When celebrities and corporate executives , who can buy and drive any car they want, drive Cadillacs by choice versus other brands then you know something good is happening.
When I start seeing more Cadillacs and less BMWs/Mercedes in rich suburbs in my region, then I will know that something "very good" is coming from GM and Cadillac.
Do some executives, small company owners and celebrities buy Cadillacs and other American branded vehicles strictly to make a statement about their patriotism and also to not offend their US business clients or fans?
When I start seeing more Cadillacs and less BMWs/Mercedes in rich suburbs in my region, then I will know that something "very good" is coming from GM and Cadillac.
Well you have to also realize that there is a snob appeal with BMW and Mercedes. Many people of those will buy a Yugo if it had a BMW or MB label on it. My point is that if something very good is coming from Cadillac (and in my opinion there is) it won't make a difference to many BMW/Benz owners simply because its not a BMW or a Benz.
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
The same 'snob appeal' is what kept Caddy alive through its dark days, when fogeys would buy them no matter how incompetent they were. I mean, people bought Cimarrons!
Well you have to also realize that there is a snob appeal with BMW and Mercedes.
Perhaps BMW and Mercedes "earned" that snob appeal over the last 4 decades with continual improvement and refinement while Cadillac cars deteriorated in actual quality and prestige. Yes, Cadillac is better over last few years, but still has a way to go.
The same 'snob appeal' is what kept Caddy alive through its dark days, when fogeys would buy them no matter how incompetent they were. I mean, people bought Cimarrons!
It seems in my area that it is more likely that a fogey is driving a Caddy than the younger (30s-40s) set. I will see fogeys (look like retirees) in Caddys in middle-class suburbs and younger people and some fogeys driving BMWs/Mercedes in the richer suburbs.
Think that there are still "American vehicle branded only" people of modest means who "treat" themselves to a Caddy when they retire.
>When I start seeing more Cadillacs and less fewer BMWs/Mercedes in rich suburbs
I'm not sure that's a good measure. Many buyers are peer-controlled. They buy what they perceive will impress their peer group.
In this area you'll see as many Caddies as you will the equivalent luxury foreign brands. However there are many cars that are garaged and don't come out for easy visibility in daily use to and from the office. Purchase (registration) figures for a state or county would be better. On the other hand there are many old boat Lexuses in this area driven by greyhairs. So the registration changes from year-to-year would be a better measure.
You could always just get a 3-4 year old Cadillac as well.
$16-$18K for a loaded one is - well, it's built better than any Corolla to begin with, so 4 years of use - and it still drives and feels better.(same with most luxury cars).
Or you could get a new Grand Marquis LS for $17K. Yes, 17K - NEW. Check out cars direct if you find it hard to believe. Gotta love rebates. A one year old model with 15K on it(rental) goes for $13-14K as a result.
Yeah, it't big. But it's so much better than something like a La Crosse or Hyundai if you're looking for a box to get from point a to point b.
Seriously, other than ultra expensive sports cars nothing says I'm rich like an Escalade. The Escalade brought Cadillac back from near death. Ever watch people stare at the Escalade at a stop light, and anyone can tell you thats the new Escalade. One thing I hate about new cars is you can't tell one year from another, but everybody knows the new Escalade. It's one of the most visually stunning automobiles on the road right now. The Luxury suv market just keeps growing because the rich are getting richer.
Thats a compliment when you compare an Escalade to a Suburban. Right now GM owns the large suv market with top drawer products. No foreign or domestic even shows a weak heartbeat in that segment now that the gmt 900 platform is here. Bring on the Escalade hybrid in 2008.
For a vehicle that hasn't been on the road ten years the Escalade is already at cult status. I don't think theirs two more desirable products to the under 30 crowd then the Prius and Escalade.
Some may indeed desire an Escalade...but there's a good contingent that sees through the hype. I'm (barely) still in that demographic, and my peers aren't in awe. It is a cult vehicle of sorts though...preferred by thuggish or ostentatious athletes and entertainment people, rich soccer moms/kept women, and fat old white guys. Probably the oddest mix in the industry. It's been a smash hit and is the force behind Caddy's rebirth...but image is everything.
Cadillac hasn't become the standard because they haven't offered products that young well to do customers want to drive. One year ago I went looking for an entry level luxury sedan w/all weel drive. Cadillac barely even had a sedan with awd. The best they could do was a $60k STS w/awd. NO THANKS.
