Toyota Tacoma vs. Nissan Frontier

13

Comments

  • goobagooba Member Posts: 391
    From what I have read the 01 Frontier lost about an inch in ride height.They made the suspension more "road worthy".There is supposed to be a change in the 02 model to be a better "off road" capable suspension.
  • jackkajackka Member Posts: 25
    I looked at the specs on the new Tacoma. The curb weight has increased about 200 pounds and mpg has dropped one mpg. Does anybody know what they added?
    I held the plastic fender flare on the new Frontier and shook it a bit. It slides around without much effort. Might that be a source of rattles after a while?
  • y2ktrdy2ktrd Member Posts: 81
    What i meant was they are still building the trucks with the same old wimpy front end.I have beena a auto tech for 15 years now and i have worked on many nissan trucks to back up my statements!In my eyes they are a scrappy truck.
  • soggydogsoggydog Member Posts: 67
    thanks gooba, I parked beside a 2000 CC and can't see any difference. maybe the larger tires on the 2001 makes up for the inch they lowered the body.... jackka. Good point on the frontier fender flares. I tried to start this discussion over on freshalloy, but no response. There is no rubber gasket or seal between the plastic and metal fender. All you have to do is tap on the plastic and you can hear it hit the metal. I think after a few years, this movement will scuff the paint.I also noticed everyone who looks at it wants to grab the flares and play with them, what's up with that?
  • mahimahimahimahi Member Posts: 497
    y2ktrd,
    Explain what is 'whimpy' about it. What is so much 'tougher' about the Taco front end? Because you worked on many Nissans, does that mean you never worked on Toyotas? I would find it hard to believe that unless you are a Nissan tech and only specialized in Nissans that you haven't worked on Toyotas. If Nissan's weak point is their front-end, what is Toyota's(I hope you are a realist and don't say the truck is perfect) every chain has a weak link, what is Toyota in YOUR opinion? I know of people(I'm not saying everybody I know that has a Toyota, but some...I know alot of people that have Toyotas and Nissans right now that haven't done anything to them except normal maintenance) that have had problems with their Toyotas some include the drivetrain front end components(all of the problems that I know about are a result of customer neglect)I myself have had problems with wheel bearings and yoke bearings on a Toyota(granted it wasn't a Taco)but, I don't blame Toyota or think that Toyota is inferior to anything because of I had some problems with it. Same thing with the '94 S-10 I had. I had four pitman arms on that truck in two years(Chevy said themselves that it was a bad design)but I don't hold anything against Chevy, there's other reasons why I wouldn't buy another S-10.
  • jackkajackka Member Posts: 25
    I guess people keep fiddling with the Frontier fender flares because they stand out like an NBA center in a room full of short folks.
  • soggydogsoggydog Member Posts: 67
    Here's another thought. I can just see some crazy guy, who watched one too many of those fishing shows on TV, chasing a 2001 taco down the road with a fillet knife in his hand.
  • 4lubes4lubes Member Posts: 7
    Hi guys, I've been reading all your comments for the last couple weeks and thought I'd venture into the fray. I own a "95" Nissan KingCab XE-V6 4x4 and had a "91" before it. Neither one of those two trucks have ever been back to the dealership for anything (I performed all routine maint. myself) I've always liked the Toyota's, but never wanted to pay the upcharge (could always get much better deals on Nissan's here in the St. Louis area). I'm in the market for a new truck right now and am contimplating both Nissan's and Toyota's. I hear all your styling comments, but I chaulk those up as a personal preference thing. Any thoughts on the extended cab vs. crew cab models? Is the additional 6" worth the $1500 upcharge and can you do anything with the 5' bed you get because you got a back seat? I think I'm leaning more toward the Toyota right now from an engine (190hp vs 170hp w/o a supercharger) and a resale (looked at comparably equip. 5yr old Toyota's vs. Nissans) What are your thoughts/experiences? Thanks, 4Lubes
  • jackkajackka Member Posts: 25
    I have an 89 Toyt PU. Like your Nissan, it's been faultless for 12 years. I'm trying to decide among Tacoma, Frontier, and Ranger.
    Here are some opinions on the extended cab models of all three:

