Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Ford Ranger

179111213

Comments

  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    Cpouser, your Ranger looks great! I agree that my mileage also went down. This is another reason to go back to the 265's.
    Well, I got the superchip today. I will be installing this weekend. I will let you all know how it goes.
    To increase HP add a K&N filter charger kit. I have the 4.0 and I did notice a difference in throttle response and how the rpms were reached faster. The engine also seemed to idle a bit smoother too. Basicly you are allowing more air flow into your intake. I also purchased and received today a Superchip. It is supposed to increase both HP and torque. We'll see, I have heard both good and bad about these chips.
    CP actually, I have a 3.73 rearend with limited slip and it does me just fine too! 4.10's are for the serious tower or hauler, gas mileage is really bad with 4.10's. That reminds me, for the person asking about power, gearing also makes a difference.
  • sushisushi Member Posts: 99
    I am all confused about all these rear-end axle things.. can someone explain?
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    Ok.
    The 3.73 means that if you turn the rear wheel once, the driveshaft will turn 3.73 times. With the 4.10, well the math is simple.
    With the 4.10 you get quicker and stronger acceleration but lower top end. The 3.73 will do ok in 4 wheeling but the 4.10 is the better combination. Problem is I would have to change both differentials, front and rear to the lower gearing 4.10 around $250 each gear set plus installation. I do not tow anything large or do the real agressive 4 wheeling, hence the 3.73 is fine for me.
    When I was younger and single I had a 69 Dodge with a 383 police interceptor engine, 355 hp with a 4.56 rear end. Could take anything stock up to a 426 Dodge non-hemi engine. That Dodge would accelerate like you would not believe but top end was limited to about 100mph vs 125 with the stock gears but it would get to 100mph very quickly.

    popezeke
    GOOD DEAL! Is the fuse located in the engine compartment the one your talking about? Good info to pass on.

    kay12
    Are you looking at invoice, a lower price vs retail, what you see on the sticker for the options? Invoice or lower is becoming the norm for what to pay for a vehicle.
    I paid about 1300 under the Edmunds/Blue Book invioce when I got mine. Thought it was a fair deal but I am sure they made money.

    Vince8:
    Thanks! Want to get some custom pinstripes in the light gray color found in the 4X4 decal on the tailgate. Want some on the fenders, around the rear side windows, side of the bed and a pattern on the tailgate, right side. I think that will be sharp. Got a notice of a 4% raise today so maybe I can afford it.
  • trenttrent Member Posts: 86
    Seems that a lot of people are paying less than invoice. I'm looking at a 99 supercab 4x4, 4.0 w/5 speed auto, off road group, 4 door, limited slip, dual media radio, sliding rear window and convenience group. I'm getting it at invoice plus tax, tags and doc fee ($95). The doc fee seems high and now I wonder if I should offer less than invoice. I have not yet signed anything and not finalized price. The total out the door price now stands at $22200. I thought getting it at invoice was pretty good but now I wonder.
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    Trent, did you already buy the truck?

    CP, made arrangements to go out this weekend to MT Rainer area and do some sightseeing. There is going to be my Ranger, a CJ5 and another Ranger. Don't know what I will find I don't go up that way to often. I wish I had a scanner I would send you pics also. Going to see if the Superchip is really worth it also.
  • trenttrent Member Posts: 86
    Have not purchased 99 Ranger yet. Since the 2000's are about to come out should I be able to do better than invoice on a 99?
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    By all means yes. Don't forget dealer kickbacks and special financing and rebates also. I purchased my 98 Ranger 4x4 XLT 4.0 5spd stepside, tow pkg, offroad pkg, pwr, 3.73 limited slip and more for 19.6K cash. The Ranger is an excellent value. Mine has been great, not one problem. If you scroll back you will see how I use my 4x4 in the Cascade mountains and deserts of Oregon. The Ranger is capable to offroad. If you use yours as an offroad vehicle make sure you get a front skidplate.
    Someone in this room was talking about engine knock on the 3.0 I don't remember who?? I talked with my friend at Ford and he tried to find a TSB or something to the fact the Ford acknowledged a problem. He can't find anything about this "knock" being a chronic problem as this person stated.
  • kieranckieranc Member Posts: 4
    Trent, I'm looking for the *exact* same truck! Although, I could do w/o the 4-doors. What state are you in?

