Subaru Legacy/Outback

1187188190192193230

Comments

  • simon_txsimon_tx Member Posts: 42
    I have a set of these for my Maxima - you'll love them.

    They were a little noisy at first, but they have great grip on dry and wet roads (don't know about snow).

    Plus they have that run flat technology thing going for them. I havda screw in one of my front tires and I drove some distance to get the thing removed. Tire pressure was zero, but sidewalls won't collapse. The tire held up fine the entire way and is showing no ill effects after 10K more miles since run flat.
  • ochsskochssk Member Posts: 52
    My 2002 Bean is approaching 30K miles and I thought I would check into the subaru extended warranty. I remember a year (or two) ago there was a good online source for the subaru warranty. Does anyone know if it still exists and what the site is?

    Also I remember some old posts about the A/C indicator light and the auto setting on the climate control but can't locate them. Our A/C light is always on when the climate control is set to auto. Does this mean the compressor is running? I'm curious because we drove Phoenix to San Diego over presidents day and it was a comfortable dry 70ish degrees and if I set the climate control to auto the A/C light was illuminated.

    By the way the car drove fantastically!
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    One of the warranty sites went out of business, so make sure to get a reference first. Also make sure you are getting a Subaru warranty, not a 3rd party company that actually sells insurance policies.

    I have a Subaru Gold, cool thing is you even get roadside assistance for the full term.

    -juice
  • jlemolejlemole Member Posts: 345
    Stay with Subaru. As far as I'm concerned, a third-party warranty is more than likely a waste of money. Subaru.com has warranty info, but you'll only be able to price it through a dealer. Shop around, you'll get a number of prices. Like Juice, I have the Gold and I got a great price from the dealer I bought my Outback from. I had just under 36k miles when I got it.

    Jon
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    The system in the Bean runs AC most of the time, in order to dehumidify and/or condition the air. The only time it does not come on automatically is in real cold weather (like below 40 deg or so).

    If you hit the auto button twice, it will go into ECON mode which runs the AC less (even if the AC indicator is on).

    Craig
  • subarujonsubarujon Member Posts: 13
    Over the winter I have managed to damage the gold coldered plastic covering on my front and rear '03 Outback wagon bumpers; on the front there is a cut with a small slice of plastic missing (caused by a sharp rock wall)...some of the gray colored plastic under the body color is showing; the rear is just a scrape (caused by a parking gargage wall).

    Should I try some polishing compound?

    Should I try some Subaru touch up paint in the cut and try to blend it in?

    Should I just leave it alone?

    thanks,

    jon
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Use touchup on the front gouge, probably 2-3 coats. Just try to fill in the gouge and cover the dark plastic, since it won't look perfect whatever you do.

    In the rear, you can probably get away with buffing it as long as the paint has not been scraped away (ie, no dark plastic showing).

    Craig
  • lfdallfdal Member Posts: 679
    03 OBW with 13.5K. Regular 5/30 Castrol for the first 2k, Quaker St Full Synthetic for the last 11.5. Oil and OEM filter changed every 3k. Car is normally driven 40/60 Highway-City.

    Viscosity was at 57.9, well within the range of 54 - 61.

    The oil flashpoint was 15 deg lower than it should have been - 350 vs 365. Fuel was at 0.8% which was under the max of 2%. I assume the fuel is the reason the flashpoint was lower?

    I'm assuming the next numbers are in ppm.
    Aluminum was 2.5 times average at 10 vs 4, Silicon was 40% high at 14 vs 10

    Interestingly, molybdenum was way low, 20 vs 47.
    Also, magnesium was 14 vs 169.

    Antifreeze and water were at 0.

    The lab's comment was that the engine is still breaking in, which accounted for the higher aluminum and silicon readings.

    Any gearheads / oil experts out there with a feel for numbers have a comment? Does the lab's comment re: slow break-in make sense for an engine using synthetic oil?

    They (Blackstone) recommended I continue with a 3k change interval. I was hoping they'd push it out to 4k.

    BTW - I contacted SOA when I originally switched to synthetic and received a response of "anytime after the first 1K".

    Comments welcome

    TIA

    Larry
  • gearhead4gearhead4 Member Posts: 122
    Larry,

    Thanks for the report on your oil analysis. I am glad to see that there are more people like me who pay close attention to their engines even when new.

    I don't claim to be a metallugist or chemist, but I would like to offer the following perpectives.

    I used to sell Amsoil synthetic oil. Amsoil recommended giving the engine some time to break-in before switching to their synthetic (I think it was at least 3000 miles). So, your engine may still be breaking in.
    The aluminum casting always has some amount of flash that will gradually break away and appear in the oil. The silicon is probably residue from the casting process as well. So, Blackstone's comments sound good to me.
    The slightly lower flashpoint I think is normal deviation and within factory tolerances. But Quaker State doesn't have the history of producing synthetics like Mobil. Switching to Mobil 1 may give you slightly better results.

    If you continue analyzing your oil, I am curious to see what the next report shows.

