven a competent vehicle since first generation. The styling is great and the interior is certainly on par with rest of the class - elegantly designed and more premium than most of the class, including the RAV4 (not my word).

    FWIW, both of Hyundai's current SUVs have had decent resale values since introduction (go look them up), contrary to your statement. Keep in mind, resale values don't change overnight, but they certainly have been on the rise for Hyundai.

    image

    image

    image

    image
  • wjbushsrwjbushsr Member Posts: 135
    I've seen the pics of the Edge, and although it may look impressive at first, I have a hunch it won't be on par with the CX-7.
    Ford has a tendency to shift its focus on the interior refinements and sometimes forget to place as much attention on the drive train. A lot of Ford owners have been unhappy with the performance of their V6 and fwd combo, so it will remain to be seen if the Edge has the same bloodline as the other Fords, or if it really is something special like its distant cousin from the Far East.
    Stay tooned ;)
  • wolverinejoe80wolverinejoe80 Member Posts: 337
    where have you been for last few years?

    santa fe is clearly better than RAV4. santa fe should be compared to a new highlander(whenever it comes out) not rav4.
  • thecatthecat Member Posts: 535
    santa fe is clearly better than RAV4

    Let's seperate opinion from fact. There is more to a book than the cover. Having said that, I have to agree that the new S.F. is a really nice looking vehicle.
  • choe13choe13 Member Posts: 348
    santa fe is clearly better than RAV4

    this is not an opinion but there is no doubt. The Rav 4 honestly is a weak suv in comparison. A nice progress from its older self but the santa fe outdid itself compared to its old self huge time.(leapfrogging most of the suvs in its class)

    Thats what happens when u benchmark much higher priced suvs and want the best for your customers

    The rav 4 definitely has the lighter feel, adds a slight better fuel mpg. But when you talk about overall package , luxury, design and the word "substance" the santa fe is described

    Whats more funny is that i know alot of these writers from edmunds and car and driver are just as stunned and actually in denail this suv can be this good, so they must nitpick ridiculous things about this car compared to suvs worth so much more priced because of course this car must have some dna related to the old excell

    magazines are just fine and have some interesting facts but in the end customer satisfaction surveys are the best indicators. The last 3 years no car company can beat hyundai cars in that
  • vbbuiltvbbuilt Member Posts: 498
    Everyone's opinion are valid. Both the RAV4 and the Santa Fe are excellent vehicles in their own rights.

    When I purchased the CX7 w/tech, neither RAV4 nor the Sante Fe offered Navigation System nor Satellite Radio. As of today, those facts are still true. I just re-confirmed those facts on the Toyota and Hyundai websites. RAV4 will offer SAT capability in Fall 2006. Hyundai website doesn't mention anything about SAT. Neither website mentions anything about NAV.

    SAT and NAV were the deal breakers. Must "haves" in my book. Sure, you can go after-market, but the results are not the same as when they're offered as factory installed options. Mazda clearly saw where the market was heading. Still no regrets with my decision to buy the CX-7. :P