    I'm looking at paying about $400 over invoice, and I thought that was a good deal! Invoice on the truck I'm looking at is about $21,420 (4x4, xlt, 4.0L, 5 spd stick, 4.10 lim.slip, payload#2, sliding rear window, trailer hitch, dual media stereo, bucket seats, tilt wheel+cruise, off-road pkg, 4-door, power equip. grp.) MSRP is 23,940. I have two dealers making me offers on this truck (a dealer trade, no one local has one like it in stock.) One's offering $500 over invoice, the other $600 over (both after dealing a bit). The one at $500 over says he just can't go any lower, but I bet the other could go a lot lower because he's the biggest Ford dealer in the country (Galpin Ford, Los Angeles area).

    Vince8: where in the world is under invoice cost "standard"??? I've never heard of a dealer that regularly sells for under invoice. Am I missing something? Also, it's not "dealer kickback" it's "dealer HOLDback" and most dealers will NOT negotiate on that money, especially if you're not doing a factory order, and even then most won't touch their holdback. (at least not in my experience.)
  • fostervillefosterville Member Posts: 13
    Thanks for the info on the 3.0 knock. The problem shows up on inclines, but not bad enough to take it to the dealer and have them mess with it. I figure if i stay on a lower gear there will be less strain on the engine.

    kieranc:
    My .02 do not buy from Galpin. I tried to get a price quote (internet leads) over the phone from a salesman named Gary and he said i would have to come down to get a quote. They come up with all sorts of BS like PDI (pre-delivery inspection) $102 and they would not go lower than $300 over invoice. In reality, its $402 over invoice bec they do not count the PDI as mark-up. They said that their service people deserve to be paid...And don't fill out a credit app before you have agreed on the price. They want to price a deal depending on your credit. What if you did not agree on the price, then they have all your personal info for nothing. These people wasted 3 hrs of my time. I end up going to Santa Monica Ford. Peter the internet salesman offered $200 over but even that is negotiable. No crap PDI. No Ford tailgate logo with Galpin on it. No tacky stripes. Galpin is not the biggest Ford dealer in town. They are big because they sell other brands as a group. If you check Forbes 500 private co. Santa Monica Ford ranks up there with Galpin and they only sell Fords. See for yourself and let us know how it went.
  • sushisushi Member Posts: 99
    No... I still think you do get worse mileage, not the same. yeah, your tire size does change the ratio of the odometer, but the truck computer should adjust that automatically for you.
  • kieranckieranc Member Posts: 4
    I didn't know that computers adjusted the odometer&speedometer ratios for you if you change tire size. My '89 ranger doesn't have technology like that. In any case, if it doesn't adjust for it (i.e. you have an older truck like mine, or something), what I said before still applies.
  • kieranckieranc Member Posts: 4
    Sorry sushi, but upon further consideration, there's no way the computer can adjust for a change in tire size. The only way the car knows how fast it's going is by how fast the wheels are turning. You can put 26" tires, or 34" tires on, and the car is still going to register the same speed for the same gear and rpm. In fact, you can lift the car off the ground, put it in gear, and register 60 mph, but your real speed is ZERO. The car has no other reference to the ground than the tires. If you put a fifth wheel speedometer on your truck, and tie that into the computer somehow, then maybe you could do what you're talking about, but I haven't seen any rangers with fifth wheel speedometers around, except in test pictures in Road&Track and the like.

