Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Ford Ranger

178101213

Comments

  • quark99quark99 Member Posts: 136
    I;ve owned 2 Rangers; a 1993 Reg Cab 2WD LB 5-sp 4.0, and a 1996 2WD S-Cab with a 4.0l auto. Traded #1 for #2 after I bought a 3000lb Sea Ray with 1200lb twin-axle trailer. #1 pulled that boat no problem, but without limited-slip and only the 3:08 rear end and a stick, let's just say the tranny got a little warm on my 90 mile jaunts to the ocean. Also, slippery boat ramps were a problem, expecially steep ones into the Pacific. Get the limited slip if you're gonna tow more than 2500 lbs! So, after getting truck #2, smooth sailing-pulled 4200 lbs of boat and trailer, with another 700lbs of fisherman all day long, smooth as silk. Cruise at 70, and stick at 55 up those 7% grades. (4.0L in both trucks.)
    Ranger impossibility story: 1st time I went to the ocean, I realized (at 3:30 AM) that my thermostat had been stuck closed for months. (Didn't notice it when not pulling a load.) Anyway, the water temp pegged while I was going over Highway 17 out here in CA. (If you don't know, this road is notorious for overheating cars-it's the road to Santa Cruz.."Santa Carla" for all you who've seen the "Lost Boys" movie.) Anyway, what to do? Not gonna NOT go fishing-unthinkable. Kept going. And going. Gauge remained pegged for 25 miles, and hardly moved down on the downslope. Long-story short: Truck never failed. Caught fish! Then left at 3:00 PM to go home and overheat the truck all over again. Made it home (90 miles), overheating all the way. Changed out thermostat, changed oil, flushed radiator. Truck was fine. Compression test was like brand-new. What else could you want from a truck??? Good hunting...(lost the '96 during an unfortunate Chapter 7...oh well) Lookin now for a 97-98 4.0 S-Cab 4wd auto. Ranger on!
  • georgeshawgeorgeshaw Member Posts: 2
    answer for vince8 my dual exhaust with tips. flowmaster muffler 3inch inlet dual 2.25 outlets with pipes to rear cost around $225.00 installed also k&N FILTER $42.00 ALSO MY TIRE SIZE 235/60R15 FIRESTONE FIREHAWKS RWL. HANDLES AWSUME IN RAIN OR SHINE. THATS ALL
  • rotorrayrotorray Member Posts: 42
    One recommendation I've read on using synthetic oils is to wait until a new engine has broken in before switching to synthetics. They have superior lubricating qualities and may hamper breaking in a newer engine. Also, if you're hesitant on switching to synthetics just add one quart of it at oil change with remainder being your normal oil. This was recommended by Consumer Reports. Also keeps the cost of oil changes down. CR also said that unless your towing heavy loads there is no real benefit to switching to synthetics but I like the superior lubrication. Just a personal thing. Just make sure ANY oil you use has the Petroleum Institute stamp of approval on the container. Some brands have it for some weights but not other weights. I've noticed this with Castrol and Pennzoil. 10-30 might have it but 5-30 might not. Just make sure it has it because it means the oil has passed all of the PI tests. Some good posts on this site recently...thanks.
  • nstewnstew Member Posts: 9
    I agree too. The yellow turn light is easier to see. Not sure why they're dropping it. I was behind a Jaguar the other night whose red taillights (no brake on) were so bright I thought they were brake lights. They turned their turn signal on and it was barely distinguishable. Like merg, I think that's a bad idea.
  • trenttrent Member Posts: 86
    I hope after 1000 miles or so the rings are seated enough in an engine to switch to synthetic. Did consumer reports mention a time or mileage figure?
  • shamusshamus Member Posts: 3
    I'm thinking about buying a Ranger but I need a power driver's seat, which is not a factory option. Has anyone ever had a power seat, or better seats in general, installed in a Ranger? How would I go about finding a shop that does that kind of work?
  • trenttrent Member Posts: 86
    I spoke with a Mobil tech person today to question putting synthetic in a new engine and he said that was no problem. He also said that several car mfgs. use Mobil 1 in their high end
    cars(Corvette,Rolls,etc.) as they come out of production.
    Possibly with older synthetics a "break in" period was needed.
  • rotorrayrotorray Member Posts: 42
    Trent,
    I think they were talking about 5,000 or so, but I can't recall exactly. If I find the article I'll post what they said. If you did it you did it. Just monitor your oil consumption. If you're happy with performance I wouldn't worry about it. They also said a caution about older engines because it it's superior lubricating/cleansing ability that synthetics might clean out some stuff that had build up and was preventing oil buring and switching to it might lead to buring oil. Personally, I used Mobil 1 in a Jeep GC from new before I read the article and was happy with it. Don't know if it made any difference because I also change my oil at 2500-3000 miles but at least I felt better about it. Figured my engine cost $8K and anything I could do to make it last longer was for the better, and $$$ in my pocket.
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    I had 14,000 when I changed to Mobil1. I would break in the engine first.

