Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Crossover SUV Comparison

18788909293142

Comments

  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    To tell the truth, I don't think VW interiors ever looked that great. VW has never really had any virtue in my eyes.

    And that rush I hear is the fury of V-dub lovers trying to defend their bugs.

    That CTS interior is awesome. It puts some Benzes to shame.
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    Look at the previous Malibu versus the new one. World of difference.
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    As sure of it as you are, I'm just as sure that it isn't. Obviously, there are others out there who feel the same way. The vehicle fit your needs and wants, but that doesn't make it imperative that everyone sees it as best. It fits your needs best, and that is all you may lay claim to in a valid argument.

    No vehicle is totally best, but there are some models are best in certain categories- for instance, Acadia best interior space in class. CX-9-.
  • tencjeddtencjedd Member Posts: 44
    >

    Sorry, but you obviously haven't sat in a VW lately. The Touareg's interior is as nice as anything out there in its class as well as cars costing $20K more. That's not just my opinion, but the automotive press unanimously agrees as well. Real wood inserts, brushed aluminum, comfortable yet firm leather seating surfaces which are nicer than my wife's Enclaves seats, and all around quality materials on the dash as opposed to cheap and cheesy plastic found in most cars in its class.

    As for "bugs", my 05 Treg has been as reliable (if not more) as the Toyota we traded for the Enclave, and more reliable than previous Grand Cherokees and Explorers. The question you ought to be asking yourself is, why does GM offer a 100k warranty? Because they have to!
  • aviboy97aviboy97 Member Posts: 3,159
    You can say that again. It was needed, though. The Malibu was dead product before the makeover.
  • freealfasfreealfas Member Posts: 652
    concur, even our 98 passat has a nicer interior than the acadia/outlook. To his credit he did mention it was his OPINION though...
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    You need to read my post again. ALL of the controls for the Ford unit are on the unit itself AND on the remote. The head unit controls Play/Pause, track advance, and some other basic features. Honda does not win that one which is what I've been trying to tell you!

    I herad what you said, bud. What I'm saying is I don't want all those controls cluttering up my unit. All I want is the most necesary. Give me the toys on the remote. Honda doesn't win? Well that other stuff was oppinion, but heres the kicker. The Pilot has a standard 9 in. screen. I seriously doubt the Ford offers that size. Maybe they give you 8 in. All that and it doesn't block the rearveiw. It's on Aol autos if you don't believe me.

    That is correct. However, comparing apples to apples you get more in a similarly priced Taurus X than you would in a Pilot. We cross-shopped the Pilot and Explorer but I wouldn't put the two in the same class necessarily.

    Not true. When comparing the 3, the Pilot EX-L vs the TX limited when comparably eqquiped were 34280 vs 33945, and the TX didn't offer one option. The Explorer would have been 36850. So Honda wins that one.

    The same goes for any other brand too.

    Very true- which means the Pilot would be comparably priced to other vehicles, and you wouldn't have to spend 2500 more and get features you don't want. And I have friends that had a DVD player installed in their Odyssey at the dealer, so it can be done.

    Sync isn't just for navigation? Wow- that makes it sound so much more sensible to me. i dodn't understand why they would offer a 2000 option on a 14000 Focus (yes they do it on the Civic, but this is Ford, not Honda).
  • vad1819vad1819 Member Posts: 309
    Yet, if you're sitting in third row set in the CX-9, it feels like your in the firing port, window and space too small.
    image">
  • freealfasfreealfas Member Posts: 652
    "What I'm saying is I don't want all those controls cluttering up my unit. All I want is the most necesary. Give me the toys on the remote. Honda doesn't win? Well that other stuff was opinion, but heres the kicker. The Pilot has a standard 9 in. screen."

    1st - we don't want to hear about yours or anyones "unit", this is a family site...

    &

    2nd - haven't you heard size doesn't matter...

    LOL and yes I know it was a juvineile answer but it was too much to pass up...
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    concur, even our 98 passat has a nicer interior than the acadia/outlook. To his credit he did mention it was his OPINION though...

    Glad he did, because I disagree completely. I don't hink there is anything hugely special about Volkswagen interiors- not even in that 75000 Phaeton.
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    2nd - haven't you heard size doesn't matter...

