Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Luxury Performance Sedans

17980828485201

Comments

  • freddybbfreddybb Member Posts: 95
    You are certainly entitled to your opinion that minivans are ugly and I know there are many others who share that opinion. But for every ugly minivan I can show you an ugly SUV, and you really have to be super focused on looks alone to overlook the car-like ride, handling, space, practicality and decent looks of the NEW crop of minivans. We think that our new 2005 Odyssey looks just fine -- not incredible, but very nice -- and it BLOWS away any SUV from all other perspectives except for off-road prowess (which we and most others don't need anyway).

    Methinks we are digressing from the main topic here so I will stop now...
  • chuck1959chuck1959 Member Posts: 654
    IMO the Odyssey looks better now than before. The new crop of mini-vans from GM are different but not necessarily ugly. As far as Chrsyler, they have basically been he same and have become boring.
  • markcincinnatimarkcincinnati Member Posts: 5,343
    So stipulated that there are ugly minivans, SUV's and ugly LPS cars in general -- but that for every ugly "tout mouthed" Audi there is an equal and opposite beautiful "trout mouthed" Audi -- ditto the Bangel BMW looks.

    To each his/her own.

    I like the looks of some of these LPS cars, some grow on me, some never grow on me and who cares anyhow (unless you can somehow force me to buy an ugly vehicle, then I would care.)

    Truth of the matter seems to be that the style and look of these cars is about all they have left to strikingly differentiate themselves from one another.

    I drove an STS with the sport package -- and if I'm lyin' I'm dyin' -- it felt like it belonged in with the European and Japanese LPS bunch.

    I was pleased with it.

    Of course the 530xi still looks like a Pontiac (to me.) But it drives like a BMW.

    My point here is to just so stipulate that the style can be debated until we are blue in the face and to just hope that we can not worry about offending each other if we "tell it like it is" (in our opinions) with respect to the "look" of these vehicles.

    Of course, it is a fact that mini-vans are all ugly.

    Just kidding.

    :shades:
  • cmybimmergocmybimmergo Member Posts: 265
    I agree. Now, when was the last time you saw an Audi commercial?
  • anthonypanthonyp Member Posts: 1,860
    I certainly enjoy your posts...Almost as though you are a professional writer....Wish you were to get a new car (audi) so I could read the pages and pages of prose....I`m getting a new audi and agree with you about the trout or bass mouth as it`s odd part , but imo they all have an odd part Tony
  • bdr127bdr127 Member Posts: 950
    When I lived in the northeast (Mass, Conn, & Penn), I seemed to see Audi commercials relatively frequently. Now that I'm in NC, I can't remember the last time I saw one..... Obviously a larger market for the Quattro in the northeast.
  • lovemyclklovemyclk Member Posts: 351
    "Of course the 530xi still looks like a Pontiac (to me.)"

    Well... I believe that it is the other way around and that Pontiac has had BMW in their sights for many years now. Pontiac has had delusions of being the "BMW of GM" and has copied design cues from them that have been poorly executed and copied, IMO. If I were BMW and could sue them to stop the design infringement, I would :)

    Of course, one can't escape the inevitable similarities such as the twin-kidney grill. Also, those similarities end right there!
  • designmandesignman Member Posts: 2,129
    Eh, I don’t think Pontiac is delusional. They know where they stand in the scheme of things. However, this kidney grille business goes back to the late 1920s and Pontiac did have it first and it does appear to have been copied by BMW. However, I think BMW got the patent on it because they applied first. I forget the details. Pontiac was indignant through the years and did not relent on carrying the grille forward, as did BMW of course. And here we are today with two horribly styled cars. Actually Pontiac has improved somewhat now that they have lost the corrugated cladding.

    As much as I like BMW’s minimal angular styling through the 70s up until now, (with the exception of you know what) I never really cared for their kidney grille. It always reminded me of that lame mustache Hitler wore.
  • jjacurajjacura Member Posts: 807
    It's really unfortunate that GM lost their way years ago. It's our greatest American business tragedy!
  • merc1merc1 Member Posts: 6,081
    Well I've had that happen with Audis and other German cars too when new. I seriously doubt it was the electronics making a scraping noise, that sounds like rusty rotors or really fresh brakes....something that would go away after a few days of use.

