Lexus RX 300

16566687071183

Comments

  • jhaymondjhaymond Member Posts: 2
    Thank you Bill & Pete for info on finding Lexus items. Unfortunately, I am in NJ and cannot drop by Bill's house in Florida to pick up that extra CD sleeve. I have contacted Irontoad who sells the whole CD Magazine (w/ six sleeves) for $22.

    Thanks Again,

    John
  • mvs1mvs1 Member Posts: 462
    don't worry about wwest, he only reads his posts. Again for the reliability alone anyone who would consider a T&C to be a direct competitor of the RX is well you fill in the blank _______.

    As for locating your vehicle of choice have you gone to the Lexus web site to locate a dealer. I believe that you can set a particular distance and they'll pull up the dealers within that radius.
  • izabelajohnizabelajohn Member Posts: 38
    It looks like the consensus is that it is the catalytic converter that is causing the smell. Excuse my ignorance, but does it mean that there is something wrong with the converter and it should be checked/repaired/replaced? Or it is not a problem and I should just try a different brand of gas.
    By the way, the smell is mostly outside of the car when idling. It is only detectable inside when I am standing at the traffic lights for a long period of time.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    would be the most likely culprit. Sounds like you're running too rich and that causes unburned fuel to reach the converter, it overheats as a result and you get the sulphur smell.

    I totally agree that reliability is an issue with any american made automotive product, especially Chrysler. But, how many vans has Chrysler sold versus Lexus' RX300s. Mind you, I'm not making excuses for Chrysler, but the media being what it is I would want to know the percentage of Chrysler T&C failures vs RX300 failures before I make that judgement.

    And, I wasn't recommending the Chrysler unless you felt you needed the AWD in the RX300. I am saying that were that the case the Chrysler AWD setup appears to be head and shoulders above the RX.

    I just drove our 2001 AWD RX300 478 miles today, from the Seattle area to the Eastern border of Oregon. I went out and bought 2 sets of snow chains before I left just in case we encounter serious weather going or coming.

    But I also kept two sets in our Jeep and we occassionally needed them even with its part-time 4WD engaged.
  • kmhkmh Member Posts: 143
    I recently tried to move the roof rack on my RX and it seemed to be really stuck in position. I have the older, taller rack design and, yes, I did unscrew the knobs before attempting to move it. Any help? What the heck am I doing wrong?
  • fasterthanufasterthanu Member Posts: 210
    Try oiling the rack .... vegetable oil or something
  • kmhkmh Member Posts: 143
    Anyone else had the sticking roof rack issue? and did vegetable oil help? :-)
  • arty101arty101 Member Posts: 2
    The roof rack was not meant to be adjustable. The knob only holds down the vertical struct to the base, and is not really there for adjustments. When you remove the knob, and then the struct, you'll be able to unscrew 1 or 2 (it's been a couple of years since I installed it) screws that clamp the base to the rail.

    Adding oil or otherwise won't make it budge until you loosen the clamps in the base. It that way, I guess you can say that it is adjustable, just not very convenient.
  • kmhkmh Member Posts: 143
    That's what I was wondering about - why the entire crossbar seemed "stuck" and the base wouldn't even budge...

    So based on what you've posted, I can move the crossbars back toward the rear of the vehicle so long as the base is unscrewed, correct?

    Many thanks!
  • kmhkmh Member Posts: 143
    I cannot recall where I read this tidbit, but another owner mentioned that Lexus would replace the older-styled roof rack with a new one based on a technical service bulletin regarding wind noise or something to that effect... Had anyone had this done? Thanks again.
  • Jon90Jon90 Member Posts: 33
    if the cost is only 1300 for the 4 wheel....and you plan to keep it....the difference is NOTHING, go for the 4 wheel for the added safety of driving in any adverse conditions. You can benefit in hard rain and even a light snow. Especially if in the future you have any kids driving it, the peace of mind is good. I know someone that had a bad accident in the rain, would it have been prevented, i dont know. Probably more so with the VSC than 4wd, but having both is top notch, and over time (not even including resale) i think well worth it.