They are in need of a transition to a company that truly serves the market they claim to be in. If the new CTS is as competent as an A4, 3 series, G35 or others they can begin to make the transition. When they add some sportiness to the STS they can begin to make the transistion. When Cadillac offers a vehicle ready to compete with an X3, RDX, or other vehicles that will soon crowd this class they will begin to make the transition. When the DTS is not a disgrace for anyone under 60 to drive they will begin to make the transition. Until then. No Thanks! I'll keep buying foreign luxury brands that hold their value better. Note to Cadillac...young buyers turn into old buyers so offer them something other than a $65k Escalade. The escalade is a very nice vehicle but everyone doesn't want an extra large SUV. Thanks.
Stunning is when review after review call it a better ride then a 70k Land Rover. Theres never been a better looking suv made. Ask Lexus if entertainers and athletes can build a brand. They'd know more then anybody what Famous people can do for a brand. Cadillac now sells 200k units a year, and a lot of that is due to Escalade floor room traffic. I do not understand why people try to knock the Escalade by comparing it to the Tahoe, Suburban, or Denali. All of them are perfection on wheels compared to their competitors in that segment. Thats like saying a Ferrari aint nothing but a dressed up Lamborghini. Ford, Chrystler, Toyota, Honda or any other major automaker can only dream locking down the large suv segment like the General has. GM is as dominating in suvs as Toyota is in Hybrids.
With the reliability issues and stigma of Rovers, I don't know if that's a big victory.
Which famous people drive Lexus and flaunt it? Lexus is a success because it has offered most of what was good about a Mercedes with little of what was bad about a Mercedes. It's a very understated car, bland styling, cushy interiors, nothing flashy.
A lot of people are suspicious of badge engineering (a classic GM issue), and maybe people feel the Escalade looks too much like its siblings. I won't deny these are excellent SUVs, but there's some hype involved. I think a lot of us would like to see Caddy in a position where there most popular model isn't a big SUV.
What review called it a better ride than a Land Rover? And, for 70k don't you mean Range Rover? A 70k Land Rover is almost impossible, since they don't make it anymore, and when they did, you'd have had to try awful hard to get it to 70k.
I agree, Cadillac needs better cars. We'll see in January where Cadillac is going when the 2008 cts unveils at the Detroit auto show. For a first attempt at getting back in the luxury game the STS wasn't a bad ride it just needs to evolve. The DTS is so misunderstood its crazy. GM couldn't have built a better boat for the segment their after with the DTS. If your into old school (boats) there's not much out there to choose from. That car was designed for the over 50 crowed and hit the nail on the head. It's easy money for GM because people who like driving cars like the DTS don't have any other choices. Even Lincoln doesn't build anything that says old school anymore. I do have one question about badge engineering. Don't most Lexus's share the same under pinnings as common Toyotas? Thats common practice in todays world.
I think it was Car and Driver, but every head to head review says the Escalade is dominating compared to a more expensive Land Rover. I think the word they use is "Hip Factor". Cool is Cool!
The only guy I can think of who is rich and famous and drives a Lexus is Bill Gates. It's only because he wants to be modest. However, I hear he's a big fan of Porsche.
Randy Moss got busted with drugs driving a Lexus. The Detroit News has an article about the new James Bond movie, and Lexus offered millions to be the only cars in the movie. In today's world I think it's more important how many rapers sing about your brand on the radio then who is actually seen in them. You'd be surprised by how many people that would die for a Lexus, Cadillac, Benz, or BMW that have never been in one.
Absolutely, Image is everything in the luxury market. You can buy a Toyota or Chevy with heated seats/navigation displays and the same under pinnings as a Lexus or Cadillac. Image is what separates luxury from non luxury.
But if the image is to be lasting, it must be backed up by substance.
Compare a 1960s Cadillac to a 1960s Chevrolet Impala/Caprice - just from looking at the car on the outside, it is obvious that the Cadillac is better built than the Chevrolet. There was substance to back up Cadillac's image.
The problem with the Escalade is that it doesn't strike me as a better deal than the comparable Chevrolet products. The workmanship isn't any better; the interior looks almost exactly the same; and the performance isn't all that different.