    M
  • lexusguylexusguy Member Posts: 6,419
    When's the last time you drove one? I drove both an A8 and a 740i almost back to back. The steering in the Audi was quite light and lacked much if any feel, and there was lots of roll in the corners. The car definitely hit its handling limits early. Interior materials in the BMW were also much better.
  • merc1merc1 Member Posts: 6,081
    Now that I can't remember. I seem to remember driving the S8, so maybe thats why I don't remember anything sloppy about its handling. I don't ever remember the materials being less than Audi's usual best in class affair though even on the regular A8. I'll take your word for it because I haven't driven and previous A8 since at least 1997 or 1998. I do remember driving the S8 towards the end that bodystyle's production run though.

    M
  • lexusguylexusguy Member Posts: 6,419
    The next Toyota to get the 3.5L V6 (now 268hp after '06 SAE net rating) is the RAV4. Under $25K, yet it should spank the GS300 in a drag race.
  • markcincinnatimarkcincinnati Member Posts: 5,343
    Audi, from certain performance perspectives, may have to avert its gaze whenever a BMW comes close -- but I know of no BMW, period, that uses better materials or jus' plain does interiors better than Audi -- the current crop of BMW's interiors can best be described as minimalist and are often described as "stark."

    Now, in somewhat of a reversal, I in no way believe that the materials used by BMW are shoddy or cheap. The leather in my wife's Premium Package/Sport Package X3 (terracotta "Montana" leather) is, as far as I can tell at about 8,000 miles on the od, of very high quality. The 530xi I test drove recently, too, had its seats covered with top grain cowhide, no doubt.

    Yet, the school of interior design, IMHO, has Audi folks as the professors at this point in time.

    The BMW 7 is a great car, perhaps a better performing car than the A8 (I said "perhaps"), but "I, senator, knew John Kennedy, and you sir are no JFK!"

    And he left in a huff!

    The "Huff" a short-lived (only one year in production) car brand from the early 1930's, noted mostly for its creator, Edward Huff, who used to take great pleasure in riding through the country side yelling at people to shut up, grow up and wise up.

    He died dejected, alone and in poverty in his room at a seedy New York tenement.

    :sick:
  • deweydewey Member Posts: 5,251
    OK the Phaeton platform being used for an upcoming Porsche sedan may have been a bit of a starry eyed notion on my part!

    But having more Porsche vehicles that share platforms with VW or Audis is not a stretch. The relative success of the Cayenne can be used to justify such platform sharing.

    Also the billions of dollars that Porsche is investing in VW would be a silly investment without any operational gains for Porsche itself!
  • freddybbfreddybb Member Posts: 95
    "Stark" and "uncluttered" are exactly the words I used to describe the interior of my 530xi, and I love it! The Audi does have a beautiful interior, but I remember not buying one the last time I bought a car because of the intimidating row of similar looking buttons.
  • lexusguylexusguy Member Posts: 6,419
    Well, the impression I got of both the inside and the outside of the A8 back in '00 was A4 deja vu, just bigger. Other than size, the interiors are basically identical. Same with the 540i and 740i. I wasnt particularly impressed with either. The LS430 in 2001 blew them both clear out of the water. The current A8, I agree, the interior is world class.
  • jjacurajjacura Member Posts: 807
    "The BMW 7 is a great car, perhaps a better performing car than the A8 (I said "perhaps"), but "I, senator, knew John Kennedy, and you sir are no JFK!"

    LOL...Speaking of Dan Quail, I understand he drives an LS430 :surprise:
  • deweydewey Member Posts: 5,251
    This may sound like a Dan Quayle joke, but this is not a joke but a fact:

    Dan Quayle is currently one of the biggest deal makers for the world's largest hedge funds called Cerberus.

    I guess being ridiculed has its advantages!

