I think there should be a reason DRL is adopted on some cars. If it's statistically proved that it improves safety, I don't want to disconnect it. Also think it this way. High beam light is normally used much less than low beam, so use it as DRL is a smart design.
jxu: People here are concerned about the soot buildup on the DRL bulb, which is also the high-beam bulb. Since reading this information, I've checked my bulbs too and noticed soot. But I'm not concerned since I rarely use the high-beam, and if it goes, I'll just replace it. I would rather have my DRLs on and be clearly visible in high glare conditions.
They gave a glowing review of the RX's interior appointments and ride, but gave it a low overall score because of its supposed performance shortfall.
But then they go on to list out ALL of the X5's shortcomings ($50K price for the V6 version, NO CD PLAYER, CD-based Nav, abysmal interior space, etc.) - all factors that the RX excels in - and throws all that out despite saying "So the X5 has a few problems. Whether you consider them minor or not depends on what you plan to do with your luxury SUV. For most buyers, a luxury sport-ute is nothing more than a luxury car substitute, and it's in this capacity that the X5 excels."
No kidding. So does the RX. I drive the RX every day in NYC and this SUV keeps me sane, with its incredible ride, luxurious quality, awesome sound system (6 CDs vs. NONE in the BMW). If I had to drive the X5 day in and out with all its shortcomings, I'd have road rage.
I think a true comparo of these vehicles should look at long-term, frequent driving. When you accept that these vehicles are indeed not intended for off-road use, and are used as a luxury car substitute, then the RX clearly is better than the X5. Undoubtedly, the MDX would still come out the clear winner, with its overall balance and excellence.
$50K and you still need an aftermarket CD player for tunes? You can have the X5. I'm keeping my RX.
It's obvious that the Edmunds reviewers, like most car magazine reviewers, can't let go of their sports cars.
If it accelerates and corners like a sports car, it wins, regardless of how comfortable, luxurious, reliable, or well equipped it is.
There is no doubt the BMW is a great driving machine, but just like the 3 Series, there is no excuse for the sub-par build quality and level of standard equipment you get for the money...not to mention the excessive NVH.
And the MDX, although a better value than the X5, doesn't compare to the RX300 in quality of materials, luxury appointments, or noise control either.
I agree that the MDX is a top contender if you want "near-luxury" and good cargo room but, if you want luxury and space is not a concern, the 2002 RX300 remains at the top of the heap...at least until the 2003 appears.
I also agree that the MDX is lower on the pure luxury spectrum and pretty much the top of the pyramid for the near-luxury segment. Thing is that it does provide all the luxury accoutrements (hey, that's the first time I've ever typed that word!) in quality that is 1 or 2 notches below the RX, while delivering a ton of space.
The RX wins by far on luxury, quality, all those things you mentioned.
Now about Edmunds' take on the BMW - that really irks me. How fast do you need to go in an SUV? How fast do you need to take that corner on Madison and 57th? In any case, the RX's power is more than sufficient. When passing at speed, I can feel the VVTi kicking in at a certain RPM and it jets.
Whether on highway or street, my RX feels good. Although not aggressively, I corner flatly, unlike, say, a Montero or Axiom, where you feel like toppling over.
Funny thing is that in every luxury SUV comparo I've ever read where the RX was involved, it was given relatively low scores because of its off-road performance. Although that is one perspective, it's clearly not shared by real-world buyers as seen in actual sales.
Seems that luxury SUV buyers really do want luxury. What a concept!
They should let me review cars around here. After all, I've purchased 3 in the last twenty years and am sort of shopping now since the van is really my wife's and she's doing 85% of the driving these days.
Most of my reviews would go something like "that's way too much money!, who cares about 0 to 60, why do I have to jack up the bumper to change the oil? and do you have free donuts in the service area waiting room?" All the rest is fluff . Steve Host SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
Way too much money? Everyone says that, not matter what you're buying - hence haggling.
0-60 ... if you're into that, sure. In an SUV? Makes no sense. In a sporty sedan? New Honda Accord (auto V6) will do that in 6.5 seconds. Amazing huh? Into manuals? The V6 coupe with manual is expected to kick some Porsche butt.
Well, my mechanic has to jack up the RX to change the oil because of the skid plate - worthwhile I would say ...