    Enjoy your RX!
  • halfonhalfon Member Posts: 5
    Has anyone purchased in the Seattle,WA area? We have made the decision to purchase an RX and would appreciate any help regarding dealers and expected cost above invoice. Thanks in advance.
  • ges1ges1 Member Posts: 10
    We purchased an '01 AWD, silver w/o Nav, at the end of August from Lexus of Bellevue. Out the door was 38215 which included shipment to Alaska (which was at least worth $1000.) Not a great deal but a lot better than what I would have done up here. Dealer tactics were less than admirable however.
  • raybearraybear Member Posts: 1,795
    Tough neighborhood. Not many dealers and more than enough buyers.

    I don't know what dealer tactics ges1 is referring to, I never had a problem with Bellevue. Perhaps we could be enlightened.
  • gsenthilgsenthil Member Posts: 154
    I didnt buy my RX in Seattle- but bought it in AZ before I moved here (to Seattle). Between Lynnwood and Bellevue I would suggest Bellevue if service is any indication. Lynnwood made me feel that they were doing me a BIG favor. I was made to wait for about 20 minutes even though I had a service appointment and no apology was offered. Bellevue also gives loaner cars for all services and is open on Sat while Lynnwood is closed on Sat and are stingy about loaner cars.

    I think at this time of the year something close to invoice (if 2001 is still available) should be a good price?

    Senthil
  • halfonhalfon Member Posts: 5
    Thanks for all the feedback. There is also Lexus of Tacoma but I have no information regarding their integrity or pricing.

    I have a coworker who mentioned a few hundred over invoice was possible given his experience in purchasing a 2001.

    Given the current economy and the fact there is little to differeniate the '01 from the '02, I will be targeting invoice.
  • ges1ges1 Member Posts: 10
    Within a week after all the papers were signed, they tried to get an extra $1000 out of me. They claimed that they made a mistake and that the papers did not reflect what we had agreed upon. Given that this claim happened on Sept. 11, I told them that I was not in any mood for such nonsense, and that they should be ashamed of themselves for insinuating that it was me who was trying to cheat them. They backed down immediately but it was a very sleazy move.
  • rexlexusrexlexus Member Posts: 4
    Just Curious: Is the rear spoiler just cosmetic, or is there actually an engineering reason for it, like better aerodynamics?
  • fedlawmanfedlawman Member Posts: 3,118
    They are called spoilers because that's what they do...they spoil aerodynamics.

    Race cars use them to keep the cars on the ground at high speeds (it spoils the airfoil effect created when air flows over the top and bottom of the car).

    Although it has no effect on handling or performance for the RX300 (or any other street car), a properly installed rear spoiler will disrupt the airflow that curls off the trailing edge of the roof and prevent vortices from forming behind the car. This helps to keep dirt and grime off the rear window.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    I wouldn't recommend them to anyone. But on the other hand I have no experience with other dealers in the area so I can't recommend them either. Have you thought about buying via the internet? After two very bad buying experiences, and I do mean really bad, one with Barrier Porsche and the second with Carrera Motors in Bend Oregon, I ended up buying my 2001 911 AWD from GreenLight, now CarsDirect.

    If you must use a dealer here in this area then try any of the others before Bellevue.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    Condon, Ore to Seattle...

    Shortest time, 311 miles, 5 hrs 58 minutes

    Shortest route, 265 miles, 4 hrs 46 minutes.

