Are you a current or recent car shopper who bought an EV and then installed solar – or who had solar already, making the decision to go electric easier?
Are you a recent EV buyer (past 3 months) as a result of manufacturer incentives and dealer discounts on these vehicles, including year-end deals? Were you convinced to buy an EV after finding a good end-of-year deal, or due to uncertainty around which EVs will no longer qualify for full/partial EV tax credits in 2024? A national business reporter is interested in speaking with you. Please reach out to [email protected] by 12/15 if interested in sharing your story.

Recharge Prius at Home on AC power?

jjgoodwinjjgoodwin Member Posts: 8
edited October 2014 in Toyota

I was wondering if anyone has information on recharging Prius batteries to full charge at home using AC power, but WITHOUT changing the battery set.

The idea is simple. Prius batteries are allowed to run lower than full charge to optimize fuel use. At your house electricity is cheaper than gas, so charging your car is cheaper than using the car as a generator to recharge it.

Should be pretty simple, and boost mileage a bit.

Any thoughts?



  • terry92270terry92270 Member Posts: 1,247
    Flawed theory.

    LithIon batteries are dangerous to re-charge @ home, and the car isn't designed to do that on purpose. You did not purchase an electric vehicle, but a hybrid. There is a BIG difference.

    You could have saved yourself thousands of dollars and bought a golf cart if you wanted an electric car. :P

    The prius is not made to run on electric other than backing up and starting the trip. It is made and designed to work with its ICE gasoline engine.
  • tpetpe Member Posts: 2,342
    The Prius uses NiMH batteries, not Li-ion.
  • jjgoodwinjjgoodwin Member Posts: 8
    As the other poster said, Prius uses NiMH not Lithium Ion batteries.

    Also, both of those battery materials are commonly purchased at any store in all sizes.

    Lithium Ion is not especially dangerous, if properly charged, and heat is monitored. Standard NiMH consumer grade (AA type) batteries can be recharged usually with similar or the same circuits that recharge NiCad batteries.

    I don't know if it's feasible, but I wonder if it would be possible to charge the vehicle through the 12V port while the car is "powered on". This might cause it to use the built in charge controller.

  • terry92270terry92270 Member Posts: 1,247
    Sorry to have mistyped LithIon instead of NiMH....BUT you miss the point:

    The Prius is not made to run on electricity other than backing up and starting the trip. It is made and designed to work with its ICE engine. :P
  • tpetpe Member Posts: 2,342
    Toyota is pursuing the idea of offering the Prius with PHEV capability within the next few years. It is primarily just a matter of bigger battery packs and modified software. There already is a plug-in thread that discusses this matter extensively. There are a handful of companies that will modify an existing Prius to make it a PHEV. Two major problems with this is that it is expensive, 9-12 thousand dollars, and Toyota will void your warranty. Nevertheless it has been done and, if you ignore the price for the conversion, it does result in considerable lower costs. Because, as stated earlier, grid electricity is much cheaper per mile driven than burning gasoline.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I somewhat agree. The Prius is already over weight for the suspension and tires. Enough batteries to give any reasonable distance would really make it too heavy for the less than great brakes it has.

    As far as Li-Ion batteries being safe. They have critical parameters that have to be followed or they can become dangerous. Ask the 4.1 million Dell laptop owners with Sony Li-Ion batteries being recalled.
  • jjgoodwinjjgoodwin Member Posts: 8
    I'm not really looking to run the Prius only on batteries.

    I'm just thinking since the Prius doesn't top off the batteries, because then it'll have no room to use things like regenerative braking, it might be good to fully charge it at night, and then the first mile or so could be on batteries since I live in a residential area, where I have many turns, and must go slow speeds.

    It wouldn't be much, but I figured if it was easy to do once I park in my garage, it would be a little extra every day.

    Basically, the way I see it. If you don't introduce outside power, all the power that goes into the batteries comes (at some point) from gasoline. If you put some power in from the outside, it won't need to charge the batteries.

    I'm not looking to replace the batteries, or make an all electric vehicle. I *was* thinking I could plug it in, recharge it at night, and get cheap costs on the next mile or two worth of driving.

