Mazda3 vs Nissan Sentra
![radical_dreame](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/02d226f01396e77fa7841c5ccdb7791b/?default=https%3A%2F%2Fvanillicon.com%2Ff502ffe29a9b437abd88cbdf104b6642_200.png&rating=g&size=200)
Please help me convince my brother to buy a 2004 Mazda 3 over a 2002 Nissan Sentra. Please!
My family is currently car shopping and for some weird reason my brother to get a nissan sentra. Ugggg. Ewwwww.
Anyways, the one he found is 2002 Nissan Sentra with 40K miles for $9,000.
I found a 2002 Mazda 3 S, with 20k miles for 15,000. Please what do i need to do to convince him. We gotta travel 100 miles to test drive both.
Also what do i need to do to convince my parents that the 3 is much better than the sentra even with that huge price difference.
My family is currently car shopping and for some weird reason my brother to get a nissan sentra. Ugggg. Ewwwww.
Anyways, the one he found is 2002 Nissan Sentra with 40K miles for $9,000.
I found a 2002 Mazda 3 S, with 20k miles for 15,000. Please what do i need to do to convince him. We gotta travel 100 miles to test drive both.
Also what do i need to do to convince my parents that the 3 is much better than the sentra even with that huge price difference.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
just my opinion though!
-thene
Sentra will deliver better mpg, Mazda 3 will deliver better handling.
Other than personal preference, what is your argument for or against each vehicle?
either way, i think a lot of it will have to do on how much your bro wants to spend, and what you can negotiate for prices on the two cars.
Good luck!
The Sandman
Wow, that's cheap. The base Mazda3 i with a 5-speed manual started at $15,150. The Mazda3 i Touring with manual close to $17,000, $18,000 with an automatic...before taxes.
Back in 2005 they didn't offer the Touring model. It was the "power package" in 04-05.
Hmmmm, well considering that for 2007, there is NO SE-R or Spec V, then you're talking about the '06 models.
From a pure performance standpoint, the SE-R and Spec V are probably a better deal (particularly if you can find a dealer trying to blow out his remaining '06 models with the '07 models hitting the lots).
But, according to the Edmunds review of the '06 Sentra:
"It's still one of the fastest economy cars on the market in SE-R, but it's outclassed by its peers in most other areas. The Sentra's biggest drawback is its cramped cabin. It's hard to find a comfortable driving position and legroom is almost nonexistent in the backseat. A decent features list and the solid performance of the SE-R models still make the Nissan Sentra a viable choice, but most small-car buyers would be better served by the Civic or Mazda 3".
No rorr, I'm referring to the 2007 SE-R and SE-R Spec V models. Not 2006. Not 2008.
They will be officially released at the end of this month at the LA Auto Show.
quote-
All-new for 2007, the Nissan Sentra will once again have SE-R high performance models; both SE-R and SE-R Spec V. As a pioneer model in the field of sport compact cars, the 2007 Nissan Sentra SE-R offers more power, performance and technology to this highly acclaimed model. The SE-R Spec V model will be powered by a specifically designed high-output version of Nissan’s 2.5-liter DOHC 4-cylinder engine. Additional information on the SE-R with be announced at the LA Auto Show on November 29th.
-end
BTW - before I made my last post I checked here at Edmunds for the 2007 Sentra (nope, they don't list the SE-R or Spec V models for '07) as well as under the "Future Cars" section.
If you'd like to compare the '07 Sentra SE-R and Spec V to the upper-end Mazda3, go right ahead........
Well, you did not know about them.........however, the major details of the SE-R and Spec V Sentra 07's have been released and known for the over 6 months.
BTW - before I made my last post I checked here at Edmunds for the 2007 Sentra (nope, they don't list the SE-R or Spec V models for '07) as well as under the "Future Cars" section. :sick:
2007's are not really "future" cars, are they?
If you'd like to compare the '07 Sentra SE-R and Spec V to the upper-end Mazda3, go right ahead........
I will later this month.
He had better keep in mind that the "upper" Mazda3 is now the Mazdaspeed3.
Personally, I do not see much comparison between the Sentra SE-R Spec V and the Mazdaspeed3 until I see official data from Nissan.
IMO, all trim levels of the Sentra are overpriced, and if the Spec V does approch $23,000....it is going to be found lacking compared to the M'Speed 3.
And the major details are.......? C'mon already, we're dying in suspense.
BTW - I looked in the "future cars" sections becaaaaaaaaaause....the '07 SE-R and Spec V models AREN'T OUT yet. :P
I'm still trying to find out what 'major details' about the upcoming car were released 6 months ago.... :confuse:
07 Sentra SE-R Spec V
200 HP
Limited Slip
17" wheels
6 speed manual
I would not say it's "overrated", however, when you stack it up against other sport compacts, it does not stand out as much as the MS3. Afterall, it is a Civic.
I called a friend of mine at the local Nissan dealer, and he stated that he wont see the SE-R Spec V for quite some time. I'm very curious how it will perform.
.....and I can recall a certain someone butting the Civic Si into a conversation which was specifically regarding comparisons between the base Mazda3 and the regular Civic.
BTW - since this entire THREAD is titled "Mazda3 vs. Nissan Sentra", why is there even discussions involving either the GTI or the Si? If the discussion has morphed over to the SE-R and SpecV, wouldn't bringing up the Speed3 be on topic considering the thread?
Will have to wait until March to see how the SE-R and Spec V measure up.
Neither the Sentra nor the 3 win any beauty contests.
Picky on my part? Sure. Just giving an example though....
boo ya. :P
HA! Have you been to the sentra ser forums? They are filled with this kind of stuff!
ANYBODY is capbable of running their mouth. Its not limited to a specific brand loyal group.
And even then i expressed interest in the car, its availability with an auto and its adundant torque.
But when you go in with the childish '_____ sucks' comments, you are just asking for it. Geez it wasn't even a si vs. se-r thread. And if it was, i'm pretty sure your posts would be along the same '___ sucks, nissan is better' lines, which unfortunately makes for very poor conversation but does make for some great 'at james31278's expense' entertainment.
Nature of competition, when you're the best everyone is out to get you fans included.
no one is the best. Just proves my point.
Thanks for your cooperation!
I test drove an 8 and was blown away with how it cornered, and how it took the twisties. The RX8 seems more sporty - it's RWD, has a great shifter, and looks more agressive when fitted with the appearance package/body kit.
for those of you who have had a chance to test drive them back to back - what were your thoughts or observations?
the RX8 only fits two in the back, and I might need to fit more than 2 people in the back of my next car...so I'm reluctant to get an 8, not to mention bad MPG and reliability issues...but it was so much fun.
you guys think a MS3 would outrun an RX8 on a twisty backgrod...or would the RX8 just walk awawy from teh MS3...in a straight line the MS3 would outrun an 8...but what about in the twisties???
The RX8 is a sports car not a sedan. I'd only have 2 in the back of an RX8 if the trip was short or the occupants were four legged. More than 2, yikes! If you only use the backseat infrequently, then go for the RX8.
Your dilemma is the classic one of heart over head. If you find yourself making excuses for getting an RX8, why fight it?