    I have heard that the engine stops wearing and that the oil basically stays the same color after 5-10K. Have heard this from many sources. One changes filter, adds a quart every 10K and thats it.

    Amazing stuff
  • trenttrent Member Posts: 86
    I used synthetic in my last truck from 5k till I sold it at 143k. It had the same oil pressure as new and used no oil between changes. I did change the oil and filter every 4k though. Since I was changing the oil myself I figured the extra few bucks was well worth it without stretching the mileage beyond the recommended intervals.
    On the Ranger I'm using the Mobil 1 filter($10) with the synthetic and I hope the price is worth it.
  • igloomasterigloomaster Member Posts: 249
    i use regular oil, and change it every 2k. there are lots of opinions on synthetics, but i figure since i change it so frequently, it's cool for me to use regular oil. you?
  • hruskahruska Member Posts: 1
    Help! The windshield wipers on my 1995 Ranger (39k miles) have a mind of their own. They come on for no apparent reason, or sometimes when I use the turn signal, or other times they won't shut off at all. Anyone out there have any good ideas or words of wisdom?
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    Yes, sounds like you have a short in your stalk or you wires are twisted. You can either try to take this apart yourself or bring it to the dealer. Should be a simple fix.
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    Yes I had the same problem. They changed the stalk switch under warrenty and it corrected the problem. It is the only problem in the 16K I have had the truck.

    1K with the synthetic and it looks about like when it went in. Changing the differentials to synthetic this weekend.
  • linkslinks Member Posts: 1
    I have a 99 Ranger XLT 4x4 an LOVE it! Can anyone tell me some brand names and where to find skid plates for it.

    cpousnr - I recall you mentioning adding your own some time ago,can you share your experience.

    Thanks to all who respond.
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    This is what I did on my 99 XLT supercab:
    The stock skidplates cost $103 for the tank and $23 or so for the xfer case at Ford. A snap to put on but do not waste your money on the stock bolts/clips. Go to the dealer to measure the size you need then go to the hardware store and buy bolts, washers and castle nuts, they kind with the plastic in the castle and save about 75 percent. Four bolts/nuts on each. Need I think a 10 and 13mm box or socket for the upper part near the frame and a regular wrench for below.

    Nothing yet that I know of for the front like a Toyota but if you look it does not really need it as there is lots of clearance and a big piece of the frame. The skids are there for the torsion bars and have been hit a couple of times on mine.

    Enjoy, they are nice trucks.
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    DO NOT go off road near rocks without skids. It could prove costly. All my plates have taken hits where I go.

    Do it early in getting the truck. There is a lot of crud that builds up under there.

    16,000 miles since Jan 1 and still going well, love the truck. Giving it a rest for a while to save mileage, driving my sons 82 VW Rabbit while he went to Army boot camp, MAN what a POS compared to the Ranger.
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    Bolt holes are already there, just look under one that has them to see where to align it.