    Tacoma Pro's:
    Best weight to power ratio
    Best reliability (along with Nissan)
    Best gas mileage (more important recently)
    Tacoma Con's:
    High price
    Hardest to utilize interior space (behind seat)
    Option packages include things I don't want

    Frontier Pro's:
    Best prices
    Better interior space access (just an opinion)
    Best option combinations in packages (opinion)
    Frontier Con's:
    Worse weight to power ratio
    Worst gas mileage
    Plastic fender flares serve no purpose

    Ranger Pro's:
    SOHC 4L V6 gives good weight to power ratio
    Good gas mileage
    4-door extended cab provides great access
    Nice ride and handling (another opinion)
    Ranger Con's:
    No manual tranny with SOHC 4L V6 (maybe later)

    I'd like to read your observations and arguments.
  • 4lubes4lubes Member Posts: 7
    Jackka,

    I think I pretty much agree with your overall assessment. The problem I face is I still have a little one in a car seat. Right now I put her in the front seat (95's have driver side airbag only)and my wife and son ride in the jump seats. See I can't put her in the back because you can't mount a car seat sideways, but with the Toyota, instead of jump seats which pull out of the sidewall they have little benches which face forward and have provisions for mounting car seats on them. The thing is of all my driving 90% is by myself, 5% is hauling something and the other 5% is with the four of us in the truck. I guess thats why I'm wrestling with the Extended vs. CrewCab decision, because the seating vs. hauling only comes into play 5-10% of the time. On the Toyota's, I agree on the engine power, and these days 1-2 mpg starts to mean something. As far as the pricing, I'm not thrilled about the upcharge, but I found after 5 yrs, comparably equiped the Toyota gets about $1600 more in resale (KBB.com), now extended out to 10 yrs or more that probably diminishes. Anyway, I'd still like to hear from someone who has a CrewCab to see if they still think the trade-off of bed space is worth it? Talk to you later. 4Lubes
  • whoopdeedoowhoopdeedoo Member Posts: 1
    Hi, I was wondering if you guys out there could give me some info, not your opinions. I'm trying to decide whether to get an automatic or manual trans in a 4X4 Tacoma. I do a lot of hunting so I need it to be geared low enough so that I don't have to use brakes on snowy hill descents, however, I do a lot of city driving. I like the convience of the auto, but I do need a rig that can go slow when I want it to. I've driven automatic T-100's and they fly down hills in 4 low. And finally, is the manual faster than the auto? Cause like anyone I do like to go fast off the line on regular roads.
  • goobagooba Member Posts: 391
    I have a 00 Frontier Crewcab.The CC was the best thing for my family.I have a 10yr old son and a 6mo old daughter.Regardless of the mfg,go with the CC.It is so much easier.I have not really noticed the limitations on the bed.I put a shell on mine and that helped on hauling different things.As far as the old standard sheet of plywood in the bed and larger items,that is what trailers are for.My advice is get a CC.
  • sconroysconroy Member Posts: 1
    I want to get the King Cab cuz I want the bed size but I have a 3rd door on my S10 now and don't want to give that up. Does anyone know if the King Cab comes with extra door or only Crew Cab? Thanks.
  • cygnusx1cygnusx1 Member Posts: 290
    Why doesn't tacoma come with a limited slip differential like the Nissan? Why can the locker only be engaged in 4 low at 5mph? Why can I pretty much see through the thin sheet metal on the tacoma's body? Why does toyo charge so much for a compact truck? Why does the Tacoma have such a small bed?

