Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Subaru Impreza WRX Wagon

15681011115

Comments

  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Let's get one thing straight here, the original poster quoted from the I-club. While I'm a big I-club fan, not everything you read there is 100% reliable.

    The major problem I found with the AT WRX is that in the non-turbo range, you are totally screwed out of power, with no way to control it. From a seat of the pants test, my XT6 has more umph off the line than the 2.0l WRX AT.

    -mike
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    Okay, then why spend the extra money for the WRX when you can get an OBS which also handles well


    Now I am getting bugged!! ;-(

    After all the detailed explanations above, the guy comes back and spouts the same old question almost as if none of the above posts happened.

    Please read the following, which was conveyed in my first post...the answer to why someone would spend more money on the WRX (over the OBS), in addition to having a *** much better *** AWD system:

    ======================
    "Also, in addition to that, the Outback Sport does not have a rear Limited Slip Differential. Due to this short-coming, there is no side-to-side power transfer. In other words, if both the wheels on the left or both the wheels on the right is on a surface that does not have traction, the Outback Sport is like a helpless baby - will not go anywhere - while the WRX Auto would smoothly power out of this situation (due to the side to side power transfer). The cars that do not have the rear LSD would only transfer power front/back or vice-versa.

    =============================

    Later...AH
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    We can argue back and forth about this issue without reaching any conclusions. One can try to logically explain certain things and someone else can dispute all that with the "seat of the pants feel". By this, we are not going anywhere !!!!

    So let us lay "the issue" to rest and enjoy our rides. I am deliriously enjoying driving this pocket-rocket (Automatic transmission and all), all over the mountains/twisty roads, with a real wide grin permanently pasted on my face. Also, this car which I originally purchased for my wife, has become my daily ride, while my other car (my previous pride and joy), the Acura 3.2TL (with the kick-[non-permissible content removed] Navigation system), has slowly become my wife's car.

    Take care,

    Later...AH
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    It's not that hard to have an LSD put in so you could get an OBS and have an LSD put in.

    -mike
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    What about the "drum brakes" the OBS employs on the rear wheels ? Should we go ahead and replace that too ? Also, to make the OBS handle nearly as well as the WRX-Auto, one has to start replacing suspension components all around.

    And all of this is without even bringing the VTD-AWD system, into the equation, which in no way, shape or form can be tacked onto to the OBS, unless one is willing to spend big-bucks...

    And after all those additions, you are still stuck with an OBS at the price of a WRX and basically what you have would be an OBS with stuff tacked on, and not a WRX. So my take is, why not spend the money upfront, and get the "real thing" ??

    Take care, everyone.

    Later...AH
  • twrxtwrx Member Posts: 647
    I chose the 5 speed because in 32 years of driving I have never owned an automatic. It would be dangerous for me to own an automatic because in a tight turn I'd try to push in clutch to shift and hit the brake pedal instead! Seriously it is really fun to shift it with its short throw lever and I can hardly wait to have the 5 speed for mountain driving next summer in Colorado.

    TWRX
  • moparmadmoparmad Member Posts: 197
    My wife is really enjoying the Outback,seems strange to fill it with less than fifteen bucks,all our other three vehicles are V8's two of them big blocks. I am curious to see how it does this winter, I expect it will be fine.

    I didn't mean to put the WRX auto down,we just didn't feel it was worth the money in our particular application,my wife isn't a performance driver per say and therefore finds the handling of the Outback nearly indiscernible from the WRX. She does wish the 2.5 had a little more power but feels it isn't worth the extra money to her to get it with the WRX. That being said I still believe the WRX is hands down the best car available for under $25,000.
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    the auto Rex has more turbo lag down low, it still has 227 h.p.! That's one reason I would get an auto WRX over an auto OBS. It all depends on your driving. If you do a lot of low gear and/or twisty/hilly driving, the manual is the better choice. If you're mostly in high gear, it really doesn't matter. It's silly to put down cars or people because of transmission choices.

    Mopar - more power? That's easy. Just check i-club.com for ideas. There's a chip available for all Subaru's for a few more horses. Also a Amsoil or K&N filter will help with throttle response.