    This is not crucial, as 45-60mpg, you are starting to split hairs when you don't have a daily commute (although I'm 20 miles from any well-known stores).
  • pathstar1pathstar1 Member Posts: 1,015
    The Prius battery can be recharged at home. Search the net and you'll find the special 200V charger required. You can't charge the "traction battery" from the 12V system, though you can charge the 12V battery from the 208 V system.

    What you have to realize is the current car is a "system". All parts are interrelated. The system is designed to maintain the "traction battery" between 30 and 70% charge. There are several reasons for this:
    1. Stopping charging at 70% allows "headroom" to recover kinetic energy via regenerative braking - accounting for about 20% of the fuel savings the car manages. If the battery ends up with too much charge the system will "dump" the energy - resulting in poorer mileage.
    2. Keeping the traction battery between 30 and 70% charge lengthens battery life - a lot. When you charge a NiMH battery above 70% charge it starts to convert a lot of the charge energy to heat - and that is the enemy of most batteries and this type in particular. That's why most "rapid chargers" you can find shut down "rapid charge" mode at 70-80% charge and switch to "trickle charge" mode. If you get them too hot they will vent gas and electrolyte - and very little of that will leave them as dead weight.
    3. If you try to run on battery power only it will take you a few miles. It's a "small" battery in the world of electric cars. Charging it to full would add perhaps one or two miles to its' range. Not really worth it considering the down side - shortened life.

    What some have done is increase the battery size by adding another in parallel. This allows more energy to be stored and a longer range on electric mode (search for EV switch), making electric mode almost practical for short runs for groceries, for example. The extra battery capacity also allows capture of more kinetic energy via regenerative braking. This has reportedly improved mileage into the 100 MPG range. It has also added weight - about 70-80 lbs for the extra battery, and loss of some cargo room.
    Generally you wouldn't want to parallel batteries, as one tends to get overcharged and the other undercharged - not the best situation for battery life, but because the Prius operates the battery in the 30-70% charge range this doesn't seem to cause problems.

    The rumour is the 2008 Prius will have home charging capability and a larger capacity battery - perhaps a lithium ion type to decrease weight and volume. We shall see.
  • terry92270terry92270 Member Posts: 1,247
    Many things have been done, including making cars that run on Hydrogen. Much better, only they EXPLODE in accidents! :P

    If you ignore the price of conversion, that is lunacy. If you consider the real-world, not the fantasy one that may come someday, conversion and electricity is hugely more expensive than gas. The future will most likely belong to Hydrogen, not some fantasy battery that is light weight and powers a Navigator! ;)
  • tpetpe Member Posts: 2,342
    conversion and electricity is hugely more expensive than gas

    You are hugely wrong. Most Americans right now are spending around $2000 per year on gas. The cost of using electricity would be roughly a third of that. With savings of $1300 per year you can pay for a lot of conversion. The cost of additional battery capacity would be considerably less expensive if the car was originally manufactured that way rather than having to be converted.
  • jjgoodwinjjgoodwin Member Posts: 8
    Do bear in mind, when calculating the savings of gas, when starting from a car over 45mpg, you aren't really saving as much as you say.

    If you really did spend $2000/yr in gas while driving a Prius, you would be driving at least about 30k miles/yr if you only got 45mpg, at 60mpg, you'd be driving 40k miles/yr.

    At that point, maybe it's better to spend money on comfort, because you are saving, bed, and housing costs, because you probably *live* in your Prius.
  • terry92270terry92270 Member Posts: 1,247
    Well, once again, I must say that is a foolish argument.

    Are you prepared to day it costs the United States nothing in resources to generate that electricity for you, no matter what you pay for it? What about the secondary generation pollution? :surprise:

    In most areas of the country, producers can barely keep pace with current demand, let along adding hundreds of thousands plugging in high-voltage chargers.

    If the idea is one of saving resources, in total, rather than the selfish interests of just one or two users, one must look at everything.

    While you are obviously, and laudably committed to alternative energy, please understand that MOST users will not be willing to keep their speed down below 50MPH, not run their air conditioning and all the other electronics they have grown used to. Not to mention the rather limited cruising range, and the hassle of plugging in, or for that matter, finding a place to do so. ;)
  • tpetpe Member Posts: 2,342
    That's a very valid point and its why it makes more sense to incorporate this type of technology in an SUV or truck. Far greater gas savings, low end torque and the extra weight doesn't seem as significant. Its also why I never understood the popularity of the Prius. A Prius has roughly the same utility as a Corolla, which is a vehicle that already got very good mpg. It seems this would be the last type of car that hybrid technology would make its way into since it would take the longest to recover the additional costs. It turns out to be just the opposite.
  • terry92270terry92270 Member Posts: 1,247
    I agree.

