Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options
Comments
I have been abused for some of my posts.
Huh?
Thank you
Be prepared to have your car washed at least once a week in the winter and still have it look dirty all the time.
Sly
It will be as tough to clean as the dark blue you see everywhere. If you are skittish, go with the silver or gray-they look great too. With the black make sure you get a thick base coat of wax before each winter, then go through the manual wash and rinse it down after every wet spell when it gets build up. About once a week. This keeps my car clean and happy all winter. The powder wont bother it as long as you park inside, and the wash helps keep the salt off the underside...
Any way there is no power to the light on door open, but the light does work with the swich, adn the light does come on when the rear gate opens, so I read the schematics as it being the diode. Fuse are good. Any Ideas. Need the light to work so I can get the alarm working after market alarm
Craig
Craig
1) Constant ground (gets switched by the dome light switch)
2) Constant +12V (always has power)
3) Switched ground (gets switched by the doors/hatch)
So which wire is the "center" wire that you're speaking of ?
Craig
There are lots of great products out there to keep your dark car looking great. My two previous vehicles were black so I would know.
Drive it with pride!
Ken
Black is like Jedi training for OCD!
-Brian
-juice
And yes black is worse then dark blue, not by a lot, but it is worse.
Sly
Found the diode, not the problem though! The light still does not come on when the doors open.
Traced the wire from the light to the front windshield pillar then it goes from there under the dash into a hugh budle of wires. From there who knows were they go! Any ideas? Is there a fuse? Relay? I'm missing something?
If none of the doors activate the light, then I would suspect it's still in the main line.
Does the dash "door open" LED light up correctly for each door?? Then you would at least know that the individual ground leads are working.
Quite a mystery.
Craig
As I own a Legacy sedan, I was wondering if the light over the liftgate actually switches on when the doors are opened. On some vehicles, only the dome light comes on when doors are opened and the liftgate light only comes on when the liftgate is opened.
Jim
The way my '00 Outback operated: the hatch light (when not in the 'off' position) will turn on when the hatch is open. It is not affected by the opening of any of the doors - only the hatch. If you have it in the ON position (not DOOR), then it will be on until you turn it off (or your battery dies).
-Brian
Did you mean wagon?
Our wagon's cargo light turns on when it's open in the default "auto" mode. But you can also set it on or off manually.
-juice
-juice
2002 Legacy Wagon
Unfortunately, so far, I have not loved mine. I'm interested in knowing if the experiences I'm having with the car are typical, or unique. My current dissatisfaction with the car and the dealership has reached the point where I am seriously considering selling it.
Two weeks after I bought the car, it started failing to start on the first turnover a few times a week. When it did finally start, it would surge and rev itself, which you could hear and see on the tachometer. It has continued to do this for the last eight months, in both hot Texas summer weather and our version of "winter" (30-40 degrees.) The dealership insists that since they're not getting any computer codes from the car, there's nothing wrong.
While the owners manual and the dealership told me the car ran on 87 octane, it does not. It detonates ferociously on anything less than 89 octane, and even then, it still periodically pings. It even pings intermittently on 91 octane. I know higher octane gas is better in general, but I bought this car to be my economical dog/bike/camping gear hauler, and I would very much like it to run on 87 octane.
My previous vehicle was a Z-28 Camaro, and it required 93 octane. That was cool, because it also had 285 horsepower. If I'm going to have to pay for expensive gas, I'd like some torque or a turbo to go with that, you know?
My car averages 16 mpg in city driving. I drive about 3 miles one way on city roads to work every day, and I'm definitely not putting the lead foot down. The best gas mileage it has ever gotten was 26 mpg, and that was on a trip out of town on mostly highways. Is it me, or does this mileage seem very low for a 4-cylinder car? None of my friends with 4-cylinder Foresters or Outbacks get mileage this low. I complained about this issue to the dealership recently (Austin Subaru in Austin, Texas) and they told me the mileage estimates that Subaru gives out are EPA estimates and thus, are mostly fiction. Well, ok.