    -Dennis
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Simple, Patti, you are not an old lady! ;-)

    I think a properly broken-in auto WRX, especially with a good driver behind the wheel, could be kept in the boost and would be quite fast.

    The 5 speed has the edge off the line, but once you get going it would be pretty close.

    -juice
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    the 5spd WRX (assumingly) would also be properly broken-in (just to be fair) and the advantage would still remain as it is. :-) Bottom line for me is that I wouldn't discourage anyone from buying a WRX just because (for whatever reason) they had to have an automatic. The WRX is just too good in so many other areas to do w/o. :-)

    On another note, I ordered 4 Dunlop Winter Sports tires in 205/55x16 size yesterday from Tirerack. I'm going to have them mounted on my stock wheels. I think I may have to go up in the Cascades for some "snow time" once everything is mounted and ready to go.

    Stephen

    Oh yeah, Juice, when do I start the new test driving position for Subaru?? :-)
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I'm just saying with a broken in tranny and engine, it would easier to keep the WRX auto on full boost.

    -juice
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    Also, another point a lot of people are ignoring is that the Automatic Transmission in the WRX is adaptive . In other words, the transmission "learns" the driver's driving style over a period of time and "adapts" the gear shifts accordingly. I realised why my WRX had grown "smoother" over the past 500 miles....it had adapted to my driving style !

    So if you are an aggressive driver with a well broken in Auto-WRX, then, the results may be a bit surprising for a person who has only driven the Auto-WRX at a dealership with 16 miles on it !!! The well broken in WRX with an aggressive driver would have adapted the gear shift points to the aggressive mode ! I really think it is a disservice to the "adaptive" tranny, to make "objective" comments on it with a short drive at the dealership with the car having 5 miles on it.

    In the BMW SMG auto-manual transmission (which incidentally does not have a torque-converter like a conventional automatic), you can adjust the "aggressiveness" of the shifting, manually ! The SMG does not have to "learn" like the Auto-WRX transmission.

    In addition to this, there is an automatic "power mode" in the transmission, which when engaged, will not upshift until redline in every single shift. The car would always be in its boost zone. And as we all know, the Auto-WRX in the boost zone, is a rocket. And when coupled with active and rapid torque transfer characteristics (of the exclusive VTD-AWD system), would make for one fun ride. Again, food for thought.....

    Later...AH
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I imagine the adaptive tranny would shift significantly different with someone like paisan behind the wheel for a few tankfulls of gas.

    -juice
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    Is paisan that aggressive ?!!

    Later...AH
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I co-drove with him for a gimmick rally and my sides still hurt! ;-)

    -juice
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    Here is something I picked up from the i-club, about the pros and cons of Automatic/Manual trannies (not specific to the WRX):

    Also, note that this article was written a while back with the opinions expressed pertaining to the Auto-trannies of those days....auto trannies have meanwhile evolved with grade-logic control etc.

    http://www.racer-x.f2s.com/proc/transdebate.htm

    Later...AH
  • 1subydown1togo1subydown1togo Member Posts: 348
    "This is the one usually given by the "juice tranny" crowd "
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    He he, in that context the "juice" is the ATF.

    His theory goes against the fact that off-the-line acceleration is quicker with manuals, because a torque converter will allow only a certain rpm, while the sky's the limit with the manual. Drop the clutch at 4000rpm, you'll pass any auto. Even 3000rpm will launch faster.

    He completely ignores the gearing advantage a 5 speed offers over a 4 speed auto, and the higher up-front cost of the automatic. He says a clutch is expensive to replace, but it's half the up-front cost of an auto, and replacing an auto tranny costs about 5-10 times more!

    The "jolt and chirp" he talks about are things customers complain about, not advantages, and it's actually much easier to chirp the tires with a manual.

    I dunno, that article it full of flawed logic.

    -juice
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    It's not what it's cracked up to be. I had this same feature on my 00'OB Ltd w/auto. With all due respect AH, me thinks you buy into the Subaru brochure a wee bit too much. Also, most of us here are pretty familiar w/the various Subaru features. A lot of what you point out is like preaching to the chior. :-) With that said, I'm glad you have a WRX regardless of transmission choice. The WRX is so good in so many ways despite (or inspite) of transmission choice.