I don't eat the donuts at Lexus. I take out an IS300 loaner and go for hot dogs!
Man I'm busy switching between QX4 and RX300 section, as I have both 00 RX300 and 02 QX4. If I had none SUV now for sure I'd choose RX300. I never push car to its limit, except sometimes drive a little harder to enjoy it. One time only on I-5 from Los Angeles to San Jose, I drove RX at about 105 mph for a short while, very impressed. I described the wind noise gets "saturated"; even if I went faster and faster, wind noise did not seem to increase proportionly, kind of set at a certain level. That is the Quality I really want. And at that speed the car is stable. Now QX4, wind noise is noticeablly high, I could tell at any speed, except at idle. Actually I don't need 4WD but (1)that time they didn't have 2WD, (2)I just wanted a 4WD to play with, (3)I don't feel like two same cars under one roof, (4)QX4 is lower priced with more features that RX does not have. I'm not interested in the other cars mentioned in the comparison.
tidester: Hey when I bought the RX I had spent weeks on Edmunds and another site (can I say it? carbuyingtips.com) so I can get a good deal.
I'll say it forever - Car_man rocks. That guy educated me on lease deals and I walked away from the dealership happy and content with the price I paid.
Since y'all are with Edmunds perhaps Car_man can accompany Steve to the dealership. I'm sure they'll get the best deal of the day.
I have a 1999 Black RX300 and it is ready for the 60,000 mile service. The service manual suggest the basic fluid change. The dealer says that they have to perform a service that would cost around $1000 for the premium service. They mentioned that it is not just the basic oil change service. What do I do? The car runs great, I've had no problems at all, since I bought the car in September 1999. It still has its original brakes and tires. Anyone knows what they do for 60,000 mile service and it is worth having them do it or simply have them do the oil change.
I actually have my eye on an early 90's Madza 4 door sedan - a '91 or '92 iirc. But the original owner (my Mom) won't part with it LOL (my frugality comes naturally ).
Green65, The Edmunds Maintenance Guide will suggest what we think you need done at 60k and how much it should cost. Steve Host SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
Thanks Steve, I think I am going to find a competent garage to perform this service. I print the 'maintenance service list' from Edmunds Maintenance Guide and compared it to the fax the dealer sent me of their 'scheduled maintenance' and there is no big difference except for the vacuum/car wash. I do my own washing and vacuuming anyway.
The dealer says that they have to perform a service that would cost around $1000 for the premium service. They mentioned that it is not just the basic oil change service
I would hope that entails more than a basic oil change!
Unless you drive very high miles, stick with the service as recommended by the manual, like Steve said. You should also know that Toyota dealers perform the same service for lower prices.
A few weeks ago I had the 15K done and the dealer quoted me $350 for it. Edmunds' quote was more around $130. I ended up going to a mechanic who services my Legend. In fact, he is a Toyota/Lexus specialist (he drives nothing but Toyotas).
The guy he had work on my car turned out to have a 99 LS400 himself (nice one - it was parked outside). He changed oil, filter and air filter, ensured all fluids were good, rotated tires, cleaned the engine, and some other stuff (checked brakes, everything). Also he noticed the inspection was expiring soon and did that too. All cost $150.
My point is that you have alternatives. And since Edmunds' recommended 60K service quote is $250, you're getting a far more expensive difference than I came across.
What's your budget? Almost 2 years ago I picked up a 90 Acura Legend for $4,200 (haggled from $4,900) in a private sale. Put in $1,000 in repairs and maintenance and it is awesome. Likely to last for many more years.
You can take your RX to any Lexus dealer's "service writer" and tell him/her that you only want the absolute minimum service done that is recommended by the factory, and before you sign the service order make sure it is written up exactly that way.
LEARN TO BE FIRM.
Otherwise your wallet will be fair game for ANY service shop.
Thanks fasterthanu, wwest for the comment. I will check my options before going back to the dealer. The premium service was $1031.95, basic is $730.95 and they are performing the save service as what Edmunds Maintenance Service suggest for $224.79.
I have time to wait for a similar deal like yours. I don't want to go over 10k and that would be for a '97 Soob wagon or similar to get to the ski hill easily. But a little truck would be nice for the ranchette too. Then again, Boise has great convertible weather for months and months....