    These are all things I asked myself before going with the Frontier.
  • mahimahimahimahi Member Posts: 497
    4lubes,
    I wanted to point out to you(in reference to the trade-in/used values) while it may be true that the Taco fetches $1600 more in "used" value but, I promise you that you that there is more than $1600 difference when you initially buy the vehicles. To put it in simpler terms, if there is say a $3500 difference between the trucks new(assuming they are closely equipped)and ONLY a $1600 difference in five years...the Taco has depreciated more. So if one cost more initially it wouldn't be fair to expect the vehicles to be worth the same. Plus, you may already know this, but good luck trying to get the prices you see here at Edmunds or Kelley's...they are just guides and retail at that. Good luck in your search, I know it's a hard decision. I have a CC and love it. I too worried about the bed size, but hasn't been a problem at all...I use my truck for hunting and towing a 4000lb boat. If the truck was going to be used for nothing except as a grocery getter and running back and forth to work I might be disappointed in the lack of 'speed'. Because I can vouch to this truck having all the power anybody with a 1/2 ton would ever need. As I stated earlier I hunt, so my dog's kennel fits back there with all of my hunting equip with no problem. So the bed compromise isn't a problem for me. I will say that my fishing rods do have to lay diagonal :)
  • chix4truxchix4trux Member Posts: 1
    I'm looking to transition from an SUV [Jeep] to a pickup. My search is currently focussed on the Tacomas and Frontiers. I've test driven a 2001 CC and the Xterra. But it has been far more informative to read all these responses. Question though: Can anyone recommend a reputable dealer in/around the San Francisco Bay Area. I'm looking for dealership with "deals" but if someone can actually recommend a dealership without the cheesy/schmoosy salesman that would be a plus too.
  • soggydogsoggydog Member Posts: 67
    anyone seen the new commercial for the tocama double cab? I'm not sure the bear's at the camp site are looking for salad, they may be looking for catfish. I really liked the commercial, just about fell out of my chair.
  • mahimahimahimahi Member Posts: 497
    Yeah...I liked it. It is hilarious!!!! But, you're right about the bears, everybody knows they love fish :)
  • soggydogsoggydog Member Posts: 67
    If anyone knows the serious answer,(I can supply my own wisecracks) Why is the tacoma so much lighter than the frontier, when they are about the same size? For example Edmunds list the Tacoma V6 4WD Double cab at 3425 and the Frontier SC-V6 4WD Crew Cab at 4108. That is a 683 lb. difference. Is the engine block cast aluminum? Thinner sheet metal? Lightweight frame? or what? I'm not sure if it's a good or bad thing, could be either way i guess. Of course the lighter weight should translate to better fuel mileage. But I like the solid feel of the frontier when you close the doors and on the highway the wind don't push you all around.
  • soggydogsoggydog Member Posts: 67
    Ok, the Frontier SE/SC has larger wheels, roof rack and nerf bars installed. I should have used the XE for compairson. The XE is listed at 4034, still 609 lbs. difference. Also, the Dakota sport QC/4WD is 4391 and the Explorer ST/4WD is 4332 lbs.
  • mahimahimahimahi Member Posts: 497
    I don't know the actual specs, but Nissan boasts about having "thicker" steel panels than the competition. I don't know how thick or even if the Tacoma is the "competition" in this case. But look at the bodies of the two trucks, the Nissan has more surface area. For example, compare the beds...the tacoma is 'thinner' than all the other brands, not saying that it is shallower inside but rather the panels aren't as big. The Nissan is also wider too. So maybe these coupled with a slightly thicker sheet metal might explain the weight difference. There's probably more to the picture though like axle housing differences and other componets.
  • volfyvolfy Member Posts: 274
    Having owned both a Tacoma and a Frontier, I can tell you the two are not sized the same. The jacked up 4x4s and CCs are more difficult to judge size difference, but if you see standard 4x2 Tacoma parked right next to a 4x2 Frontier, the size difference will be very apparent to you.

    Not only is the Frontier's overall dimensions larger, it sports bigger wheels and a larger and taller bed as well.