    Simple truth: change the tire size, and your speedometer&odometer will not be accurate anymore. AFAIK, the only way to fix this is to get a different gear/cog for them, to change their gear ratio to account for the larger tires.
  • trenttrent Member Posts: 86
    I think someone posted this site in the past for ratios and tire size:
    http://www.off-road.com/tools/gearcalc.html
  • sushisushi Member Posts: 99
    That sucks then.
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    In todays paper they are listing a 1999 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 3.0 5spd, A/C, CD, buckets, pwr steering, ABS, back slider and a few more options, for 13,977, granted there are only 6 of them. Wow, this is a bargain!
    I didn't say under invoice is standard. But at invoice or a few hundred over invoice is not unheard of for the Ford Ranger. And yes, the dealer "holdback" or kickback whatever you want to call it is negotiable. Everything in the car selling business is negotiable. The Ranger is the best selling compact truck and Ford wants to keep it that way. In my part of the country (NW) they are offering $1000 cash back or .9% financing for 36months.
  • dannygdannyg Member Posts: 131
    Has anyone out there used carsdirect.com for buying a ranger? They quote sub-invoice numbers, promise delivery in a week, etc., etc.

    I'm looking at replacing my '85 Ranger XLT 2.8L 4X4 LWB at some point.

    Thanks,

    Dan
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    I know what the knock noise is with the 3.0s. . .
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    CP, what??

    Got back from Mt Rainer and what a day, what an experience I had. Took my truck up some 6-7% maybe more inclines. Had to go 4 low and crawl up these due to rocks/gravel. Boy, the NW is beautiful right now. Temps in the 80's, skys are clear for miles. Saw deer, elk, and even the splash of some beaver.
    Also had a run in with a Chevy owner who absolutely hated Fords of any nature or kind. This guy had an attitude that was incredible. He had a nice truck no doubt, he had a ZR2 in red. Thought I was going to have a nice conversation with him when we met up, talk about the forest, trails, what he was up to and such. So, I left. I guess you run into all kinds up in the middle of nowhere. I do carry a 9mm with me, my friend also carries a 22. I hope to never get into a scramble, but you never know what kind of maniac you'll run into.
    See you in the hills.
  • ezunigaezuniga Member Posts: 2
    I'm about to buy a brand new '99 Ranger XL 2.5L 4cyl tomorrow and was wondering how do i break it in? Do I drive like i normally drive or should i drive slow for a while or fast? I want to break in this truck the correct way so it wont give me problems in the long run. Any info is appreciated.

    Thanks

    E.Z.
  • hmerglerhmergler Member Posts: 85
    Dannyg:

    Well, I haven't bought from CD yet, but I am thinking about it. As for them offering a Ranger for under invoice, they are including the current $1,000 rebate. I am looking at a SuperCab 4-door XLT that CD says will be about $500 under invoice. In reality, they are offering $500 over invoice, which really isn't that bad, but you may be able to do better. I would try without them first and if you can't find anyplace that will deal with you, then use CD. I think their delivery guarantee is kinda neat as it puts the pressure on them to find a truck with the configuration you ask for.

    - The Merg
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    Well to answer your rebate question, no I did not qualify for the $1000 or $400 rebate. That was just the price they offered. I ran the the way it was equiped on both KBB and Edmunds and the way I read it, was way under invoice. Now I am sure they made money. Basically it was $20,800 sticker, around $18,600 invoice as per KBB and Edmunds and I paid $17,300 and change before tax/licence and fees for an XLT 4X4, 4.0, 5speed, CD. I did not get any other options, other than cruise which got thrown in, but did not want them. I think what happens is this dealer buys 20-30 like equiped vehicles, gets a discount from Ford and sells them a bit above cost. The dealer is Mike Naughton and can be found at:
    http://www.bigmike.com I think I posted some of his special deals on 3.0L and 4X2s a few posts ago.
    You know, every area/dealer is different. You might just be getting the best deal in your area.
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    As I recall the vehicle I bought was $15,989 WITH all the rebates.


    I could have gotten the $1000 rebate but chose the financing at 2.9% instead. It was an either or and I came out better with the financing vs rebate.
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    And I may be wrong but I do not think you can touch an XLT 4X4 4.0L 5 speed for under 16K very many places.
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    Vince:
    Look around you when it happens there will be a Tacoma nearby with the driver pounding his fist in a knocking sound because he knows you got a great deal!