    Most using Hybrids today should be doing so to make a statement, not seeking "savings".

    I view it more as offering financial encouragement to the auto companies to stick with alternative fuel development, and don't make a game of coasting, driving very slowly, not running the AC, etc.

    If one wants to actually save resources and their cost of transportation, currently one would be far better off buying any car with excellent gas mileage than a hybrid.
  • tpetpe Member Posts: 2,342
    You clearly don't understand what the technology is capable of.

    No special high voltage charger is needed. A standard 110v home outlet will suffice. I'm guessing the process of plugging in will be less than 30 seconds, not much of a hassle. That time is probably more than offset by the time saved in fewer stops to the gas station.

    If the recharging is done at night it is beneficial to the utilities due to load levelling. At least that's what the people that run these utilities say and they embrace PHEVs.

    You don't need to drive below 50 mph. Even at speeds above that some of your propulsion is from the electric motors.

    Around 55% of the electricity in this country is generated by burning coal, which probably is as dirty as burning gasoline. The rest is considerable cleaner. So 55% of the time you are polluting as much as the gas burner, the rest of the time you are not. Still a big improvement and we don't have to import coal.
  • terry92270terry92270 Member Posts: 1,247
    Well, I will bow out of this discussion as you are clearly off on a tangent, some moral and political tirade.

    Most of us live in the real world, and cannot rely on what might be, or could be. You have a lot of "ifs" in your theories. You received a good answer as to why re charging and topping off the battery is bad, so nothing more needs to be said on that score.

    Good luck in your modifications! :)
  • crashqcrashq Member Posts: 5
    I think the "savings" aspect is not nearly what some people think. Most consumer organizations have even stated that you won't get any savings with a hybrid currently. You have to figure in replacement battery costs etc. The more you charge a battery the faster it will need replacement. I haven't seen any estimates on electric vehicles since teh EV-1 wen belly up, but I suspect the cost isn't any lower than the hybrids.

    That said, I see no problems with the enviro-statement, or reducing gasoline consuomtion. (there is still pollution from the power plant used to make electricity though).

    Buy the charger, charge it to 70% and let us know what the result is.
  • pathstar1pathstar1 Member Posts: 1,015
    Sigh, the poor misunderstood Prius. ;)
    Go have a good look at one.

    First, on the outside, it's about the same size as a Corolla, as you compared it to. On the inside it's about the same size as a Camry. Check the specs. Same cargo capacity, same passenger room (within 0.5 cu ft).

    The Prius will go about 130% farther on a gallon (or litre) of gas. Maybe more, if driven "correctly". Don't accuse me of comparing the mileage of the "highmilers", I'm just looking at what posters to this and other forums are claiming. Even if you tried to "highmile" a Corolla, you wouldn't increase mileage more than about 20% - the Prius can and does much better than 50% increase when driven that way.

    Much of the appeal, for me, anyway, is the car is "electronic". It even has an "on/off" switch! Cool technology.

    My friend keeps saying it's too expensive compared to "normal" cars. What "normal" cars? If we compare to cars with equivalent usable space, such as the Camry, the cost is about the same. In fact, owners of both cars report when they go to pick up "goods", they take the Prius. When they go on long trips, they take the Camry. They say they can get a lot more into the Prius, even though on paper they are about the same size space wise.

    The cost of ownership appears to be much less. Currently resale value is phenomenal.

    It's just cool technology. Further incentive is the perception that Prius drivers must be environmentally responsible.

