Subaru Crew - Future Models II

1162163165167168446

Comments

  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    the "new" 2.0 turbo Forester still only gets 177 HP. I sure hope that's not the case here.

    According to Paul Hansen (apexjapan.com/I-Club), the UK-spec cars—while not identical to US-spec cars—are pretty close to what we get in terms of power; more so than those found in other markets, such as Australia or Japan.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    No way, why even bother bringing that over. They won't, gas is cheap here. It's totally different.

    And isn't their base car a 130hp 2.0l, something like that? That makes the turbo a decent upgrade for them.

    -juice
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    for UK customers, the turbo is a decent upgrade. I think what Paul was referring to was engine tuning, not engine size. It's his understanding (I think) that UK engines and US engines are similar in terms of tune to meet similar emissions and fuel requirements, thus have similar states of tune.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Even that weaker turbo had pretty good 0-60 times, around 7.7s IIRC, vs. about 9s for the 2.5l.

    But the Escape and CR-V are already in the low 8s. Having to use premium fuel for a tiny advantage isn't worth it. I want to see it BLOW THE DOORS OFF the competition, not just edge them out.

    Remember, it's a moving target. I bet the Escape gets the 220hp engine from the Mazda 6, since that's the same block, basically.

    -juice
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    This is getting interesting!

    The spy photo is certainly a left hand drive model so it just may be the Statebound model.

    I don't expect the XT to have any fancy internals like the twin-scroll turbo. My conservative hope would be that Subaru tunes it for more low end torque. However, the article does imply the same 227 peak HP. I wouldn't be surprised if Subaru decided to drop the same engine used in the US-spec WRX just to simplify support costs.

    I think the XS Premium will still be around. With the last generation Forester, SOJ had 'premium' model with all the nice trimings mated to the 2.5L AVCS engine and positioned it as it's luxury touring model. The turbo was a separate variant with a more sporty bent to it.

    I wonder if the XT will have the same pull-type clutch found in the 5-speed WRX. I couldn't imagine the current 5-speed being mated to the EJ20 turbo.

    Ken
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    juice,

    You *know* the XT WILL blow the doors off the competition, baby! Where's hondabro now? ;-)

    Ken
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    when you think about the Forester getting a turbo before the Legacy, it becomes just another humiliation for the (hither to premium) Legacy lineup...

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I bet they're assuming it's the 227hp engine. I bet we get the JDM 217hp one.

    Ken: I'm sure hondabro, who owned a 1997 CR-V auto with the slowest 0-60 time in my memory (12.5s according to CR), traded it in and was too ashamed to come back and admit it!

    Bob: they are experimenting with the lineup. The H6 was too expensive. The WRX was just right and sales skyrocketed, but now they have more warranty issues than they're used to dealing with, and reliability down to "average" (gasp!).

    So give us a 217hp Forester with that new clutch that limits pressure to the tranny.

    -juice
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Yes, the Legacy line would seem a little ignored with the turbo Forester, but don't forget that the Legacy does have the only available 6-cylinder engine. The Legacy needs a more performance oriented engine, but not necessarily a turbo.

    Ken
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Well, Outback does.

    Subaru treats the Legacy and Outback as separate lines. They even have different brochures.

    -juice
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Juice- Are you sure about those 0-60 times? ConsumerGuide.com lists the CR-V's time as 8.6 sec, the Escape's as 8.9 sec and the Forester's as 9.3. So the current Forester is still fairly competitive. However, I'm with you, I want to be able to blow the doors off the competition! Therefore I'd like to see the Forester turbo running in the low 7s.

    -Frank P.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    One Tribute hit 60 in 8.2s, per C&D, and the CR-V was close. Times vary a lot, but I'd like to see the turbo well ahead so as to leave no doubt which is the quickest, even with automatic.

    -juice
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    You need to have those good 0-60 and 1/4 mile #s on family cars! :(

    -mike
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Not really, I'd just like to own a car that meets my family's needs but is also fun to drive.

    I'm not asking for 280hp, 200-220hp would be fine.

    -juice
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    C'mon, paisan; family guys can't have fun too?

    Ed
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Just the vehicles such as SUVs and what not are not built to be race cars. It's like the idiots with SUVs who are on the SUV boards saying how their Durango runs a 16s 1/4mile etc. I dunno, just seems like a machoismo thing, you can't go that fast on the street...

    -mike
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    It's beginning to sound like some of the good stuff (Twin-scroll turbo, etc.) may remain in Japan. :(


    So what else is new...


    Bob


    http://www.4car.co.uk/jsp/main.jsp?lnk=220&storyid=1784

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Well, I'd like to see bigger brake rotors and maybe fatter stock sway bars on the turbo, too. I believe in balance.

    Strap a hemi V8 to a Durango that handles like a bathtub half full of water, and you have a scary ride.

    Let's see. I load her up with 4 passengers and the requisite Subaru dog, plus luggage, and haul up to CT or the beach. I'm hitting lots of on ramps so good torque is a safety feature. Not mega HP, just solid mid range torque. 200 ft-lbs or so.

    Then, to stop all that weight, you need solid brakes. Gimme 4 pots. Or the rotors off the VDC, which are bigger and can handle stopping all that weight without boiling the brake fluid.

    Finally, let's limit body roll so it doesn't scare the kiddies, and for better accident avoidance. I'd like to see less dive and squat, too.

    I think Forester is among the best-in-class for sport/cutes, but there is room for improvement.

    -juice
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    The headlight does look better as a complete unit. Just avoid close-ups, or change the yellow to clear.

    I like the taillights, it's a subtle change but neat.

    -juice
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    the rear wiper and different rear deck badging. No large S U B A R U, and different WRX label on the blue Japanese-spec STi?