    Vince.
  • carlitos92carlitos92 Member Posts: 458
    Your thread is getting silly. Maybe you ought to just go buy a Santa Fe; I'm sure it wouldn't be a BAD choice. But there will always be thousands and thousands of people, along with some professionals who drive cars for a living, who think it is not the BEST choice. Live with it.
  • sssfegysssfegy Member Posts: 132
    Is That a RAV4? When are they going to have their own designers? Does the interior remind you of other IDENTICAL Hyundai interiors? Why can't they be themselves?
    Very Boring..and I pay the same money?!!!!!!!
  • almcg2almcg2 Member Posts: 14
    Hyundai is a good company, who makes a fine product. Much respect to Hyundai and the Santa Fe. Toyota products are legendary. Rav4 is a fine product as well. I chose to buy the cx-7 and have never regreted it for a moment. Yes it could have better milage, but I can afford the gas. I love the build... so solid, with great attention to detail. I could have gotten a great deal on a caddy SRX if I wanted plush... a not so great deal on a fx 35 if I wanted a step up in interior glitz. But I didn't buy those, even after test drives... and I could of afforded pretty much whatever I wanted. I recently sold a condo and banked a huge profit. Money is no problem. The CX-7 had the best "WOW" factor for me. The pickup is excellent with that turbo, the ride is sports car like. I have no problems manuevering into and out of tight places. I didn't want a truck made to look like a family car. I wanted a cool looking, feeling car that could also carry my family and some extra stuff if needed. I just finished moving from one house to another and the CX-7 played the part of mini moving van quite well. with rear seats up or down, the car hauls enough cargo to make me happy. The nav system is excellent and the Bose Surround sound system knocks me out every time. I've tweaked it so the sound really spreads out. Very true surround sound. I love it and "all" my riders have commented on it. As a matter of fact, "all" my riders comment on quite a few things about the cx-7. It's just a fantastic, quality car. I didn't know how good it was until I owned it for a while. I knew it had been getting great reviews from owners... the people who really matter, but it's even better than I anticipated.
  • vivavegas99vivavegas99 Member Posts: 39
    Like what most people are saying, it's clearly an opinion on what car is "better" than the other. I clearly do not like Hyundais, having been a previous owner of 2. As I said, they have made quite the improvements on their vehicles, but it's still a Hyundai and I will never purchase another one. I love my RAV4, having done extensive research including safety tests and attended several auto shows and played with ALL the SUVs in that class. I based my decision on what was best for me. I wonder how many people have taken advantage of that "bumper to bumper" warranty that Hyundai boasts....hopefully their vehicles aren't nearly as mechanically crappy as they once were. :-)
  • nxs138nxs138 Member Posts: 481
    I'm in the market for a CUV with 3rd row seating, and must say that the interior of the RAV4 is nice, along with exterior styling.

    However: was at the airport last weekend, and noticed a lady in a RAV4 pull over to the dropoff lane. Another car pulled in tight behind her, and she was a little mad that she couldn't swing the gate open all the way. And because it swings the wrong way, she was basically sticking out in the second lane traffic while trying to unload luggage.

    Why in heck didn't they make the gate swing the other way? And, more importantly, why doesn't it swing up?

    So as of now the RAV4 is off my list, unless they revise this whole gate thing in the second year model. Otherwise, it's a nice CUV overall.
  • davesuvdavesuv Member Posts: 149
    Interesting discussions. The fact that all three vehicles are being sold and have staunch supporters tells me that each vehicle is a nice one. For many, buying a car is a very personal and satisfying experience, and it's only natural to defend your purchase decision. Since no two people are looking for exactly the same thing in a vehicle, no car can be perfect for everyone. Thank goodness we have such great choices.

    Myself, I'm going with the Santa Fe. I'm not an aggressive driver and value a quiet comfortable ride over G-force in the turns. I also don't particularly like the looks of the Cx7, which is more station wagon than SUV. I'm sure the Cx7 is a beautiful vehicle to many. I think the RAV4 looks great, but the interior is not as nice as the Santa Fe in my biased opinion. Also, I must have both the third row seating plus heated front seats in my car, and the RAV4 does not offer this combination for some reason. I'm sure I could be very happy with any one of these, the Santa Fe just fits my needs the best.
  • vbbuiltvbbuilt Member Posts: 498
    If you're willing to hold tight for awhile, look for the CX9. It won't have the right side/ wrong side gate issues. Go to the Mazda USA website and look at the pics and see if the styling is on-par with the RAV4.