Segway anyone? Steve Host SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
Does anyone knows of a website that gives a list of preferred garages in your area. Example, www.certifiedfirst.com gives you a list of autobody repair shops that have been inspected and meet the Underwriters Laboratories Inc. standards.
I just upgraded my tires from the Goodyear Intergrity to Bridgestone Dueler H/L and I'm pleased as I notice a difference ( for the better). thanks to all of you for your suggestions. Unfortunately, I didn't upgrade until I had over 1000 miles on my '02 rx300 so I had to pay a bit more. did anybody get an upgrade on their tires from the dealer?
My friend bought a 94 ES300 68k miles loaded for 10500 in Phoenix AZ (private party sale). Car was in excellent condition with no scratches on the body and fully checked by Lexus mechanic.
I have a new RX300 and I never thought I would buy a station wagon, but this one is pretty nice. I know people compare it to SUVs (it is not one) but it really comes in handy. It is not too large but has enough room to do some things you can't with a car. The only problem is finding after-market add-ons to spruce it up. Unfortunately, if you see one RX you've seen them all.
fantom i had the tires mounted with the white lettering on the inside. I bought my tires at the Firestone dealer and I paid $400 for 5 dueler h/ls mounted. I had about 1200 miles on the car when I switched.
Can someone explain the information screens to me a little better? mpg/mph1/mph2 I'm not getting it.
Our '99 RX is reaching 45K and we have two persistent problems. We continue to have a reverberating sound at idle when the transmission is in gear, like when idling at a traffic light. Second problem is a popping noise in the front end. Any help would be appreciated. It will be going in to the dealer for the 45K service next week. Thanks.
Read the manual for information about the screen. In summary: Press INFO to cycle through the functions .. MPG, MPH, etc. When you get to a certain function, press INFO and keep it down. You will see the figure reset to 0. For instance, reset MPG to 0. When you drive, you will get a new MPG estimate that averages your MPG until you reset it again. It is useful for long trips. I reset the MPG and MPH to 0 and know, by the time I arrive at my destination, what my MPG and average MPH are. Second MPH is another average, depending on when you reset it.
The reverberating sound is pretty normal. I've had it in every car I've owned and it occurs to a lesser degree in the RX. It's the transmission in gear, as you say. When you put it in neutral, nothing. People on this board have gone as far as taking it to the dealer multiple times to 'fix' it, but there's no fix. I wish the dealers would just tell people, sorry it's normal. Unless it's really pronounced, and not subtle like mine, I wouldn't worry about it.
Popping noise: if this happens after you first start the RX, put it in gear and drive off, it's normal. It's the ABS system being activated (or something to that effect - pump engaging maybe?). Again, normal. If the popping nopise happens more than once, it's something else.
In the Lexus manual there is an item that says to "re-torque drive shaft flange bolts." It is listed every 15K miles. Could someone explain what this is and does it apply to both FWD and AWD models. Bolts generally should not loosen once they are properly torqued. Just had the 30K service done at Lexus and I don't plan on returning there until 60K. Hopefully Toyota can do the re-torquing at 45K if it needs to be done which is where I have my oil changed. I have a 01 FWD. Thanks
The popping noise you hear from time to time is probably the front struts. There is a..... SERVICE BULLETIN No. SU00299 Date: DECEMBER 1999 Component Description: 60.SUSPENSION:INDEPENDENT FRONT Summary: SERVICE INFORMATION TO ELIMINATE FRONT SUSPENSION SUPPORT NOISE. The struts are included in the 'drivetrain warranty' and will be replaced at no cost to you. Lexus Corporation will not inform you of the strut problem, only if you are having problems with the struts. They won't inform you of any problems if you don't complain about them first. They and other manufacturers will only inform you of things that may contribute to possible safety concerns. I have a 1999 RX300 and it has the same problem. A service manager at the Lexus Dealership it was purchased from has ordered replacement struts to install on my RX300.