    Bob
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Very sweet pictures! Looks great, but man, oh man, what a huge hood scoop.


    I read through the Japanese article and the tester mentioned that, despite his initial concerns, the hood scoop actually didn't impair his vision when he actually drove the STi.


    The article continues on to say how much better the new STi performs, but he made an interesting point on how suprisingly quiet the cabin is. He and the passenger were able to hold a normal conversation on the track with helmets on while taking a corner at 170km/h (106mph).


    Also, there are more photos on the following page of the article:


    http://car.nifty.com/as/column?cid=car&sid=1&aid=0211130017&pid=4


    There's a nice arrest-me-red WRX wagon at the end.


    Ken

  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    That red wagon looks great with those 17" anthracite wheels. I sure hope we get those wheels here, this time around, and not the current 16" units.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    No, but it's the type of thing you'd notice before me. ;-)

    The rear deck looks cleaner, but I still can't get over all the pink decals. At least it's on the real thing.

    I hope the 17s become a factory option. That makes the most sense. You could autocross it in stock classes, but those that want a smoother ride don't pay the cost penalty.

    -juice
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    while waiting for an alignment. The car still pulls, btw :rolleyes:

    it is just a little too, um, public works, ya know? Still, it is nice to see bolder colors again. It has been a drab 8 years or so
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Did bystanders try to hail it? ;-)

    -juice
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    yea, good point. This one had a dumb dealer-installed black pin strip too
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I think it would be safe to assume that most, if not all these items, will also pertain to US-spec models. Vehicles are due in March! It sounds like the WRX may be available with a moonroof (as an option?).


    Bob


    http://forums.i-club.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=276188

  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    Anyone here heard of new body style for '04 Legacy/Outback? I would expect a change for that year, but Subaru seems to be on a longer cycle sometimes. I'm considering an '03 sometime next year, but might hold off if '04 will look a little less "bland".
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    is slated for '05 MY.

    Bob
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Interesting to note the following:

    • EBD, I wonder if this is in response to those WRX owners who've experienced temporary brake failures?

    • There was no mention of the great looking gray 17" wheels that everyone else gets. :( I hope they're at least a factory (not dealer!) option.

    • Our '96 Impreza Outback has 4-wheel disk brakes. I guess there is some truth to the saying: "what goes 'round, comes 'round..." It seems like Subaru is streamlining production with this upgrade, which is good.

    • As I suspected, it looks like the '03 Impreza will have a short model year.

    • It sounds like the STi will hit the showrooms well after the other Imprezas.

    • There was no mention of heated seats for the WRX, because they're already part of the Canadian WRX package. I hope they make it into the US-spec WRXs this go 'round.

    Bob
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    quote: • There was no mention of the great looking grey 17" wheels that everyone else gets.

    SOA dumped a whole bunch of the gold 5 spoke wheels used on the '98 2.5RS because they weren't very popular. (looked GREAT on white, black and blue cars though, IMO.) since then it's been nothing but silver, and it wouldn't surprise me if they stayed the course there...

    -Colin
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Bob -- Nice summary as always. I believe EBD is just Subaru keeping their vehicles competitive. I surely hope SOA offers the US-spec WRX with the cold weather package. I'm a huge fan of the heated side mirrors.

    Colin -- I liked the gold wheels too. :-)

    Ken
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    Thanks for the '05 Legacy tidbit, Bob. I guess that settles it.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Well, you can always buy a new STi, when the hit the shores here. ;)

    Bob
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Nooooooooo!
    Oh well.

    -Dennis
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    if it's an option, which is what it sounds like—it's your choice to get one or not.

    Bob
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    He just bought an '03.

    -mike
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    I couldn't wait. I desparately needed a h.p. bump from 137. :-D

    -Dennis
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I guess you can always get an aftermarket moonroof...

    Bob
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Although I would only get a small one similar to the JDM moonroof.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    That would fix one of my complaints, the moonroof option that is.

    Thing is, if the 2002 RS didn't have it, maybe people wouldn't complain so much. But it did, and the WRX replaced it, so that stood out like a sore thumb.

    Another point - all its competitors have them, including RSX, Celica, A4, etc.

    EBD? Forester XS has it, so maybe it was already scheduled to make it across the product line. CR-V has it standard even without ABS!

    But don't make the WRX too good or Frank, Ed, and Ken will sell their Foresters and join the Dark Side. Use the Force, Luke, your driving skills and a turbo Forester compensate. ;-)

    -juice
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Getting....harder to resist...the Dark Side.

    Only a turbo Forester will bring peace to the universe.

    Ken
    (just finished watching his new SW Episode II DVD)
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Patience. When the Forester arrives, you'll have to take it to the track, to face its father, I mean the WRX, and only then will you become a true Jedi Knight.

    ;-)

    -juice
  • subearusubearu Member Posts: 3,613
  • wrxsoon1wrxsoon1 Member Posts: 158
    If you haven't started one already I'll be the first to get on the waiting list for your wagon when your new STi arrives ;). I know you've broken it in nicely and with all those mods already done...I'd be plenty happy with that.

    Then again if SOA gives us heated mirrors, heated seats and an optional moonroof on the MY04 I may just have to go that route.

    -Ian
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    ....most track schools I know class it as a small SUV, i.e. "truck," i.e. not allowed! Plus I like to autocross.

    Must...hold..out.....for.....Legacy turbo.....
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Not if it looks like the Cross Sport model, i.e. lowered and with no cross bars. That one doesn't look much like an SUV at all.

    We'll see. paisan said an SVT Lightning was chasing his SVX on the track that day, the Forester is a lot less trucky than that.

    -juice
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.