    ;)

    Vince.
  • vivavegas99vivavegas99 Member Posts: 39
    Yeah I agree about the way the door opens. The funny thing is, most times I don't do any curbside parking where the door would be an issue. But at the airport I can see that. Good thing I don't go to the airport that often! For my use, that was a very small inconvenience, which is what most people have to decide before they purchase. Like my husband says, there's no such thing as a perfect car. I'll tell you this though, the V6 I have is the coolest!!! :-)
  • vivavegas99vivavegas99 Member Posts: 39
    Very well put :)
  • ergsumergsum Member Posts: 146
    Another advantage of a "lift" style rear is accessing the cargo area in bad weather conditions. Helps keep the rain off your head.
  • joe97joe97 Member Posts: 2,248
    Not sure if you were being sacarstic but those pictures I posted are all Santa Fes.

    And by the way, if I was in the market for one, my pick would be the Santa Fe, why? Aside from the styling, which is completely subjective, the functional side of things, features and other neat items in the Santa Fe make it a worth pick :)
  • joe97joe97 Member Posts: 2,248
    CX-9 is in a different class than this topic of discussion.
  • nxs138nxs138 Member Posts: 481
    It would be nice to know if the CX-7 will eventually get 3rd row seating. On the Ford Edge website they do mention it as a possible future option, so maybe it'll make its way into the CX-7. Not sure if I need all the room of a CX-9, but 3rd row seating for some occasional use (i.e. parents or friends come visit, they wouldn't have to take separate cars since we could chuck the 2 kids in the 3rd row). That's the only disadvantage of the CX-7 compared to the RAV4 (I personally like the styling of the CX-7 better, but my wife seems to lean toward the RAV4).
  • carlitos92carlitos92 Member Posts: 458
    It would be nice to know if the CX-7 will eventually get 3rd row seating.

    Good question. I was planning on buying a RAV4 with the third-row option when the CX-7 hit the market, and the Mazda's styling totally blew me away.

    The CX-9, while in the same styling vein, just doesn't seem to have the same "wow" factor at all. Throw in what appears to be a nappy Ford V-6, and I wasn't compelled to wait for the bigger CUV.

    FWIW, a friend of mine just bought a RAV4, and the third-row seat seems to eat up ALL the cargo space. That makes it useless for what I had planned to do, which is meet the inlaws at the airport with both their grandkids in tow. Sure everybody could fit, but where does their luggage go? If I had less to spend and wanted my CUV to be a drag-racer, I could do the Toyota with a V6, but for me, The CX-7 pushed all the right buttons... :)
  • vbbuiltvbbuilt Member Posts: 498
    CX-7 won't get a third row...that's why Mazda is bringing out the CX9. Almost identical styling, but just a bit larger to accomodate more passengers and will have a 250 HP MZI 3.5-liter V6 engine. More details can be found at http://www.mazdausa.com/MusaWeb/displayPage.action?pageParameter=upcomingCX9

    Vince.
  • vbbuiltvbbuilt Member Posts: 498
    You're right, but I was replying to post #132 (nxs138), who was commenting that he didn't like the RAV4 swing gate and who also was looking for a CUV with a third row. I was simply telling the poster that the CX9 will have 3rd row seating but will have a lift gate. I suggested that he may want to hold off his purchase until the CX9 comes on the market.

    Remember, this is a Mazda thread, contrasting the RAV4 and Santa Fe. So my comments were appropriate for this thread.

    Vince
  • jcspohrjcspohr Member Posts: 97
    Looks a lot like the 2007 Santa Fe IMHO.

    Better looking than CX-7. Again, just my opinion.

    JCS
  • davesuvdavesuv Member Posts: 149
    This is not a Mazda thread. It shows up under the Santa Fe and RAV4 forums as well, so is a thread common to all three vehicles and does not emphasize any one.

    Your comments were appropriate. Hopefully the goal of this thread and others is to disseminate information and varying viewpoints so as to help people select the best vehicle for their needs, whichever vehicle that may be. Posts that give facts or opinions backed up by facts and explanations are the ones I find most helpful.
  • carlitos92carlitos92 Member Posts: 458
    CX-7 won't get a third row... Well, never say never. Toyota has bigger SUVs but still brought out the third row in the RAV4. I guess my point was that it was a compromise, and in fact the CX-7 might have more space for the third row than the Toyota...