    Of course, if none of this turns your crank, then it's obviously not the car for you.
  • tpetpe Member Posts: 2,342
    I think that if you looked at the demographics of people purchasing these hybrids you'd conclude that they're probably smart enough to realize it isn't a money saving proposition. It doesn't matter to them. They probably also recycle, there's no money in that.
  • moonkidmoonkid Member Posts: 6
    HOw about slot cars?
    Run on electricity
    could charge while they drive on the freeway
    Have small battery for say 20 miles independent driving.
    Charge at work, store, home, and solar panels.
    One hops in the car, drives to the freeway, plugs in the slot, reads a book, 30miles later gets out of the slot, drives 5 miles to work on local roads.
    A computer on the car could calculate electricity usage and you could pull into a station once a month to pay your bill.
    what do you think?
  • tpetpe Member Posts: 2,342
    You've totally misjudged where I'm coming from. I have nothing against the Prius. Well that's not true. I don't particularly like its styling. I am surprised to find out that it has more room than a Corolla. I drove a Corolla for a couple of years and averaged around 35 mpg, combined city and highway. It was a totally competent vehicle. I'd say that back then I used about 400 gallons of gas per year (14,000 miles) so today that would cost me around $1200/year. If I had been driving a Prius that got 50 mpg I would have spent $840 on gas for a savings of $360, not bad.

    Here's my point and I'm sure you've heard it before. If instead of my Corolla I had been driving a 15 mpg SUV that could have gotten 18 mpg with hybrid technology the dollar savings would have been $470, around 30% greater. So I guess the message is that people who drive trucks really don't care all that much about mileage to begin with, which is why they haven't embraced hybrid technology even though from a dollars and cents perspective they'd be the biggest beneficiaries.
  • tpetpe Member Posts: 2,342
    I'm with you on this one. I actually believe that once electric vehicles(EVs) become more prevalant someone will devise a way for them to charge as they go on specialized lanes. I don't know if it will be slots but the idea is basically the same. That would totally eliminate the criticism regarding their limited range.
  • pathstar1pathstar1 Member Posts: 1,015
    Except I think people still misunderstand the Prius. It's not an electric vehicle. It's a gasoline powered vehicle that uses hybrid technology to improve efficiency. ALL it's motive power comes from gas.
    The improved efficiency comes from:
    1. Use of regenerative braking to recover ordinarily lost energy.
    2. Because of the power plant design, it can shut down the "ICE" (internal combustion engine) when it's not needed to provide power.
    3. Because of the presence of the MG (motor generator) to enhance power, the ICE could be designed to optimize efficiency (atkinson cycle - lower power output).
    4. Use of a CVT (continuously variable transmission) to optimize the output of the ICE.
  • tpetpe Member Posts: 2,342
    I think people are pretty aware of what the Prius is. It does have a battery pack and it does have an electric motor, the two components required for an electric vehicle. If the battery pack on a Prius is always charged between 30-70% then there is always some capacity to store additional energy that can come from an outside source. This new energy could then be used to power the car, i.e. it would now be able to go farther. Whether or not this is a good idea or whether it will void the warranty are separate issues. In the case of the Prius the battery pack is so small any additional distance gained would be negligible. I'd guess that if you charged the battery from 70% to 100% you would now have maybe 1/2 mile of all electric driving before you were back down to the 70% charge that you started with.
  • jjgoodwinjjgoodwin Member Posts: 8
    I searched for hours and couldn't find a separate charger that specifically said it would recharge the prius batteries.

    Recharging to 70% is fine for me.

    Any ideas/links to find the charger for sale?

    To be clear, people keep talking about electric vehicles, or modifications. I *do not* want to modify my prius, nor try to drive it as an electric car. I just thought it would be nice to drive the first mile or two each trip on electricity, since I must maintain slow speeds (~25mph) for about 4 miles anyway.

    For people who get on some rant about switching from one form of pollution to another, perhaps this is not really a good forum to rant in, since a Prius is a small car, and you would charge at night, I don't think it would "load down" our power grids. I'm also not looking to drive more than a few miles on electric.

    If someone comes up with a way for $500-$800 or so to drive 10 miles on electric at <35mph which goes into the Prius, even if it is fully house charged, I'd be interested, but so far everything I've seen is $3k-$12.5k which is not appealing in the least.