    Whoa now- I was just taliking about automotive electronics. Gosh!

    Besides- smaller is definittely better- at least for a DVD player.
  • baggs32baggs32 Member Posts: 3,229
    The Pilot has a standard 9 in. screen. I seriously doubt the Ford offers that size. Maybe they give you 8 in. All that and it doesn't block the rearveiw.

    That is correct but you pay $400 for that one extra inch and you still lose functionality.

    Not true. When comparing the 3, the Pilot EX-L vs the TX limited when comparably eqquiped were 34280 vs 33945, and the TX didn't offer one option. The Explorer would have been 36850. So Honda wins that one.


    I don't think you are studying the lists of standard features well enough. A 4WD Pilot EX-L with DVD starts at $35,045. An AWD TX Limited starts at $32,935. Add a moonroof, DVD, and aux climate control and it is now $35,540, right in line with the Pilot. With those 3 options the TX has everything the Pilot has. However, the TX also has backup sensors, Sync, fog lamps, power passenger seat, adjustable pedals, and a few others the Pilot does not have.
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    It has been about 6 mos. since I've been in a 'dub. But the Toureg was certainly nothing hugely impressive. It should be nice- It's a 40k+ SUV. I think I might even expect more. And the Enclave's seats, while the leather may not be quite up to that standard, are definitely more comfortable.

    The question you should be asking yourself is "why is VW in trouble right now?" Because they think they can charge 40k for a mainstream CUV (well, that's part of it). The Toyota Priues sells better than the entire brand. And you are a lucky owner because I hear horror stories about VW reliablitiy.

    Truthfully, I like the Toureg. And while the starting price is ridicoulous, you can get an '05 for 20 grand! That's deprication that speaks for itself!
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    That is correct but you pay $400 for that one extra inch and you still lose functionality.

    No you don't- and you gain 6 cuft of cargo space and passenger volume with the Pilot.

    I compared 2wd models.

    Add a moonroof, DVD, and aux climate control and it is now $35,540, right in line with the Pilot. With those 3 options the TX has everything the Pilot has. However, the TX also has backup sensors, Sync, fog lamps, power passenger seat, adjustable pedals, and a few others the Pilot does not have.

    The Pilot EX w/ DVD is loaded and so you do get dual power seats. You also save 500 bucks, with which you can order a $300 back up sensor, and some fog lamps. You get some standard features on the Pilot that the TX doesn't even offer, and you don't have to go around searching for a TX with all those options, because they are standard on every EX w/DVD. Plus, there are some buyers won't don't want SYNC, which you have to pay extra for, don't you?

    To tell the truth, if given the choice between the two, I'd pick the more spacious, powerful TX (because I wouldn't even consider buying the DVD system option), but thank God I'm not faced with that terrible decision. That's what it means to be stuck between a rock and a hard place!
  • vad1819vad1819 Member Posts: 309
    " I don't hink there is anything hugely special about Volkswagen interiors- not even in that 75000 Phaeton."
    I have to disagree about Phaeton. Have you ever seat there? If seat there on second row you will have tons of space for your legs. It's a like in Jaguar XJ.
  • vad1819vad1819 Member Posts: 309
    I have reading your arguments about Pilot and TX. One thing is bothering me, why do you need DVD player in car. Do you know fact that, the pediatric USA are very recommended don't let kids to watch a TV at all before 2 years old, and after maximum two hours a day. By the 5-6 year old they, kids, rather play a game boy, so built-in DVD is useless option. It's a cheaper to buy a head rest DVD( portable, hang over head rest).
    Another option is not necessary need - NAV System. If you have verizon cell, they provide portable NAV system for 10 bucks a month with all option you can imagine. I have use couple times, it's very good, plus you can take with you at any city in US. It will tell you a restaurant, shopping, Starbucks and more and more.
    One option/s in the car I ought to have, there a climate control, power seats, and auto regulator wiper blades.
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    I have to disagree about Phaeton. Have you ever seat there? If seat there on second row you will have tons of space for your legs. It's a like in Jaguar XJ.