The Escalade's good qualities spring from its corporate platform - not anything inherent in the Cadillac nameplate, or even anything that the Cadillac Division did to that corporate platform. Realistically, the comparable Chevrolets are a better deal.
Sooner or later, that will catch up with the Escalade. At least the CTS is uniquely Cadillac, and offers buyers something different.
I'd like to see the Escalade in a unique body. Let's justify the price premium through something other than hype. Caddy cars can do it, why not the blingmobile? Pop culture is pretty dumbed down right now...I don't know if I'd want to be the vehicle that sums up the current movement. Short term vs long term, maybe.
Oh, and some dumb athlete getting a drug bust in a Lexus isn't exactly star power. Maybe if a future Janis Joplin could sing about one or something...
You don't know how positive it would be for Cadillac to have an athlete get pulled over with a kilo of cocaine. Better yet Cadillac would die to have OJ do another chase seen on the highway in a white Escalade. Like it or not, the society we live in is all about hype.
Does any other source think having an overrated athlete busted for drugs in any given make of car gives it any cachet? I think that's a bit far out there. That incident did not have any effect on Lexus sales or popularity.
I don't see lots of people running to old white Broncos today.
The GMT 900s are good SUVs, but nothing groundbreaking or advanced about them. No new Technology per se, that others don't have. And they are badge engineered to the max.
Next year the gmt 900 gets two mode Hybrids. Business Weeks reporting over 20 mpg combined driving. That is ground breaking as it gets. Competitors are lucky to get 14 mpg and I mean lucky to get that. Better example: Gm would be happy to pay Lebron James 50 Million dollars to get pulled over in an Escalade with a kilo and Uzi. With no affiliation to the company of course!
...to a Cadillac to see a difference back in the 1960s. A Pontiac Bonneville or Grand Prix looked like a much more substantial car than a Chevrolet Impala or Caprice. Good God, Pontiac was an awesome car back then!
Speaking of these dempgraphics, the middle aged well-to-do male was originally intended as the primary consumer, I am sure. Anyone know why the younger sometimes criminal ostentatious set fell for these things? Their ability to take 24" wheels?
Cadillac knows the market their after. GM got input from Musician, athletes, and entertainers while the Escalade was in design stages. Any vehicle with a price tag of over 60k is a niche vehicle. Nobody complained when Toyota built the Prius for a certain crowed. I think we would be pretty spot on if we profiled the average Ferrari buyer.
I certainly don't think Caddy knew their deluxe SUV would be the darling of gangstas and rappers, wannabe and otherwise. I don't see the same crowd driving in a Lexus LS.
I'd love to know what "input" they got and which of it they used.
I see a pretty wide crowd in Prius, maybe only having political leanings in common.
When the caddy first came out it wasn't designed for Gangstas, but when Gm seen the interest they ran with it. The Detroit News ran a story about how GM gathered a bunch famous Escalade owners together to find out what they wanted in the new model before design ever began. The rappers wanted big wheels, and thats exactly what they got. Half the reason its sales are so good is the Escalade was partially designed by the people who already owned them. You have to admit the Prius could have been made a lot more main stream then it was. The Camry hybrid is mainstream. The Prius is built to say I'm an Environmentalist, and your not.
This kind of image hype isn't new. Im sure back in the day when James Dean died most teens could tell you exactly what he was driving when it happened, and wanted it. On a funnier note: Everbody knows Tony Saprano doesn't roll in anything but GM's suvs.
They needed to create a survey to realize that big wheels would be a selling point? Who does GM hire? I wonder what percentage of Escalade sales are really to entertainment types, and not just to the average overpaid exec/kept woman/younger lessee...
To me, a Prius says I don't care about cars. Then again, a Camry says little different. An Escalade says some things too.
The rappers wanted big wheels, and thats exactly what they got.
Well, there you go (fintail), input from the main customer. Funny how fat old white guys are villafied for their "wasteful opulence" when they drive one of these sleds, but Rappers certainly need a truck like that don't they? Double standard at the least. That's the problem - and a good reason to get an LX-470 - the anti-rapper SUV.
