By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
An experimental woody wagon was built in 1947, but abandoned. It was recovered from the woods behind the South Bend proving ground and is being restored.
No production wagons built until 1953 - the Conestoga, a 2-door wagon available as a flathead 6 (Champion) or V8 (Commander). See one at:
http://130.11.52.153:8088/Photos/Archive/54SW/54sw.jpg
There was a slight restyle in 1955. See a junked one at:
http://home1.swipnet.se/~w-85663/project/weed55.htm
From 1956-58 the styling changed in an effort to ape GM. It failed miserably. In 1957-58 the range included super-stripped-down "Scotsman" models with one sun visor and cardboard interior door panels. '57-58 Packard wagons were lightly, and poorly, facelifted Studes. See them at:
http://130.11.52.153:8088/Photos/Archive/56PV/pv1.jpg - '56
http://www.stude.com/Parkview.htm - '57
http://home8.swipnet.se/~w-85663/project/1958_2.htm - '58
1959 saw the intro of the Lark, with flathead 6 or V8. The first Lark wagons were 2-doors. See one at:
http://home8.swipnet.se/~w-85663/project/1959_2.htm
2-door and 4-door Lark wagons were available in 1960-61. Check them out at:
http://home8.swipnet.se/~w-85663/project/1960.htm - '60
http://home8.swipnet.se/~w-85663/project/1961_2.htm - '61
1962 was a one-year-only model with unique styling. See it at:
http://home8.swipnet.se/~w-85663/project/1962_2.htm
The Wagonaire came about for the 1963 model year, and was carried on through the bitter end in 1966. A great photo of a '63 featuring the sliding rear roof can be seen at:
http://www.carlover.com/bigcar.asp?carpicid=10640-1.jpg
The '64 Wagonaire was made into a popular Matchbox toy. I had one. Here's a mint one with its hunter and hounds attachments:
http://www.angelfire.com/va/billjack/images/swag.jpg
For good factory and current pix of Studes generally go to
http://home8.swipnet.se/~w-85663/main.htm
Okay, Stude rant off. Back to Subarus. Thanks for humoring me.
Ed
My favorite years are the 1950 bullet-nosed, aircraft-inspired models, and the georgous 1953 coupes designed by Raymond Loewy. Talk about timeless design; they look as good today as they did in 1953. The '53 models, especially the coupes, were way ahead of their time. Another favorite of mine is the '62(?) Loewy-designed Avanti, with the round headlights. I never cared for the square headlight versions, and I hated it when they changed the body proportions of the Avanti a few years later. Every change that deviated from the Loewy original, made it worse, IMO. BTW, some guy down the street from me has an Avanti replica.
I wonder how many people know Studebaker started way back in the mid 1800s building Conestoga wagons. Many folks who crossed the western plains in the mid-1800s were riding in Studebaker "prairie schooners."
Again, thanks.
Bob
As you can see some of the Studes are of questionable styling appeal - in particular the '56-58 models - and are an acquired taste. However, they do have their fanatics, much as Subarus do.
Gotta run - have a plane to catch. Glad you liked them.
Ed
My uncle ran a Studebaker dealership right up until they stopped building them. I remember him driving a bright red Lark with TWO Paxton superchargers hanging off its chrome-encrusted V-8. Front disk brakes too; wow, what a car that was.
Then there was the 60's Lark that a guy a few grades ahead of me in high school owned. He broke letters off the chrome "Studebaker" badges until they just said, "Stud". He was a real clown :-)
It's no wonder Studebakers continue to have a following; Studebakers were adventurous vehicles with lots of character. Thanks for the trip down memory lane!
Cheers,
-wdb
Virtually every car brand suffered from this. Whenever a "new" body style was introduced, the first year of that model run was almost always the best looking. The all-new '54 Caddy/Buick/ Olds models were much better looking than '55 or '56 models. The then all-new '57 Ford was much better looking than the '58 model. Name any brand from that era, and the same was true—including Studebaker.
Bob
The S-class also has optional climate comfort rear seats (with the little fans that draw away moisture from your back). The coolest thing about these powered rear seats, at least to me, is that when the rear head restraints are lowered, when you buckle up, the head restraint that is directly behind your head will automatically raise.
The MBzs that have the auto up windows/auto close moonroof have pinch sensors. Those without pinch sensors have only the auto down feature.