I haven't noticed any complaints about the Lexus Premium Sound System concerning the AM Band. My 1999 RX300 has the poorest excuse for a radio on the AM Band. There is exceptional loud ignition noise that makes it impossible to hear AM Band broadcasts. The FM, Tape and CD are great! I'm told by the Lexus service manager that there is nothing that can be done. Also the Owner's Manual states that...'Audio system made in Nakamichi has a "NAKAMICHI" logo on the panel.' Okay, so is NAKAMICHI a city in Japan? Is it supposed to be a better radio than the Lexus Premium Sound System? And what does a NAKAMICHI logo look like? These are questions believe it or not that the people at the Lexus Dealership where this vehicle came from cannot answer. Maybe some of you can. Or does anyone else have the AM Band problem?
Believe it or not I really do like my 1999 RX300. However, in addition to the AM Band ignition noise this vehicle drives me up a wall sometimes with rattles. (It rattles all the time, up the wall is sometimes.) Vibrating rattles, plain old loose parts,(tire well area) rear seat area, right side of vehicle rattles, dash rattles, you name it, it has them. It and my wife's 1997 Toyota Avalon run a close race for winning top prize for rattles. The Avalon has top honors at present. This RX300 is our fifth Toyota product and Toyota just hasn't found out how to build a vehicle without rattles, except for a 1996 4Runner I had. It didn't rattle. When I purchased the RX300 I thought I would be leaving rattling Toyota products in the past and was I ever wrong. How do the other owners of RX300's cope with rattles? Ford's that I have owned in past years never rattled like these vehicles. I know, I know, some are saying don't buy anymore Toyota products but they do have a better reputation for requiring less maintenance if you can say a new air conditioner compressor, clutch, expansion valve, etc., is less maintenance at 55,000 miles on the RX300. No, Lexus wouldn't bear any expense for replacing the parts either because it was 5,000 miles over warranty.
gcrim21: Nakamichi is a high-end audio manufacturer. It'll say NAKAMICHI on the radio panel. It's supposed to be a upgrade compared to the standard sound system. Some like the Nakamichi better. *shrug* I dunno, the standard one seems just fine to me. Your dealer sounds kinda dumb if you ask me.
The engine noise you're getting is unfortunately specific to your situation (engine electrical shielding and radio). Honest, mine is fine on AM, no engine noise too. AM is kind of noisey to begin with you know.
"...a city in Japan?" Heh, I believe you're thinking of Nagasaki, one of the cities nuked in WWII. Not quite the same.
I suggest you consider swapping your 1999 for a newer model if you're annoyed by it. Or better yet, go ahead and get a Ford Exploder. Ask for the non-shredding tire option though.
Nakamichi is a Japanese company NOT a city. Nakamichi has been known for many years (although not as prominent in the last 10 years or so) as probably the best audio equipment mfgr on the planet. Especially great for tape decks (remember those?) and recording euipment. Very high end and supurb audio equipment. Is it that much better than "standard" eqip from T/L? Not sure. And even further not sure if it's worth the xtra $
I found that the AM band on my 01 RX (w/nav) is pretty useless for what I consider its intented purpose, long range radio reception. It could not recieve any station at all in north central oregon, just lots of static.
Upgraded, and larger, standard tires of any brand would be nice on the 2WD, but IMHO, driver enthusiasts are the last thing Lexus is considering when outfitting the RX-300. Seems the vast majority of buyers prefer the long lasting, marshmallow ride of the Integrity.
Your got a good price deara if you swapped the used tires, and a great price if you held on to them. I put the Bridgestone white lettering on the outside and am really happy with the looks. The Michelin lettering does nothing for me, so I would go for the black wall with them.
Let's hope Michelin has a good host of lawyers for when Ford starts pointing fingers at them for accidents caused by factory supplied under-inflated tires.
We have just returned from a week at the beautiful Ossipee Lake in New Hampster. Took the evil wife's '02 RX. According to the trip computer, for the 580 miles driven we averaged 21.8 mpg at an average speed of 34.8 mph. Two adults/two kids and a week's worth of stuff loaded in the hatch. Many short trips to restaurants, StoryLand and mini-golf. Not too bad...
Smooth ride, very comfy seats, quiet (although some wind noise, but quiter than my 300M). Held all the stuff with a touch of room to spare, although the rear windwo view was somewhat limited. Actually did a similar trip last summer in my 300M and the trunk held almost as much stufff! First extended & loaded trip in the RX. Nice.
