By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Regards,
OW
For those who think that people who drive Infinitis and Acuras wont look at this car I think you have to look at cars like the CTS, Enclave and 300C for reference. when a well designed American car comes out it usually gets some attention from import owners. When the 300C was new there were stories about people trading in German and Japanese cars for it because it offered so much space, power and style for the money.
As another point of comparison:
I test drove 3 different M45s – each the Sport model – before settling on my Corvette last Fall.
I decided to spend a little time looking at how the G8 would seem ( based on preliminary information ) to stack up on specifications, since I was quite impressed with many dynamic aspects of the M.
I hereby acknowledge that the M45, at just over $50K for the Sport model, is not a direct competitor to the G8 GT \ V8. So, there. But anyway:
Weight appears similar – The M45 is just over 4,000.
And it did handle reasonably well, as far as I could tell in my test drives.
( I never really push for anything like maximum cornering speeds on a test drive. )
The M45 Sport rides on 245/40x19s – where the G8 looks like it will have exactly the same sized rubber.
And the G8’s near equal F\R weight distribution is clearly a positive.
And specifying an LSD is a “good thing”.
The 5 speed manumatic trans. in the M45 is one reason that I decided against the M. The trans. behavior was actually OK. But. I happen to have a ( not very rational, but very strong ) preference for low RPM at cruising speeds. My Corvette shows just over 1,500 RPM at 70. The M is geared for 2,300 RPM at 60 ( and close to 2,700 at 70 ) and I simply find that engine speed “too high” – for me. Not that the motor will not happily turn those RPM – and Infiniti seems confident that the motor will last. At least for the duration of their warrantee period: 6 years \ 70,000 miles, as I recall.
GM, obviously, will be warranting their drivetrain for 5 \ 100,000.
Partly due to this gearing, the M45’s EPA highway MPG rating ( 23, under the “old scheme”, for 2007 & 21 for 2008 ) is not particularly impressive. The G8 posts 23, under the new 2008 testing procedures. Two more MPG = almost 10% better fuel mileage.
One big contributing factor to the M45’s acceleration ( satisfying, for a fairly large 4-door sedan, typically posting high – or even mid-13s at something over 100 in the quarter mile ) is the relatively aggressive gearing. And gearing that requires no 2-3 shift before completing the 0-60 run, and no 3-4 shift before the end of the quarter mile.
The HP \ TQ ratings for the M45’s V8 are: 335 \ 340. ( Premium )
The G8 is 361 \ 385. ( Regular )
With a bit less weight, but also with substantially less aggressive final drive gearing, I still wonder what the actual, independent test numbers for the US G8 GT will finally be. The 6L80 does provide a reasonable overall first gear ratio ( 2.92 final times 4.03 first gear = 11.76 to 1 ) but the M45 overall is 12.87 to 1. Hmm. And second for the M is 2.37 and 7.96 overall – vs the G8’s second gear of 2.36, but 6.89.
My ** GUESS **, based on all this ( certainly does not qualify as real ‘analysis’ ) is that the G8 GT \ V8 with automatic will end up posting very similar numbers to the M45 for 0-60 & the quarter mile.
- Ray
Still interested . . .
= = =
Gearing.
M45:
Final drive: 3.36:1
Top gear ( fifth ): 0.83
G8:
Final drive ( A6 ): 2.92
Top gear ( sixth ): 0.67
[ fifth = 0.85 ]
Length.
M45: 192.6
G8: 196.1
Wheelbase.
M45: 114.2
G8: 114.8
Width.
M45: 70.8
G8: 74.8
That is my biggest weakness...
(( In the car realm. ))
- Ray
TQ addict - - - seeking 12 step program...
No known cure. Best you can do is diesel.
Regards,
OW
Indeed.
Regards,
OW
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
Over 30 MPG on the highway is real tempting at this class of car.
Regards,
OW
If Pontiac bets it's sales on the G8 replacing the GP or Bonneville do you think the sales numbers will match?
Regards,
OW
If the dealers feel they are trying to compete with the "luxury" brands and thus keep the prices high, volume low, the car will flop like the GTO.
If they see it as a pedestrian car and try to get as many out on the street ala Charger, then we'll see them all over.
Only time will tell.
-mike
Motorsports and Modifications Host
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
As for the GTO, there are still brand new GTOs sitting on lots here in NY/NJ. I almost picked one up for about $23k over the summer.
If the dealers sell em at a resonable price and go for volume the car will do well.
-mike
Motorsports and Modifications Host
Here is a problem I see happening...
A dealer knows he's gonna get 2 G8 GTs for the entire year. He says well let's make sure we make $ on them so we'll do MSRP+$5k "market adjustment". They then sit on the car until the one sucker comes along to pay for it. This would essentially make the car flop IMHO because people will look at it and say "I'm not paying $5k over msrp for a pontiac". Then GM turns around and says "oh no, look the G8 is failing, guess we'll stop selling em here since they aren't selling" and the circular reasoning goes on...
Hopefully this doesn't happen, but I could see it happening.
-mike
Motorsports and Modifications Host
The G8 and the Commodore will be built in the same Australian plant, with the facility running at full steam to a tune of 620 units per day. About half of that number will make its way outside of OZ, split between Chevrolet (Middle East), Vauxhall (UK), Daewoo (Korea), and Pontiac. That probably doesn't make room for more than 50,000 G8s a year here in the States, and in the unlikely event the sports sedan isn't a hit, GM can shift sales anywhere else in the world.
That speaks of limited demand so hard to get in yr1. Looks like GTO numbers to me.