As for the first aid kit, it has been standard equipment on all MBzs for over 40 years. The Euros and Asians even get a large and very nice reflective warning triangle that fits to the underside of the trunk lid. I've been kicking myself for not taking the one in our family's E-class when we moved from Singapore to Canada many years ago.
Drew
Host
Vans, SUVs, and Aftermarket & Accessories message boards
I guess I wouldn't be so against OnStar if you didn't have to renew your contract every year. From what I understand, most people who have OnStar, don't renew. If that's indeed the case, it seems like a big waste of money to me.
Bob
http://www.autonews.com/html/main/stories0702/qa702.htm
Bob
Bob
I think the ST-X will be priced like the Outback line, more or less. So a 4 banger will cost less than that ($25k) but the H6 more ($28k).
I agree that they should keep trying to work out the Midgate. It's the Avalanche's best feature. GM remembers how their minivans didn't do well because Chrysler beat them to key features (dual sliding doors).
The PowerTrip was a lot of fun. They did a demo of the ESP which was cool. A CL500 ran through a slalom at 50mph with it off, and spun out. Then it did the same slalom again, at 60mph, with ESP on, and it made it through effortlessly.
Very impressive because some people complain that it reduces performance, but in this case it allowed for a better performance.
Though you can get a VDC for a lot less! ;-)
My favorite features that I'd like to see Subaru adopt? I loved the hatchback's dual moonroof. There are two, and the front one goes up and back, over the back one. Genius. Better than the Outback's because the front opens all the way.
-juice
Avalanche- I saw one at a Chevy dealer yesterday. It's huge! Way too big for me. I really think Toyota has hit upon a happy medium in terms of size as to their Tundra. It's a bit smaller than their competition, which is good. On the other hand, I think their Sequoia is huge. It's way too tall, which is also my main complaint with the Avalanche.
Bob
Bob
What's wrong with naming it a Subaru?
-Brian
I guess it doesn't matter that much to me - since I'd get the true Subie version anyway. Saturn and Saab are both getting SUVs soon, so I'm not sure how it would fit in either's line up.
-juice
Bob
Regards,
-wdb
-juice
The new Saabs just don't do a thing for me. I can't see where GM has helped them. I hope (pray) they do better with Subaru.
Bob
Thing is, GM didn't go far enough to distinguish them. They're too Opel-ish. A key hole in the center console isn't enough.
At least the 9-5 got good reviews, though I haven't driven one.
-juice
If you haven't sat in one you should.
-Colin
-juice
-Colin
Bob
-juice
-mike
juice, how did you like the SLK's 6 speed in comparison to your Forester's 5 speed? When I first tried 6-speed (with the C240), I had a bit of problems finding the gears in the gate, but that soon passed.
Drew
Host
Vans, SUVs, and Aftermarket & Accessories message boards
I have since owned 3 more Saabs, but dumped the last to buy a Forester S. The new Saab 9-3 is really a re-badged new 900 and is actually SMALLER than the old 900 and with many downgraded features, such as a cargo floor that is 6 inches shorter and is no longer flat. The Forester has a flat cargo floor that is much easier to load bulky objects into.
Saab's reliability has taken a big fall since GM came into the picture. However, the 9-5 was unusually reliable for a new model. Then it went downhill. It also costs too much, and with a low pressure turbo producing 170 hp (now 185 hp but still the same torque at 194 ft. lbs.) for a 3500 pound vehicle in the luxury class, it was underpowered. A V-6 was available but only with auto. Now you can get a high pressure turbo with lots of power and torque. But it is not a good value. And heated seats are now not only optional, but you have to take them for both front and rear as a package. There are many other GM style marketing limitations also.
I have found that a few other recent Subaru purchasers are also former Saab owners who became fed up with either Saab or their dealers. Saab dumped many of their dealers a few years ago. Some states have NONE or one. Subaru has three times as many dealers.
As you know, I'm very interested in making cars better. All my comments about future product posted here and elsewhere, are geared to that eventuality. Always have been. Always will be. Sometimes gadgets are part of that picture.
I don't agree with you about more gadgets mean more problems. Look at the average 2001 car and compare it with a similar vehicle produced 30 years ago. Today's products are full of "gadgets" as compared with those built 30 years ago. And... today's vehicles are far better than those built 30 years ago.