    Not that being the smaller one is necessarily a bad thing. I really missed the 29mpg I used to get on the Tacoma. I'm also disappointed that Nissan thinks the Tundra is 7/8th sized and so will be building their full-size truck larger. If I do decide to buy a 1/2-ton later on, it is looking like the Tundra is about the only "full-size" I can park in my garge.
  • soggydogsoggydog Member Posts: 67
    Thanks, I really never thought about the Tacoma being smaller, makes since though. I was specifically talking about the new double cab. I remember reading a magazine article that said the double cab was a complete new vehicle, not just a ext. cab with the cab stretched to add two doors and a shorter bed. So I thought it may be larger. I believe both vehicles are about 200" long, don't know about width.
  • toad10toad10 Member Posts: 12
    I had the chance the other day to sit in the Frontier cc and the Taco double cab. I'm 6'4 and fit comfortably in the rear seat of the taco with the front seat all the way back. The Frontier is much more crammed in the back, . Also the bed on the taco is a little bigger than the nissan but not by much. One downfall to the taco is you can only get an auto tranny with it also 2002 you can get auto only also. Maybe they will get a 5 speed eventually I can only hope
  • mahimahimahimahi Member Posts: 497
    The Taco is definitely narrower!!!! Just sitting in both will tell you that, the Nissan's cab may not be as long but is wider.
  • gringo1gringo1 Member Posts: 72
    Thanks for the offer to sell your truck.
    My apologies for late response -- been on an emergency out of town the last month and out of touch.
    I do need a 4X4, without a doubt, so your truck won't do.
    Thanks also to others who responded to my ?s about what years were the best for used Toy/Niss p/u.
    I finally can start looking again.
  • gringo1gringo1 Member Posts: 72
    Well I bought a 92 V6 Xcab 4x4 with 135,000 miles.
    I know I need to do timing belt replacement and while in there do the drive belts, crank seal, and check water pump.
    What else would you recommend be done on these Toys? I need to drive it a long ways so will do the radiator flush, oil change, differential change also.
    Any other tips?
    Thanks. It had the head gasket replaced at 88,000.
  • brianw6brianw6 Member Posts: 2
    Toad10 and anyone else: I read the Edmunds report regarding the Tacoma, under pros and cons it said the seating was uncomfortable. I looked at them and tend to disagree. What do you think. I am also comparing the Frontier crewcab to the Tacoma double cab. Except for price, I am leaning towards the Tacoma. I agree with you Toad that the backseat in the Tacoma is much roomyer than the Frontier. Toyota styling is still there although I am impressed with the Frontier exterior styling. The Frontier has very cheap interior fabric. Also, I'm considering the 2.7L 4 cylinder for gas mileage reasons. Anybody have any comment about the gas mileage rating for the 4 banger? Please give me your thoughts.
  • 2k1trd2k1trd Member Posts: 301
    Was the test on the 00 tacoma? The 01 tacoma seats
    are way more comfortable and have better back support.Oh and for the 4cyl.....i would NEVER buy a truck with a 4cyl(just my opinion)
  • brianw6brianw6 Member Posts: 2
    The reason I am opting towards the 4 banger is that it has better fuel economy and they have gone to the 2.7L. I have a 90 Toyota Deluxe xtra cab with the 2.2L and automatic trans and it has guts, so with the 2.7L, I am pretty sure it will have spunk. As for the model year, it's 2001.
  • madhatr880madhatr880 Member Posts: 29
    I have had a 2000 and 2001 tacoma the 2000 a four cylinder and the 2001 a six. the gas milage is kind of misleading my 2000 actually got a little less than my six. the only thing i can figure is the power to weight ratio. I guess the six just doesnt have to work as hard as the four. however the power of the four is still very impressive and a great motor.
  • vtec2vtec2 Member Posts: 43
    I am looking at either getting a Tacoma Double Cab or a Frontier Crew Cab. Can anyone help me out with which one would be better to put three kids in the back of. Two of them in car seats. Which ever one can fit all the kids will be the one I buy, regardless of gas mileage, weight, sheet metal thickness, etc. Your opinion will be greatly appreciated.
  • obyoneobyone Member Posts: 7,841
    I wouldn't recommend any children in compacts. Did you check the crash testing on these two trucks at www.nhtsa.com. If you really need a truck and will be carrying children at minimum get a Dakota Quad cab or a full sized pickup like the F150 supercrew.
  • madhatr880madhatr880 Member Posts: 29
    i am not sure about the crash test, but i do know that both are great trucks. even though i love toyota i like the looks of the frontier more. i have also driven the frontier and loved it. it seemed very responsive and had what i felt to be a roomy cab and i am 6'2" 245lbs. i never actualy drove the yota but i did sit in it and it too was comfortable. the motor however is the same as that in my truck. it has proven to be a very peppy motor. which ever one you chose i feel you will like it. another one to look at is the sport trac. i have driven it and it was very nice. the dodge however. i hit one in my 626 and did 800.00 worth of damage to the rear end of the quad cab. i bent the bumper under and dented the rear panel. all it did to my 99 626 was scratced the bumper. that really doesnt mean much but just to let you know. all in all it is a nice truck though.
  • cncmancncman Member Posts: 487
    vtec;
    easiest thing to do, take the kids with you on the test drive and put the seats back there, see which works for you better, I don't think you can go wrong with either, just depends on which one works for you. Good luck
  • volfyvolfy Member Posts: 274
    Don't know how big your kids are, but somebody asked kinda the same question about fitting 3 child seats in back of a full-size car. I'm sure you'ver got good reasons to want a crew cab; perhaps you need to put the kids in the truck occasionally. I still think, however, a minivan is a much better vehicle for hauling 3 young ones regularly.

