By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
The 'nox is handsome, though. Reminds you of an MDX.
-juice
I am thinking about K&N filters for my other cars also....but have not pulled the trigger on them yet, since they are relatively new....
'regards/..
I don't know about CAFE numbers - I usually get around the EPA estimates on my cars.
Steve, Host
I've been using it since 9/22/1999 for my 1999 CR-V. I've been consistently above 25 mpg for the past 100,000 miles.
My former car, a 1992 Honda Civic Hatchback, CX series was getting up to 45 to 47 MPG on the highway. I did not remember what I got on the City MPG.
So, I am somewhat dissapointed that I don't have that same type of mileage in the 2004 CR-V but I needed more cargo room when I do community outreach programs for various volunteer groups I belong to.
For instance, I average over 25 mpg on my Forester.
There was one occasion where I towed a trailer with about 1500 lbs overall weight, my milege was...drum roll please...
17.3 mpg! *eek*
-juice
I've been keeping gas record books since 1974,
I have canceled checks and tax returns back to 1981 but gas record books? I get this image of Rick Moranis as accountant Louis Tulley. Are you going to turn into the Keymaster of Gozer?
Obligatory on-topic part:
When I tow my 5,000+ pounds of boat & trailer behind the V8 AWD Mountaineer, I see 8 to 10 mpg. At the speed limit, the Mountaineer might see 18 to 19 mpg. At speed limit + 15, I see maybe 16 mpg. I commute in a VW GTI so I don't worry all that much about SUV fuel economy.
Haven't been around for a while. What happened to the "I don't like SUVs" infinitely long thread?
I had to Google Rick - guess I didn't see part II.
Steve, Host
She tends to go about 10 mph slower than me.
This was the same load, same roads, all highway.
-juice
I thought she literally "beat you" ....
good thing its only a contest of mpg...
"where do the stairs go?" "they go UP"
Bill at his best...
but naw....Steve is no nerd....he is one cool dude.....he does a lot of snow boarding ....
But he may be the Matrix, the architect, or the oracle...or even NEO...
;-)
-juice
-juice
I hear acura engines need more miles in order to break in, so maybe I will break the 30 mpg point....
-juice
Usually it's abbreviated TLC, anyway.
-juice
sorry, but got a little offtopic with the TL acura figures ....
not that much unlike a SUV, IMO.
back to SUVs....
I am getting 19 mpg on some freeway driving in the cayenne, but the suburban gets max of 17 mpg...
When you reset the ECU, the engine runs rich, my mileage does to the *pits*. I lose about 4 mpg or so on the first tank, then it bounces back.
So I don't disconnect the battery unless I absolutely must. Like when it died.
-juice
take care too...
Just finished a road trip to NM:
Low: 26 MPG - 75 MPH avg speed
High: 30 MPG - 70 MPH avg speed
The best MPG was at high altitudes (above 5000 feet), using 88 octane (NM doesn't have 87, so I went up one).
I generally get a lot lower in town, around 20-21 (though I did get one tank at 19.5).
The above figures are solid road travel only, less than 10 miles in town on each tank.
i'm getting only 11 to 12 mile/gallon
on my 01 pathfinder i used to get 16-18 on city and 20s in the highway. i had 80k miles before i sold
Any ideas?, anything i could check before going to the dealer?
-Thanks
both of my pathfinders were 4x4. On the LE i run in in 2wd most of the time
anything else i need to check?
Thanks....
-mike
I was hoping for better mileage, especially since I'm careful with air pressure in the tires, no jack-rabbit starts, etc.
Steve, Host
seems most people think the K&N is just bolt on hype.
but for all engines, the amount of power and fuel economy and engine efficiency depends also on how the motor moves in and out air&fuel/exhaust.
Some engines have this maximized already, so bolting on a K&N will do little. Some have restricted airflow, probably due to design flaws or short cuts inherent in engine makiing..
I have a K&N on my 1999 Suburban....and also a supercharger , to force more air into the engine per minute.... The company (Stillen) that built the engine swears by it...saying it helps the engine breath.
but I think it really depends on your own models' engine.
P/S: I have 1400 miles on my CRV now.
Remember, drag increases with the square of speed, in other words the drop in mileage will not even be linear as speeds increase.
Plus the CR-V is shaped like a brick, it doesn't exactly slip through the air. Few SUVs do.
-juice
When it comes to fuel economy, speed kills. Keep your speed around the 65 mph mark, go easy on acceleration, and "drive smooth". You'll get better mpg.
FWIW, my 1999 CR-V is rated lower than the 2004 at 22-25 mpg by the EPA. I've been getting 25 mpg since sept. 1999.
-juice
On the highway, yes. Adding a 5th cog at the top end, really doesn't do much for city driving.
The EPA raised the automatics from 26 to 27 mpg in highway driving. However, that could also be a result of the addition of drive-by-wire.