    HE,HE!

    ezuniga:
    Well I alternated my speed on the 4.0L engine for the first 1K and did not go over 70mph, drove it reasonably easy for the first 5K, changed oil at 5K and it seemed to break in mpg wise around 10K.
    I do not think there is any special way to break them in but would not recommend racing them in the first 1K.
  • fostervillefosterville Member Posts: 13
    I posted a problem regarding an engine knock on a load (hills, acceleration). I went to the dealer and it turns out to be a ping. I have 3.0 V6 (4K)that Ford calls flexible fuel vehicle (FFV). The dealer recommended using a higher octane gas and it worked. It runs very well now. I thought the manual did not recommend using fuel higher than 87, but they said the 87 rating is a worldwide rating. Due to the fact that California requires fuel that has higher oxygen content, it doesn't run very well on CA 87. My questions is, do i have to regularly use higher octane gas now or i just happened to get bad fuel and can switch to cheaper gas after a couple tanks of higher octane gas? Did the pinging cause some problems i might encounter in the future?

    I didn't know that the 3.0 FFV uses a special type of engine oil that is very expensive. The dealer quoted $9 a qt. Now an oil change runs about $70 a pop. I wish they tell me this before i chose this engine. These are BMW prices. These are the type of things a buyer doesn't really look into when shopping. I'd appreciate any comments or help. thanks.
  • mister_rrrmister_rrr Member Posts: 5
    Fosterville,

    If you search the web you'll find that the pinging problem you describe is common to 3.0L FFV vehicles. I've been trying to get my Ranger fixed since early summer, and haven't had any luck. On my last visit the dealer retarded the timing and that worked for about 3K miles but the problem is back. I've given up on it and have decided to live with the ping. I don't plan to go to a higher octane fuel because everything I've read indicates that it will only be a temporary fix.
    In four years the loan will be paid off and I'll fill it with 93 octane and sell it to some other sucker. Ford screwed you. Sorry about being so blunt but there's no other way to say it.
  • fostervillefosterville Member Posts: 13
    Ford screwed us is a more accurate description. Did you also get the same word on the special oil for FFV? That's an even bigger screw of $9.00 a qt. plus labor and filter. Thanks for the info.
  • mister_rrrmister_rrr Member Posts: 5
    Fosterville,

    I don't think it's Ford doing it to you this time.
    I'd post the question on their consumer website at www.ownerconnection.com. That will get you in touch with Ford's Consumer Assistance Center, which will either confirm the $9 a quart story or contact the dealer.
  • mister_rrrmister_rrr Member Posts: 5
    Fosterville,

    I buy Motorcraft 10W-30 oil at Walmart. It cost about $1.30 a quart. The filter is a Motorcraft FL 400S which cost about $3.00.
  • rotorrayrotorray Member Posts: 42
    LOOK FOR THE AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE STAMP ON THE OIL YOU BUY. CONSUMER REPORTS DID AN EXTENSIVE OIL TEST SOME TIME AGO AND COULD FIND NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ANY OF THE OILS BEARING THIS STAMP BY "API". THIS MEANS IT MEETS THEIR STANDARDS. ACCORDING TO CONSUMER RPTS AS LONG AS YOU BUY OIL BEARING THIS STAMP YOU CAN SHOP FOR PRICE BECAUSE, ASIDE FROM MINOR ADDITIVE DIFFERENCES, OIL IS OIL IS OIL.....
  • igloomasterigloomaster Member Posts: 249
    Hello friends
    I own a 1994 B2300(Ranger disguised as a Mazda), 2.3 liter 4 cylinder engine.
    I bought it with 42,000 miles on it. It now has
    82,000 miles on it. I love it. I have only had to tune it up once, and I am religious about changing the oil every 2,000 to 2,500 miles. One question though: obviously the vehicle lacks power, but sometimes when I am pushing it on the highway, like trying to climb a bit doing 55, I hear a flutter coming from the engine as I depress the accelerator to compensate for the hill or whatever. Almost sounds like a diesel engine at times. What is it,
    and what might happen? It doesn't affect the
    overall performance of the vehicle; it's simply a
    weird fluttering sound.
  • igloomasterigloomaster Member Posts: 249
    What's the general feeling out there on the value of using snows? I use Cooper Weathermasters, with Studs, on my Ford/Mazda Ranger. I really feel like they make a difference during the sometimes harsh New England Winters. Any comments, suggestions, opinions? Should I try a set on my new Honda Civic hatchback this winter, or stick with the factory installed all weather tires?
  • georgeshawgeorgeshaw Member Posts: 2
    just had a question on the 2000 ranger does anybody know any info on a bigger motor or horsepower for next year? also a proud owner of the 1998 ranger 4.0 5spd loaded stepside with 190 hp /k&n airfilter/dual exhaust kicks butt!
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    George, how much did the exhaust split cost you??
    Seems like we have the same truck, I am enjoying the heck out of mine. Do you have 31's on yours? I have 31's but am thinking of going back to 265 or to a 275. The 31's just don't give it the nice ride around town it used to have. I use my truck to commute to work as well as do the camping/hiking and logging road duty. I live in the NW and visit the Cascades and deserts of Oregon/Washington quite often. My Ranger has performed flawlessly in offroad use. I generally use the logging roads and access roads only. Its still new to me so I don't want to get it too scratched up or dented.
    See you in the hills!
  • skipdskipd Member Posts: 97
    Yeah, when does Ford plan to put the more powerful SOHC 4.0 V6 that they put in the Explorer as an option in the Ranger? It gives a heck of a lot more horsepower and torque. This would be a big advantage over Ranger competitors. Anybody hear anything?