    Oops am I off-topic again?
  • jjacurajjacura Member Posts: 807
    Right,,,not a Dan Quayle joke and You really aren't too far off topic....Cerberus Hedge Funds recently bought the leasing unit of DaimlerChrysler, a pretty hefty addition for this $16 Billion New York hedge fund.
  • sdiver68sdiver68 Member Posts: 125
    I don't get some of the Audi praise here as a "premium" nameplate. Consumer Reports and JD Powers consistently rank their predicated relaibility and quality/satisfaction as much lower than other cars being discussed here, Jaguar being a possible and rarely mentioned exception Their resale values also have traditonally reflected their lack of quality. I, and justifiably so, have always considered Audi to be Jaguar quality in a German car. Or, another way of putting it, a high end VW with all their attendant QC problems.
  • docnukemdocnukem Member Posts: 485
    I think you've hit on one of the answers to Mark's question (and the source of his bemusement). While there are many on this board who are car fanatics and consider Audi to be among the elite German car companies, many in the car-buying public in the States do not see Audi the same. It is therefore very hard for them to justify paying the same (or nearly) for an Audi as for a BMW or MB.
  • markcincinnatimarkcincinnati Member Posts: 5,343
    According to Audi's own "game plan" (assuming the stuff published in CAR and European Car magazines are actually the real Audi Game Plane), they considered themselves on the fringe of Premium (right through early 2005.) There was a "frequency histogram" if I recall my college statistics, that had several car brands clustered together and Audi (over a period of years) was moving toward the cluster.

    The claim was that the 2005 MY would begin "the big moves" into Premium territory.

    The A8L and W12 have moved Audi in the general direction of Premium for a couple of years (but at what price point), yet the A8 is a bit too esoteric and at a price point that makes it less of a "mass market" car regardless of its capabilities and lux content.

    The 2005 A6, on the other hand, has moved Audi closer to the cluster -- some would argue they are now in the same Solar System with the broad range of cars that Automobile, Car & Driver, Motor Trend and Road & Track loosely call Luxury Performance Sedans (aka Premium Class).

    We may argue the point -- did Audi with the A6 actually move into the Premium Class or did it just make a really good run at it and is still in the [Super] Near-Premium Class or is it simply a Freshman in the class.

    I just got the latest round of accolades (conveniently distilled and placed in an expensive brochure) sent to me by Audi of America. To read the stuff that they have been able to amass over the past year it certainly seems like Audi (with the A6 and the A8 'family') are now legitimate (but perhaps "probationary") members of the class.

    With great fondness and brand loyalty, I have always said (about Audi) that they were VW's "who knew somebody."

    As far as I am concerned that is a compliment.

    And, without wishing to start the debate up again, I will one more time say that Consumer Reports opinions mean less than my 3 year old Sheltie's opinions on "Nawsomes" vs. "Bonz." He likes 'em both.

    CR has many fans -- I am one of them, but not with respect to their ability to convince me of the merits of a particular car.

    Speaking only for myself, cars are NOT an appliance. Cars are just about the most emotional thing I can think of or about, second only to family.

    Those folks who rely on CR are welcome to do so and I do not fault them for using CR at all. I simply find, in this case, CR to be an unreliable source for information.

    But, it's just my 'pinion. :shades:
  • designmandesignman Member Posts: 2,129
    The problem is that quality is not synonymous with reliability. For instance, take a cashmere sweater. Good cashmere is considered quality but wears out in no time. It’s no good for working at a computer because I get holes in the elbow area practically overnight with ratty looking forearms to go with it. I don’t feel like spending money on good cashmere sweaters only to be walking around the office looking like Jed Clampett. But they sure do look and feel good as long as they last. There’s your “quality”. I guess it's the same thing with cars.
  • sdiver68sdiver68 Member Posts: 125
    Thanks for explaining that, MarkCinc.

    First of all, I am not a CR fan at all, EXCEPT I do believe their reliability ratings are somewhat scientifically based. I'm a 25+ year reader of C&D and R&T, and from the perspective of comparing the qualities of BRAND NEW cars, I agree Audi seems to be coming into the ballpark and even knocking a few home runs like the S4. However, those mags generally do not consider owner satisfaction, reliability, resale value in their comparo ratings, but curiously do usually have price dependent and price independent judgements, which have never made sense to me without factoring in all costs of ownership (depreciation, expected maintenance included).