    I swear!
  • rockyballrockyball Member Posts: 22
    Did you get these readings sitting or after moving?
  • clee4clee4 Member Posts: 103
    I would think by now you would have gotten rid of that NAV system. P.S. When you do, send it to me, I love mine. Wife and I were out looking for brick for new house. We were sent to several houses to look at different brick. The NAV system sure did save a lot of time and fuss trying to find address.
  • rexlexusrexlexus Member Posts: 4
    Keeps the rear window clean and looks good too!
  • raybearraybear Member Posts: 1,795
    halfon-forget about it! You have to start somewhere, but that's too low.

    ges-OUCH! When I was selling cars I'd never have had the guts to try that!
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    Thank you for contacting Lexus. The Lexus Customer Satisfaction Department is staffed to respond to your email inquiries, Monday through Friday 6:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Pacific Time. You should receive your response within twenty-four hours Monday through Thursday. If your question requires an immediate response, please feel free to contact our department by telephone during our business hours at 1-800-25-LEXUS (1-800-255-3987).

    Question
    Last evening as I was driving home just after dark a deer ran out across the road in front of me. I absolutely can't remember a time when I laid on the brakes any harder than I did last evening. Afterward I was surprised that the pedal didn't break off. The good news is that the RX300 stopped without hitting the deer. Well, maybe the bumper grazed her butt a little bit, but both my wife and I agreed that she wasn't likely hurt at all.

    I was very impressed with the braking action, the RX just squatted and "growled" to a quick and sure stop. Both of us assumed the "growling" was the result of the ABS kicking in.

    Which brings up my question.

    Has anyone thought about activating the ABS ONLY if the VSC indicates the vehicle is not tracking correctly?

    I was on dry concrete pavement last night and I came away not being quite sure that I wouldn't have stopped a mite quicker if the ABS had not interfered. I know that the VSC yaw sensor is very likely much more sensitive to yaw than is my own "behind", but I did not have any sense at all that the vehicle was deviating from a straight line stop. It would be my guess therefore that the ABS activation in this case was needless.

    Since the primary purpose of ABS is to allow me to maintain directional control of the vehicle would it not be a good idea to let me have full and complete control of the braking action unless the vehicle is deviating from the desired "track"?

    Or is it even possible to change the ABS braking algorithm such that it allows more severe braking unless or until the VSC over-rides it?

    You may update this question by replying to this message. Because your reply will be automatically processed, you MUST enter your reply in the space below. Text entered into any other part of this message will be discarded. [===> Please enter your reply below this line <===] [===> Please enter your reply above this line <===]
  • clee4clee4 Member Posts: 103
    Now the deer knows how we feel. Ever thought that the reason you stayed straight was the ABS?
  • jeffmust2jeffmust2 Member Posts: 811
    Clee4, now stop trying logic on Willard; it just slides right off.

    Like that po' deer.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    Starting in about the mid-eighties most vehicles had the correct ratio front/rear brake proportioning valves and that virtually eliminated the tendency for the rear to "come around" during heavy braking, especially on dry pavement.

    Back when I had the 92 Jeep I would remove the ABS pumpmotor fuse during the summer months.

    But to answer clee4's question, the ABS only kicked in for the last few feet, when I was almost stopped anyway, so I doubt if it was any real help.

    But, even so, sometimes it's better to stop as quick as possible regardless of directional control. There must be some reason why single vehicle accidents are substantially higher in ABS equipped vehicles vs non.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    Went over to Lexus to pick my 2001 RX300 transaxle shop manual and discovered it to be the same as my 2000 issue. According to Lexus the Transaxle/transfer case design hasn't changed since the first one rolled off the line.

    Of course that doesn't mean some "invisble" changes haen't been made, increasing (or decreasing) the viscous clutch preload and "attack" rate for instance.
  • gsenthilgsenthil Member Posts: 154
    I am not very mechanically inclined- but Willard- if you feel that Lexus is fooling people into buying its AWD models, why dont you go to a Consumer court? With the money that you get for settlement (assuming you win as you sound so confident) you can buy all the T&Cs you want.

    Senthil
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    As I have said before, Lexus isn't truly misleading anyone directly. Most of us aer all too willing to mislead ourselves. And yes, that list includes me.

    Go back over these posts, can't you see the trend?

    Most of the responders to my adverse posts want to "kill the messenger who brings the bad news".