Regards,
OW
Cars like this (the 300C comes to mind) come along from time to time amidst a flurry of 'return to our roots' hoopla and favorable 'enthusiast' reviews and then it turns out that they are the same POSs they always were - or are, at best, unremarkable - by any definition.
-mike
Motorsports and Modifications Host
Regards,
OW
except for the fact they never imported 50k GTOs as someone stated recently. The GTO was only supposed to sell about 20k a year. Its not the same thing. I love how everyone is ignoring the GTO's lack of a base model and $33k starting price. Do you think that may have had a little to do with its sales?
-mike
Motorsports and Modifications Host
A little...the rest was the $3K premium tacked on to the sticker price and the bland design. Bottom line, low sales.
I am not ignoring the base model and lower price points. It's the supply vs. demand that will be the factor and the allocations to dealers, wait time after order, etc.
50K is the estimate...let's see what comes in.
Regards,
OW
Regards,
OW
Yet the Corvette C6 has endured all of these. And still sells in decent numbers – for such a specialized ( and relatively expensive ) car.
Will some dealers try to sell G8s for over MSRP: Almost certainly the answer will be ‘yes’. At least initially. Given the current state of franchise law in the US, there is almost nothing GM \ Pontiac can do about that.
Some buyers ( still ) order without a test drive. Foolish though that may be.
There is currently a “waiting list” at most BMW dealers for a new M3.
Although we will not know for some time if we are already ( by the ‘official’ definition ) in a Recession, there are clear signs that our economy has some trouble. And sales of cars like the Corvette, that are discretionary purchases, are impacted earlier rather than later.
Will demand for a G8 GT be impacted? We just do not know.
We could speculate endlessly here – but I am just waiting to see how it plays out.
- Ray
Interested, but not obsessing . . .
2. We all know GM nor Chrysler nor Toyota can exceed Hyundai in bang for the buck. If you think the Genesis whips the 300/G8 in value you should compare it to the GS350 or M35 since they are far more expensive.
3. Until we know final pricing on the Genesis we need to hold off on saying how its totally superior to the G8. The starting price is likely to be $29,995 but with options I suspect it will hit $40k or more. The G8 tops out at about $34k which isnt bad at all.
4. Chrysler upgraded the interior of the 300 for 2008 and it seems to be a little more luxurious. I agree the base model 300 is pretty spartan but the loaded interior with nav and tortoise shell trim isnt all that bad.
I would love to drive a BMW that was the size and had the power of a G8, but it would cost far more than I could afford. I guess that's the point; The G8 appears to have more than adequate quality, plus the size and performance I desire at a price I can easily afford.
This is what we are all hoping for, myself included. I could definitely see one of these in my driveway IF and this is a BIG IF, the quality is up there.
-mike
Motorsports and Modifications Host
the Lexus/Infinit/BMW etc etc. buyer is not going to be caught dead in anything that says 'Hyundai' or 'Pontiac' on it regardless of how good they may or may not be. Therefore the Genesis is not competing with those high end cars, but down (several) notches and squarely in the G8s ballpark. If Hyundai tries to market the Genesis as some sort of 'poor man's' Bimmer it will fall on deaf ears, forcing those traditional Korean car discounts (and resale values) so that even if it does sticker at $40k for the V8 model it will still drive out in G8 (and 300) territory. If the G8 V8 tops out at $34k as you suggest - and sells for that - so will the Genesis.
And sure the Toyotas/Nissans/Hondas of the world have no desire to compete on a 'lowest common denominator' basis like this, they don't need to - something about knowing about how to make a profit selling cars
I always see the concept of "hard plastic" being used to diminish the perception of a certain car.
Maybe I've not been in enough luxury vehicles, but have a few questions about things I read.
Do some car manufacturers use soft plastic? If so, what is the advantage?
Or are the surfaces covered in other materials, such as metal, cloth, leather, etc..
Is wood necessary for a car to be a luxury model?
Thanks for the information.
From the G8 pics I've seen online and video on youtube, seems to me that the 'plastics' as you guys refer it to, is pretty good considering the garbage from Big 3. If the plastics are that of the CTS, then it will be good. I don't know much about Australian market but I would think since they have a much competitive market with vehicles we don't get; there has to be a reason it's won so many awards, including Car of the Year (overseas) - and that's not solely based on the performance bang for the buck.
Paisan a 'Host'? When did this happen?
Man, I've been gone that long? I guess I better visit more often to 'witness' Dr.Frill become a Host too. Not that this is a bad thing..
Any ways, I am more in line for a new Camaro...
BL.
Welcome back Bruce Lee!
Well several factors beside the interior and build quality (the driveline will already be suiteable, that's a given and the strong suit of the G8) and several of these factors stopped me from getting the GTO:
o Aftermarket availability of things such as Bilstien Shocks, Koni Sport Shocks, Big Brake kits, Springs, etc etc.
o Ability to put on a wider rear tire, GTO had this issue that you couldn't put on a tire much wider than stock w/o mauling the fenders.
o Handling ability, braking ability, coupled with ride quality.
o Final pricing of the G8 GT 6MT.
-mike
Motorsports and Modifications Host
Just because Hyundai would like to think that the Genesis is some sort of competitor to some cars that are $20k+ more, doesn't make it so. The Korean marketing depts. will learn this soon enough as Hyundai's 'overambitions' are exposed.. As I said earlier, somebody that might spend $60 or $70k on a 550/M45/GS is going to have no interest in the Genesis (or a G8/300). The Genesis/G8/300 also have something else in common - none of them are (or will be) cars to be 'lusted' after - in the same way that the others might be.