Subaru Forester (up to 2005)

1190191193195196344

Comments

  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    I have been seeing a new Forester XS in my parking lot at work, and it turns out the owner is a guy just down the hall from me! We chit-chat about cars from time to time, but I never knew he was the owner, even after seeing the car for a few weeks (he was previously a Honda guy). Last week, I had parked my wife's Forester next to his, and then another girl in the building with an 02 parked next to me. That's the funy thing about Subarus, either they are rare or you see three in a row! I bet we must almost be setting a record for the largest number of Forester owners in the same building! (well, at least at NASA anyway).

    Craig
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Actually the S had fore and aft adjustments for angle, more so than height. The new XS lifts the entire seat and goes about an inch higher if you set it at the max.

    They did delete the mud flaps and the cargo liner and cover, IIRC.

    Phong: check the ATF fluid level and ask your dealer to double-check at your next oil change.

    -juice
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    That's too bad Subaru got rid of the angle adjustments. I really appreciate mine on long drives -- it's nice to fiddle with them every so often.

    I think the most I've seen is three in a row too. I went hiking over by Santa Cruz. Pulled into a parking spot, got out and whaddayaknow -- three in a row.

    Ken
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Try the new seats, though - they are really nice. I don't think they're a step down at all, in fact they're a nice step up. Best lateral support in the class, easily.

    The new mechanism basically copied VW - they ratchet up higher and higher. The only thing I didn't like was that at the highest position it seemed to angle you towards the seat very slightly.

    -juice
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    I like the seat angle adjustments on my S as well. I have nto logged enough seat time in a new Forester to comment on the new design. A wider WRX-type seat for us fat Americans would be helpful though.

    Ed
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    << A wider WRX-type seat for us fat Americans would be helpful though. >>

    Ed I'm going to post this over in the new suggestions forum.

    Bob
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    I really like the WRX seats, fit in them but could stand to lose 20 lbs. and fit better. The lumbar adjustment in my Forester's seat lets me get a bit better support there than in the WRX though. I also love Alcantara (a/k/a "ecsaine") for its grippiness.

    Now give me heated Alcantara with good lumbar support and adequate thigh support for this fire hydrant, and I'll take you on a road trip.

    Ed
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Didn't a Japanese seat belt manufacturer use that excuse for faulty product? Hilarious.

    Funny thing is the 2004 WRX indeed got wider seats. They are very comfy and no less supportive.

    -juice
  • nygregnygreg Member Posts: 1,936
    I use the seats like a pair of my favorite jeans. When they start getting tight, I start cutting back on my food intake.

    Craig- I will park next to another OB if available. At least I know the door bumpers will line up (no ding). Maybe you three can get turbo Foresters. Then you can really blast off at NASA. Sorry!

    Greg
  • joseph50joseph50 Member Posts: 235
    Ever since I got my (then new) 2001 Forester S it exhibited this quirk:
    After starting for work the morning after a rainy night a scraping/friction noise would come from the back rear wheels area upon brake application. After a couple stop signs the noise would be gone, so I figured "moisture factor."
    Am I thinking correctly, and is anyone else experiencing the same? Why would only the back calipers get wet? Should I be more concerned than I am?
    Thanks in advance.
    joe
  • leo2633leo2633 Member Posts: 589
    I get the same sound from my '01 Forester S after sitting a while during a rain storm. It is from the surface rust that forms on the rotors. I get it on both front and rear rotors. It has happened on every car I've owned with disc brakes. It does, in fact, dissipate after a few stops, as the pads scrape the roors clean.

    Len
  • pntdpntd Member Posts: 5
    Thanks AJ and Michael for your help. I did take it to the dealer two months ago. They did a complete check the transmission, fluid and everything, then told me the transmission was fine. They also showed me a letter from Subaru issued to all dealers. According to the letter, many 03 Forester owners experienced this problems and Subaru said that the delay was OK. I also called Subaru customer service to file a complain and the rep said the same things as well. I'm wondering how many 03 Forester owners have the same problem and that's why I post this message.

    I also asked the tech why I didn't see this problem during test drive. His answer was after the break-in period, the car settled down and worked like it supposed to.

    Long term reviews of 03 Forester did mention about anything like this so I'm wondering how wide spread the delay is.
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    I get the same thing after washing my Forester. It's just the sound of a very thin layer of oxidation (rust) coming off when you apply the brakes.

    It's completely normal.

