Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options
Comments
Bob
Bob
Ken
-mike
Isuzu is the largest or 2nd largest Truck manufacturer in all of Asia, they also do a lot of diesel technology too.
GM is Huge (Hughs communications one of it's many holdings)
-mike
Bob
-mike
Shows GM as the largest single stock holder of FHI, the owner of Subaru.
-mike
Frank
Interesting thought.
Bob
Bob
http://www.autonews.com/html/main/futureproduct.htm
An AWD version may be forthcoming?
Bob
Bob
-mike
http://www.familycar.com/RoadTests/ToyotaCamry/Photos.htm
I still don't care for it, but rear lights are much better now, as compared to those "squinty" ones in 1997-2001 design.
When oh when will we get a peek at new Forester?
I don't see much point in that Subaru minivan. No AWD, no invoation in engine design and its pretty small compared to other stuff out there.
If I were in the market for a minivan I would love to get a Subaru, but I want one with Subaru characteristics, not just name.
Just like Lee Kuan Yew (former Prime Minister of Singapore). The tiger in his case was the communist party he joined to gain power. When he got there, he jailed eveyone of them who put him into power.
It's a complete systems that incorporates truly full-time AWD with a fully independent suspension, longitudinally mounted boxer multivalve engines, low center of gravity, and a rigid chassis all wrapped in a package with quality engineering.
Traviq has a torsion beam rear suspension (read: not independent). Transverse-mounted 4 in-line engine. No AWD, even. Doesn't look like a low center of gravity to me. GM parts, just look at that ugly shifter. Excuse me while I go toss my cookies.
@#*&%$!
OK, I'm back.
I do like a couple of ideas, though. 22% more displacement for 31% less money. And that 3rd row folding seat is trick. Take those ideas, only, please!
So, a twin-turbo Legacy for less than a VDC sounds good. That would put the street price under $30 grand, easy.
-juice
-mike
AN says Forester turbo for MY2004, so N/A only for the first year. Hope it gets variable valve timing.
They say STi with 280hp for 2004, too.
Legacy is getting a "freshening", is all they say about that. Hope Bob is right about the upgrades. The pattern has been to add content along the way.
They say ST-X for fall 2002, but on the previous page it says the SIA plant will get the extra capacity for the ST-X in Q4 2002, so I'm not sure when we'll see it.
Finally, an MPV on the GM Lambda platform, but only in 2006. That's not what we were hearing in the past - the 2005 SUW was supposed to be a bigger Outback. We'll see.
-juice
I will admit GM's track record with it's "partners has been pretty lousy. I hope they can learn something from Ford (yes, FORD!) here. Ford's done done a great job with Jaguar. Subaru, et al, should be so lucky.
Bob
-mike
Patti
Also, if a hybrid is developed, I'd like to see a boxer engine with IMA (integrated motor assist) and AWD.
And the fuel cells? Just mount them longitudinally.
Cut the costs if you must, but keep the character.
Ford has hits and misses. The B4000 trucks are blatant Ford clones. The MPV and Tribute use Ford engines, and the Tribute and some 626s use a Ford tranny. The current Protoge is nice, but the next one will be a Focus clone.
The bean counters find excess production capacity, then force Mazda to use it up, basically. So Mazda is losing its identity. They need the rotary back, big time.
-juice
-Colin
Jim
Ross
Where do I sign?
-juice
-mike
Bob
I wonder if diesels will make it in the US. I mean outside of commercial trucks. They have a bad rep here.
My cousin, the one with the Outback, has an extended cab V8 Chevy as her husband's company car. I like it, but it hasn't been as reliable as her Outback. And the interior is still GM-cheesy.
-juice
It could happen here too...
Bob
If our taxes get that bad in my lifetime (it would be naive to think fuel tax going up that much and others remaining level) then I'm leading an armed revolt.
Remember: an average of 40-60% of what you pay at the pump is TAXES. If the raw product costs the same (i.e. Europe) and the taxes quadrupled from their current (ridiculous) levels then we'd have European prices for gasoline.
-Colin
Bob
Bob- The difference between Ford-Jaguar and Gm-Subaru is that Jaguar was a struggling company desperately in need of help. I hate to believe Mike's hypothesis is true but it's strictly survival of the fitness in the business world. If GM thinks they can get away with plundering Subaru's technology then they certainly will. I'm sorry Patti but Subaru would be well advised to watch their back.
Re STi and turbo Forester debuts scheduled for 2004... now that will present a true dilemma! (Albeit a good one)
-Frank P.
I'm not so sure GM is capable of making good decisions on behalf of their import partners. I haven't seen anything to date to change my mind. Oh, they'll make decisions to benefit core GM products, but the fringe brands have suffered. From my perspective, I'm not impressed with what they've done with Saab, Suzuki or Isuzu.
I do agree that Subaru should be very careful about their relationship with GM.
Bob
So much for the Tonka toy image. As texsubaru says, once you see it in person, you'd be hard pressed to call it a "cute-ute."
Bob
Dennis
Jeep's finally being realistic with their pricing. You can thank the extra market competition for that.
Dennis- I think after you see one in person (or better still drive one), you'll be less likely to call it a Tonka toy.
Bob
Dennis
former disgruntled '95 Neon owner.
-mike
Bob
It's certainly not a Tonka. Tippy and heavy, but certainly sturdy. Far more refined that XTerra, Vitara, or Sportage, the other small trucks.
It's tall, so the cargo area volume it OK if you can stack things up, like luggage. Not so for things like groceries, which would get crushed. At least they have those hooks for grocery bags, one of many minivan-derived conveniences.
Ford is supposedly letting Mazda develop the next 626, and the preview drawings look promising.
I wonder, though, if GM can be as hands-off, and delegate development like that. I propose:
Let Suzuki take over the micro-car platforms. The Wagon R is the best selling vehicle in Japan, and the vehicles derived from it would mostly sell in non-US markets. All engines under 1.6l would be Suzuki's responsibility, too.
Let Subaru pick up where that leaves off. Engines from 1.8l to 3.0l for cars, and small and mid-size platforms (read: Impreza and Legacy). They could also engineer all the AWD (but not 4WD) systems.
Then let Isuzu do all diesels and all 4WD systems. Offer TOD on other platforms, including GM cars, and drop the part-time only primitive systems they use now. Isuzu could become their powertrain specialists, basically.
What would GM do? Trucks. Face it, that's what they know best. They could focus on large V6 and all V8 engines (except diesel), and all full frame platforms. This could include a return of cars like the real Impala, with RWD.
Oops, forgot Saab. OK, let them develop the large car platforms, and all near-luxury cars.
That way, each division does what it knows best. What do think?
-juice
Therefore GM would only consist of:
Saab, Subaru, Isuzu, Suzuki and Chevy truck. Period. End of story.
Bob
I guess they could use the Saturn name, and axe Chevy and Pontiac.
There is a lot of pride in the Cadillac name, so meld Buick's quality into Cadillac.
Keep Chevy trucks, but call them professional grade instead of GMC. Right now it's like Chevy is the lesser truck, though they are the same.
-juice
Bob's version of GM is interesting. It would also eliminate all of the similar models (like the Grand Prix/Monte Carlo, Bonneville/STS, etc.). I bet they'd be more profitable that way.
-Brian
-mike