'21 Dark Blue/Black Audi A7 PHEV (mine); '22 White/Beige BMW X3 (hers); '20 Estoril Blue/Oyster BMW M240xi 'Vert (Ours, read: hers in 'vert weather; mine during Nor'easters...)
Has anyone had experience using Michelin CrossTerrain Tires on RX300's? I will be needing to replace the Goodyear Integrity Tires pretty soon and Michelin suggests the CrossTerrain's as a replacement. The Integrity's are mighty smooth. I would hope the Michelin's would be as smooth. I usually purchase a new vehicle with Michelin's on it but the Integrity's were so smooth. I noticed that Toyota Highlander's come equipped with the Integrity's as well.
I have used Michelin LTX M/S tires on previous SUV's but this RX300 is more car than what I consider an SUV. The LTX's were always smooth too but I don't know how they or the CrossTerrain's would be on the RX300.
I put xterrains on my '00 RX last winter (or so) and really like them. The ride is greatly improved, road noise about the same, braking far better, cornering much improved. Don't get a lot of snow here in the ATL area (ice storms now and then) so I can't respond to any true wintery driving performance.
I like mine. Others on this board like their's too. Some people have other prefs - but I like mine and would always reccomend them.
Comments
Has anyone read Edmunds' latest lux SUV comparo?
They gave a glowing review of the RX's interior appointments and ride, but gave it a low overall score because of its supposed performance shortfall.
But then they go on to list out ALL of the X5's shortcomings ($50K price for the V6 version, NO CD PLAYER, CD-based Nav, abysmal interior space, etc.) - all factors that the RX excels in - and throws all that out despite saying "So the X5 has a few problems. Whether you consider them minor or not depends on what you plan to do with your luxury SUV. For most buyers, a luxury sport-ute is nothing more than a luxury car substitute, and it's in this capacity that the X5 excels."
No kidding. So does the RX. I drive the RX every day in NYC and this SUV keeps me sane, with its incredible ride, luxurious quality, awesome sound system (6 CDs vs. NONE in the BMW). If I had to drive the X5 day in and out with all its shortcomings, I'd have road rage.
I think a true comparo of these vehicles should look at long-term, frequent driving. When you accept that these vehicles are indeed not intended for off-road use, and are used as a luxury car substitute, then the RX clearly is better than the X5. Undoubtedly, the MDX would still come out the clear winner, with its overall balance and excellence.
$50K and you still need an aftermarket CD player for tunes? You can have the X5. I'm keeping my RX.
tidester
Host
SUVs; Aftermarket & Accessories
It's obvious that the Edmunds reviewers, like most car magazine reviewers, can't let go of their sports cars.
If it accelerates and corners like a sports car, it wins, regardless of how comfortable, luxurious, reliable, or well equipped it is.
There is no doubt the BMW is a great driving machine, but just like the 3 Series, there is no excuse for the sub-par build quality and level of standard equipment you get for the money...not to mention the excessive NVH.
And the MDX, although a better value than the X5, doesn't compare to the RX300 in quality of materials, luxury appointments, or noise control either.
I agree that the MDX is a top contender if you want "near-luxury" and good cargo room but, if you want luxury and space is not a concern, the 2002 RX300 remains at the top of the heap...at least until the 2003 appears.
The RX wins by far on luxury, quality, all those things you mentioned.
Now about Edmunds' take on the BMW - that really irks me. How fast do you need to go in an SUV? How fast do you need to take that corner on Madison and 57th? In any case, the RX's power is more than sufficient. When passing at speed, I can feel the VVTi kicking in at a certain RPM and it jets.
Whether on highway or street, my RX feels good. Although not aggressively, I corner flatly, unlike, say, a Montero or Axiom, where you feel like toppling over.
Funny thing is that in every luxury SUV comparo I've ever read where the RX was involved, it was given relatively low scores because of its off-road performance. Although that is one perspective, it's clearly not shared by real-world buyers as seen in actual sales.
Seems that luxury SUV buyers really do want luxury. What a concept!
Most of my reviews would go something like "that's way too much money!, who cares about 0 to 60, why do I have to jack up the bumper to change the oil? and do you have free donuts in the service area waiting room?" All the rest is fluff .