    So, I wanted to make sure anyone reading this forum from a position of not having the history of 25+ years of enthusiast knowledge has the benefit of at least asking the questions regarding Audi.
  • lovemyclklovemyclk Member Posts: 351
    To think that GM had all of the resources at their disposal to be the best in the world... and all they could muster were rental cars for the most part - save for the Corvette and occasional Caddy or truck! I remember, as a boy in the 50's and 60's, going with my Dad every 3 years to the Caddy dealer to by his new Sedan DeVille or Fleetwood. It was quite a treat. Also remember my 1st time in a car at 100MPH in a '63 Buick Riviera (silver over red)! GM was the best, IMO, back then.

    After all of that "indoctrination", I will not consider the Caddy - even the new STS/CTS. Have driven them and will not pay the premium $$'s they are asking until they earn their position in the market.

    Some may disagree, but if I'm spending $50K+, it's going to BMW, MB... or even Lexus if all I want is luxury. I really WANT to buy a Caddy or other American LPS car, but the choices and dollars asked are not viable... yet!
  • wale_bate1wale_bate1 Member Posts: 1,982
    Oh I don't care about the branding. My beef with Caddy is that in spite of the resources you mention and the sincere effort to reclaim some semblance of world level participation, they still can't seem to source decent switchgear and the interiors still feel and look like a lower tier player. Add to that the fact that I can't stand the Art & Science leftover styling idiom.

    "Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how'd you like the play?"

    If they fix the inside and chic up the outside, and offer a solid RWD player a tad smaller than the CTS (too big) I might bite. Certainly they appear to be headed in the correct direction where the rubber meets the road...
  • lovemyclklovemyclk Member Posts: 351
    Speaking of smaller Caddies, the BTS for the European market appears to be based on the same platform as the Saab 9-3. Front drive? Is so, better not ever find itself on our shores, or it will die an ugly death!

    Regarding the "small things" like switchgear, etc... these little things impart a feel of quality (or lack thereof) and GM feels down market in a big way - as are many American nameplates right now. For STS $$'s, I don't want to feel like the K-Mart parts bin was raided to save money.

    That said, improvements are being made and one day... maybe one day...
  • markcincinnatimarkcincinnati Member Posts: 5,343
    Oh boy, I bet if I go down this path there will be some amongst "us" that will deem me one thing or another -- from a political perspective. But, if you will allow my point to be placed in context and in history (then and now), you certainly should let me start out by saying I am NOT intending to express a political view.

    End of disclaimer.

    In 1989 a then "nobody," Michael Moore released a film called "Roger and Me." Anyone remember it? It became "something" over time as it was released and re-released on the format du jour (now DVD, of course.)

    Moore's premise is well known and I will not digress into a review of the film except to comment it was entertaining and informative if you recognize that it is at once a documentary -- a well-spun documentary -- and a bit of fiction.

    Now Moore wanted, so he said, to show Roger Smith, CEO of GM the results of the layoffs that ostensibly were Smith's handiwork.

    Now here is the part where you have to keep everything in context. And add to the context the part that is germane to us here in LPS edmunds.com land. Part of the thread here of late includes a generally undefended notion that GM (Cadillac in particular) has squandered billions and its possible future and to this day cannot build a car at a price that makes most of us take either the CTS or the STS seriously.

    N.B.: While @ MSRP, I agree that "who are they kidding with respect to the asking price;" but, reality check, even before the GM employee pricing of late, the STS's (here in Cincinnati at least) were discounted some $7,000 and even V8, loaded SRX's were slashed to $49,999 with super sub-vented leases.

    Sorry, again, for the run-on sentence.

    So we are all [apparently] mostly in general agreement that the CTS and STS are the most likely suspects within the GM line to compete in what we know as the near premium and premium classes of cars. But, we can't see an STS/AWD commanding or being worth some $63,000+ (well, at least it appears MOST of us cannot fathom those dollars for a Cadillac with its 'less than impressive' quality and fit and finish.)

    What Roger & Me didn't do or perhaps couldn't do was explain part and parcel of the milieu that led (in part) to Smith's ascention to the position of GM's CEO.

    Saying it's the economy stupid would be right, incomplete and too easy.

    "It was the economy stupid. . ."