    Ken
  • taft4taft4 Member Posts: 57
    Sometime after I purchased my 2003 XS Forester in late October 2002 I received a long questionaire from some organization whose name I have forgotten. Anyway it was about 8 pages in length and I enjoyed completing it. Not too long after that I received a similar questionaire of the same length from Subaru with detailed questions, and again I completed it. Since then I received long questionaires from J. D. Powers, from AutoPacific, and from some other firm whose name I misplaced. In three cases they sent me a buck for my efforts. Anyway, the questionaires are all a little different, all are very detailed and all I found fun to complete. My responses are hopefully helpful to those who sent them. This has never happened to me before with my previous car purchases and so I am wondering whether this is a usual experience for all new buyers of Foresters?
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    I noticed the same thing on my WRX this morning; a subtle "bap-bap-bap" and grinding sound when the brakes were applied the first few times. I had washed the car on Saturday, and it has been garaged since then. Must have been rust on the rotors. I once noticed this on a Honda I had left parked at an airport for a week. I think it's fairly typical.

    Craig
  • once_for_allonce_for_all Member Posts: 1,640
    at 1150 miles, put in Mobil 1 5W30. Surprised to find so much plastic down below, it doesn't seem substantial enough to last long or protect from anything other than water. But I guess that to be important, since a bunch of cold water directly on the exhaust headers is probably not good.

    I don't recall anyone mentioning the oil filter flap in the plastic guard. Six really neat half turn screws with a pop out screw head, pull out the screw insert, then the flap turns to allow good access to the oil filter. It took me a while to figure out how the screw operates, it is nothing like I have run into before.

    John
  • lowellklowellk Member Posts: 30
    Frank P.: And don't I know it after having driven that Civic for more than 214,000 miles. The 165 ponies under the XS hood are a welcome jump up from the 90 hamsters in the Civic. I was very happy to be driving the AWD XS, regardless of its mpg, instead of the FWD Civic during the heavy rains last week (well, it seemed heavy to us so. Cal. folks). And I truly love the cruise control. :->

    juice: Adjusting for angle affects height, and vice versa, of course. The Owner's Manual gives 'em equal weight: "Turn either dial to adjust the angle and height of the seat cushion to the desired position."

    I do think the seat/seat-back cushions and bolsters are better than those in the S. I would rather have both fore and aft adjusters instead of the single adjuster so I could fine-tune the seat angle and height more to my liking. Like you, I recommend that potential buyers try the seats out for themselves (unlike me; I didn't sit in an '03 XS until after I'd bought mine).

    pntd: I notice a lag of a second or so when going from reverse to drive in my '03 XS, but thought it more a quirk than a problem.

    Craig: Many Subaru sightings at the university where I work. The lot closest to the building I work in usually has six Outbacks (3 Wagon, 2 Sport, 1 Limited sedan), four other Foresters besides mine, four Imprezas (2 RS, 1 TS, 1 WRX), and some Legacy sedans and wagons. And that's in just one of the several lots on campus.
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    pntd Mar 12, 2003 6:54pm

    I would agree with Lowell. It is a characteristic of the 4EAT. I believe it does that on my '98 OB, '99 OBS, and the '03 WRX, all 4EATs. I'm probably so use to it that I no longer notice it. I will refer to it as a quirk, and NOT a problem.

    -Dave
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Mark me down as yet another Forester owner who appreciates having the fore & aft seat height adjusters. While I'm sure I could make do without them (this is my first vehicle after all that is so equipped), it's still nice to be able to adjust the seat angle. Especially during a long trip.

    IRT increasing the seat width, I prefer Greg's simple alternative. I certainly hope that car seats aren't going to be the next area to fall to the super-size craze!

    -Frank P.
  • speterson1speterson1 Member Posts: 228
    Catching up to the boards after getting back from a short vacation with my wife and I wanted to put in my .02 in regards to MPG. Drove to Ohio and back from central Illinois and before we left I wanted to check my tire pressures since one of the front tires looked low. It was; about 20 psi in fact, and the other three were all low too, ranging between 22-28 psi. Inflated the fronts to 34 psi and the rears to 32. Now I am pleased to report that our mileage is back up around 27-28 mpg, which is typical for our Forester during the summer months.

    All winter we had been getting around 19-24 mpg and I had attributed it to our ethanol and the cold weather, but now I will be more diligent in checking the tire pressure since it made a noticeable difference and has probably been the biggest factor all along. Shame on me for not checking it earlier...