PRIUS - I'm an old hippie, actually, who wants to make a statement that I'm an environmental extremist now. CAMRY - I don't care about cars, but like the least possible trouble and good economy in my car. FUSION - I got a better deal on the Ford than the Camry. MALIBU - I don't care what the hell I drive. STRATUS - I don't KNOW what the hell I drive. ALTIMA - I like the looks of this car better. ELANTRA - Cheaper than anything else, and the warranty is great.
Comments
When I start seeing more Cadillacs and less BMWs/Mercedes in rich suburbs in my region, then I will know that something "very good" is coming from GM and Cadillac.
Do some executives, small company owners and celebrities buy Cadillacs and other American branded vehicles strictly to make a statement about their patriotism and also to not offend their US business clients or fans?
Well you have to also realize that there is a snob appeal with BMW and Mercedes. Many people of those will buy a Yugo if it had a BMW or MB label on it. My point is that if something very good is coming from Cadillac (and in my opinion there is) it won't make a difference to many BMW/Benz owners simply because its not a BMW or a Benz.
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
And it isn't a false comparison. Just deal with the fact that a current model Caddy is in fact within reach of whatever is left of the middle class.
Perhaps BMW and Mercedes "earned" that snob appeal over the last 4 decades with continual improvement and refinement while Cadillac cars deteriorated in actual quality and prestige. Yes, Cadillac is better over last few years, but still has a way to go.
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
It seems in my area that it is more likely that a fogey is driving a Caddy than the younger (30s-40s) set. I will see fogeys (look like retirees) in Caddys in middle-class suburbs and younger people and some fogeys driving BMWs/Mercedes in the richer suburbs.
Think that there are still "American vehicle branded only" people of modest means who "treat" themselves to a Caddy when they retire.
lessfewer BMWs/Mercedes in rich suburbsI'm not sure that's a good measure. Many buyers are peer-controlled. They buy what they perceive will impress their peer group.
In this area you'll see as many Caddies as you will the equivalent luxury foreign brands. However there are many cars that are garaged and don't come out for easy visibility in daily use to and from the office. Purchase (registration) figures for a state or county would be better. On the other hand there are many old boat Lexuses in this area driven by greyhairs. So the registration changes from year-to-year would be a better measure.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
$16-$18K for a loaded one is - well, it's built better than any Corolla to begin with, so 4 years of use - and it still drives and feels better.(same with most luxury cars).
Or you could get a new Grand Marquis LS for $17K.
Yes, 17K - NEW. Check out cars direct if you find it hard to believe. Gotta love rebates. A one year old model with 15K on it(rental) goes for $13-14K as a result.
Yeah, it't big. But it's so much better than something like a La Crosse or Hyundai if you're looking for a box to get from point a to point b.
Rocky
Not anyone in my circle. Must be punk kids. Who the heck cares about a gussied up Tahoe. Just a glorified suv/truck.
Some may indeed desire an Escalade...but there's a good contingent that sees through the hype. I'm (barely) still in that demographic, and my peers aren't in awe. It is a cult vehicle of sorts though...preferred by thuggish or ostentatious athletes and entertainment people, rich soccer moms/kept women, and fat old white guys. Probably the oddest mix in the industry. It's been a smash hit and is the force behind Caddy's rebirth...but image is everything.
They are in need of a transition to a company that truly serves the market they claim to be in. If the new CTS is as competent as an A4, 3 series, G35 or others they can begin to make the transition. When they add some sportiness to the STS they can begin to make the transistion. When Cadillac offers a vehicle ready to compete with an X3, RDX, or other vehicles that will soon crowd this class they will begin to make the transition. When the DTS is not a disgrace for anyone under 60 to drive they will begin to make the transition. Until then. No Thanks! I'll keep buying foreign luxury brands that hold their value better. Note to Cadillac...young buyers turn into old buyers so offer them something other than a $65k Escalade. The escalade is a very nice vehicle but everyone doesn't want an extra large SUV. Thanks.
You can lease one of these for what? 499? Doesn't say rich to me.
Ask Lexus if entertainers and athletes can build a brand. They'd know more then anybody what Famous people can do for a brand. Cadillac now sells 200k units a year, and a lot of that is due to Escalade floor room traffic.
I do not understand why people try to knock the Escalade by comparing it to the Tahoe, Suburban, or Denali. All of them are perfection on wheels compared to their competitors in that segment. Thats like saying a Ferrari aint nothing but a dressed up Lamborghini. Ford, Chrystler, Toyota, Honda or any other major automaker can only dream locking down the large suv segment like the General has. GM is as dominating in suvs as Toyota is in Hybrids.