    True- it's hugely special in that it's- well- huge. Limo like rear seating. But the interior appearance is not anything big. I'd rather pay the same price and get an A8. But let's get back on topic.
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    A friend of mine replaced her Infiniti G20 with a Murano SL - loaded with practically everything but NAV. I was very impressed with the vehicle; it rode a lot better than I expected it would with the large wheels (the 5-spoke alloys). With 64k miles and in great condition, the list price was $19,990 - although I don't know what she paid for it. It does have lots of toys for the money, however, and it had plenty of rear seat space. Five adults (my 6'4" self sat behind the driver, who is 5'10") rode across town and back. No problems at all.
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    I have reading your arguments about Pilot and TX. One thing is bothering me, why do you need DVD player in car. Do you know fact that, the pediatric USA are very recommended don't let kids to watch a TV at all before 2 years old

    What? There is nothing wrong with the occassional educational video on a long road trip. And the Simpsons movie can't hurt too much either. ( :P )

    It's a cheaper to buy a head rest DVD( portable, hang over head rest).

    But these DVD players can break, whereas one that came from the factory (with a vehicle that may have been purchased for a very good deal) can be repaired thorughout the vehicle's life.

    If you have verizon cell, they provide portable NAV system for 10 bucks a month with all option you can imagine.

    While I don't think nav screens are necessary either, if your argument is sensibilty, then it is definitely no a good idea to include the use of cell phones while driving.

    I'd say we disagree on our vehicles' options, and how we use them.
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    It's nice, I just think for this new remodel Nissan couldv'e done more with it. More power, slightly refined looks and performance- they must think it's a Corvette! How 'bout a third row? That Pathfinder isn't cutting it for families out there.
  • bobw3bobw3 Member Posts: 2,989
    you gain 6 cuft of cargo space and passenger volume with the Pilot.

    If you're comparing the TaurusX & Pilot...You have greater cargo area behind the 3rd row of the TaurusX and much better legroom in rows 2 & 3.
  • vad1819vad1819 Member Posts: 309
    My father has Murano. I drove it many times, it's good vehicle, the transmission is amazing.
    I like how looks Pathfinder, but seating position to close to roof. I like second row seat, it disassembled as 33/33/33
  • vad1819vad1819 Member Posts: 309
    " There is nothing wrong with the occassional educational video on a long road trip"
    How many long trip per month are you doing? Long trip it above 100 miles.
    Simpsons is adult humor.

    "But these DVD players can break,..................."
    Buy extended warranty from Best buy or Circuit City, it will cost you about 20 bucks.

    "While I don't think nav screens are necessary either, if your argument is sensibility, then it is definitely no a good idea to include the use of cell phones while driving."

    Wallmart, Target and other retails are selling different kinds of cell phone holders for cars. Plus speaker phone announced a very loud and clear directions, if you missed your turn it will re-calculated direction automatically.
    I'm not trying to argue about options and how to use one, I'm giving advice how to save a couple bucks, because resale price will not appreciate what you did paid for it.
    In new world of Hi-tech we can replace some car options by alternative. Plus by these actions we can push automakers to make these options standard. Like it happened with airbags, power widow, alarm, air conditioner and many other.
  • freealfasfreealfas Member Posts: 652
    "But these DVD players can break, whereas one that came from the factory (with a vehicle that may have been purchased for a very good deal) can be repaired thorughout the vehicle's life. "

    and the factory setups have never had a problem...I think you missed the boat on this one. factory nav and dvd setups are just HUGE profit centers for the manufacturer's. what happens when factory nav breaks after the warranty runs it's course and its a $1-2k fix as opposed to the $150 fix of just buying another standalone system. adding $2-3k to the price of a car that you are financing when you can get both stand alones now for less than $400. do the math, do anything else with that money and you are coming out way ahead.

    I really find them nothing more than a gee whiz toy that adds nothing to driving that a map and sense of direction can't solve. and yes I have been around them in rentals and such.
  • freealfasfreealfas Member Posts: 652
    " Plus by these actions we can push automakers to make these options standard. Like it happened with airbags, power widow, alarm, air conditioner and many othe"

    now you missed the boat as well, dvd & nav are a very long way if they ever are going to be standard as they make way too much money on them as options... they'd be fools to build that cost into a car's base price.

    you make a very good point about resale though and only getting a incremental portion of the huge outlay back. I'd stay away from cars that have these in a used market as I would not want a dead screen when they break and I don't want to pony up the cash to fix it. and they will break...
  • vad1819vad1819 Member Posts: 309
    "I really find them nothing more than a gee whiz toy....."