    I hate to think about getting sideswiped with 3 car seats across the back. Personally, I would compromise whatever work utility you might loose without a pickup bed, instead of compromising the safety of the children. A minivan can still haul a butt load of stuff.

    My $0.02.
  • gyakergyaker Member Posts: 1
    Okay, here goes, and this will be long, but I know edmunds' readers are the best...

    I am helping my brother buy a new car - he wants a pickup to lug around his musical gear and possibly take him up and down the east coast.
    We probably have a little over 10k to spend on this purchase. Because his current ford station wagon has been dying, and we've never had good luck with american cars, we want a foreign vehicle.

    So what to do?

    I see that both nissan and toyota have a small pick up, but first I was really impressed that both of their 4-cyl engines are really powerful (upwards of 150 HP!!) I drive a car with a 120HP engine and it definitely has some kick to it. But all the MPGs of the pick-ups are in the low 20s! Just for a laugh I looked at the chevy S-10 and saw you can get one with a 120 HP engine whose gas millage is in the upper 20s...big difference! See, I can't imagine he'd carry around his equipment + a friend (max 600 lbs). So I guess no foreign pickups come with small engines?

    Second, we can't decide whether to get new or used. I wrestled with this problem when I bought my car, but ended up getting new b/c of the warranty. If you buy a used Toyota or Nissan do you get the remainder of the Warranty? Is it just the powertrain or also the bumper to bumper? And do you have to buy the used car from a toyota or nissan dealership? We are getting this car from a dealership (and not an individual, cause we don't have the time or wits to sell the old car ourselves).

    Or with the end of the year sales will it be best to buy new?

    Also, how much, in general does one of those cover-things (sorry, don't know the name, a Cap maybe?) that goes over the pick-up bed cost? I saw on nissan's web site that it is a $1000 add-on to the frontier. Is it that much if you don't buy it from the dealership?

    FInally, how common is it to find a crewcab used? It seems like that would be nice, but not essential.

    So in all honesty we want a basic pick-up that will last forever (hehe), but that doesn't need to be super-powerful at all, just well priced and good at moving some heavy roadcases around. Styling and extras don't matter.

    TIA! :)
  • eharri3eharri3 Member Posts: 640
    Reconsider the power thing. You may think right now you want the cheapest, smallest, most fuel sipping engine you can find, but consider several facts.
    A) It will get annoying trying to keep up with traffic, merge, avoid getting rear rended, or slow people down etc... in a vehicle with a dog of an engine.

    B) I'm not sure where you're getting your mileage numbers, probably from EPA listings, but you have to realize those are almost meaningless. They basically run the cars on a treadmill under 'simulated' real world conditions and come up with ESTIMATES. If you look closely at any sticker, it will tell you mileage numbers are estimates that will vary with real world conditions. And in the real world, when you push a basic compact truck around with one of those tiny 4-bangers they offer, the engine has to work so hard to perform well enough to keep up with traffic that you actually tend not to see the mileage you expect. Add in things like an extended cab(I'm sure your brother will have music equipment he doesn't want bouncing around in the bed), air, and a few other options and mileage and acceleration really suffer. On the other hand, a bigger engine moves the truck without so much effort and often gets better mileage.

    So what's my advice? If you absolutely must have a fourbanger, even though I don't think mileage will be much better than many sixes(My 4 cyl. 2 wheel drive regular cab Ranger gets 21-24, not much better than the small V6), then go with one of the imports. Their 4 cylenders are stronger. Period. The S10 is an absolute dog without a 6, I'd stay away.

    If you want to consider a 6 cylinder, look at the Ford Ranger with the 3.0. It offers 150 or so horses but 185 pounds of torque. Ask owners of this vehicle: You may be suprised to find that their mileage is actually often comparable to 4 cylinders.