Which famous people drive Lexus and flaunt it? Lexus is a success because it has offered most of what was good about a Mercedes with little of what was bad about a Mercedes. It's a very understated car, bland styling, cushy interiors, nothing flashy.
A lot of people are suspicious of badge engineering (a classic GM issue), and maybe people feel the Escalade looks too much like its siblings. I won't deny these are excellent SUVs, but there's some hype involved. I think a lot of us would like to see Caddy in a position where there most popular model isn't a big SUV.
Ferrari and Lamborghini aren't really related.
Sources please.......
The DTS is so misunderstood its crazy. GM couldn't have built a better boat for the segment their after with the DTS. If your into old school (boats) there's not much out there to choose from. That car was designed for the over 50 crowed and hit the nail on the head. It's easy money for GM because people who like driving cars like the DTS don't have any other choices. Even Lincoln doesn't build anything that says old school anymore.
I do have one question about badge engineering. Don't most Lexus's share the same under pinnings as common Toyotas? Thats common practice in todays world.
The Detroit News has an article about the new James Bond movie, and Lexus offered millions to be the only cars in the movie.
In today's world I think it's more important how many rapers sing about your brand on the radio then who is actually seen in them.
You'd be surprised by how many people that would die for a Lexus, Cadillac, Benz, or BMW that have never been in one.
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
Compare a 1960s Cadillac to a 1960s Chevrolet Impala/Caprice - just from looking at the car on the outside, it is obvious that the Cadillac is better built than the Chevrolet. There was substance to back up Cadillac's image.
The problem with the Escalade is that it doesn't strike me as a better deal than the comparable Chevrolet products. The workmanship isn't any better; the interior looks almost exactly the same; and the performance isn't all that different.
The Escalade's good qualities spring from its corporate platform - not anything inherent in the Cadillac nameplate, or even anything that the Cadillac Division did to that corporate platform. Realistically, the comparable Chevrolets are a better deal.
Sooner or later, that will catch up with the Escalade. At least the CTS is uniquely Cadillac, and offers buyers something different.
Oh, and some dumb athlete getting a drug bust in a Lexus isn't exactly star power. Maybe if a future Janis Joplin could sing about one or something...
Like it or not, the society we live in is all about hype.
I don't see lots of people running to old white Broncos today.
Not always, sometimes it is pure image and no substance. Case in point is how much money is spent on bottled water?
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
Right now? You mean there was a time when it wasn't dumbed down?
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
Ahem....I resemble that remark! And besides, I drove Navigators......so there.
Better example: Gm would be happy to pay Lebron James 50 Million dollars to get pulled over in an Escalade with a kilo and Uzi. With no affiliation to the company of course!
Speaking of these dempgraphics, the middle aged well-to-do male was originally intended as the primary consumer, I am sure. Anyone know why the younger sometimes criminal ostentatious set fell for these things? Their ability to take 24" wheels?
Nobody complained when Toyota built the Prius for a certain crowed. I think we would be pretty spot on if we profiled the average Ferrari buyer.
I'd love to know what "input" they got and which of it they used.
I see a pretty wide crowd in Prius, maybe only having political leanings in common.
You have to admit the Prius could have been made a lot more main stream then it was. The Camry hybrid is mainstream. The Prius is built to say I'm an Environmentalist, and your not.
On a funnier note: Everbody knows Tony Saprano doesn't roll in anything but GM's suvs.
To me, a Prius says I don't care about cars. Then again, a Camry says little different. An Escalade says some things too.
Well, there you go (fintail), input from the main customer. Funny how fat old white guys are villafied for their "wasteful opulence" when they drive one of these sleds, but Rappers certainly need a truck like that don't they? Double standard at the least. That's the problem - and a good reason to get an LX-470 - the anti-rapper SUV.
CAMRY - I don't care about cars, but like the least possible trouble and good economy in my car.
FUSION - I got a better deal on the Ford than the Camry.
MALIBU - I don't care what the hell I drive.
STRATUS - I don't KNOW what the hell I drive.
ALTIMA - I like the looks of this car better.
ELANTRA - Cheaper than anything else, and the warranty is great.