I asked them to do a mileage test themselves on the car. They did, by topping off my 89 octane-filled tank with 91 octane, driving it 27 miles, topping it off again and proclaiming to me that it gets 31.3 mpg. There is no way in Hades that it gets 31.3 now or has ever gotten 31.3 mpg, but the dealership service manager adamantly insisted that it does and that if I'm not getting this mileage, it must be my driving.
Have any of you EVER gotten 31.3 mpg in city driving in your automatic Outback?
I love the design of the car, the room, and clearance, and the interior. I'm beginning to think, though, that my particular Outback is not so sound.
I'd at least reset it to get a fresh start. If mileage is that bad something is not right. Knock sensor maybe?
-juice
In my understanding, octane has very little effect on mpg. And driving 27 miles on a warmed-up car to determine gas mileage sounds like a bogus test. Drive the car one foot and it might calculate to 100mpg!
Starting Subies: many of us have found that allowing the fuel pump to pressurize the lines first eliminates starting problems. Do this by turning the key to "on", wait a few seconds until the fuel pump stops "whirring", then start the car.
HTH,
Jim
16mpg for a 3-mile city drive on a cold engine? Sounds about right. AWD extracts a mileage penalty, and it is most noticeable in stop-go and slow speed driving. Your commute is probably the worst possible set of conditions as far as gas mileage is concerned.
Good luck,
-wdb
Mark
Krzys
I believe ground clearance works in the favor of the Forester and the Outback -- it puts their floor structure higher into the impact area where it offers structural integrity. Since the IIHS test simulates being T-boned by an SUV, it would stand to reason that higher vehicles would fare better.
There is some black magic in the side impact tests -- many manufacturers put reinforcements, beams, and simple straps inside their doors to perform better in a particular test. This helps in ratings, but may have zero relevance to any given real-world crash scenario. So you really need to understand that when looking at the ratings. A car might do great in the IIHS test, poor in the NHSTA test, and excellent in an Australian test. But none of those tests are exactly what you may encounter on the road!!
I would say to do more research on this, including looking at other tests of the Legacy and those done in other countries. And then draw your own conclusions.
In my opinion, knowing how well my Outback rated, I can't see a reason why the Legacy would be that much worse -- so in my opinion, I would say it's a peculiarity of having 2" less ground clearance and the specifics of the IIHS test. In certain real world accidents, the Legacy might actually do better than the Outback!
Craig
I've seen posts affecting the 2.5L from ~1999 through 2003. Nothing on 2004 or 2005 models, but from what I can gather nothing much has changed in the engine over these years.
I deeply want to avoid any sort of hassle factor of a 10 issue arguing with the dealer over this sort of stuff. Esp. considering it is such a major part - not something like a strut or a rattle.
So please educate me.
My salesperson claimed the whole issue was originally a bad batch of gaskets that they worked through. I took that as total BS given I've read people having to replace the gasket at 60K and then again only 20K later. Why wouldn't the replacement gasket be the "better" one if true?
'96-'99 - DOHC 2.5l (phase 1 engine). There is some truth to the change in gasket design and materials used here. Replacement gaskets seem to be holding up ok.
'00-'04 - SOHC 2.5l (phase 2 engine). There was talk about various tests on gasket change, but don't think anything was really done. The problem is in the upper block (deck) design, and how much dimensional change the 'open deck' goes thru with heating cycles. It is apparently enough to scrub the gasket into failure over time. An 'additive' is used (kind of a stop-leak) to prolong life, but time will tell if it is effective. Yes, there have been reports of repeated failures but it is unclear if when those gaskets were changed, if the additive was used. My '02's were changed at 15k miles, but the dealer (and later Patti) told me that the additive was not needed in my case. Why? I could never get an clear answer....
Turbo motors: These use a different (closed deck) upper block design that is more thermally stable, and seem to be immune to failure.
Newer 2.5l without turbo: Very good question! Did they change the block, or just relying on the additive? Maybe someone else can complete this chronology....
Steve
I have a 2.5 with no turbo in my Legacy. The intake manifold is definitely changed between 04 and 05, but I could not see any block or cylinder head changes.