    And luxury toy for adults. Most 99% people driving to work every day using same road. So r u going to lost while you're driving to work? That's why I suggest to buy portable device or use Verizon nav. system.
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    Buy extended warranty from Best buy or Circuit City, it will cost you about 20 bucks.

    These electronic stores can often times be a hassle. It's much easier getting these features from youre dealer. I did state in the post you replied to that I am not interested in in car dvd players, but some like to have these features, and you shouldn't force your oppinions (yes- oppinions) on them just because you can't afford these features. Also, having aftermarket features installed kills resale value. Now let's get back on topic.
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    and the factory setups have never had a problem...I think you missed the boat on this one. factory nav and dvd setups are just HUGE profit centers for the manufacturer's.

    Some don't like the hassle of messing around with electronic stores, if the vehicle with the price they want comes with these options, than it's so much easier. I feel that spending extra money on car dvd players is a waste, but if I ever do want one then the best way I feel to do it is getting one that came with the car. That way, I don't have to mess with wires or installments.

    Anyway, this is getting off topic.
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    Don't quote me on this, but I just read that the VW Tiguan starts under 23g. This would be a much better price to compete with CR-V and Rav-4. I wouldn't get near this, but I'm sure some teenage girl would love it.
  • freealfasfreealfas Member Posts: 652
    "I did state in the post you replied to that I am not interested in in car dvd players, but some like to have these features, and you shouldn't force your oppinions (yes- oppinions) on them just because you can't afford these features"

    pot calling kettle black today or just finishing the year on a condescending note...

    a pretty ballsy move assuming what others may/may not be able to afford. you might want to reign that in as vad may make more than all of us combined and just lets logic take over as opposed to dollars ruling on this one... I imagine most of us around here paying for internet service monthly to share our OPINIONS and owning $20-$40 CUV's can afford any of the options being debated.

    As for aftermarket installation I hardly think a suction cup held GPS and a headrest strapped dvd monitor that both can be removed with NO damage is going to kill resale value in ANY REGARD...

    Do you really need that high a horse to carry all of those opinions around on to force on others now???
  • freealfasfreealfas Member Posts: 652
    "Don't quote me on this"

    then why post it if you "don't want to be quoted?

    "but I just read that the VW Tiguan starts under 23g"

    calling your own reading skills into question by not wanting to be quoted now?

    "I wouldn't get near this, but I'm sure some teenage girl would love it."

    taken up market analysis in your free time... IMO since we're just inferring opinions as opposed to forcing them on people or basing anything in fact, I haven't seen to many teenage girls driving these small CUV/SUV's.
  • baggs32baggs32 Member Posts: 3,229
    No you don't- and you gain 6 cuft of cargo space and passenger volume with the Pilot.

    I was talking about the extra 1 inch of DVD screen real estate not interior space. You do pay $400 more for that in the Pilot. Correction. It's actually $300.

    The Pilot EX w/ DVD is loaded and so you do get dual power seats.

    Nope. Only the driver seat gets power adjustment. See here.

    You also save 500 bucks, with which you can order a $300 back up sensor, and some fog lamps.

    Fog lights are $395 not including installation. Backup sensors are $682 before installation charges. Sure you can negotiate the price of both but I seriously doubt you could get both for under $500 installed. At least not in my experience with Honda dealers.

    You get some standard features on the Pilot that the TX doesn't even offer, and you don't have to go around searching for a TX with all those options, because they are standard on every EX w/DVD.

    Hmm, I found two. Side marker lights and a 115 V power outlet which only comes with the DVD trim. Other than those two the TX blows the Pilot away with its features at the same price point. See the Pilot specs here and the TX specs here.

    Plus, there are some buyers won't don't want SYNC, which you have to pay extra for, don't you?

    SYNC is standard on the TX Limited trim but it is a $395 option on the lower trims.

    To tell the truth, if given the choice between the two, I'd pick the more spacious, powerful TX

    Me too but my wife, who drives the family hauler, would not. That's why I know waaaaaay too much about both of them! ;)
  • baggs32baggs32 Member Posts: 3,229
    "But these DVD players can break,..................."
    Buy extended warranty from Best buy or Circuit City, it will cost you about 20 bucks.


