Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Inconsiderate Drivers (share your stories, etc.)

1314315317319320478

Comments

  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited April 2011
    In CA State, it is estimated 25% of drivers drive without licenses and/or insurance. This is not to even address those that are seriously under insured. Full legal insurance is defined as 25,000 cash BOND, meaning one can post lower amounts through a bonding agent.

    That is a pc way of saying: So F... in what?

    Now I do not know the population of so called "licensed" drivers, but there are app 24 M+ cars in CA state. So if I may reach a bit (24 M * 25%) we are talking of 6 M NON licensed drivers, JUST in CA state. Is this a trend? NAH ! What would make one come to THAT conclusion? :blush:
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    edited April 2011
    Oh, I remember.

    Don't get me going...

    Where in CA are you?
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Through internet difficulties, I "misspelled" renewal. So, this is the correction.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    That's probably because we slap the wrists of those who drive w/o a license or underinsured. Maybe if there were mandatory jail time for driving w/o a license, people would think twice about it.

    A guy driving w/o a license hit my wife's car last year. She was not as attentive as she should have been, but given detail of impact etc. he could have easily avoided the accident had he been driving the speed limit (35 in a residential area) or just braked hard. Guess what? He asked the court for damages against my wife so he could pay his court costs for the charge of driving w/o a license. The prosecutor had a good chuckle about that.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Just be glad it wasn't in CA. The prosecutor with a straight face would probably have argued in FAVOR of it.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited April 2011
    Yes, years ago I got a load of the Chicago STYLE of solving traffic issues. I had to see a client in Des Plains, IL. (governmental). So a contact was sent in a private car ( probably the real inadvertent mistake) to pick me and some one else up at O'Hare International Airport. After we got the second person, we went to her car. She parked curbside and literally when we came out she was boxed in at least 4 deep in front, behind, side. Long story short, she could not get out even if she wanted to. So a Chicago policemen seeing the dilemma looked at her and us and asked is this your car? The two of us that she picked up had not a clue, so we both didn't answer or one of us said no, I do not remember. Evidently that pissed the cop off or perhaps the gal's body lanuage said yes it was mine. Again, I do not know. So immediately he says, follow me. All of a suddent all the drivers of the cars that were blocking her exit materialized. He started to pound on the other cars to get them to move so we could follow him. Once he cleared a path, he started yelling and several times, how are you going to resolve this? We non Chicagoans looked at each other in utter amazement. Resolve what? So in hind sight, I am thinking he is saying to himself I am going to show these bozo's how we do it in Chicago. So leads us to a station where they have a bullet proof glass window and they DEMANDED payment then and there. The governmental contact just pulled out a CC and paid what what asked. She later explained that was that particular government's policy of taking care of this and that she would get reimbursed. Needless to say, I think all the bru ha ha could have been solved with a Lincoln or another negotiated president.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    I see no proof from any source - and when those who set the laws are asked to ante up, they either get defensive or hide. That's just the way it is.

    How about this? People who make the rules are forced to prove their case, or are dismissed from their highly paid jobs and windfall benefits.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    I don't think an IDL requires any actual driving skill - it's a scheme for auto clubs to make money. I all my times renting cars in Germany I was never asked for it.

    Speaking of reciprocal licenses, WA is reciprocal with Germany - their tests are a lot harder than ours! I remember taking my test, 20 minutes behind the wheel, too easy.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    There are two separate people in my parking garage who appear to come from the same region. They will both will let their cars warm up for about 10 minutes before driving off (both cars are late model Hondas). I once went and yelled at one of them to stop it when I could smell the exhaust while cleaning my car. I am sure they are great drivers.

    There's no way I could be a driving instructor either, especially in my neighborhood.

    I guess if the bar is set low, more people drive = more gas tax, car sales tax, retail revenue, etc.
  • xrunner2xrunner2 Member Posts: 3,062
    You reminded me of something. One day I was patroling a freeway and I stopped this car for 80 in a 65 zone. He gave me a Illinois license and on the back was a $ 20 bill.

    Illinois eh?

    Recall when I was a little little kid, my father took me along for a vehicle inspection in Crook County, ILL. Before we got out of the car to hand off
    to the inspector, my dad put some money on the seat. Don't think
    my dad ever had a problem in passing the test.
  • jensadjensad Member Posts: 388
    I loved your post as I laughed reading it. Fathers are special and you have a very wise father. I remember I stopped a man for driving 40 mph in a 65 mph in the far left ( fast lane) . He offered me several "incentives" including a date with one of his "harem"s girls. I.e. he ran a "house of ill repute".

    And yes I declined. I cited him for driving too slow on a very buzy Bay Area freeway. (I.e. average speed day time on that freeway was about 65-80 mph.)