    Skip
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    I know its coming, but the question is when. The last article I read was 2000 sometime. When the Ranger gets this V6 its going to kick some b... mine is a 98 Ranger 4.0 XLT stepside loaded, but when this beast arrives, I may be looking again.
    Don't get me wrong, I like my Ranger and it has been very reliable and has had no problems getting where I want it to go.
    I just wish Ford would stop putting those damn Firejunkers on their trucks and find an alternative.
  • skipdskipd Member Posts: 97
    Vince8, Do you remember where you may have read this, I would like to see it. If they are going to put the SOHC V6 in the Ranger sometime in 2000 I may wait a little while to get mine so that I can get this engine. Another question....Why don't you like the Firestones?

    Hey, out here in the NE I'm seeing '99 Rangers offered at $1,400 under invoice as a result of the Ford factory clearance.....too bad I can't buy right now. How often do these clearances with deals like that come about?

    Skip
  • trenttrent Member Posts: 86
    I just recently bought a 4x4 supercab, 4 door, 4.0 auto with off road package and a few other options. I paid invoice ($21372) and felt I got a good deal. The other similar trucks that came in with mine were all pre-sold so I don't think I could have come close to the deal you're talking about (-$1400). Maybe they would offer that on some of the "left overs" on the lot but I don't think you could find a loaded 4x4 with your color choice and options for that. Then again maybe their is a lot more to choose from on the west coast.
    What kind of Ranger are you looking for?
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    Well, first of all, the SOHC engines need much more RPM to develop the same torque. Remember the Tacoma vince? The current 4.0 develops its torque at 2700 rpm vs around 4000 for the tacomas v6.

    Second, the SOHC, while it should be reliable, is more expensive to tune.

    Third, I havent really found a need for more power than my 4.0 delivers. Not into racing Tacomas from stop lights. . .