    Gotta tip the tank skid to the side to get it under as it is real big.
  • mjbwrtrmjbwrtr Member Posts: 172
    hey guys....i have a question.....maybe "rav" can answer it...i have a 1988 Ranger XLT with the 2.9L V6 in it. wonderful truck. i have done almost nothing to it. i have 108k on it right now. hoping to get it to 200k. here's the question: i need some help in changing the fuel filter, as it is a pain in the [non-permissible content removed]. can anyone give me some pointers about this? if so, email me at mjbwrtr@hotmail.com
    thanks!
  • trenttrent Member Posts: 86
    My rpm at 55 mph is around 2k and at 70 mph is 2500 with the 4.10 gears (in od).
    Just wondering what rpm those out there with 3.73 gears run?
  • quark99quark99 Member Posts: 136
    Maybe some of you Ranger owners out there can answer these questions...(thanks any and all)
    1-Why is the Ranger regular cab/short bed lighter with an automatic than with a manual transmission?
    2-What are the stock rim widths on a Ranger? 6' or 7"??
    3-Do any of you have the 80 watt radio/cd/cassette "tuned for the Ranger" setup in your truck? Is it any good?
    4-How much HP/Torque can be added from a aftermarket dual exhaust, are there any available, and if so, will the vehicle pass CA smog?
    5-Least expensive way to push the engine output to 180-190HP and 240 lbs of torque?
    6-Speaking of transmissions, how good is the new 5-speed automatic?
  • sredman1sredman1 Member Posts: 66
    I Just put in a factory order on a 2000 ranger.. and of course they say delivery will be in 6-8 weeks... does anybody know how accurate those estimates usually are... Can I actually expect it when they say or should be prepared to wait???

    THANX
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    Sredman1,
    When I ordered mine it took 6 weeks. Ford has a huge capacity to manufacture Rangers. Before you take delivery.
    1. Look the truck over with a fine tooth comb, make sure there are no scratches, dents or dings.
    2. Check to make sure EVERYTHING works.
    3. Check to make sure you get everything you ordered.
    quark99, yes there are inexpensive ways to boost HP and Torque out of your Ranger. I installed a K&N air charger kit and a chip. It makes a difference, but only around second gear can you start to feel it. I also noticed on the freeway if I have to pass and drop it into 4th gear there is one heck of a nice kick. I would estimate my truck is putting out about 185hp and 240ft/lbs of torque. There is a difference in how quickly the rpms are reached and remain constant. Its not whip your head back acceleration, I am one that believes trucks aren't race cars. There is however a difference. All these mods costed me about $500. There is a post a bit farther back about splitting the Exhaust. This is my next project. This will give you a good 10-20hp increase. Good luck!
    Trent, I have a 4.0 5spd 3.73 gears. At 65 I am doing about 2K rpms, closer to 80 brings me to 2.5K rpms.
  • trenttrent Member Posts: 86
    Vince, What size tires are you running? Did you notice what your rpm's were with original tires?
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    I have an all Terrain 31" tire on my Ranger. Junk the Firejunkers right away. Most tire places will give you some sort of trade in towards a set of tires.
    If you have 15" rims the 31" tires will fit fine.
    If you have a 16" rim the 265 75R 16 will fit fine also. Don't let any tire place tell you otherwise!
    This will give your Ranger/Mazda a ground clearance within 1/4" to 1/2" of a Tacoma TRD.
  • barlitzbarlitz Member Posts: 752
    I read an article about the 4x4 ranger driving through the mountains in south america they gave it great reviews, but the truck they used was a 4 door similiar to the nissan are those availible now or was that a prototype does anybody know.
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    Nope, not a prototype. This is supposed to be available sometime in spring 2000 I believe. It is going to come with a 205HP V6 that delivers about 245ft/lbs of torque. Say bye, bye Nissan. Their high tech 3.3 only delivers 200ft/lbs of torque with 170hp.
  • hmerglerhmergler Member Posts: 85
    Actually Vince...

    I heard that Ford is going to be coming out with the 2001 Explorer Sport Trac. Basically, it's an Explorer with a P/U bed. My guess is that they can charge more for it if it has the Explorer badge on it instead of the Ranger badge.

    - The Merg
  • skipdskipd Member Posts: 97
    Yes, I've seen pics of it. Manufacturers are calling these things SUT's. Nissan is coming out with one too that is based more on the Xterra, not the Frontier. The difference between them and the crew cab is that there is a liftgate behind the back seats. The back seats will fold down which will provide more room to load gear with the shorter beds.

    Skip
  • barlitzbarlitz Member Posts: 752
    It definately was a ranger,the article also said ranger I can't remeber the name of the magazine but it was a automobile mag and not a truck magazine the photo was on the cover and there was a 3 or 4 page write up.
  • hmerglerhmergler Member Posts: 85
    One neat thing that the Sport Trac will have will be a power rear window. It will be controlled by a knob. Turn it slightly right and the rear window vents, turn it more and it rolls down completely. Now why don't they put these in P/U's instead of the manual sliding rear window?