    The best statement I have seen from Lexus on this matter is, paraphased, "as long as all four wheels have traction then the RX300 will deliver torque to all four wheels". And that is a true statement IMO.
  • clee4clee4 Member Posts: 103
    Sometimes you have great ideas.
  • gsenthilgsenthil Member Posts: 154
    God didnt make us on assembly line...so we are all different. Whats the best car? Depends. We all have our own perception of whats good. Some might measure the ability of the car to reach 60 in the shortest time, or its 60-0 braking distance, or how comfortable it feels, or how many people it can carry, or how beautiful it looks; or its heritage; or how much bhp/torque it has..maybe the whole torque curve; or how fast they can go without spilling the drink kept on the dashboard; or how many years it can drive without any problems; or how safe it is..I can go on & on. We attach diferent weightage to these factors and buy the car that we personally deem the best one for our own purposes. The person who owns a Kia Sephia and the one who owns a MB S Class both have made good decisions. It will be stupid of either one of them to laugh/make ill remarks at the other's car. I bought the car that I own for _MY_ personal needs and perception. Its stupid of anyone else to judge me on the basis of their needs to tell me (even if they are correct) what I _should_ have bought. Hell- if I wanted a true offroader, I would have bought a G Class but I cant afford the $$$; maybe the Wrangler coz I can afford it now- but it would probably cost much more in repairs over the years LOL.

    That said, I might kill the messenger who tells me I have made a bad judgement in buying my car.

    My 2c

    Senthil
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    if someone posts a question on this board in which the answer openly, but correctly, disparages your choice would you still want to "kill the messenger"?

    Personally I feel the same way you do, I weight all my own personal parameters, do some serious research, and then make my decision.

    But, once my decision is made I do not close my eyes and ears to opinions of others who may still know more than I do, or maybe only some small facet of knowledge that might be important to me but not to others.

    The way I have run my business for over twenty-five years now....

    I make no decision until it is absolutely necessary to do so. In the meantime I set about gathering all of the input I can pertinent to my decision making process.

    Even if I have made a "final" decision, I am not at all hesitant to change my mind if important new information becomes available before my final decision is irreversable.

    When I discover that a decision I have made was wrong, or based on wrong information, or if I am myself simply mistaken, then I most readily admit to it and set about correcting the matter as best I can.
  • gsenthilgsenthil Member Posts: 154
    Ok ok..I am not going to kill anyone...

    I want to sell my 2001 RX300 SS Black...will consider trade for a 2001 AWD T&C. Anyone interested? LMAO

    Senthil
  • ravlravl Member Posts: 129
    Great post. If you can afford it and your Jeep dealer's decent, get the Jeep Wrangler. As a third vehicle, you would have a BLAST. I owned a '97 for a few years and loved the heck out of it.

    Now, about selling that SS ...I've got a black one too, and just for grins, go out some time and remove the luggage racks. Then, go to the front of the vehicle and tell me it don't look awesome! I'm still deciding on the side view of the car, but from the front, with that SS grill--SWEET!

    If that ain't enough, now picture it with some wider, performance tires.
    Double SWEET!
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Customer_Satisfaction_Inquiries@lexus.com
    To: Willard
    Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 11:03 AM
    Subject: [Incident 011031-000003] tire chains

    Recently you submitted a question to the Lexus Customer Satisfaction Department.

    Subject:
    tire chains


    At 11/06/2001 10:49 AM we wrote -

    Dear Mr. West:

    I am following up with you regarding your inquiries. Customers will elect to install snow chains on the front tires only for short periods of time (ex. a short ski trip). Customers will elect to install snow tires on their vehicles if they will be driving for longer periods of time in the snow.

    Lexus does not recommend installing rear tire chains on the vehicle since there is not a sufficient amount of clearance. Installing rear tire chains can cause damage to the body, tires, and chassis.

    It the responsibility of the driver to have sufficient control of the vehicle in order to drive in a safe manner.