    Just my $.02.
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    True, CP, I don't race 4x4's either. I look for what a truck really needs which is torque! I think sometimes people are misled by all the high tech mumbo jumbo and HP ratings. The 4.0 in its current form does me just fine also. With the mods I have made, it runs even better and smoother. I guess its the 205HP and 245ft/lbs of torque that really make me salivate at maybe trading in when these start to pop up.
    skipd - sorry I can't remember what article it was. I do remember it was about 2 months ago I had read this. Maybe you can contact a Ford dealer and they can give you better info?
    I just don't like the tread pattern on the Firestones. Its not agressive enough for offroading and to put it plainly, they are cheap.
    If you order or buy a Ranger, head right down to the nearest tire shop and trade them in on something, almost anything is better. Go to at least a 265 or even a 275. I went to a 31" and am contemplating on going back to at least a 265 due to ride. The 31" tires are nice for offroad but suck for commuting.
    I picked up my Ranger loaded for 19.6K. I paid cash and ordered it from the factory, had a discount coupon and got the rebate also. I got one hell of a deal. Although the deal only took about 1 hour due to the cash, and I knew what I wanted and had all the numbers.
    I have also heard of others getting Rangers at or below invoice. This is not uncommon on the West Coast.
  • johneeljohneel Member Posts: 11
    Back a few postings ago (434-437) a Ranger owner asked about types of fuel for the 3.0 V6 FFV. The owner's manual says avoid premium fuels and use only 87 octane. But Ford's online "ownerconnection.com" site has an expanded owner's manual that recommends using at least 91 octane. I wrote and asked them which octane is right, and their response was "...We recommend that you use a fuel octane rating of at least 91. Gasolines with lower ratings may be used, but performance may
    decrease."

    I think Ford has to get its owner's manuals in order. And what do they mean by "performance?" Acceleration? I'd sacrifice that to save dollars at the pump as long as I'm not decreasing the life of the engine. Any thoughts?
  • fostervillefosterville Member Posts: 13
    John,
    The email by Ford's customer assistance stated i should continue using at least 89 on the 3.0 FFV to solve the pinging problem (at 4300 mi?). I first used 92 and it ran well, then switched to 89 to see if that will do and it did. The performance sure made a noticeable difference compared to the 87. It confuses the matter further when even Ford can't stick to their own manuals.

    Another case in point is the motor oil. All the dealers i've contacted said there is a special motor oil for the FFV and it cost $9.00 a quart, then Ford's customer assistance said (after checking with the factory) as long as it meets API seal for gasoline engines...it should be OK. The manual doesn't state a special oil for the FFV either. But the dealer claims there should be a supplement. I requested Ford's customer assistance to check again and still waiting for a reply.

    To Ford's credit, their customer assistance is accommodating and responsive. I do not want to jeopardize my warranty but i don't want to get ripped off by the dealer either. You would think they can have some type of consistency with their answers. Pardon the length.
  • skipdskipd Member Posts: 97
    trent, you may be right on questioning which Ranger model I can get at $1400 under invoice. I'm just letting you know what I am seeing in the paper out here in PA. I'm probably not going to buy until the beginning of next year, But when I do it would probably be An XLT extended cab 4X4, with the 4.0, and 5 speed auto. Still trying to decide if I I want the power package, but I definitely want the convenience package with cruise control. It keeps me from getting speeding tickets on the freeway and will probably pay for itself in a month or two :) I like the toreador red, but the bright atlantic blue metallic looks pretty good on the 4X4 too. Actually, I don't mind the dark green and bright red either. I'm not real picky when it comes to color I guess. And what is this about platinum wheel lip moldings on the 4x4's? They look black to me in the brochure. I don't think I would like platinum.

    I'm trying to decide whether or not to get the offroad package. I'm buying the truck because I do a lot of outdoor activities and I plan to tow a pop up camper and a small fishing boat. However, I only plan to do light offroading at best to get me to my fishing, hiking, canoeing spots, etc. We also get walloped with snow here in PA at times. So, what do you guys think.....is it worth the extra cash? I don't think i need it, but does the offroad package give the truck more clearance or a higher stance? I like the more aggressive looking higher stance on trucks.

    cpousnr & vince8, you guys bring up good points about the SOHC. I probably won't need any more power than what the current 4.0 offers for what I will be towing. But what we need and what we want are two different things! Just kidding, I'm actaully a pretty practicle guy, and I'm not looking to go racing either. However cpousnr, you seem to think the SOHC is more reliable. Is this true?

    Here is an interior question for you Ranger owners. I'm considering the bench seats vs. the buckets with the center console. Are the buckets worth the extra cash? More comfy? Anybody been on both? I recall reading an article somewhere on the internet that said the buckets were more comfy with the manual lumbar support. What do you guys think?