Bob
Ross
Good luck to them I guess. But I do miss my old Saabs, quirky 95s, 96s and 97s with 2-stroke motors and freewheeling and mechanically raised pop-up headlights and windows that pivoted up and down rather than sliding in tracks. Those were fun, quirky cars; unreliable, expensive as all get-out to fix, but fun. The newer stuff (anything after the 99 actually) hasn't ever appealed to me the way those did.
My 2 cents,
-wdb
Bob
Faye
The clutch surprised me too. Very light. For some reason I expected a very mechanical feeling, stiff clutch. Not so. It actually felt a lot like our Subie.
I loved the feel of the wood shift knob and the steering wheel. The interior definitely felt "styled", perhaps in reaction to the TT's gorgeous interior.
The Power Trip actually taught me a bit about the value of the VDC model. I mean, you're getting a lot of that stuff for a whole lot less. Yes, it seems like a lot for a Subie, but it IS a lot of high-tech wizadry with some luxury sprinkled in.
-juice
I like how they wrapped the top half wooden part of the steering wheel with leather. This is so that the sunlight doesn't reflect off the wood and glare into your eyes.
Indeed, with the VDC you get many of the same features for a lot less.
Drew
Host
Vans, SUVs, and Aftermarket & Accessories message boards
-juice
BTW, I guess you didn't get to play around with the recirculate feature on the S and CL. If your windows are open, pressing and holding down the recirculate climate control button will close them. Press and hold the button again to reverse the procedure. Another neat feature! Also, the S and CL's vanity mirrors have zit zoom. The 2nd level (behind) magnifies! ;-). A possible Subaru addition I wonder?
-mike
Topic: July 3rd: "Ford & Firestone - Major Malfunction... or Media Monster?"
BUT, the new WRX still has the fog light, security, and cruise arming switches on the lower left side of the dash where they are blocked by the steering wheel from the view of some drivers and hard to reach for most.
I do like some gadgets that make the vehicle more drivable. For example, I wish that the more expensive WRX would have the cold weather package and fully adjustable seats as supplied on the Forester. An outside temperature gauge with ice warning feature would also be useful in Northern climates. For pure gadgetry, how about a boost gauge? The optional auxillary gauge package could have instruments that MATCH the main ones in design, instead of the cheap looking ones that are grossly overpriced, and that some dealers inflate to even higher prices.
Some people seem to feel if the gadget is "comfort/convenience-oriented," rather than "performance-oriented," it has less value. At least that seems to be the case for people who value performance over comfort/convenience. To each his own. I myself like a good balance between comfort/convenience and performance, so therefore there are both performance and comfort/convenience gadgets that I like.
Bob
Sticker price on my 1988 Subaru XT6 was $20K.
Has lots of great things in it: Outside Temp guage, trip computer, full guages on the dash, nicely placed switches for lights, wipers etc.
Now...
What is $20K in today's money? I'm not sure what '88 $s are in today's economy, but I'd guess well over $30K. If you are willing to pay for it, no problem. But don't forget every single subaru buyer would need to be willing to pay the extra $ in order for it to work, since they can't afford to have 100s of options.
-mike
https://ssl.autocenter.net/webparts/acatalog/Online_Catalog_Utility___Convenience_625.html
I got to drive a 2.5 Turbo Forester over here in London, and d_mn that was one fast machine!
The clutch and stick are different too. The handling wasn't bad, but not as good as say an Impreza, but the engine is definitely sweeeeet.
-- ash
At the show they actually were bragging that the Coupe (Hatchback) started under $25k. But that dual moonroof is a must have and will probably bring the price up to $28k or so with freight. I bet most of the ones on the lot will be around that price.
M-B should hope people look at it as a bargain Benz, rather than an expensive hatchback. I think they will, but my money's on a WRX for a fun small car. Of course I'm not as image-conscious as some. I told Bob that it was a perfect first car for the son or daughter of very rich parents (given all the safety equipment and the prestigious label).
I too agree with Jeff - a boost guage should be standard on that type of vehicle. And yes they should match.
Ash: I think it's a 2.0l turbo, unless he brought the engine over from the US. Still, those have 215hp IIRC, definitely a sweet ride.
-juice
Bob
My point being a VDC with HIDs and climate control may increase sales by 10%, but offering the H6 on base Outbacks with a manual transmission would likely increase sales by 30%.
I say Outback rather than Legacy because the Outback is and will remain the sales champ. A turbo Legacy would be sweet, but that's a different audience, another niche entirely.
-juice