    When he got to court I read my notes on the back of the ticket, and the judge, a retired FBI agent zaped him, i.e. max fine.

    Good luck to all and stay safe.

    jensad
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Your's is one of the first I have heard, giving a ticket for going too slow in the fast/#1 lane. Way cool.
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    That probably happened on the Nimitz.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited April 2011
    I just heard this in passing. The Texas House passed a bill for an 85 mph speed limit !!
  • oregonboyoregonboy Member Posts: 1,650
    Yep
    Texas
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    No "proof" they or anyone else would provide would satisfy you. So why should they try?
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    How do you know? They have never really tried - they don't have to.

    And no explanation ever as to why limits seemingly arbitrarily change on various pieces of road.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    I bet people already drive that fast anyway. Sounds good.
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    Oh, that's just wonderful! Gas go's to 4.00 a gallon so they RAISE the speed limit!
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited April 2011
    Think of it as the sliding scale tax one wants to pay. You can still go 45 mph on those same freeways. So at 85 mph speed limits, I would get 50-52 mpg. @ 45 mph, (I would fight massive road hypnosis) I would get upwards of 60+ mpg.
  • hammerheadhammerhead Member Posts: 907
    So there can be up to a 40 mph differential??
    Ludicrous!
  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    The problem with a speed limit of 85 is that those who think they are qualified to safely drive that speed will be the ones who really are not qualified to drive over 50 while pushing 95 in the process.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    How do you know?

    Personal experience. :)
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    Recall when I was a little little kid, my father took me along for a vehicle inspection in Crook County, ILL.

    How long ago was this? I have lived in the Chicago area for all my life and cannot remember any time that they had manditory vehicle inspections.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    Very calm commute today, but still saw a couple of stupids.

    First one - a person who I won't categorize in an Infiniti FX. Very short driver, barely able to see above the wheel, going 5-10 under with a death grip on the wheel, left lane with traffic streaming around on the right. I think licenses to "new residents" should have specific testing areas based on the origin of the driver.

    Second - greybeard in a dirty W124 wagon, going about 5 under. I move around to pass, and we are both suddenly going 10 over. Why do so many of the local dopes speed up when being passed? Should be a capital crime.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    IMO, those who can't handle 50 are the one going 55 in the left lane of a 60.

    Maybe there should be graduated licenses for speed.
  • shriftyshrifty Member Posts: 255
    "Second - greybeard in a dirty W124 wagon, going about 5 under. I move around to pass, and we are both suddenly going 10 over. Why do so many of the local dopes speed up when being passed? Should be a capital crime."

    I had something similar happen to me last night. I was in the right lane, the other person was driving in the left (not passing anyone of course). As I was catching up, they sped up. As we approached another vehicle, they began to slow down some, but not enough for me to move in front. Then they sped up rapidly, and I got in behind them to pass the vehicle in the right lane. Once I did, they brake checked me a few times. On the 4th brake check, I sped up around them on the right and made the pass.

    I really don't understand the concept of getting angry at someone who may pass on the right. The most extreme case I saw was someone driving 60 in a 65, and when I was about to pass, I was curious to see how fast they would go to try and prevent me from passing. At about 105 (guessing they quit at around 95) I cut in front of them and they immediately slowed back down to 60 while I slowed back down to 70.

    Not sure what the mentality is, nor do I care. I just want to stick to the right lane, pass when I can, and move back over when I'm finished.

    If you don't like being passed on the right, why drive in the left?
  • shriftyshrifty Member Posts: 255
    edited April 2011
    Late one night (early morning) around 2AM I was driving through NJ on an Interstate. The road was completely deserted and I was driving in the right lane about 70-75 until…

    About a minute or two later I saw a vehicle camping in the left lane traveling at about 50-55. As I approached and was about to pass, they swerved into the right lane without signaling or looking when I was about 2-4 car lengths behind forcing me to hit the brakes and swerve left to avoid a rear-end collision. They proceeded to swerve through the right lane and off the exit ramp. I then moved back into the right lane and back up to speed until…

    About a minute or two later I saw another vehicle camping in the left lane traveling at about 50-55. As I approached and was about to pass, they swerved into the right lane without signaling or looking when I was about 2-4 car lengths behind forcing me to hit the brakes and swerve left to avoid a rear-end collision. They proceeded to swerve through the right lane and off the exit ramp. I then moved back into the right lane and back up to speed until…

    About a minute or two later I saw another vehicle camping in the left lane traveling at about 50-55. As I approached and was about to pass, they swerved into the right lane without signaling or looking when I was about 2-4 car lengths behind forcing me to hit the brakes and swerve left to avoid a rear-end collision. They proceeded to swerve through the right lane and off the exit ramp. I then moved back into the right lane and back up to speed until…

    About a minute or two later I saw another vehicle camping in the left lane traveling at about 50-55. As I approached and was about to pass, they swerved into the right lane without signaling or looking when I was about 2-4 car lengths behind forcing me to hit the brakes and swerve left to avoid a rear-end collision. They proceeded to swerve through the right lane and off the exit ramp. I then moved back into the right lane and back up to speed until…

    About a minute or two later I saw another vehicle camping in the left lane traveling at about 50-55. As I approached and was about to pass, they swerved into the right lane without signaling or looking when I was about 2-4 car lengths behind forcing me to hit the brakes and swerve left to avoid a rear-end collision. They proceeded to swerve through the right lane and off the exit ramp. I then proceeded to cuss out the horrible state of NJ and every dang LLC!