  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Any modification you do to a Prius hybrid system will void the warranty without a doubt. If you live in CA that is 10 years or 150k from new. The only way I would consider it is if I bought an old Prius that needed a new battery anyway. Then you could justify spending the money. You could probably pick up an out of warranty Prius for near nothing. There is one being offered on eBay with 110k miles for $4295 "buy it now". Says in perfect condition. Not salvage titled. Take it and invest 12 grand in Li-Ion batteries and a 110 volt charger and you may be the envy of Edmund's.
  • midnightcowboymidnightcowboy Member Posts: 1,978
    "I think that if you looked at the demographics of people purchasing these hybrids you'd conclude that they're probably smart enough to realize it isn't a money saving proposition. "

    LOL the selling point of Hybrids is that they have high gas mileage and therefore it is implied they save money!

    However, if you look at objective reviews on mileage measurements even the mileage savings is suspect.


  • midnightcowboymidnightcowboy Member Posts: 1,978
    Host --

    You have two threads that appear to be the same. May be they should be combined.

    Look at thread "Plug-in Hybrids"

    Cheers and Power-On'

  • acdiiacdii Member Posts: 753
    I drive an F350 Dually Crewcab diesel Pickup. I just bought a Prius and with the amount of miles I drive each week just to go to work, the savings are about $500-600 a month, or so I figured, only time will tel for sure. Your statement regarding people who drive big truck dont think about mileage is false. Most people who drive big trucks have an ego issue, and dont care that they are dishing out huge bucks to drive their ego mobile around. OTOH, people like me who have the truck because I NEED the truck, I have horses, would LOVE to have a diesel hybrid that got 30% better fuel economy. Currently my 8000# truck averages 14 -18 MPG depending on weather and traffic, highway close to 20MPG. Diesel is a very efficient system, and if the Prius was diesel we would be looking at better acceleration and getting at least 60 MPG city instead of the actual 48. Highway would be considerably higher as well. We really need to have more diesel cars out there, but people have this impression that diesel is dirty etc, when in fact it is cleaner than gasoline cars, especially when properly driven and well maintained. Check out the new Mercedes benz E series diesel, it gets better EPA ratings than most hybrids, including the Camry and Accord. The new Particulate filters get rid of the PM that you see coming out of the tail pipes of trucks, the black smoke, which is really the only bad part of the diesel, and what most people dont realize is the particles from that smoke fall to the ground, and dont hang in the air like the exhaust fumes from cars do. Ever been behind a car that the driver mashed the accelerator on? That stinks worse than my truck under a hard load, and guess what, those hydrocarbons are what go UP into the atmosphere. The only true bad emission from a diesel is increased Nox emmisions when too much heat is applied to the fuel, from too much boost, or fuel delivery for increased horsepower. A properly tuned and driven diesel produces less NOX, CO, and CO2, than the newest ULEV gas engine. The newest diesel, with the EPA junk added on meets the same levels as the Prius does.

    If more SUV's, cars and trucks were diesels, they would get better EPA ratings, and put out fewer emmisions, people will just have to deal with the smell of the fuel itself, as the tail pipe smell is gone now from the new diesels.
  • jg6jg6 Member Posts: 70
    No Way!!

    The Camry has over 5% more passenger volume and over 4% more cargo space.

    You should have stuck with the "about" the same size.....
  • roland3roland3 Member Posts: 431
    ... acdii, the NOX is created by heat and pressure in the combustion chamber. The temp of the fuel preinjection is almost a nonfactor, other than if it is too cold it does not combust as well. Actually I would like to see some studies done on the fuel starting at 300 F. but ALL the manus seem to fear their fuel system components. The NOX is one of God's cruel little jokes, as heat, pressure, compression gives us efficiency and power especially in Diesel.
    ... NOX, might not be the worse thing to breath, as compared to CO, HC and particulate but creates the BROWN haze and receives the most attention. I am for clean air but I think exhasut gas recirculation is not the way to obtain it. For one thing in a big truck it takes fifteen more horsepower to drive the fan with an EGR system. This is a big problem for thirty years because CARB and EPA measure exhaust gas quality and NOT quantity. Not to mention that many of these EGR systems are failure prone a few years down the road. I believe that air quality will follow fuel efficiency.
  • chadxchadx Member Posts: 153
    I just got back from our annual trip to Germany (we have family there) and rented a BMW 1 series for a 300 mile one-way trip up north. It had the small diesel engine. With the manual tranny, the acceleration was nice and zippy, though it took some adjustment to get used to the redline being so low for a small car. Maybe 5k rpm.