    Sorry about the length here guys. Got a little carried away. But these conversations will help hold me over until I can get my truck :)

    Skip
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    Go the offroad pkg, you get heavy duty shocks and the 265 tires, making the trucks stance a bit more aggressive and taller, along with guards underneath that protect the powertrain and gas tank. Also go the tow pkg its only a few hundred more and you can tow up to 5000lbs. Although be careful doing this I have heard with smaller trucks it can be quite hairy. I have towed about 4200lbs across town with no problems, Ranger did it just fine. I don't know if I would try it across country though. When I ordered my truck I had sat in a bench and a bucket, I found the buckets much more comfortable and sporty looking.
    I use my Ranger for about the same you would use yours. I live in the Northwest and frequent Mt Hood, Baker, Rainer, and Helens, along with the eastern desert areas. The Ranger does just fine and will get you where you want to go, or want to get out of. Good luck on your search!
  • trenttrent Member Posts: 86
    I think the off road package is worth the $336 even if you don't use it much. You'll get 16" wheels and as Vince said taller tires. I also went for the limited slip axles which seems to be reasonable at $251.
    I like the bench seats because I can squeeze in one more 5 year old otherwise I'd go for the buckets.
  • nstewnstew Member Posts: 9
    I've been checking www.fordnews.com constantly to see if the 2000 Ranger looks any different than the 1999...the only thing I've found is that they're dropping the yellow turn on the taillights and there's a new color for 2000...Mandarin Gold. I'm also waiting to see if the bigger engine is offered, not that I have much choice, my car lease is up in June and I'll start shopping for a Ranger in about April. Anybody heard anything else new?
  • hmerglerhmergler Member Posts: 85
    Is it just me or is Ford trying to get the Ranger to be more like a mini-F150, kinda like Dodge is making the Dakota compared to the Ram? That is the only reason I can think of that Ford would do away with the yellow turn signal. Personally, I think the yellow turn signal is safer than making the entire tailight into the turn signal. I would rather people see three red lights and a yellow blinking one when I am slowing down for a turn than two red lights and a red blinking one. This is even more dangerous if one of the other brake lights burns out. Anyone else have any thoughts on this?

    - The Merg
  • spkirkspkirk Member Posts: 10
    i agree 100%
  • skipdskipd Member Posts: 97
    I understand that the offroad package may not be necessary for the light offroading I may do, however, I'm confused as to what it does for adding height to the truck. It makes sense that the 16" wheels would give me another inch, but then I guess the more aggressive tires and shocks would give me more height? Is that what you guys are saying? If so, how much more and is it a noticable difference? Like I said I just like the look of the higher stance on a truck eventhough I won't necessarily need it. I also like the style of the 16" wheels offered with the offroad package better than the XLT 4X4 wheel without the offroad package. I'm hoping Ford will make some changes to the wheel styles in 2000.

    What do you think the 4.10 rear does for gas mileage. I'll be using this truck as a daily commuter as well as a weekend toy, so this is also a concern. In addition, since I won't be doing any heavy offroading (I think) do I really need a limited slip diff? What would the advantage be?

    cpousnr, Nice truck! In fact, you have an almost identical setup to my buddy in NC. Same color XLT ext. cab with 5 spd. manual and bench seats. He told me the buckets are not an option when you get the manual trans. The only differences between the two trucks is he has the offroad package and his bumpers are painted platinum instead of chrome. Personally I like the chrome bumpers. It doesn't seem to me that his truck has a higher stance than yours....then again I guess it would help to see them side by side.

    On the wheel lip moldings......I definitely like the moldings, I just thought they were black, not platinum. They are definitely platinum on your truck cpousnr, but are they platinum on all 4X4's? They look black in the '99 brochure, maybe it's just the lighting

    Talk to you later fellas,

    Skip
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    skip, forgot to mention, get the limited slip its worth it. Gives that added traction when you need it. I have the 4.0 5spd mated to a 3.73 and my mpg AVERAGES about 22. I beleive the 4.10 will make the mpg worse.
    As CP said, I installed a chip and it does make a difference. I noticed also on passing the engine picks up rpms quicker too.
    I also like the yellow turn signal. I believe it is safer and easier for other to see.
    See you in the hills!
This discussion has been closed.