    Avoid the Dodge Dakota V6: It's less powerful than competitors and still manages to guzzle too much gas. The Toyota V6 is also a very good engine and usually averages in the high teens and if you're lucky low twenties. The Chevy S10 190 horsepower V6 is also very nice and should get similar mileage. Just remember, no matter what kind of compact pickup you get, even with the smallest 4 bangers, driving style will determine mileage very much, and your driving style will have to be extremely aggresive with most 4's.
  • vtec2vtec2 Member Posts: 43
    Thanks for all the feedback as to which truck to buy. My wife already has a '00 Odyssey, but I want a truck. Which ever one I get should be safer than piling them in the back of my Sentra. Thanks again.
  • mahimahimahimahi Member Posts: 497
    Although, IMHO both trucks are awesome, according to the safety numbers the Nissan rates higher(King Cab versions). If this is a factor you should see if there are any numbers out on the Crew Cab models yet. There might be on the Nissan since it's been out longer.
  • eharri3eharri3 Member Posts: 640
    I know a minivan probably doesn't seem so cool to you, but in order to fit three carseats without it being a major hassle you'll probably need some sort of vehicle with a third row seat, whether it's a minivan or SUV. But, as someone said, the best way to find out is to take all three seats to the dealership and tri to stuff them in the back of both of these trucks.
  • volfyvolfy Member Posts: 274
    It really doesn't sound like a pickup truck is what you're looking for. Depending on what kind of instruments you're talking about, you'll probably need a camper shell; a tonneau cover is mostly likely not allow enough volume since it goes flat over the bed rails. A hard tonneau cover is about $1000 and a good fiberglass camper shell is probably twice that.

    I would say a good used compact SUV is probably better suited for what you're describing. But if you are dead set on a pickup, don't buy used if you can spend 10k+. A brand regular cab can easily be had for 11k or less, especially around this time of A brand new pickup and a tonneau cover or camper shell will not break your bank.

    Be careful about comparing pickup and sedan performance. Those HP number may seem impressive, but bear in mind they also weight considerably more than a welterweight subcompact car. I've owned both 4cyl Tacoma and Frontier and test driven the rest, and in my experience, only the Tacoma has acceleration anywhere close to what you're used to in a subcompact - and that is only because the Tacoma, at 2700lbs, is quite a bit lighter than the rest. Most other compact pickups weight in at a little over 3000lbs. 4cyl pickups are mainly econo-hauler/commuters, not pocket rockets with a basket. :-)

    Good luck.
  • dssher19dssher19 Member Posts: 1
    The 4 cylinder pickups are plenty adequate unless you need to pull a boat or a trailer. I often have 1000 lbs of gear in mine and I STILL feel that I have no problems accelerating and passing.

    It is an interesting theory that a "6 cylinder does not have to work as hard as a 4 cylinder, therefore it gets better gas mileage."

    So I suppose that turbo-charged 8 cylinder engines get the best gas mileage because they don't have to work hardly at all? Yeah, right!

    More cylinders firing = more gas burned over time. That's just simple physics.
  • allknowingallknowing Member Posts: 866
    Actually, there are instances in which a smaller, lower torque engine will burn more fuel for most drivers compared to a larger engine with the torque curve producing greater torque at low RPM's. If you have to push the gas pedal farther on the truck with the smaller engine (delivering more fuel to the engine) to achieve adequate acceleration vs. very little pedal pressure required to achieve the same acceleration with a higher torque engine, you will use less fuel with the larger engine regardless of the extra cylinders. Unfortunately, not many, if any, of the larger (6 cylinders and up) truck engines are designed for optimum gas mileage.
  • volfyvolfy Member Posts: 274
    The main cause of less fuel efficiency in a 6cyl vs 4cyl engine is the greater parasitic losses due to greater cylinder wall and bearing surfaces. This is why a 6cyl engine will typically be less fuel efficient than a 4cyl engine of equivalent displacement . It is not strictly a displacement-dependent.

    Of course, every engine has a fuel efficiency curve that varies with RPM and load. If a 4cyl, which might normally be more efficient than a particular 6cyl engine, is forced to operate at a low point on that curve, then it is possible for that 4cyl to burn more fuel than the 6cyl.