    Another interesting thing - I have never seen more new cars being shipped on our nation's highways than I saw during the ride home yesterday. I kid you not, we must have seen no less than 25 car-carrier semis during our 420 mile drive! March must be a good month for car salesmen!
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    taft4: somehow, your purchase just made it on to an automotive mailing list.

    lowellk: you really didn't sit in the '03 before buying it? That's a nice leap of faith. :-)

    Don't get me wrong, I like the angle adjustments, they're great for long trips when you're fatigued. It's just that the new ratcheting mechanism has a much bigger range of adjustments going up and down.

    -juice
  • ducktapeguyducktapeguy Member Posts: 115
    You know you want one. Someone is selling one over on nasioc.com.

    http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?s=8485c96c43eeac6d- 2a4b3a27b61e8433&threadid=328841

    It's for a 01-02 Forester. If I had the money I'd be getting it right now.
  • dafracksdafracks Member Posts: 14
    I recently purchased a used 99 Forester L with a 5 speed manual transmission. I am noticing something odd when I put the car into 1st gear the first few times each morning. I get a slight stuttering feeling, as though the mechanism (clutch??) is grabbing a bit before the ride smooths out. This continues for the first 2-3 starts from first gear. It doesn't seem to be a problem when I let the car sit all day at work and then drive home.

    I had an automatic transmission before and so my questions are? Am I just really sleepy and lame at shifting early in the morning?

    Is there possibly something wrong with the clutch I should have looked at before the 1,000 limited warranty expires.

    Does the car need to warm up a bit and all the fluids flowing before I try to drive and shift.

    Cars aren't something I know a lot about. The car went through a Dealer Gold Certification check but I know that doesn't always mean much. Please help! If this is not the right forum I can post this somewhere else.
  • nygregnygreg Member Posts: 1,936
    The shuddering is something many MT owners have experienced. I believe there is a recent fix for this (new clutch and plate). How many miles on it?? Others will chime in with more info.

    Greg
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Welcome Tracy.

    You're experience clutch chatter on a cold drivetrain. It has nothing to do with your driving style.

    Depending on how bad it is, you could just ignore it (it doesn't seem to affect clutch longevity), or ask the dealer to adjust it, or even replace the clutch's pressure plate.

    Maybe start with a dealer adjustment and go from there.

    To answer your other question, insert the key and turn it, but wait a couple of seconds for the fuel pump to establish fuel pressure before turning it on.

    Once it's started, give it at least 7 seconds to establish oil pressure before driving off.

    Finally, try to avoid putting too much load on the engine until it's fully warmed up. But I do think it's OK to drive off if you're taking it easy for the first couple of miles.

    -juice
  • twrxtwrx Member Posts: 647
    Yup. that's the good old Forester clutch with its best known problem. My 98 did that. I also had a throw out bearing replaced at one point. They adjusted it and the shudder was lestened. When I traded it in in (60000miles) 2002 on a WRX it was shuddering but tolerable. I also had clutch failure caused by contaminated clutch fluid at about 45000 miles (that was a simple $50 one hour fix). If they will replace the clutch with a newer one, go for it. I have heard that even newer models have clutch problems but I have had none with my 2002 WRX clutch (24,000 miles at present.
    TWRX
  • dafracksdafracks Member Posts: 14
    Hello and thank you for the quick response. The car has 70,500 miles on it. I can feel my blood pressure dropping after reading your responses.

    I would like to take it back to the dealer to have it fixed. They may turn me down as it's a "limited" warranty but it's worth a try.
    It's a load off of my mind to know that it won't affect the longevity of the clutch. I had to replace a transmission in an old Nissan Stanza wagon I had. It was a pretty pricey undertaking.

    Would you know about how many miles on average a transmission should last?

    juice - I'll follow your instructions on starting and waiting. My 92 Camry has 252,000 well loved miles on it. I have to say that I really, really, really like this Forester and I want it to be around for awhile.
  • grahampetersgrahampeters Member Posts: 1,786
    G'day

    Unfortunately it is one of those "characteristics of the vehicle" that irritates. My one big hassle with my Outback.

    The detailed explanation for the cold/damp morning clutch shudder was given to me by Subaru here in Australia after a bit of a run around. Apparently the clutch facing material is fairly hard but asbestos free, intended to last under failry heavy load. However, the clutch material is susceptible to moisture take up, when cooled from warm (ie usage) on a damp evening. Think of how the dew settles on the windows on such days. On the following morning, it will be juddery until it warms up. Slightly higher throttle settings at take off (with a little clutch slip) seem to avoid the problem. Starting, as I usually do by aplying the clutch from idle and then acceelerating is less successful.