    As for the shortened bed size, one thing I read was that there is going to be a flip out bed-extender. When not flipped out, it breaks the bed up into a 1-1/2 foot and 2-1/2 foot compartments. Great for holding groceries in place. When flipped out, it extends the bed to 6 foot or so.

    - The Merg
  • johneeljohneel Member Posts: 11
    Love my new Ranger that I have had for exactly one month. But my 3.0 V6 is a gas-guzzling pig. I'm averaging 17.5 MPG. It's sort of ironic having a vehicle you like so much that you have to avoid driving it to save money.
  • hmerglerhmergler Member Posts: 85
    John:

    Your truck just needs break in. I've heard that the 3.0L can take a good 3-5000 miles to break in. Some people have said that their MPG doesn't break until 10,000. Also, from what I've heard, 17.5 MPG is pretty good if the truck hasn't broken in yet. Most people are saying that they're getting about 13 MPG.

    - The Merg
  • trenttrent Member Posts: 86
    My 99 4x4 supercab,4.0,auto,4.10 gears is getting 16 mpg. I have around 1400 miles on the truck and look forward to better mileage (I hope) after break in.
    Was it 4 wheeler mag that recently had an artical on improving gas mileage?
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    I own a 4.0 5spd XLT 4x4 kingcab and my mileage is about 21mpg average. But, when I turn the A/C on it drops to about 17mpg average. Needless to say I only use the A/C when temps reach over 85F. These compact trucks are not gas sippers when they have V6's and 4 wheel drivetrains to pull around.
  • kreichkreich Member Posts: 1
    I have a 97 ranger and my check engine light just came on at 48000 miles. I was wondering if this is pree set in the cpu on the truck to get me to go to my dealer or if I actually have a problem. I have the 4 cyl. engine and have been getting around 27 miles to the gal.
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    I know some manufacturers do the check engine light deal so you have to go into a dealership and get it turned off. Call a dealership and ask. Especially if your truck runs good and has no reason to go to the dealer.
  • hurtubisehurtubise Member Posts: 9
    My 1999 KIA 2dr 4X4 convertible is on its deathbed. I'm torn between a Ranger 4X4 4dr,stepside or a Wrangler sport (I have a small utility trailer I can use). Anyone own both of these in the past? Is the 4.0l worth the extra bucks/gas mileage? Last winter I was in Argentina.All makes of vehicles,Ford, GM,Toyota,Nissan VW!,and others offered the SUT on both the smaller and full size versions of their trucks. Very popular down there. And yes, it was a Ranger crew cab, not the new Explorer ($) version.
  • angmarangmar Member Posts: 2
    AT the age of 40, I am about to buy my 1st new car ever. The reason I never bought before was I never knew what kind of deal (or ripoff) I was getting from a dealer. So I always stuck to buying used. This internet pricing is GREAT. I am working with my local Ford dealership (the same one I have stormed out of twice over the years because they wouldn't negotiate with me). I went through AutoBytel and I got refered to their "internet salesman". He is very friendly this time and price is not even an issue ($99 over dealer invoice for 2000 Ranger Reg Cab LB w/ v6). They also charge $90 for FDAF Assessment, which the salesman admitted was just more profit, but hey, $200 over invoice is still a fair price in my book. My question - The dealer says they have just started a $500 cash rebate on 2000 Rangers (but alas, no .9 financing), but expects it to go to $1000 in the future. I am trying to time the arrival of my new truck to coincide with the maximum rebate. Does anybody watch Ford for rebate trends? At what time during the yearly sales "cycles" does Ford start their rebate programs? Thanks in advance.
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    (hurtubise):
    Can only speak for the 4.0L Ranger but in my opinion, it is the better engine if you have a choice. Reasons:

    1. Economy about the same. Just took a trip to so. Colo, cab loaded with 5 trees and tools, hauled 1300+ lp of water 20 or so miles to my property, worked on the property in 4 wheel drive, drove to Nat Forest to hunt grouse using 4 wheel drive some of the way, 350miles total on 18 gal of gas. I use the cheap regular 85 octane and for me it works well at Colo high altitude. Understand though that I changed to 31X10.5X15 tires which lowered my mpg due, I think, to the extra work required to move the tires. With the 235X75X15 tires I was getting 21-23 on the same trip.

    2. Torque curve better. 4.0L develops max torque at 2700rpm vs 3700rpm for 3.0. Torque 225 lb/ft vs 18f lb/ft for 3.0.

    3. 16,500 miles on my 99 Supercab so far engine maintenance free.