Jim W.
The IIHS side-impact test is brand new and is more severe than the NHSTA side-impact test. The IIHS test uses a dummy representing a small female (4'11", IIRC) whereas the NHSTA models an average male.
While it is dismaying to see a "poor" rating, consider these things:
- Crash test simulations test results represent just one data point involving numerous variables.
- The Legacy and OB have faired very well in other tests around the world(actually, the OB has not been subject to the IIHS test yet)
- Higher seating position does help against impacts vs. SUVs (explains OB and Forester performance), but it subtracts from dynamic stability (ie. increases rollover risk)
- The Legacy received poor marks for side intrusion but scored well with head protection on the IIHS test
Ken
There was seepage to the outside of the engine. No internal leaks or internally "blown" head gasket problems (to the best of my knowledge). The car ran perfectly right up until the gasket was replaced.
The seepage had gone on for years but only recently became enough of a leak to be noticeable in terms of losing fluid capacity. Even at its worst it only lost a small bit of coolant over a very long time period -- I'm talking thousands of miles here, multiple oil change cycles. The real issue for me was that it leaked onto the exhaust system and vaporized, so I could really smell it. I never saw any spots on the ground.
When I discussed it with the dealer I really expected them to recommend adding sealant to the cooling system. I was a bit shocked to have them come back and say they'd replace the gasket, under warranty no less!
Regards,
-wdb
I have a 03 Outback Sedan 4 cyclinder I bought used in 04. When I first bought this car fuel mpg's were 31.5 mpg.
That was the one and only time mpg was ever over 30. Mileage dropped to 27, then 25-26 and now is at what I consider a miserable 22-23 mpg.
I realize winter driving has some effect but I am getting 100 miles less per tank than when I bought this car.
The only thing I've done is to add a front bug schield to the car. I've just had a 30,000 mile tuneup, this has resulted in only 23-24 mpg. Not much of an increase.
Could a bug schield effect mileage? And why is it that this car never seen 31 mpg again?
I drive moderately, 55-65 85% highway/country miles
When at the dealership waiting for my tuneup, I was speaking with someone who has a Forrester she told me she has never gotten Less than 31! And the motor is the same ( I think) as mine.
Any suggestioms?
Thanks much, Ponyrider2
EPA Mileage Estimates: (City/Highway)
Manual: 21 mpg / 27 mpg
Automatic: : 21 mpg / 26 mpg
31 seems to be possible but it is hard to imagine that she had never got less than 31mpg.
Did you check the air pressure? What was pressure when you bought the car? What is it now?
Krzys
I have a 2000 Legacy GT sedan with 5 speed manual transmission. Mileage-wise it should be fairly similar to an Outback, although an automatic Outback wagon might average a tad (1 or 2 MPG) worse than I do. I keep the tire pressures between 32 to 36 pounds, depending on whether they are my summer or winter tires and what the prevailing road conditions are; the fairer the weather, the higher the pressure. I'm not exactly a lightfoot on the throttle, but neither am I prone to full-on drag race starts. In traffic I'm pretty quick to pop the car into 5th gear and just trundle along with the crowd. On highways I tend to push the legal speed limit, doing 65-ish on 55 mph roads and so on.
I average 24mpg on secondary roads, and 26 to 28mpg on freeway trips (the car is so much fun to drive that we don't always take freeways to get where we're going). I can't give you a good "city" mileage rating because I do very little driving in city conditions.
These numbers have been very, very consistent over 75,000+ miles, after an initial break-in period of maybe 5,000 or 6,000 miles. Subarus are well known for loosening up with age. When the car was new those numbers were 2mpg worse, i.e. 22 and 24-26mpg.
My best-ever tankful was 32mpg, driving down out of the Rockies; it was mostly downhill for 200 miles. You could have picked me up off the pavement when I did *that* math.
Cheers,
-wdb
Krzys
where do ya sign up
I am lucky to break 24 or so, and that is exceptionally high for me ('02 OBW 4cyl auto).
Steve