    Subaru tell me they can change the clutch but problem will reappear after about 1000 miles. I will live with it. Supposedly later clutches are dual mass or something or other.

    Hope that helps

    Cheers

    Graham
  • dafracksdafracks Member Posts: 14
    Hi Graham,

    Yes and I live in the rainy northwest US so there is plenty of dampness to go around. It rains from October through July 4 most years. Right now it's warm and wet.

    OK, so I'll live with it. Just gonna ask this question again for my sanity. About how many miles should a manual transmission on my Subaru last?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    70k miles is beyond the powertrain warranty, but if you're on good terms with your dealer I think they could take a look at your next service stop. If you have a Subaru Gold extended warranty they should take care of it, period.

    It doesn't affect longevity so if it doesn't bother you much I wouldn't lose any sleep over it.

    A manual tranny should last the life of the car. A clutch is a different story. I've seen clutches replaced at 36k, 80k, 107k, it varies greatly. None of those were Subarus, though.

    -juice
  • dafracksdafracks Member Posts: 14
    juice, That huge blast of air you just felt was me breathing a sigh of relief. I know this dealer, they would have made it cost a lot of money to fix.
  • windy6windy6 Member Posts: 57
    Well this is kind of weird. We have a 98 Forester L, I say we, but I mean she. I've probably put a couple of thousand miles max the past 3 years. Anyway I had to take it on a two day business trip and I noticed that two hits on the remote unlock didn't unlock anything except the driver's door. Got home and tried the other remote, even put new batteries in both. Wife claimed the remote never unlocked anything other than drivers. I'm sure it used to do all 5!
    Has a wire fallen off a relay? A relay gone bad? Have I lost it? I asked a buddy who's had a dozen or so subies over the years and he swears every one with power door locks would unlock all 5. I know if I call the dlr, I'll get the old "bring it in and we'll look". BTW, nothing about this in owners manual.
    Help
    windy6
  • armac13armac13 Member Posts: 1,129
    A double hit on the open button should open all 5 doors. What the problem is I don't know, but the behaviour you describe is NOT normal.

    Ross
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Also, try just holding down the button for a few seconds. That works for me.

    Another thing is where you point it. I'm not sure why, but if I am behind it and point it at the hatch, I get the best range. This is odd because the receiver is under the steering wheel.

    -juice
  • rochcomrochcom Member Posts: 247
    On the '98, push the button momentarily to unlock the driver's door, hold the button for about two seconds to unlock all doors. I find that sometimes, you need to be closer to the vehicle to unlock all doors than to unlock just the driver's. I am not sure why.

    Also, holding BOTH buttons for two seconds is the "panic" function that activates the alarm -- handy if someone nearby acts suspiciously.
  • lowellklowellk Member Posts: 30
    juice: No, no test drive. In fact, I didn't visit any dealerships. Saw an '03 XS Premium in the parking lot at work and some other '03s during my daily commutes. That's all. Handled the order via phone and fax with a fleet sales manager. I didn't actually meet him until my wife and I went to take delivery of the XS. It still had the protective wrap on when we arrived. Didn't sit in it until after all the paper work was done and we were ready to go home.

    --- Lowell
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Wow. You did get a fresh, non-test-driven vehicle, then.

    Did they clean it up nicely during the PDI?

    -juice
  • lowellklowellk Member Posts: 30
    It was fresh all right, it had rolled off the trailer just the day before. There were only three miles on the odometer.

    The two prep guys did a very good job. The body, windows and cabin were spotless. The window sticker was neatly tucked into the glove compartment and they even set the compass to the correct zone. The only thing they missed was checking the tire pressure. All five tires were over-inflated. Overall, I was very satisfied with their work.

    --- Lowell
  • jtm4jtm4 Member Posts: 60
    windy, I have a '98 L. One hit and the driver's door opens or hold the button down for a couple of seconds and all 5 doors open. I've noticed, when the battery gets weak, the range of operation gets shorter. I don't have an alarm on my vehicle.

    Jim
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Why, oh why are tire pressures so commonly overlooked during PDI? That's just a pet peeve of mine.

    Ken
  • eps105eps105 Member Posts: 216
    Just caught up on the last few days of posts, so I thought I'd chime in on some issues...

    Forester XS seats: As a previous owner of a 99 Forester L, I was worried about the switch to only a single height adjuster, as I liked to have the front almost all the way up and the back all the way down so as to cradle and support my thighs. I was pleased to find the the angle and contour of the 03 Foresters to be quite comfortable. No complaints here. I see it as a design streamlining/simplification rather than cheapening, as the seats are at least as comfortable if not more so.