    4. 4.0 has been around a while so it is a proven engine. Not sure of the 3.0 history.

    Not to say that the 3.0 is bad, Four Wheeler listed the 99 XL 3.0 as its "Best Buy" for small pickups.

    If you can choose and do not mind the extra 600-700 bucks, go with the 4.0
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    sorry, 185 lb/ft torque for 3.0
  • jc51jc51 Member Posts: 4
    Has anyone had any problems with 98 ford ranger 4-wheel 5 speed 4.0 with the emergency brake freezing up in winter. I can't get the truck to move until the thing unfreezed. had to leave it one day and drive the toyoto.
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    Nope, I have had my Ford Ranger XLT 4.0 5spd buried in the snow in the Cascade mountains and have never had any problems with cables freezing.
    In fact, I just hit the 18K mark and my truck runs fantastic. I'm feeling pretty confident I am going to make it to 100K, just like my old Ranger did.
  • dannygdannyg Member Posts: 131
    Yes, I agree the 6-cyl Rangers are guzzlers. My 1985 4x4 2.8L V6 longbed gets about 15-16MPG around town and 20MPG highway. I'd buy a new V6 truck but why be stuck with the car payment AND the bad mileage? With my old truck (95K, running strong) at least I only get the bad mileage...

    If Ford can do one thing to improve the V6 Rangers, it would be to improve the gas mileage. It is amazing to me that the current 3.0L V6 Ranger is rated only a couple of MPG better than full-size V8 trucks!
  • cpousnrcpousnr Member Posts: 1,611
    My gas mileage on my 99 4.0L XLT supercab is now, with the 31X10.5 tires 17-18 around town, 20-22 hwy. With the 235X15 tires I was getting 22-24 hwy and 19-20 around town.
    I think your wish was granted in regard to mpg
  • skipdskipd Member Posts: 97
    All compact trucks with a V6 get similar gas mileage, give or take one or two miles per gallon. So, it's not a Ranger problem, it's the price you pay for buying a truck. I would get the V6 simply for the tourque and towing power that I will need.

    Skip
  • th3176th3176 Member Posts: 1
    I am looking at a used 99 Ranger. It has the 4 door option as well as all of the bells and whistles. Plus it has a few added options such as chrome monkey bars, towing package, bed liner and chrome rails along the bed. Mileage is 6000k. They are asking $18400 which seems pretty good. The only problem is it comes with the 3.0 li engine. I am not planning on doing much towing but I was kind of leaning twd the 4.0 engine. Was wondering what you guys thought about the 4 li engine compared to the 3 li. Do you always need high octane gas to keep it from knocking. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Todd
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    th31, the 3.0 is a good engine. I own a 4.0 that has been slightly modified with some aftermarket parts. The price sounds good for what sounds to be a pretty well loaded Ranger.
    If you are looking for more performance out of your 3.0 try a K&N air charger kit and a chip. I put these on my 4.0 and noticed a difference.
    Also dyno'd it and increased HP on the 4.0 to 184.
    One thing I also recommend to any new Ranger owner. Get rid of those damn Firestones. They are a 4ply tire and not made for any sort of offroading. They are garbage to say the least. Get yourself a 265x75rx16 or a 31" tire. Depending on what size rim you have a 16" or 15" one or the other size tire will fit fine. Your bumpstops are far enought away along with your turning radius is fine also. This will give your truck a nicer stance, ground clearance equal to the Tacoma, and best of all much better offroad traction. If the tires are in good condition most tire stores will give you a credit towards the purchase of new tires.
    Good luck. Any other questions your in the right room to ask.
  • jloco1jloco1 Member Posts: 34
    I just purchased my first truck. 1999 Ranger XLT Supercab(2 door), 4X4, 4.0 V6 w/5 speed manual. Is it me? or is this thing loud? On the highway 55-75mph it seems to whine like a jet (in 2 wheel mode). Is this the tires? (firestone wilderness at) Or is something wrong with it? Like I said, it's my first truck. Is this normal? Please help Someone!!!!!
  • trenttrent Member Posts: 86
    If you're use to a car the Ranger will definitely sound louder. Mine is a little noisier than my last truck but it doesn't really bother me. You'll get use to it.
This discussion has been closed.