    Stephen
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I didn't want to sound like I think the auto has no advantages. It certainly does.

    It is better for towing, and even for driving on loose sand. It's more convenient and comfortable, too. If you have to lend the car to someone, they are far more likely to know how to drive it. And resale is easier and likely higher as well.

    Plenty of trade-offs, some good, some bad.

    -juice
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Stephen -
    That's odd. In my wife's 99 OB Ltd., I do buy into the adaptive shift. My wife can actually accelerate her car better than I can. I drive it maybe once or twice a month. When I give it the gas, I floor it too hard and it kinda stalls. Two weeks ago she suprised me at a busy intersection with the car's fast pick up. I was like, "How'd you do that?!?!" Maybe it's because she has the lighter, leaner 99 model. ;-)

    Dennis
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    As proof, of the driver w/AT, at every auto-x I attend most people are totally amazed at how well I do with my AT XT6. Most of the times, their jaws drop when they hear it's an AT. It does take a lot of practice to drive an AT in a performance situation, but it does make left foot braking very easy.

    -mike
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I'll have juice as a navigator any day on a rally, in fact I'd definitely like to have him navigate a rally for me.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    OK, just let me double my life insurance...

    Kidding! If I can make it and have the time, I will.

    -juice
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    hunter001 Nov 15, 2001 11:53am

    He he... Boy, is he.
    He almost had me wet my pants. And, we were only tailing him to a local Diner. :-D

    -Dave
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    Yeah...definitely the lighter, leaner 99'model is the difference. My 00'OB Ltd was a porky little pig...one of the big reasons why I got the WRX (sans automatic). :-)

    Stephen
  • jabukwajabukwa Member Posts: 2
    hi, new to the discussion.
    bought a blk wrx 5spd wgn about 3wks ago. just suffered thru 1000 miles of restrained driving. live in minnesota so took it in to dealer yesterday for engine block heater. drove home (3mi). then later drove slowly (<2000rpm) to get coffee. foggy and windows wouldn't clear so looked at temp guage and it was in the RED!!! stopped and towed to subaru.
    they admit to having screwed up, "air lock".
    what do i do now? they say it is fine, and are going to give me some oil changes. that doesn't make me feel much better.
    any suggestions
  • dill6dill6 Member Posts: 120
    I've been hanging around here for a couple of months trying to make up my mind on what AWD vehicle to get - had worked myself into a state of chronic indecision with all the pros and cons. Then a few days ago someone posted how they'd test driven something, and, though they felt pretty lukewarm about it, thought they'd probably buy it anyway because it made so much "sense". Juice, and some others, replied to the effect of "if you don't love her don't marry her."

    Well, that got me to thinking, and the next day I woke up knowing what to do. Last night I picked up my 5sp silver WRX wagon at the dealer. Took a 25 mile canyon detour on the way to work this morning. Man, did I make the right decision!!! (for me, just for me) This thing is even better than I thought. And I've already made peace with the slightly wacky styling. Hell, I'm a little wacky myself.

    So thanks everybody, this site has not only been a fun diversion but has actually helped me with a pretty big decision, and I couldn't be happier about it.

    Did I mention that I LOVE my WRX?
  • dsm6dsm6 Member Posts: 813
    Amen, brother. That post just about says it all.
  • revkarevka Member Posts: 1,750
    Dill6- Congratulation on your new WRX wagon. We look forward to hearing more... Happy motoring! ;-)

    Jabukwa- Sorry to hear about your vehicle problem. If you don't get a response here soon, you should also post (copy/paste) your message in our Subaru Crew - General Maintenance & Repair discussion. Good luck.

    Revka
    Host
    Hatchbacks / Station Wagons / Women's Auto Center Boards
  • cupholder1cupholder1 Member Posts: 231
    There are some advantages:

    Easier to talk on the cellphone as you weave in and out of traffic at high speeds...

    Easier for the wifey to put on her eye makeup while driving, when she is using the car....

    Yup, those seem to be the things that really count the most to your average slush box driver.
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    Coincidentally, I do none of those things ;-( Talking on the cellphone while driving I mean.......

    But I know my friend who talks on the cellphone while driving and he drives a stick-shift.