    When your kid puts his/her foot through the sceen you lose that $20 too and have to buy a new one. The roof mounted units are pretty immune to physical damage. If they are phsically damaged by your kids then you have bigger things to worry about than them watching too much TV. :surprise:
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    I was talking about the extra 1 inch of DVD screen real estate not interior space. You do pay $400 more for that in the Pilot. Correction. It's actually $300.

    I was just saying that you get more than an inch on the screen for 300 bucks. But for 300, it really doesn't matter. For 300, if the two are that closely matched, it should be about which one you like more based on looks, or who will offer you a better deal (Ford hands down).

    I did know foglights were more than 200, but I thought after looking at the accord site that backup cameras were only like 400. I'm dissapointed that Honda doens't give you dual power seats on their top of the line model. But that 115V power outlet is a nice standard feature.
  • bobw3bobw3 Member Posts: 2,989
    The roof mounted units are pretty immune to physical damage.

    But they'll give your kids stiff necks!
  • docrwdocrw Member Posts: 94
    First of all, the point of navigation systems is not to use them when you are driving to work-that is an inane and condescending statement. The point of having the nav system is for when you have to go someplace you've never been or there is a detour or accident in your way and you have to find a new route. If you don't want to have a nav system built into your car that is your prerogative, but to call them a toy is arrogant and condescending. Your alternatives are much less practical, portable systems are a magnet for thieves and need to be removed from the car every time you park someplace, and less safe-have you tried to read a cell phone screen while driving someplace unfamiliar, plus the portable systems have to be mounted on the dash, which obstructs visibility.

    For future reference, try giving these things a little thought from a different perspective and you will see that just maybe you have oversimplified things.
  • vad1819vad1819 Member Posts: 309
    First , any time when you look at any screen it's consider an unsafe situation. So?.....
    Second, if you ever use one you should know you're listening voice, not looking at the screen. Yet, portable units have real traffic update and re-route your way, but you have to pay extra.
    Third:
    So, verizon is good alternative for nav system, you can call at same time and it's mobile.( even if got in dead zone and come back,it still show your route.) But if you spend a couple more bucks for your phone you can get a PDA or Blackberry. These have bigger screen plus real google live traffic update.
    So, conclusion built -in unit is not really practical compare with portable and Verizon service, and I'm still think it's expensive toy for adults.

    Just try one time your verizon service, as nav system.
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    First, you are getting off topic, and second you are simply forcing your unproven oppinion that that a Verizon Cell phone with VZ navigator is the best way to go. Not everyone wants to spend ridicoulous amounts of extra money on phone service extras (which is exactly what Verizon makes you do). Plus you shouldn't look at your phone while you are driving, so that's out. Built in Nav systems are just as practical as any other GPS option.
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    Ahhh Freealfas-

    This forum wouldn't be the same without you analysing every bit of everyone's statements. Happy New Year.

    taken up market analysis in your free time... IMO since we're just inferring opinions as opposed to forcing them on people or basing anything in fact, I haven't seen to many teenage girls driving these small CUV/SUV's

    In the county I live in,16 year old girls that drive around like Paris Hilton in Benzes makes the ones riding arounf in their 25g compact SUVs look conservative. So I culd see a big market for the Tigaun with younger females (Jeep's target for the Compass).
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    a pretty ballsy move assuming what others may/may not be able to afford.

    Well they say "if ya got it, then use it." Yes- that was one of the bold unforgiving statements I shoot out every once in a while. It's not good to sink to the levels of others, but that was a statement Vad would make- in fact one he did make at one time.

    As for aftermarket installation I hardly think a suction cup held GPS and a headrest strapped dvd monitor that both can be removed with NO damage is going to kill resale value in ANY REGARD...

    I mean the ones you go to Best buy to get intalled. But suction cups can lose their suction, and those dvd straps are annoying to rest my head on. Also wires get tangled, and the whole situation can become a big mess.

    Do you really need that high a horse to carry all of those opinions around on to force on others now???

    The bigger the better (sorry- couldn't resist).
  • vad1819vad1819 Member Posts: 309
    For some regions of US it may be make sense to have all this options, like Mid-west.
    Low cost of the housing, so saving money on house you can spend on useless option (couldn't resist). Automakers make a lot money on this options. It's like pizza with extra topping, same taste, but high price.
  • baggs32baggs32 Member Posts: 3,229
    I was just saying that you get more than an inch on the screen for 300 bucks.