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
Way too much money? Everyone says that, not matter what you're buying - hence haggling.
0-60 ... if you're into that, sure. In an SUV? Makes no sense. In a sporty sedan? New Honda Accord (auto V6) will do that in 6.5 seconds. Amazing huh? Into manuals? The V6 coupe with manual is expected to kick some Porsche butt.
Well, my mechanic has to jack up the RX to change the oil because of the skid plate - worthwhile I would say ...
I don't eat the donuts at Lexus. I take out an IS300 loaner and go for hot dogs!
Lovin' the RX ...
I'm not interested in the other cars mentioned in the comparison.
You don't understand! Steve is such a dedicated penny pincher that he makes Lincoln turn blue! ;-)
tidester
Host
SUVs; Aftermarket & Accessories
tidester: Hey when I bought the RX I had spent weeks on Edmunds and another site (can I say it? carbuyingtips.com) so I can get a good deal.
I'll say it forever - Car_man rocks. That guy educated me on lease deals and I walked away from the dealership happy and content with the price I paid.
Since y'all are with Edmunds perhaps Car_man can accompany Steve to the dealership. I'm sure they'll get the best deal of the day.
I would appreciate some feedback. Thanks.
Green65, The Edmunds Maintenance Guide will suggest what we think you need done at 60k and how much it should cost.
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
I think I am going to find a competent garage to perform this service. I print the 'maintenance service list' from Edmunds Maintenance Guide and compared it to the fax the dealer sent me of their 'scheduled maintenance' and there is no big difference except for the vacuum/car wash. I do my own washing and vacuuming anyway.
I would hope that entails more than a basic oil change!
Unless you drive very high miles, stick with the service as recommended by the manual, like Steve said. You should also know that Toyota dealers perform the same service for lower prices.
A few weeks ago I had the 15K done and the dealer quoted me $350 for it. Edmunds' quote was more around $130. I ended up going to a mechanic who services my Legend. In fact, he is a Toyota/Lexus specialist (he drives nothing but Toyotas).
The guy he had work on my car turned out to have a 99 LS400 himself (nice one - it was parked outside). He changed oil, filter and air filter, ensured all fluids were good, rotated tires, cleaned the engine, and some other stuff (checked brakes, everything). Also he noticed the inspection was expiring soon and did that too. All cost $150.
My point is that you have alternatives. And since Edmunds' recommended 60K service quote is $250, you're getting a far more expensive difference than I came across.
LEARN TO BE FIRM.
Otherwise your wallet will be fair game for ANY service shop.
I can't speak for everyone here but I think that is insane. I love Lexus but gimme a break.
Willard: are services prices negotiable? If Green shows up with the Edmunds printout, would they match the price?
Segway anyone?
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
I thought about that too. But how bad could it be? Not worse than a European car, for sure.
And oh to be behind the wheel of that awesome Lexus ...
Help would be greatly appreciated.
Now for the important question. Raised white letters or not?
Can someone explain the information screens to me a little better? mpg/mph1/mph2 I'm not getting it.
Read the manual for information about the screen. In summary: Press INFO to cycle through the functions .. MPG, MPH, etc. When you get to a certain function, press INFO and keep it down. You will see the figure reset to 0. For instance, reset MPG to 0. When you drive, you will get a new MPG estimate that averages your MPG until you reset it again. It is useful for long trips. I reset the MPG and MPH to 0 and know, by the time I arrive at my destination, what my MPG and average MPH are. Second MPH is another average, depending on when you reset it.
The reverberating sound is pretty normal. I've had it in every car I've owned and it occurs to a lesser degree in the RX. It's the transmission in gear, as you say. When you put it in neutral, nothing. People on this board have gone as far as taking it to the dealer multiple times to 'fix' it, but there's no fix. I wish the dealers would just tell people, sorry it's normal. Unless it's really pronounced, and not subtle like mine, I wouldn't worry about it.
Popping noise: if this happens after you first start the RX, put it in gear and drive off, it's normal. It's the ABS system being activated (or something to that effect - pump engaging maybe?). Again, normal. If the popping nopise happens more than once, it's something else.
i may know someone who is looking to replace their tires on a 99 RX300... would you be interested in selling them (if you still have them)?