    On our drive, I averaged between 90 - 110 mph with plenty of runs up to 120mph (and I was getting passed liked crazy) and still pulled over 40 miles to the gallon (I had to convert from metric, etc). That car is rated at 50mpg highway, and I'm sure it would get it at legal U.S. speeds. They have an even smaller diesel that is rated at 60mpg. BMW is also making changes this year to improve the hp rating 10 - 15% but still increase mileage 15%, so the 1 series will be even better. All this without any hybrid technology. Oh, and they meet all tier 2 emission requirements quite handely. It's definitely a "consumer perception" issue, in this country, regarding diesel power and it's performance, cleanlyness, etc.
  • colonel570colonel570 Member Posts: 2
    I am looking at purhasing a 2001 Prius with 142k miles. The guy I am going to buy this car from said:

    The car had some kind of failure, so he towed it to the dealer.

    This is what he told me:

    The lights do come on the computers
    > are all energized. It gives an error code that the Toyota
    > mechanic says indicates the main battery. It is a different
    > code than what it gave when the inverter was bad. It will
    > not start since the electric motor is the starter also. Yes
    > I am sure that you can replace the main battery(which is
    > called the traction battery by Toyota) and it should be
    > fine. The mechanic at Toyota said that he thought that the
    > battery that is in it would be ok if it were charged. I am
    > just relating what I have been told. I really do not know
    > anything about these cars. You are welcome to look at it for
    > yourself. I am sure if you know about these cars you can fix
    > it but I do not know how. The mechanic who did some of the
    > work on it was going to buy it but he has lost his job and
    > moved out of state.

    Let me know what you guys think about this car. I think it has been sitting for about a year.

    ANY advice would be wonderful and helpful!


    PS I really want one of these I just can't afford a new one!
  • stevegoldstevegold Member Posts: 185
    Stay away from that car. The 2001-2003 were no good to start with. Poor performance, poor milage, lousy cabin. If it was a 2004 or newer, I might take a shot.
  • coontie66coontie66 Member Posts: 110
    I guess one of the first things I would do is to find out the cost to replace the battery. I have heard several figures but not from Toyota.

    When I think of these Hybrids I immediately think of the childrens game where there are 11 kids and 10 chairs. Ring around the ROSEY is what we called it. Whoever is left holding the car when the battery needs replacing is in trouble.
  • colonel570colonel570 Member Posts: 2
    Does anyone have anything helpful to say? I know how much the batterys cost at the dealer, I can also buy them off ebay for $1500. I am wondering if anyone else has had this problem and is it possible to repair this battery at home using parts purchased off ebay or getting a battery from a junkyard or is it possible to charge the battery or is it possible to recharge the battery using the onboard generator rolling it down a long hill? I dunno I am just thinking out loud.
  • stevegoldstevegold Member Posts: 185
    Forget about Plug In Hybrids for a few years unless your driving is limited to 5-10 mile round trips. The present Prius traction battery will get you 1 mile if you're lucky. A $10,000 retrofit will get you maybe 10-15 miles before the ICE takes over or you have to recharge. My 2004 Prius, with EV, goes about 1/2 mile. Jim Woolsey, former CIA Director, has a specially modified Prius that gets him 40 miles to work where he recharges to get home. He would not estimate what the conversion cost. It was done at government expense and takes up the entire trunk and back seat. For very short trips get an golf cart or an electric car. A natural gas/ICE would be a logical replacement for a gasoline/ICE.
  • dmathews3dmathews3 Member Posts: 1,739
    Just curious, you say you can go about a 1/2 mile on just the electric at what speed? Also Ford says up to 47 on theirs in which I can get about 44 or so for about close to a mile but trying to watch the road and the fancy dash makes it hard to tell for sure also that is using the ice to get to 50 and let it coast down to 44 where the ice shuts off and electric takes over. One thing I have never got it up to 47 from a dead stop as I just haven't had the time to find a lonely flat road nor the time plus we got it for our family car and mpg wasn't our first priority.
  • john1701ajohn1701a Member Posts: 1,897
    >> Does anyone have anything helpful to say?

    I owned one for 3 years before upgrading, then recently upgrading again.

    The 2001 was really nice. Not sure what the "poor" judgement was in comparison to. Performance was fine (never any trouble merging) and mileage was too (45.4 MPG average for 59,827 miles).
  • john1701ajohn1701a Member Posts: 1,897
    >> Just curious, you say you can go about a 1/2 mile on just the electric at what speed?