    I see. However I already proved to you visually and verbally that the Ford system offers more than the Honda system yet costs more. The extra inch of screen is nice but I don't see how they get off charging more for it. Ford increased its screen sizes from 7" to 8" last year without increasing the price so it can't cost Honda that much to put those in there.

    I did know foglights were more than 200, but I thought after looking at the accord site that backup cameras were only like 400.

    Fog lights are a lot more than $200 on a Pilot after installation. It's crazy what they charge for those! The camera is $464 before installation for the Accord but neither the TX nor the Pilot have a backup camera as an option or a listed dealer accessory. Remember that the nav system is required in the Accord to get the backup camera so it really ends up costing you roughly $2,600 plus installation. That ain't chump change!

    I'm dissapointed that Honda doens't give you dual power seats on their top of the line model. But that 115V power outlet is a nice standard feature.

    I agree on both points. The power passenger seat isn't standard on the TX Limited either but you can get it in a package and still undercut the Pilot's price while getting more.
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    It's like pizza with extra topping, same taste, but high price.


    If the pizza really tasted the same, customers wouldn't pay more than $5 for a cheese pizza. Toppings do change the characteristics, just as options on a car do.
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    However I already proved to you visually and verbally that the Ford system offers more than the Honda system yet costs more.

    I believe I proved to you the negative of this, as Honda gives you a larger screen (without increasing the price from its smaller predecessor) and you haven't given me any example of a feature on the Ford's that isn't on the Honda's.

    Remember that the nav system is required in the Accord to get the backup camera so it really ends up costing you roughly $2,600 plus installation. That ain't chump change!

    Not true- you can a the beeping system. That's whats 400 bucks.

    The power passenger seat isn't standard on the TX Limited either but you can get it in a package and still undercut the Pilot's price while getting more.

    What? That's dissapointing. Power passenger seats should be standard in all topline models of these cuvs.
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    For some regions of US it may be make sense to have all this options, like Mid-west. Low cost of the housing, so saving money on house you can spend on useless option (couldn't resist). Automakers make a lot money on this options. It's like pizza with extra topping, same taste, but high price.

    Heh- more guessing I see. You don't know that I live in the mid west. Why don't you 1) get some facts and 2) stay on topic.
  • vad1819vad1819 Member Posts: 309
    I posted my opinion and alternative way for nav and DVD systems. I don't push my opinion. In other hand, some guy was rude and couldn't resist to put more "pepper in the stew".
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Would some of y'all please list what 5 or 10 crossovers you think are the most popular, or perhaps the 5 or 10 that most represent to you what a crossover is?

    It's for a little personal project of mine. :shades: Thanks.
  • albookalbook Member Posts: 1,282
    Most Popular CUVs:

    1)Honda CR-V
    2)Toyota Rav-4
    3)Ford Escape
    4)GMC Acadia
    5)Honda Pilot
    (I know there is one or two between Escape and Acadia- just coudn't think of them)
  • vad1819vad1819 Member Posts: 309
    Full size by popularity:
    1. Acadia/Outlook
    2. Pilot
    3. Highlander
    4. CX-9
    6. Veracruz
    7. MDX
    8. Tribeca
    9. Outlander
    10. Ford TX (I'm not sure if it real CUV, I think it's more oversize wagon).

    Small CUV:
    1. CRV
    2. RAV
    3. Santa Fe/Tucson (Escape-but it's more small SUV)
    4. Edge
    5. Murano
    6. Equinox
    7. Vue
    8. RDX
    9. RX
    10. Sorento/Sportage
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    1.) CR-V
    2.) Escape/Tribute (Popular, but not too carlike)
    3.) RAV4
    4.) Highlander (These are EVERYWHERE - and seem like little more than tall Camry sedans)
    5.) Equinox (Fairly common in Birmingham, AL, but pretty crude and barely carlike)

    I always felt that a crossover was a cross between a car and an SUV. Vehicles like the Pilot and Enclave are basically less-space-efficient minivans in my eyes. Others may disagree, and that's fine. :)
Sign In or Register to comment.