    Smith, or so it most surely seems (in context), was NOT really a "car guy." Smith and those in power before and somewhat after his time were "accountants." The line of cars that all were built on the same platform (remember the Cimarron?) were the product of a car company led by CPA's -- not a right brain anywhere to be found, at the time, amongst those in control of GM.

    Remember I said (my opinion, only) that cars are emotional and second emotionally to family (I love my wife because it is logical, right?)

    The era, perhaps that peaked (or is that piqued?) during Smith saw the car manifested through the eyes and "soul" of an accountant.

    We are where we are (with respect to GM and US car companies in general), in part, due to GM's shift from emotional (passionate) leadership to rational (logical) management.

    Moore was not entirely biased, not entirely the left-wing wacko he is often portrayed as today -- it is just that his documentary was incomplete insofar as being a bellwether of where we have come to in American car-dom.

    Hopefully, this will not incite those on either the left or the right to enter into discourse that will surely be frowned upon here.

    In the context of LPS cars and Cadillac in particular (and with respect to the post I am directly responding to) I thought it might be a relevant line of thinking.

    Drive it like you live. :shades:
  • lexusguylexusguy Member Posts: 6,419
    Detroit was not good at rapid design theory change in the '70s. For the most part, they still arent. It wasnt just GM, all three were blind sided by the gas crunch, and they left a golden window for Honda and Toyota to jump in to. The crappy cars that all three peddled on the US market in the '70s, '80s, and '90s were sorry attempts to copy Japan's compact, efficient FWD formula.

    Ironically, the current auto situation has a lot of things in common with the '70s gas crisis. Detroit is again stuck with a bunch of big, gas guzzling whales, just SUVs this time instead of the big '70s iron. They're still using 2-valve engines, and inefficient four-speed automatics. Trying to get away with 20 year old technology just doesnt work anymore.
  • lexi300lexi300 Member Posts: 36
    I bought a Lexus GS300 AWD this summer. I've put 6,200 miles on it so far and love it. It's my first luxury car. Before this, I owned a Toyota 4Runner and before that a Toyota Celica. I always took my cars back to the dealer for their scheduled maintenance. Rarely, I would skip one appointment and go to Jiffy Lube for an oil change, but by and large I would return to the dealer. Lately with the 4Runner, that meant around $90 or $100 for "minor service" every 7,500 miles. 15,000 and 30,000 mile check-ups were, of course, more.

    Now that I have the Lexus, the first oil change visit was free. They did a nice job: they topped off all the fluids as I would expect, washed the car, rotated the tires, and changed the oil. I asked what it would cost me the next time for the exact same service and was told it would be about $220.

    WOW!

    Now, I realized maintenance on an LPS would not be cheap. But *what* is a Lexus dealer doing to earn $220 for minor service every 5,000 miles? I can surely get an oil change and tire rotation for much less than 25% of that price elsewhere.

    What do the rest of you LPS owners do? I know BMW gives several years of scheduled maintenance free, but I don't think the other companies do. Is there any way Lexus dealer service is worth that money, or should I just plan on going to the Lexus dealer for the big 30,000 mile checkups?

    Thanks for any advice.
  • greenbeltgreenbelt Member Posts: 55
    I would only go to the selling dealership for the major Services like 30K. Call around, if you can for cost estimates.

    Everything else is Jiffy Lube or better still a great local mechanic.
  • lexusguylexusguy Member Posts: 6,419
    Personally, I always go to the dealer while the car is still under warranty. Jiffy Lube may screw something up (they do that a lot) and the dealer may choose to not cover the repairs under warranty.

