Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
Smart Fortwo
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Of course, in my area, there always seems to be a "fad" component to sales of quirky vehicles. The new Beetle, PT Cruiser, and smart, to name a few, all are bought and VERY visible right away then the newness wears off or some new and unusual vehicle comes along.
There WERE about 7 smarts that I was seeing around town during the summer, but I hadn't seen one on the road since early Sept until yesterday.
Dennis
There are folks here who jump from vehicle to vehicle depending on what's "trendy" and adhere to the philosophy from the Eagle's song New Kid In Town...
They will never forget you 'til somebody new comes along.
Not a judgement, just an observation. When the Hummer came out they were highly visible here too.
I had a smart pull out in front of me when he shouldn't have this summer. I managed to avoid hitting him, but the look on his face told me he knew he was in a bad spot.
The silliest defense I've heard of the smart with regard to safety is that it's so light that it would probably bounce off the front of an 18 wheeler and the car would keep you safe. Uh huh :confuse:
That comment was even immortalized in an Ask Dub Schwartz! entry on the Alternate Route.
I have, not only that I have driven one. Yes its a small car but it is fun to drive, nimble and easy to manuever around things.
I can't imagine driving one of those on the freeway, how dangerous.
I have seen them on the freeways and they kept up with traffic very well and seemed to handle the wind very well.
As for dangerous its not really any more dangerous than any other small car.
And only 40 mpg, why not buy a 5-speed civic,
Well that 40 MPG is most likely a combined city/highway mileage. The Smart owners I have talked to state that they get mid 30's city and mid to upper 40's highway. With that 5-speed civic you might do 40 Highway but a lot less in mixed driving. So the Smart would get at least 10% better gas mileage than the 5 speed civic.
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
It's amazing to me all the naysayers that come here to bash the smart or try to save the poor goons that consider buying.it. What is that all about?? If you are not a smart buyer or admirer, you won't get why anyone would be smitten with it. Anyone who compares a Versa to a smart is certainly not speaking to the smart buyer. Nothing wrong with a Versa, but where does it end? Shouldn't the Versa buyer consider the Altima or Fusion? Shouldn't the Fusion buyer consider a New Taurus or a Lucerne? Shouldn't the Lucerne buyer get a Yukon instead? Maybe we should all drive the same weight and size vehicles, and Harleys should be banned?
Anyone care to comment on the design or quality of this engine? I assume it doesn't contain any latest tech valve-trains or injection systems...
Who supplies the transmission? And it it a 5 or 6 sp auto? Was the previous model a 6 sp and the current (USA) model is a 5 sp? Thanks.
I didn't get the power steering and its just fine without it. I took it to the mountains for the weekend, it was a little sluggish uphill, but didn't bother me at all, I was able to drive the same way I always do on this route. It was a very comfortable ride. At first the no cruise control bothered me, then I found a comfortable angle for my foot to stay on the accelerator and it was fine. The weather was mild so I'm not sure I can vouch for it not getting blown around, but I didn't notice anything so far with that. There was plenty of cargo room for my friends and my stuff in the back.
I live in the city and street park at home and work. My quality of life is so much better now that I don't have to wait for spots right in front of my home anymore (I can always count on someone to leave a big enough gap for me to get into, which used to aggravate me because it was usually someone taking up two spaces) I wanted the shortest possible car I could find. This is the perfect car for me.
You may think this is a great gadget but if the informedforlife.org's data is correct, and I have no reason to believe it is not, don't run into anything or be run into or you may find yourself re-thinking your position . . . .
http://www.informedforlife.org/demos/FCKeditor/UserFiles/File/1MasterSCOREr.pdf
For everyones information informedforlife.org uses very questionable methods for determining safety ratings as was discussed here before. See post # 345 and 348.
Tell me priggly how in the world can informed for life use two sources that say car 'A' is safer than car 'B' and come up with car 'B' is safer than car 'A'?
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
There is no alternative yet if a truly small car is what you want. There is no alternative yet if you don't constantly want to be driving around a back seat and a lot of sheet metal you never use. There is no alternative if the economical car you prefer to drive is one that sticks out, gets reactions and makes you smile when you look at it.
It's amazing to me that people come here to bash the smart or try to save the poor fools that consider buying.it. What is that?? If you are not a smart buyer or admirer, you won't ever get why anyone would be smitten with it. Anyone who compares a Versa or an Aveo to a smart is certainly not speaking to the smart buyer. Nothing wrong with a Versa, but where does it this end? Shouldn't the Versa buyer consider a midsize for greater safety? Shouldn't the midsize buyer consider a fullsize? Shouldn't the fullsize sedan buyer get an SUV instead? Maybe we should all drive the same size vehicles, and Harleys and other cycles be banned? Maybe vehicles with less than 6 airbags should be crushed now?
The smart fills a niche. It is not a niche you want to be in. Fine. Even if all your safety claims are true, that is not going to dissuade people for whom the smart appeals any more than safety claims are going to get Harley riders off their hogs.
A good product is going to fulfill the needs and wants of the consumer. The smart simply doesn't fulfill the needs of a large portion of the car buying public. Yes, I could use the smart for a lot of my day to day transportation, but certainly not all of it, so I have to make a choice as I can't afford to buy multiple vehicles to perform different jobs.
Maybe it would help to hear what a smart fan thinks the niche of the smart is. Because right now the only smarts I've seen on the road fit the pattern that I've seen over and over with many vehicles... It's new, it's different, and *I* have the latest fad vehicle.
An example of good friends of mine...