Thanks!
tidester
Host
SUVs; Aftermarket & Accessories
Thanks
Date: DECEMBER 1999
Component Description:
60.SUSPENSION:INDEPENDENT FRONT
Summary:
SERVICE INFORMATION TO ELIMINATE FRONT SUSPENSION SUPPORT NOISE.
The struts are included in the 'drivetrain warranty' and will be replaced at no cost to you.
Lexus Corporation will not inform you of the strut problem, only if you are having problems with the struts. They won't inform you of any problems if you don't complain about them first. They and other manufacturers will only inform you of things that may contribute to possible safety concerns.
I have a 1999 RX300 and it has the same problem. A service manager at the Lexus Dealership it was purchased from has ordered replacement struts to install on my RX300.
GOOD LUCK!
My 1999 RX300 has the poorest excuse for a radio on the AM Band. There is exceptional loud ignition noise that makes it impossible to hear AM Band broadcasts. The FM, Tape and CD are great! I'm told by the Lexus service manager that there is nothing that can be done.
Also the Owner's Manual states that...'Audio system made in Nakamichi has a "NAKAMICHI" logo on the panel.' Okay, so is NAKAMICHI a city in Japan? Is it supposed to be a better radio than the Lexus Premium Sound System? And what does a NAKAMICHI logo look like? These are questions believe it or not that the people at the Lexus Dealership where this vehicle came from cannot answer. Maybe some of you can. Or does anyone else have the AM Band problem?
gcrim21
Ford's that I have owned in past years never rattled like these vehicles.
I know, I know, some are saying don't buy anymore Toyota products but they do have a better reputation for requiring less maintenance if you can say a new air conditioner compressor, clutch, expansion valve, etc., is less maintenance at 55,000 miles on the RX300. No, Lexus wouldn't bear any expense for replacing the parts either because it was 5,000 miles over warranty.
gcrim21
Allan
Nakamichi is a high-end audio manufacturer. It'll say NAKAMICHI on the radio panel. It's supposed to be a upgrade compared to the standard sound system. Some like the Nakamichi better. *shrug* I dunno, the standard one seems just fine to me. Your dealer sounds kinda dumb if you ask me.
The engine noise you're getting is unfortunately specific to your situation (engine electrical shielding and radio). Honest, mine is fine on AM, no engine noise too. AM is kind of noisey to begin with you know.
"...a city in Japan?" Heh, I believe you're thinking of Nagasaki, one of the cities nuked in WWII. Not quite the same.
I suggest you consider swapping your 1999 for a newer model if you're annoyed by it. Or better yet, go ahead and get a Ford Exploder. Ask for the non-shredding tire option though.
The logo can be seen on their web site:
http://www.nakamichi.com/
Would be nice if RXs did the same instead of the low-end Goodyears on the 2WD models.
Your got a good price deara if you swapped the used tires, and a great price if you held on to them. I put the Bridgestone white lettering on the outside and am really happy with the looks. The Michelin lettering does nothing for me, so I would go for the black wall with them.
We have just returned from a week at the beautiful Ossipee Lake in New Hampster. Took the evil wife's '02 RX. According to the trip computer, for the 580 miles driven we averaged 21.8 mpg at an average speed of 34.8 mph. Two adults/two kids and a week's worth of stuff loaded in the hatch. Many short trips to restaurants, StoryLand and mini-golf. Not too bad...
Smooth ride, very comfy seats, quiet (although some wind noise, but quiter than my 300M). Held all the stuff with a touch of room to spare, although the rear windwo view was somewhat limited. Actually did a similar trip last summer in my 300M and the trunk held almost as much stufff! First extended & loaded trip in the RX. Nice.
'21 Dark Blue/Black Audi A7 PHEV (mine); '22 White/Beige BMW X3 (hers); '20 Estoril Blue/Oyster BMW M240xi 'Vert (Ours, read: hers in 'vert weather; mine during Nor'easters...)
I have used Michelin LTX M/S tires on previous SUV's but this RX300 is more car than what I consider an SUV. The LTX's were always smooth too but I don't know how they or the CrossTerrain's would be on the RX300.
I like mine. Others on this board like their's too. Some people have other prefs - but I like mine and would always reccomend them.
Keep asking around and good luck!