    Not too sure the original question was on this issue at all. It was on whether or not the 4cyl. trucks are good performers or not.
  • tacomafranktacomafrank Member Posts: 61
    The 600 lb weight difference is supposedly due to alot of sound-proofing that Frontier uses on the undercarriage and body, which helps give it a quietr ride on the road.

    The drawback of the extra weight on the Frontier is performance. The stock V6 Tacoma has a better power-to-weight ratio than the supercharged V-6 Frontier, which makes it quicker on road ( abotu 1 second faster 0-60) and more agile off road
  • volfyvolfy Member Posts: 274
    I rather think most of the difference is simply due to the fact that the Frontier is physically a bigger truck than the Tacoma.

    I agree with your comment that the Frontier is quieter, as well as the rest of your comments. Now that I've moved to Houston and the rush hour traffic have reduced my Frontier mileage down to 22mpg sometimes, I kinda wish I had my old Tacoma back. :-)
  • east489east489 Member Posts: 8
    I think this msg center is just great I am getting quite a bit of insight on trucks I am considering.
    I am going to order one soon. I am down to the
    Toy Tac 4x2 4cy. or Prerunner 4x2 or Frontier.
    I need some help pls. I do not feel I need the 4x4 cost and utilization being the factor, however, I like the idea of the Prerunner 2.7 vs the 2.4, extra power would be appreciated. Being higher off the ground for safety would be great. LockDiff does not come with the 2.6 just the 6 (this fact bothers me). Can any one give me some more reasons for getting the Prerunner vs the 4x2 Tacoma 2.4. IS the ride going to be as smooth as a Tacoma 4x2 or is it the same as a 4x4. I feel the prerunner is a bit sparse/smaller compared to the Frontier. I can live with that issue. I have had 2 Toys and am leary about getting the Nissan. However, all the msg I have read have spoken highly of both products.
    Comments appreciated. Note: None of the dealers in the area have a PreRunner for road testing (Michigan area) Truck to be used in Northern Michigan.
    Thanks
    RonP
  • tacomafranktacomafrank Member Posts: 61
    Ron, the TRD package with locking differential IS available with the 2.7 4 cyl on the 4x4 Tacoma. Your dealer salesman mightnot know it, but it is. I almost bought one off the lot here, but opted for the non TRD model instead. Not sure if the same holds true on the prerunner models.

    If you want to offroad in a 4x2 Prerunner, a locker is a BIG plus. In a 4x4, you will rarely need to use it though...
  • webbdwebbd Member Posts: 176
    The Frontier is a reliable truck, but if you want the best, you need to put down the extra money and buy the tacoma. The 2.4L in the 4x2 will absolutely destroy the nissan because the nissans are 5-700 lbs heavier, depending on model. I owned a 4x2 reg cab before getting my prerunner and it was much faster and powerful than all the other compact trucks on the road. Here are some numbers which Nissan or the other "domestics" can't match as far as 4x2 reg or extended cabs go:

    towing: 3500 lbs (reg. or ext. cab)
    payload: 1494 (reg cab)
    0-60: 8.4 (reg. cab)

    Now as far as the prerunner, if you get the 2.7L, you only get 8 more hp and 17 lbs more torque. With the extra weight of the prerunner's suspension, that power advantage gets canceled out. The towing limits are the same, though. The only advantage to the Prerunner (reg. cab) is better off-road ability. A severe disadvantage is that it only comes w/ automatic trans.

    If you plan on owning this truck for a long time, put down some serious money and get either the 2wd with the V-6 or the Prerunner Extended Cab V-6 (my pick). The V-6 prerunner is a little slower 0-60 (9.2 vs. 8.4-9.0) but it is a much smoother engine, quieter (trust me, this is a good thing on long trips) and it has over 80% of it's torque at just 2500 RPM's. It's a gem. Plus, you can get the off-road package and big wheels which all together look vastly better than the humble 2wd reg cab (an ugly 2wd truck, if you ask me).

    As far as the Locking Diff, unless you ever go off-roading, you will never need it. You are considering the 2wd and the prerunner, so I just figured you weren't doing too much off-roading.

    Of course, it's your life and your opinion is really the only one that matters to you.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.