    Brake noise: I too have always noticed the temporary brake scraping noise many days for the first few stops. It's good to know that's totally normal.

    Auto tranny lag: Neither my '99 nor my '03 Forester ever had the smoothest transmission, but they are responsive enough. I definitely have noticed the lag from reverse to park in my '03. I'd say about 1.5-2 seconds. If I give it gas too soon, it feels like something is slipping and then grabs with a shudder. If I wait 2 seconds, it's takes off smooth. Again, it's good to hear this is normal. However, the person that posted it also lags when starting from a light -- I would find that unacceptable and dangerous. You should accelerate as soon as you touch the peddle. I would escalate that issue to your dealer and Subaru if it is not resolved.
  • eps105eps105 Member Posts: 216
    Last June, after I first got my '03 Forester XS, I posted a few comments about the auto climate control. After owning it for over 9 months now, I feel that it is one of my largest complaints about the new Forester. I am surprised more people don't post comments about this.

    Is it me, or is it incredibly annoying that the A/C turns on when it the interior reaches the set temperature, even if it is 10 degrees outside?

    I would certainly like to see an economy mode that overrides the A/C. (Yes I know I can turn it off manually, but it resets when you press the Auto button again.)

    I also feel that the blower level is way too biased toward rapid temperature gains rather than passenger comfort. If it's very cold, I don't mind it blowing on the highest fan speed for a couple of minutes to at least get it tolerable, but then I'd like to see it drop to the 2nd level and gradually warm it up. I can't stand it blowing out heat on the highest level for 10-15 minutes, so I am constantly overriding it. It also feels like it over compensates and gets too warm, so I generally am turning the temp down to 66 or so.

    Anyone else share these feelings? I think Subaru could definitely tweak the design of this.

    Elliot
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Ah-hah! Nobody's perfect. ;-)

    Elliot: it's actually a common complaint. There was a lot of discussion about it a while ago.

    -juice
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    In general, I dislike the auto climate controls on our LL Bean and Forester XS. Ocassionally, they get it right, but most of the time, we have to fight with the system or override it. One of the things I appreciate most about my WRX is the simple manual controls. I forgot how nice it was to be in charge of climate control. With the recent mild weather we've been having I set it and forget it. On the Bean and Forester, it seems like the auto systems are always blowing in your face.

    Craig
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    My wife's car has it just right - all simple rotary dials, total control.

    -juice
  • bsvollerbsvoller Member Posts: 528
    Speaking as a certified IT geek, there IS such a thing as too much automation. If the automation can 1) satisfy the vast majority's needs, 2) the vast majority of the time, 3) allows for easy manual adjustment the few times that it makes a poor choice, and 4) introduces no new behavior that defeats basic functional requirements, OK. Otherwise, no thanks. In practice, that can be a pretty tall order.

    I can't speak to how well climate control works out of personal experience, but the Subaru rendition apparently needs work.

    I'd look for a way not to own it personally, like powered doors on a mini-van. More trouble than they're worth, from what I've gathered. How hard is it to make some simple settings on the climate controls, really ? I see zero benefit. What am I missing ?

    As to my powered doors example, I know that some people can't live without 'em, but for my money, powered doors are a deal-killer. I won't pay for them. I don't even want them for "free". Too many reports of problems that the dealer can't isolate. "Honey, I'm stuck in the parking lot at the grocery store, because the doors won't stay latched." This is an example of #4 above. No thanks.

    -brianV
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    You're right. They have been a problem on Ventures, Odysseys, and MPVs. They seem almost universally problematic.

    -juice
  • gened1gened1 Member Posts: 256
    There can be too much automation in a car. I have to agree.
    That said, I see no excuse for the Forester not having power seats. I just can't fathom that Subaru doesn't feel the Forester owner is important enough to offer this feature.
    Also I've had many cars with automatic climate control and I always have had to over ride the numb n*ts computer to the point of frustration. Even on high end cars like Lexus and Corvette . Manual is better as long as it has enough options.
  • bsvollerbsvoller Member Posts: 528
    Even powered seats offer little real benefit unless tied to a "memory" feature. If you can store your preferred seat position and recall it, great, otherwise, it's extra weight, cost and complexity for little benefit, IMO.

    -brianV
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Not that I need power seats, but in the hierarchy of automation you would definitely expect that to come before auto-climate control.

    But drop both, I'd rather see them spend money on something more useful, like real metal skid plates instead of the plastic covers.

    -juice
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.