    Your Question:
    Dear Sirs or Ms,

    Tomorrow morning we head out on our first wintertime trip in our 2001 AWD RX300. We will be traveling from the Seattle area to the eastern Oregon border. Our return trip will be via central Oregon, over several mountain passes.

    In preparation for our trip I just reviewed the owners manual regarding snow tires and tire chains, and came away a bit puzzled. On page 283 regarding snow tires you make the following cautionary statement.

    "Installing snow tires on the front wheels only can lead to an excessive difference in road grip capability between the front and rear tires which could cause loss of vehicle control"

    And on page 284 with regards to chain installation you state, in BOLD:

    "Install the chains on the front tires as tightly as possible. Do not use chains on the rear tires."

    Since the AWD RX300 has the engine torque biased predominantly to the front axle I can readily understand the need for installing chains on the front wheels, but I cannot understand why you state that they should not be used on the rear wheels also.

    You clearly acknowledge, justifiably in my opinion, that installing snow tires only on the front wheels might lead to loss of control. Wouldn't putting tire chains only on the front also increase the potential for loss of vehicular control, rather dramatically over snow tires only on the front?

    I have heard many people complain, upon taking their FWD vehicle in to have studs installed, that the shop insisted on installing studs on all four wheels, otherwise they wouldn't do the work at all. My explanation to them has always been along the lines of your own statement, increased traction in the front vs the rear will very likely lead to loss of control, especially in downhill braking circumstances.

    Isn't this even more true of the RX300 and your recommendation of tire chains only on the front?

    Shouldn't you have an even stronger cautionary note in this case?

    But, more to the point, the RX300 is a "luxury", relatively expensive, SUV, I would think the very best suggestion you could make is to advise the RX300 owners to ALWAYS use tire chains on all FOUR wheels.

    But my questions are:

    1. What harm would be done, if any, to the RX300 AWD drive train if I were to install tire chains on only the REAR wheels?

    2. What if I am willing to go to the expense of putting tire chains on all four wheels? What would be your advice?

    As for 1, above, I am aware that installing tire chains only on the rear wheels would create a disparate, or differential turning rate, lower at the rear axle than at the front axle, that could not be overcome by the resultant viscous clutch "tightening up". But isn't that also the case with tire chains on the front only, a differential turning rate front vs rear that cannot be overcome and thus the viscous clutch's temperature would continue to climb higher and higher?

    The only apparent difference, to me, would be that tire chains only on the rear would result the viscous clutch "tightening up" to the very same level as chains only on the front, but would result in a much safer, dramatically so, overall operational configuration.

    But the only question I really and truly need an answer to is number 2.

    Thanks,

    Willard West



    If your issue remains unresolved, please update this question here.

    You may also update this question by replying to this message. Because your reply will be automatically processed, you MUST enter your reply in the space below. Text entered into any other part of this message will be discarded.

    [===> Please enter your reply below this line <===]

    I agree with you 100%, I just went out and looked and there is less than 1" of clearance between the top of the tire tread and the bottom of the coil spring suspension.

    But, given the increased level of traction provided by snow chains only on the front and the much greater likihood of downhill or braking loss of control due to this "reverse" traction "offset", wouldn't you agree that it would be even more advisable, especially for those of us who swicth to snow tires/wheels in the wintertime anyway, to switch to a lower profile tire/wheel setup all around so one could balance things out by installing chains all around, if needed?

    I am also somewhat disturbed by your suggestion that "short-term" use of snow chains only on the front wheels is "safe", while at the same time acknowledging that long term use of snow tires only on the front is not. It seems to me that the use of snow chains only on the front increases the potential for loss of control so dramatically over "snow tires front only" that even very brief use might, statistically, even out the safety issue.