    Later...AH
  • cupholder1cupholder1 Member Posts: 231
    Wreckless driving isn't limited to automatic drivers :)

    But I swear, I have seen many women in these 5000 pound Chevy Suburbans PUTTING ON THEIR MAKEUP WHILE DRIVING!!! Aaaaargh!

    Wouldn't want to be hit by that Suburban while in a Rex...
  • pfloodpflood Member Posts: 2
    I noticed a lot of used 2002 WRX's for sale
    through Autotrader on their National Website. Prices asked were about $2-2.5K under brand new.
    What was significant was that there were no Outbacks of the same current year offered at all.
    Does that mean that buyers of WRX's are unhappy
    and bought into all the magazine hype only to find the real world experience was different, whereas the Outback owners experiences were more in line with what they expected?
    If so how will this affect resale values two or three years down the road. I notice that the projected redidual values of OB's are 2% higher
    than WRX after 24 months. However, those projections are guesswork, but those are the figures supplied to banks and leasing companies.
    Most "sporty" type cars have held their values well, why should the WRX be an exception?
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Have barely gone on sale, you'll have to look at 2001s.

    -mike
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    I agree ! It is pretty nasty seeing a person in one of those "Suburbans" or "Expeditions" straying all over the road with the driver yakking away on a cellphone. Ladies putting on their make-up is the worst, right alongside men who shave or read newspapers while driving !!! Also, an "Auto trans" would facilitate such despicable deeds.

    Later...AH
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    How could you possibly even see up into the cab from the wrx? :) I mean they are so huge it would be next to impossible to see who or what was driving them! :) haaaaaaaa

    -mike

    PS: Just some friday fun.
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    As paisan stated, 2002 WRX has been on sale for almost a year, while the 2002 Outbacks have just come out (1 month back?!!).

    Also, if some people have bought the WRX based on hype built up by magazines, then it is better that they sell these cars off and "real enthusiasts" pick these gems up. Good riddance of "bad blood", jmho !

    Later...AH
  • dill6dill6 Member Posts: 120
    The WRX is definitely an enthusiast's car - those who aren't will find the ride too firm, and probably be the same people who bought ATs and find themselves wondering where all that vaunted horsepower is while they're stuck in turbo lag limbo. And there's no plastic wood either (thank G*D).
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    No plastic wood, just plastic brushed aluminum :)

    -mike
  • pkl88pkl88 Member Posts: 8
    Being too poor (given my expenses) to own an WRX yet, perhaps I'll just have to wait it out for one of them folks to get tired of their ride and get me an used WRX for my "joyride" ride.

    - Paul
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    Stuck in "Turbo lag limbo" ? I would think the "manuals" are not exempt from it ?!!! Or does the "manual" car have some "mechanism" that "eliminates" turbo-lag ? Please pardon my ignorance, since you seem to be onto something which I was unaware of !

    For the record, like the manual WRX, the Auto-WRX is a ** rocket ** once it enters the boost-zone....no ifs or buts about it. "All the vaunted horsepower and torque" are still around, don't worry !!!Before entering the boost-zone, both the manual and the Automatic are a bit sluggish, which IMO, is a good thing, since it would be useful during deep snow, since we can better modulate power, off-boost.

    Off the line, the WRX (Auto or Manual) does not have the "thrust" of my Acura 3.2TL, nor the linearity of power delivery, but once you get used to its "power characteristics", it is like driving any other car. Did I mention the addictiveness of the "riding on rails feel" ?

    Disclaimer: I am not talking about situations where you indulge in vehicle abuse by pumping rpms up and then dumping the clutch during launch.

    Later...AH
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    As much of an AT fan I am (never owned a stick) the WRX can be kept in the boost area much easier with a MT than an AT, which reduces the effects of turbo lag.

    -mike
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    That is certainly possible. But the effects would not be as dramatic, as was portrayed earlier. To reach the "boost-zone", all it takes is a stab of the gas pedal and in an instant you are there. And that is with an AT.