    I took my LS400 to Jiffy Lube once, and spent $300 at the dealer to fix the damage they did. (This was after warranty though, I'm not sure what Rehal's policy would be if it was still under warranty).
  • dan339gdan339g Member Posts: 56
    I would agree that historically in the US, Audi has been a "wannabe" player in the premium market, in the shadow of MB and BMW. I seem to recall a description in one of the Auto mag's of Audi as the "German Buick". I personally shared this perception, which was re-enforced when I test drove an A6 in both 1999 and 2001 while shopping for my last two vehicles (Volvo S80 T6, and BMW 530i). However, ultimately a superior product will stand on it's own merit, and I think Audi has finally earned bragging rights with the recent A6 and A8 models. After entering the Audi showroom with my admitted bias, I left the test drive thinking that Audi is a worthy contender in the premium LPS market. Of course, there is a variety of subjective judgements that comprise this perception, but as a life long "car guy" I am truly impressed with the progress. Kinda reminds me of how Honda and Toyota arrived as cheap little economy cars that no one initially took seriously, and now command seemingly endless respect based on the quality and value their products represent. Time will tell if Audi can maintain this momentum, and take a permanent seat at the premium table.
  • cmybimmergocmybimmergo Member Posts: 265
    "I never really cared for their kidney grille. It always reminded me of that lame mustache Hitler wore."

    It reminded me of the Edsel.
  • bartalk3bartalk3 Member Posts: 692
    Lexusguy: Do you work in the auto industry? You seem to know more about cars and the industry than most auto writers. You could probably get a job as a Lexus consultant to advise on strategy and get their engine placements straightened out.
  • deweydewey Member Posts: 5,251
    People will not buy products from companies they don't know and don't like," says BMW's Freymann. "Car manufacturers from countries like China will grow from the bottom up. They may become a threat to a company like Ford, but not to us. We are not just selling a car, we are selling an image."

    The above quote is from Edmunds Inside Line.

    BMW is selling an image?? I thought I bought my BMW and intend to buy a future BMW based solely on drivetrain/chassis considerations! The HELL with image--I dont need to impress anybody but myself!

    The proof that image itself does not sell cars is the Jaguar X. Despite the high image of a Jaguar on the hood most drivers did not want to drive a rebadged European Ford Mondeo. If Ford had provided a Jaguar X with a drivetrain/chassis combo that could beat the specs of the BMW 3 series, I can assure you Mr. Freymann would have a far more humble opinion about BMW Image.

    This kind of BMW arrogance provokes a lot of hostility. If you want to observe this hostility in action then go the the new Lexus IS250/350 forum. For every one sentence about the IS there are about 3 sentences on how crappy and unreliable BMW are!
  • jjacurajjacura Member Posts: 807
    Bartalk3...I would agree....and also between Lexusguy, Merc, and MarkCincy you collectively have your industry strategist, analyst, and diplomat package right here in edmunds LPS city! ;)
  • docnukemdocnukem Member Posts: 485
    If you crossed all three of them, you'd have a guy driving an MB with an ultra-premium after-market sound system wearing a bemused look...
  • zidecarzidecar Member Posts: 49
    I would agree that Audi has come a long way.

    I have had first hand experience with it. My first Audi was a new Fox purchased in '75. At the time, it offered FWD and fuel injection and was one of the few cars that ran on regular leaded fuel and met EPA standards. It had also garnered a high rating from CR, but that was not a factor in my buying decision. I had a foreshadowing of my long term relationship with the car when I picked it up from the dealership and discovered that the horn, gas gauge and windshield wipers did not work. This was after receiving a piece of paper stating that the car had been carefully checked by technician and was certified for delivery! Not even an apology from the salesperson or dealership! Fortunately, I went over the car before signing the final papers so those repairs were done on the dealership's time. The Fox never got over its need for long term bonding with the dealership. I had numerous problems with the car throughout my ownership period (8 years), the worst of which was its love for consuming a quart of oil every 1000 miles. Audi claimed this was normal operation which was reinforced right up through the ranks to the US Audi Corporate folks. Of course, toward the end of my ownership interval, I was reimbursed by VW for the cost of 2 valve jobs to replace valve guide seals. Apparently this was a widespread problem that VW had and never formally acknowledged with the Dasher (Passat) and Audi Fox. It also didn't help that customer focus was a completely foreign concept to Audi dealerships. Their service advisors were the lords and customers the "unwashed" masses. But when the Fox was running, it was a hoot to drive........

    In subsequent years, Audi learned a hard lesson about customer focus with the "unintended acceleration" debacle, i.e., it almost cost them the business in the US.

    Such owner experiences tend to have long memories in the minds of the buying public (as seen by this posting!). I believe (my opinion) that this is historical baggage that Audi is still working to overcome.