    [===> Please enter your reply above this line <===]

    If you have any further concerns, you can also reach the Lexus Customer Satisfaction Department at 1-800-255-3987, Monday through Friday, 6:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Pacific Time. Sincerely, Kevin Saylan Customer Satisfaction Representative
  • mickey7777mickey7777 Member Posts: 5
    I have had my 2001 RX300 AWD for almost a month now and I enjoy driving it ,for the price(I did pay 1200 below invoice)It is a excellent vehicle. I Considered the BMW but it was 10K more, the Acura was 5K more. The Highlander was 2-3K less, but I know Toyota service can be questionable and Lexus SUV has a better warrantee. My only complaints are the Radio and heater controls being too close together and the turning radius( the Highlander is better in this department). As for the Chrysler T&C mini van,not for me, as i want to keep my vehicle for more than 100 K. miles and I have my doubts about the T&C mechanically. I have driven the T&C and didn't enjoy it as much as the RX300. My gas mileage is about 20 miles per gallon, this I think is better than the T&C.
  • avery1avery1 Member Posts: 373
    Is the only issue for the rear the clearance? If so, can't this be solved with cables instead of chains?
  • jeffmust2jeffmust2 Member Posts: 811
    installed by some RX owners the next time you write. Perhaps that affects the clearance, eh?
  • gsenthilgsenthil Member Posts: 154
    My friend had the Wrangler. Unfortunately reliability is more important to me than offroading. I also make a lot of 50-200mi trips on weekends on freeways

    I have been thinking of removing the spoiler...

    I think it looks better with the racks on top. I really want bigger and wider tires/wheels. But what do I do with the present ones? I dont want to spend $$$ on new tires and wheels when mine is just 2 months. I asked tirerack.com and they dont trade in old tires/wheels :(

    Last Sunday I washed and waxed it..sunny in Seattle. Then went for a drive and couldnt resist going offroad. Came back home in the night with mud splatters 1/3 the height...I actually take my Lexus offroad...ofcourse it depends on one's definition of offroad :)

    Enjoy whatever you have however you want- Life is too short!

    Senthil
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    This is so close even cable chains, due to centrifical force, would strike the coil spring. I don't remember which way + or -, but my 17"s (+1 "technique") or within 3% of the circumference of the OEM tires.

    If there are other issue with chains on the rear the Lexus rep didn't say.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    Shop on Belle-Red road upgraded my RX300 to 17x8 wheels, spacers all around and Michelins for about $2k, took the oems in trade, included.
  • wuxwux Member Posts: 18
    Where can one get a RX300 for $1,200 below the invoice? Thanks.
  • gsenthilgsenthil Member Posts: 154
    I am not looking to spend more than a few 100 bucks on bigger tires. Any suggestions? Maybe I should just wait till its time to replace the present ones.

    Senthil
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Time to Refinance Your Car Loan?

    Steve
    Host
    SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
  • ravlravl Member Posts: 129
    The Wrangler reliability was a big issue for me too. Couple that with a bad dealer, and you've got a rotten experience at the end of a lot of fun.

    As to swapping out tires, if you've got the Integritys, I'd be swapping so fast the credit card wouldn't have a chance. One of my specific requests before taking delivery was to swap chromes with the Bridgestones for the alloyed Integs. I'm going to wait until the Bridgestones start to wear before replacing.

    When you bought your SS, did you happen to notice if it looked like it sits lower than regular RXs? My husband and I both think the suspension lowers the vehicle around an inch. I'm curious if anyone knows this to be true. With the different suspension, it's possible. Hey WWest, wanna write Lexus for me? :)

    I was next to an X5 today and I'll betcha the new RX300 has tires *very* similar to the BMW. What an awesome look.
  • pbk77pbk77 Member Posts: 23
    Whenever I turn on the heat or A/C in my 2000 RX, I get this weird smell initially. The smell eventually goes away, but it definitely bothers me. Anyone one have a solution to getting rid of this? I've tried searching on previous posts, but no results. Please help! Thanks!
  • pschiffepschiffe Member Posts: 373
    Have you checked and/or replaced the 'air refiner filter'? I believe it's accessed from the glove box.

    Pete
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.