    This argument does not apply to cars on the dealer lot with 5 miles on the Odometer, since the Auto-tranny of the WRX is ADAPTIVE. In a well broken in Auto-WRX with an aggressive driver at the helm (for a while, when the tranny "learns" the driving style), the way the car reaches the boost zone (and retains it there) is completely different from the feel in a "newbie Auto-WRX" on the dealer's lot with 5 miles on it. I don't think it is fair to make "judgemental observations" about the car after driving the "green specimen" at the dealership, especially due to the "adaptable" nature of the Transmission.

    This "adaptability" of Auto-transmissions would be more pronounced in a Turbo-charged car than in a Normally Aspirated car.

    Note: Not all Auto-transmissions have the "adaptability" built-in.

    Later...AH
  • himilerhimiler Member Posts: 1,209
    "Why" do I "get" the "feeling" you "used to" drive your "English teacher" "nuts?"

    Auto tranny=frictional losses, no matter how smart it is (and the WRX slushbox is pretty smart). Also, the fact that it's one ratio down on the manual means that you're likely to fall out of boost more often.
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    bill - Congratulations and have lots of fun!
    You can giggle about no fake wood but the UK has it as an option. :-) They also have 4 pot brakes, 17" wheels standard and various other goodies.

    AH - Yes, it is easy to overcome the turbo-lag in the manual by keeping the revs up around 2500-3000 or so. Of course, constant launches at 3000 will put a lot of wear on the tranny. ;-)

    We should have never told AH how to use bold. :p Better than the constant caps he used to use though.

    -Dennis
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    I am really glad you like your automatic WRX. I'm also glad you own a WRX but there is no way (adaptive or not) that an auto WRX would be as easy to stay in boost range as the manual. Sorry, that's a fact that has been demonstrated over and over and over and....kind of like this auto vs manual tranny debate. :-)

    Stephen
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    All subaru ATs are adaptive as are i'd say 80% of the cars on the market today. And as I said I'm a big AT fan and still feel that the AT doesn't do the WRX justice, and yes I've driven broken in AT WRXs. I'm glad you are happy with it, and if I were to buy a WRX I wouldn't discount an AT.

    -mike
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    After hearing about your driving style, the guy who allowed you to drive his broken-in Auto-WRX, must be a brave man ! J/K

    As I said earlier, it is definitely preferable to have the WRX in a Manual, if it is equipped with the VTD-AWD system.

    I think Subaru is doing a disservice to the Manual WRX buyers, when they are foisting the VC-AWD system on them. The WRX gets nothing special over the models below it. Other than turbo-charging and bigger anti-roll bars/LSD, the WRX-manual is a mirror image of the RS, that costs 1000s less, while the WRX-auto (due to its overwhelmingly better VTD-AWD system), is well worth the premium it commands over the RS-Auto.

    My order of preference for the WRX configuration would be as follows:

    1) WRX manual with VTD-AWD (does not exist)
    2) WRX Auto with VTD-AWD (tie)
    2) WRX Manual with VC-AWD (tie)

    The deficiencies of the VC-AWD due to its very nature - using a center differential based on a Viscous Coupling with fluid filled in, to transfer torque = slow and inefficient transfer of torque, has outweighed the advantages of the stick-shift, IMHO. Use of the viscous fluid is akin to the Auto-transmissions having a torque converter as opposed to a direct gear linkage in the manuals. These cars are admired for their AWD sytems and not for their stiffer suspensions or stick-shifts, and on that criteria, the WRX-manual is not very strong, even though the AWD of the WRX-manual, manages to get the job done, as long as you don't really tax it. If needed, I can try and explain, where the deficiencies of this AWD system lie, which are pretty glaring, to say the least.

    Also, the auto-WRX, inspite of the handicap of the lack of a stick-shift, has risen up the rankings due to its over-whelmingly superior AWD system, when compared to the VC AWD system, employed by the manual-WRX. In fact, this is one of the most sophisticated systems currently available in the market, among all makes and models, equalling in sophistication, the previous generation Mercedes 4-matic and/or the AWD employed by the previous gen.Porsche 911 turbo.

    I would not even be debating this point about the manual-WRX, if it came equipped with the VTD-AWD system. Without it, the comparison becomes sort of a wash, in-spite of violent disagreement from manual-WRX owners.

    just my 2c.

    Quickly donning my double layered flame-suit and ducking....

    Later...AH
This discussion has been closed.