    Within a span of 8-10 minutes I almost got hit 5 times by these horrible people! Why is it so difficult to pay attention! :mad:
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    The dope I saw today wasn't even in the left lane...I moved left to pass, and he sped up. I suspect in his case it was subconscious, he didn't seem to be aggressive.

    But I do know what you are describing. LLCs are by definition passive-aggressive, so that kind of junk is right up their alley.

    I have had the aggressive ones on highways too. I remember once, in the old car, a minivan sped up as I went around, and we got up to about 85 before I got by. Once I passed, I ran just a little over the line to kick up some spray behind me. He backed off fast :shades:
  • shriftyshrifty Member Posts: 255
    One time I had severe unintended deceleration in front of an LLC....

    Must have mistaken the brake for the gas pedal. :blush:
  • jensadjensad Member Posts: 388
    I did not mention the one slowwwww driver on the Nimitz, but this one was on the Mac Arthur right near Park Street off ramp. Small world.

    jensad
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    In that sense nothing has changed but the speeds.
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    I used to work in and around Oakland. I've seen it all!
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Ah, .... yes, I am sure. When they post 2 or more ARMED security guards in an airport DENNY'S, you really have to wonder.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    I've had my foot slip before too, must be the shoes :shades:
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    Today's winner - late 90s 2-door S10 Blazer, "University of Florida" sticker on the back window, going about 20 in a 30. I couldn't see the driver - deeply tinted windows, probably illegal. I was thinking it might be having mechanical issues, but he never moved over. The road we were on branched into a larger road, so I shot by ("shot" at maybe 5 over the limit) and he was very far behind me in an instant, he might have even stopped. Florida, tinted windows, weird driving...drug runner? :shades:
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited April 2011
    aka drivers on (against the law for a while) cellphones and texting, has begun in earnest. Evidently it is VERY easy to do as the CHP officers had little to ZERO issues identifying scofflaws and pulling them over. The fine is a minimum of $159 dollars. I am not sure if it adds points to the driving record. This would also be a boost to the insurance companies.

    CA state distracted driver crackdown
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    Let's hope it expands to other distractions rather than cherry picking one.

    It's funny, where I live, yapping became a primary offense - yet I see as many people doing it as ever.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    I have read in passing that app 75% of distracted driving accidents/fatalities are due to EATING. Since smoking has become known for the slow (fast also if you burn your house down around your ears) killer that it is, I am sure smoking used to be a larger percentage of distracted driving statistics.
  • jensadjensad Member Posts: 388
    I understand 100 %. I grew up in Oakland and San Leandro. And the area is still in my heart, (eg. Fenton's Ice Cream) and the fun times. I was on BPD in the 60s then CHP. And I too have to agree with you, "I have seen it all" and I am glad I am retired.

    Souns like you are a long way from the Bay Area. When my beautiful wife retires this year we will travel and hope we canI will seek a new "domicile venue".

    Good luck to all and stay safe.

    jensad
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    19 hours on the freeway Friday and Saturday.Mostly good drivers the whole way except for one LLC that was matching someone in the right lane, both going the speed limit. Made it hard for those of us who were going 5 over to get by them.

    Must be something about Illinois. Odd too, since that's the only place we really saw much in the way of cops.
  • shriftyshrifty Member Posts: 255
    Hey Steve, I don't recommend this as an option as it can be very dangerous, but in a situation like this you could attempt to entice the LLC to brake check you. As they slow down, hit the gas and pass on the right in the gap that is now being created by the brake check. Again, not recommended, but it can be effective as a last resort.
  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,934
    And yes I declined. I cited him for driving too slow on a very buzy Bay Area freeway. (I.e. average speed day time on that freeway was about 65-80 mph.)