    Time warping ahead to 2005...... I was in the market for a AWD luxury sedan. My short list narrowed down to 2 vehicles - Audi A6 & Infiniti M35x. In the end, the Infiniti was the winner from 4 perspectives: better ergonomics, better value for the dollar, better predicted reliability and better dealership customer focus.
  • deweydewey Member Posts: 5,251
    It always reminded me of that lame mustache Hitler wore

    Maybe BMW shoud re-design their grilles to look like FDR's chin!
  • docnukemdocnukem Member Posts: 485
    Then they would be copying the Subaru B9 Tribeca...
  • wale_bate1wale_bate1 Member Posts: 1,982
    "I thought I bought my BMW and intend to buy a future BMW based solely on drivetrain/chassis considerations!"

    You fool! ;)
  • deweydewey Member Posts: 5,251
    Yikes, nobody's chin is that ugly!
  • deweydewey Member Posts: 5,251
    Sometimes I feel like the only fool on this planet that drives a car with a blue propellor logo! :(
  • designmandesignman Member Posts: 2,129
    I disagwee wit doze who don’t like Cwis Bangle styling. I weely weely dink BMWs look gwait… vewwy pwogwessive. Beauty is in da eye of da behoada.

    :P
  • dan339gdan339g Member Posts: 56
    Great minds think alike, as my "short list" also included the A6 and the M35X. Based on your criteria I think you made the right choice, with Infiniti having the edge on ergonomics, reliability and dealer experience. I would question "value" however, as this means different things to different people. As noted previously on this board, for an enthusiast a car purchase is as much an emotional decision as a practical one. Since you are wise enough to have not factored emotion into your criteria, I can understand how the M would represent a better value. However, when I factor that into my decision process, the answer for me is Audi.
  • hpowdershpowders Member Posts: 4,331
    Looks great and drives better than anything else in its price range.
    I rather drive controversial than boring, but that's just me.
    As far as I'm concerned (and that's all that really matters) my new 545i is perfect.
    As we say in Bangleland:
    iDrive, you condemn, we laugh.(liberally translated from veni, vidi, vici).
  • docnukemdocnukem Member Posts: 485
    There once was a Bangle named Chris
    To bimmer cars he gave a new twist
    Despite all his works
    Some thought them as quirks
    But shareholders now get the gist.

    (or substitute for the last line:
    "But shareholders are not at all p****ed")
  • hheelloohheelloo Member Posts: 11
    I need a luxury/entry-luxury vehicle for city driving, that is also capable of handling the mountains, all for under $33K.

    My work requires shuttling executives (luxury/class). My personal life includes being both a single guy in Los Angeles (style) AND spending significant time in the mountains (awd or stability control).

    Also, the vehicle should make me look older/more executive than my age (early 30’s), without looking pretentious.

    I will probably finance a certified pre-owned, to leverage a more luxurious vehicle at a more affordable price.

    What car do you think would be best vehicle for luxury, value, style, residual, reliability and driving impressions?? Perhaps:

    2005 G35 X awd sedan: a bit “boy racer”?
    2003 Audi A6 2.5T or 3 quattro: spendy and (supposedly) unreliable?
    2003 or 2004 Lexus ES330: uninspiring, and fwd?
    2003 or 2004 Acura TL: uninspiring, and fwd?
    2003 Jaguar S-Type: pretentious, no awd?
    2004 Cadillac CTS: unsophisticated, unreliable, no awd?
    2004 Lincoln LS: unophisticated, unreliable, no awd?
    2003 BMW 530: expensive, old style, no awd?
    2003 or 2004 Volvo S80 2.5 T awd: uninspiring and unreliable?

    I am considering keeping my Tacoma truck for the mountains, and using a sedan (such as above) for mostly city driving. Perhaps this would allow for a more affordable FWD (such as an ES330). Otherwise, a truck might smell like mountain gear when I return on Monday and pick up executive clients...however an fwd might be unsafe for my mountain driving.

    If I had to choose, I would say A6, BMW 530, G35, ES330…but each has distinct disadvantages.

    Thanks for your opinion!
Sign In or Register to comment.