    42 MPH is the threshold for the models thru 2009.

    46 MPH for the 2010.

    62.1 MPH (100 km/h) for the plug-in.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    "..8000# truck.."

    When all you really need, seem to need, is a horse trailer and the ability to tow it.

    Most any 3000# vehicle can do that quite handily.

    "...If more....were diesels.."

    Exactly where gasoline engine technology is "taking" us, gasoline engines that run in diesel, compression ignition, mode part of the time.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    " in trouble.."

    That depends on the level of investment, purchase price, and the miles already driven.

    Not really much different, "investment wise" from having to refill the gas tank once it has been drained, or overhauling the engine once the need arises, or even needing a new set of tires.
  • stevegoldstevegold Member Posts: 185
    The EV circuit is programmed to turn itself off above 32 mph or if you floor the gas pedal. That would of course be modified upward with a Li-on or other better traction battery but it will take while for a really better Plug in System to make sense.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    Actually the thing that makes little sense about home charging is the inability to put more than ~1/2 gallon, 20 miles, in the "tank".
  • dmathews3dmathews3 Member Posts: 1,739
    I am finding out one thing about my Fusion Hybrid now that winter is fast approching and the temps at night are down in the teens is that my factory installed block heater is making a real difference for me. Even though mine is in a garage plugging it in on a timer for about 3 or so hours before I leave for work has made a huge difference. Without it I'd back out and drive the less than 3 miles to work and the electric would never kick in and I'd get about 18 mpg would show on my display. Just by plugging in the block heater the electric would kick in about 2 miles or less and I'd go up to about 29 mpg and accorss town I can get about 48 depending on traffic. I know it isn't as much as the Prius but hey it weighs about 1K more and has more HP on both engines so I expect worse.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    And in the process you may be slowly destroying your catalytic converter.

    "...block heater.." "..electric would kick in.."

    Not so much as the electric kicking in as the ICE more quickly shutting down. Quick ICE shutdown due to the ECU thinking the short ICE operation was sufficient to have raised the calatyst to operational temperature, ~800F.

    More likely than otherwise, It wasn't.

    Use of the block heater to preheat the engine, ONLY the engine, FOOLS the control ECU into thinking the catalyst has been raised to operational temperature when in reality it isn't.
  • dmathews3dmathews3 Member Posts: 1,739
    So why is it an option on most vehicles? I find it hard to believe that auto manufacturers would sell it if they in turn are going to have to replace a bunch of cataliystic convertors.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    Factory option, ACTUAL factory option, or dealer installed..?

    Thoughtlessness on the part of the dealer if so.

    The TRADITIONAL, historical, use of a block heaters was/is RARE and for use ONLY on extremely COLD nights such as one might encounter in MT, ND, or AK.

    If the HSD block heater were to be used as above the manufacturer's thinking might be all well and good. It might have never occurred to the factory engineers that a block heater might be "abused" in the manner many now seem to be doing.

    I have been in AK at times when even a block heater wasn't sufficient to allow you to start the car and simply drive away. The power stearing fluid was often frozen/congealed so I would go out and start the car for pre-warming and then go back in and have breakfast.
  • dmathews3dmathews3 Member Posts: 1,739
    All I can do is go by the seat of my pants. It improves my fuel economy, some of the other Prius forums speak highly of them, the Ford Escape ordered in the far northern states and Canada according to posters on other forems claim they come with the heater, I got it as an option. My last question is what are your qualifications that you can say they aren't good and I need facts to back up your claims.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    Why do I need qualification..??

    Do your own qualifying.

    With the block heater NOT being used to preheat the ICE the ICE will run for an extended period before allowing electric only mode.

    When the block heater is used to preheat the ICE it shuts off much earlier.

    Absent the need for the ICE to run to recharge the battery, which is clearly not always the case, what other reason is there for running the ICE for an extended period...??

    Passenger heat/comfort...?? Then it wouldn't do that on a hot day and it clearly does,


    Known FACT, WELL known fact. Most new cars will not shift into OD until you drive 3-5 miles and the catalyst is heated to operational temperature.

    You do the "math".
This discussion has been closed.