    Wow, I wish more Officer's were like you and actually cared about safety. I have never seen someone pulled over for driving too slowly, yet I've seen hundreds that were guilty of it. Driving too slowly, especially in the left lane, is much more dangerous than any speeding driver.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited April 2011
    Yikes! Not in that big of a hurry - might save five minutes over a two day drive.
  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,934
    There are many reasons the faster drivers get in less accidents than the slower drivers on the highways and freeways of America:
    1) Faster drivers are probably more confident, and more capable drivers (agreed not 100% of the time, but usually the slow pokes are the worst drivers and that's why they are driving slow on the freeway).
    2) Faster drivers are keeping up with traffic and don't get rear-ended as much or as easily.
    3) Slow drivers tend to have merging issues where the most danger is (getting on and off the freeway).
    4) Since an accident occurs when two objects attempt to occupy the same space at the same time, it is irrelevant what the speed is.
    5) True, it takes longer to brake when going faster, you have less ability to change direction when going faster, but you also have less chance of being rear-ended, less chance of being T-boned (less time in the intersection cause your going faster, ect)
    6) When you pass bad/slow drivers, your interaction with them is limited to a second or two, whereas a semi-slow driver's interaction with a bad/slow driver is longer, (maybe 5 to 10 seconds).
    7) slower drivers are bored drivers, and bored drivers become distracted drivers, sleepy drivers, or inattentive drivers (why do you think bumper hits occur a lot even in bumper to bumper traffic?)
    8) The statistics are easy to find, just look up any city's accident statistics from any police angency on what the average speed is of an accident (hint, it's not freeway speeds).
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • shriftyshrifty Member Posts: 255
    edited April 2011
    Not exactly the best thing to do, but if the time savings could creep up into 30-60 min or more, it could be an option to use as a last resort. Personally I'm not a fan of this method, but I've found it far more effective than flashing the lights or tailgating. I've only done this about 4-5 times, mainly when the LLC has been traveling a good bit under the limit and they have the potential and intent to stay there for half an hour or more.

    One trip on I70W coming back from the DC area heading toward the PA turnpike, an LLC paced an old RV traveling about 40-50 MPH for about an hour or two. Unfortunately at the time I did not have a 3rd lane as an option. I didn't know about the "brake check method" until many years later.

    I should have specified previously, this method is not used for the clueless LLC, but rather the LLC who is intentionally pacing traffic in the right with the intent to hold back traffic.
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    There are many reasons the faster drivers get in less accidents than the slower drivers on the highways and freeways of America:

    Actually there are two reasons.

    1.) More driving is done at lower speeds than at higher speeds. think about it how much driving do you do over 55 MPH as opposed to under 55 MPH.

    2.) Higher speeds are typically driven on wide open limited access highways which by their very nature are safer than city streets and rural roads. So yes its safer to drive 80 MPH on I-39 through Northern Illinois than it is driving 60 MPH on Lower Wacker Drive in Chicago. But that doesn't mean its safer to drive 80 MPH on I-39 than it is to drive 60 MPH on that same portion of road.

    About your points.

    1.) Confidence does not equate to compentence. The most confident drivers I know are not great drivers. the best drivers I know drive much slower because they recognize difficulties in increasing speed.

    2,) While the faster driver has less likelyhood to be rear ended they are more likely to rear end someone. Who is typically at fault, the one rearended or the one who rearends?

    3.) I dont see a correlation between the speed one drives and their ability to merge. I have seen fast drivers who did not know how to merge.

    4.) Increasing speed makes it harder to avoid occupying the same space at the same time.

    5.) While going faster may decrease your chances of getting rear ended as stated above it can increase your chanes of rear ending someone. I would also question your stats on being T-boned. Going slower does give the driver more ability to avoid being T-boned if one sees someone approaching the intersection.

    6.) What happens if you pass a fast but slighty slower bad driver or a bad driver who is driving slightly faster than you?

    7.) Bad assumption on your part, driving slow does not mean that driver is bored or will be bored. Getting bored while driving would have more to do with the persons personality more than speed. I once drove down I-55 in Central Illinois at the breath taking speed of 5 MPH and trust me it was not boring.

    8.) See my first statement.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • tallman1tallman1 Member Posts: 1,874
    8) The statistics are easy to find, just look up any city's accident statistics from any police angency on what the average speed is of an accident (hint, it's not freeway speeds).

    That stat is about as useful as the one I learned in driver's ed about the majority of accidents occurring within 25 miles of your home.
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    I am at an intersection stopped at a red light waiting to make a right turn on red. The road I was going to turn on is under construction that started a few days ago. Two my left a VW is approaching and I thought that he was going a bit fast. While he was driving an appropreate speed for the road s/he was about to hit a bump in the road that was created by the construction. S/he hit it pretty hard.

    They go through the intersection and I pull out behind them. They get to another "Bump" and after learning their lesson went over that one reallllllllllllllllly slllllllllllllllllow.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    That stat is about as useful as the one I learned in driver's ed about the majority of accidents occurring within 25 miles of your home.

    In the last 6 months I think I was further than 25 miles from home (as the crow flies) once.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

Sign In or Register to comment.