    And maybe it's a nappy MAZDA V-6... I stand corrected. :)
  • vivavegas99vivavegas99 Member Posts: 39
    The third row is more of a "bench" in the RAV4 and does take up all the cargo room. The RAV really isn't what I would consider a great vehicle for picking up large groups of people and luggage. More for 4 average sized adults (2 in front and two in second row) and cargo in the back. For someone with a family of 5 or more I would have gone with a larger vehicle. Since it is just myself and my husband this size works out great for us. Just used the cargo area this weekend with the quick release seats, they went down in a flash and folded flat. It was great! :)
  • jarekjarek Member Posts: 24
    Hyundai will be a hyundai no matter what. Even though it looked and drove better than the BMW X5.
    A qulity of the vehicle can be definied after several years of usage. With Toyota the quality is for granted. With Hyundai it is still a lottery.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Maybe it's better to take nothing for granted...

    Toyota recalls double: volume hurting quality?
  • jcspohrjcspohr Member Posts: 97
    Not sure what you are implying? Let me paraphrase your statements - if a brand had problems in the past it will always have problems? You think Hyundai quality is lesser than Toyota.

    You might want to look at the history of Japanese made vehicles (and other products for that matter).. Many years ago they were all considered crap-ola. I have fond memories of the the 70's Honda CVCC and my wife's Datsun B210 (now Nissan).

    FWIW - I agree with you about time will prove quality. For me Hyundai is not a lottery. I also own a 2001 Elantra with over 100K. It has been problem free and still looks and runs great. My 2001 Taurus SEL with only 55K on it isn't fairing as well. :(

    My 2 cents...

    JCS
  • davesuvdavesuv Member Posts: 149
    I agree. A reputation must be earned and maintained through consistent quality and reliability. Toyota and Honda have earned this reputation (and associated volume growth) after many years of proving themselves. Hyundai seems to understand this and is in the process of proving itself. Hopefully, the buyer satisfaction and reliability gains it has recently achieved will continue. Four or five years down the road, I'm hoping it too will have proven itself in the public eye and reap the volume rewards that go with it.

    For now, I'm counting on all the efforts it's made with the 07 Santa Fe. Designed in California, engineered in Ann Arbor, MI, and built in Alabama in the newest, most automated auto plant in the nation that already ranks 3rd for build quality in spite of its recent opening. If any new vehicle has a chance of being done right, I think it should be this one. I still anticipate first model year problems, similar to what Toyota or Honda have with their new cars. I just can't pass up a chance to have the latest and greatest :D , even if I'm taking a slightly greater risk than with a Highlander (which is the only other vehicle that fits my requirements).
  • vivavegas99vivavegas99 Member Posts: 39
    Hyundai definitely has a tall order trying to have as good a reputation as Honda or Toyota. If they do continue their new and improved record, maybe they might one day be up with the big dogs. Until then I stay far far away, no offense to those that own them.
  • vbbuiltvbbuilt Member Posts: 498
    I second davesuv's remarks. In addition to owning the CX7 I also own the 2004 Santa Fe. It has 60000 miles on it and still running strong. The only warranty issues that I've dealt with are nit-noid: the dash clock and a motor for the remote mirror had to be replaced.

    Vince
  • vbbuiltvbbuilt Member Posts: 498
    Is it time to add another new discussion group? Now that the Ford Edge will soon hit showrooms, it might be interesting to how this vehicle stacks up against the CX7, RAV4, and Santa Fe.

    Ford's website has extensive details and pricing. A quick glance reveals that feature for feature (as close as I could configure the Edge), the Ford comes out nearly 2 grand higher than comparably equipped CX7. Styling is OK, but it's not as sleek looking as the CX7. I'll be waiting to see the press reviews for the Edge and see the inevitable comparisons to the CX7. Consumer Reports is already making those comparisons.

    Vince
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.