They are building a green sustainable house jumping through regulation hoops in order to get grants to cover a portion of the costs. They live in a small town and drive a smart not only for the mileage, but because it uses fewer resources to build a whole car. They have just ordered a second one. They are the kind of people who couldn't care less what others think of what they drive. Another friend, a developer, drives his (probably his fourth or fifth vehicle) has it for fun drives between job sites.
I don't know what the smart niche is either. I don't think there is any homogenous group that goes after it. Rather, it is a niche vehicle because of its very specialized nature. The actual reasons people choose a very low volume vehicle (relatively speaking) will be about as varied as the number of buyers. Sure, there are people who will buy it because it is cute. As well as other reasons.
The reality of it is is the Smart does indeed fulfill the needs of a large portion of the car buying public, especially those with multiple cars in the household. Tell me how many two (or more) car families have one car that doesn't really need a back seat? When our kids were little there was no reason that either me or the wife couldn't have been driving a car like the Smart. Sure we needed a car with more room and a back seat but we didn't need two of them. Next time you commute to work look around and see how many cars only have one occupant.
Please do not confuse what people think they need with what the actually need.
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
According to the EPA its 34 MPG, just one MPG better than the Smart in city driving and 8MPG less than the Smart on the highway. Try again.
the Saturn Astra gets about 38,
Again according to the EPA the Astra gets 32 MPG highway. Try again
Ford is putting out the new Fiesta in about 6 months and it gets identical gas mileage and it's cheaper.
We can talk about the Fiesta when it gets here. Yes it gets identical gas mileage but thats in Europe. If it comes with the same engine expect the mileage to drop once it gets US emissions. Expect it to drop even more if it gets a more powerful engine.
They are running about 18-21k.
I believe they start at around 11K.
Sorry I don't see any non hybrids getting anywhere near what the Smart does.
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
I have some personal knowledge and experience in this area because of my time spent in Japan. In Japan, the (tiny) Smart car concept makes sense. Distances are short, speeds are low, parking is always a problem. The Japanese make an entire class of cars that are 'Smart' competitors - the Kei class. They're quite efficient and comfortable. However, they're not intended for high speed work and generally don't attempt it. Her's an example from Toyota that I'd prefer to a Smart, I think, for use in the Same circumstances.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_iQ
The Smart car is really only suited to a few niche markets in the states - New York City, San Francisco, and perhaps (the old) New Orleans.
As far as the environmental impact, the fact that the Smart is recyclable is rather irrelevant in the states, since it won't be. In fact, since the United States IS set up to recycle steel cars and not plastic cars, the Smart is LESS likely to be recycled.
Having said all this, I like cars, and I like innovation. If I were in a location where a Smart was at all practical, I'd consider one....they're very cool... but in truth, I'd much rather have a Suzuki Cappuccino cause it's closer to who I am.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzuki_Cappuccino
Dennis
I am the very happy owner and driver of a smart ForTwo for seven months now. I live in a rural area, am averaging 50.6 mpg for over 7,200 miles, and prefer to drive my smart over my Honda Ridgeline or VW Eos. I find the safety test result FACTS from the the NHTSA, IIHS, and Euro NCAP as well as the extensive safety features of the car (including standard "Stability Control") quite reassuring. I'm proud of what owning and driving a smart as opposed to virtually any other vehicle does for the environment. As a longtime "car guy" (45 years in the automotiove business) and enthusiast, I thoroughly enjoy driving my smart. And. by the way, the latest issue of Consumer Reports lists the smart as one of the "Most Reliable" small cars and the Toyota Versa as "Least Reliable."
I believe (my opinion) that we all have the right to hold and express our own opinions but we don't have the right to represent them as facts. What do you think/believe?
Enjoy
Have you talked to everyone who has bought one? If not thats just your misinformed opinion. I have talked to many Smart car owners and everyone loves their car.
We must keep up our will to wipe out any thought that this car could work for anyone.
So basically you want to wipe out the truth? The truth is this car would work for millions of people. How many people drive a commuter vehicle and never have more than one other person in the car? there are many that fit that bill.
It is dangerous!
So is a motorcycle, so is a Yaris. Lets face it, unless you are driving an armored truck driving is dangerous, the Smart is no more dangerous than any other small car and safer than a motorcycle or a scooter.
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
Honestly, I was going to go test drive a smart just to see what they were like, but our local dealer stopped having them.
I'm not trying to "save" anyone from buying or driving a smart. That's the great thing about cars. We can all choose what we like for whatever reason. I just shake my head sometimes at the hyperbole when it comes to safety of ANY vehicle when people make statements like "it's so light it would probably bounce off the 18-wheeler instead of crush".
Sort of strains common sense a bit!
Might be interesting for some of us to keep a log of our driving for a week and see how much car we actually use or need. It might even surprise me, but thinking back on this last week there were about four times I was in the car with less than 3 people on board. Still might be an interesting exercise once I get over this head cold :sick:
They just hated it and couldn't wait to get rid of it.
I was going to ask if these cars can really be driven on the freeway and I read here about a poster who drives hie 80-90 MPH!!
I'm not bashing them but for the life of me, I think I would rather walk!
85 mph or so:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcump2Zx7SU
No car is right for everyone but I can't think of a car that would be more wrong for me!
I used to work at Internationals Corporate office, They had a couple of those CXT's parked there. Any car parked next to them looked ridiculous (or visa versa pick your choice).
Anyway I still say that as a second commuter car (which many families have) the smart would be the perfect second car.
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
To me, they look like a cartoon car!
I wonder how they are in a strong crosswind?