    Jim W
  • self_mechanicself_mechanic Member Posts: 95
    Quaker or Castrol synthetic, I believe, is a group III oil which is based on a highly refined petroleum oil where else Mobil 1, Valvoline, Amsoil and Redline are group IV oil based on PAO (poly alpha olefin). I stay away from heavily hydro crack group III synthetic oil. I am using Mobil 1 5W30 and changing oil every 7500 miles on my Bean.

    Alland
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    This was done on my wife's car. She's a slightly easier driver than I am. :-)

    Performed by Blackstone on a 99 OB.

    "Oil use interval: 3,875
    Oil type & Grade: Castrol GTX 10W30
    Make-up oil added: 0
    Miles on unit: 70,848
    Air filter: K&N
    Oil filter: OEM (Purolator)

    Aluminum 3 [3]
    Chromium 0 [1]
    Iron 4 [8]
    Copper [2] [4]
    Lead 4 [3]
    Tin 0 [1]
    Molybdenum 41 [45]
    Nickel 0 [0]
    Maganese 1 [1]
    Silver 0 [0]
    Titanium 0 [0]
    Potassium 0 [0]
    Boron 15 [41]
    Silicon 11 [9]
    Sodium 4 [10]
    Calcium 2562 [2108]
    Magnesium 5 [226]
    Phosphorous 794 [738]
    Zinc 900 [878]
    Barium 0 [0]

    Properties
    SUS Viscosity @ 210F: 60.3 (Should be 59-65)
    Flashpoint: 365F (>360)
    Fuel %: .5 (<2.0)
    Antifreeze: 0 (0)
    Water: 0 (<.1)
    Insolubules: .4 (<.6)

    Dennis: Everything looks very good in the initial sample from this engine. All wear read well below average, which is a good indication of normal wearing parts and careful operation. The universal averages show normal wear after about 3,500 miles on the oil. Insolubules (oil oxidation due to heat, use and blowby) were low at 0.4%, showing good oil filtration. No fuel dilution or anti-freeze was found. Silicon was not excessive at 11 ppm, so we think your air filtration is still getting the job done. At 70,848 total miles, this engine appears to be doing well."

    -Dennis
  • mchinmchin Member Posts: 22
    We switched an Impreza for an OB sedan on Sat. I notice the steering wheel on the OB is not as tight as the Impreza. I was wondering if the steering should be the same?
    Thanks.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I'm not sure about steering ratios, but there is more travel and play in the OB suspension, so slightly looser steering would seem normal.

    -juice
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    I have an Outback and am Impreza (WRX), and the steering feel is vastly superior in the Impreza. The Outback has a sloppy feel right around center whereas the WRX feels very precise. I don't think much can be done to improve the Outback's steering feel, though firmer rack bushings may help a little. Some of the feel is also due to the tires and suspension, of course. My advice would be to adapt to it!

    Craig
  • kmcleankmclean Member Posts: 173
    Greetings, all,

    Post 9666 (10 Feb) described the new tires I put on my OB just before a trip to Bend (OR) - total trip ran a bit over 1K miles, so I got to run the tires on Interstate, 2-lanes, mountain access roads - in dry conditions, heavy rain, heavy snow, old slop, and a bit (not much) of ice. Tires performed very well - quiet and stable at speed, both dry and wet, confidence-inspiring in packed snow, fresh snow, rutty ice, slop, and some mud (boy, did the OB look like hell at the end of this trip!). So my initial impression is very positive - I'll let you know how they hold up over time/mileage.

    One fun exercise involved my 17-year-old daughter with her first snow driving (too dangerous to practice in metro Seattle). Mt Bachelor has a huge (I'd guess 10-20 acres), flat parking lot at the main lodge. With no on-site lodging or night skiing and the lifts closing at 4, it empties out by 5 (still light until 5:30 on a typically sunny day). With about 8 inches of fresh powder over at least a couple of feet of packed snow, I let her have at it. She was impressed by how the car would dig in and launch after being snowed in all day, and she learned the limits of steering (ca. 20-25 mph) and how turning the wheel beyond a certain point has no effect (the hazards of over-controlling). Ditto with braking - both straight ahead and while in a turn. All in all, lots of fun and good (safe) lessons learned. Oh yeah, she heads to the Air Force Academy in July, and hopes to fly fighters after graduation (then grow up and go to med school). Wonder where she got those ideas!?

    Cheers from (nearly springtime) Seattle,

    Ken M.
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    Ken-

    Congrats to your daughter! Years ago I went on a tour of the Academy when I was trying to get in. I had the nomination but not the grades. It's funny, I was too "dumb" for the Air Force, but not West Point:-) Unfortunately I was never that athletically inclined (polite way of saying I stunk at team sports) so I never made it. THe campus (at that time) was fantastic.

    And to keep it on topic- you'll see a ton of Subaru's out there.

    Mark
  • mrk610mrk610 Member Posts: 378
    What tires do you put on .
  • kmcleankmclean Member Posts: 173
    Michael -

    I installed Goodyear Eagle GT-HRs - same size as the original Firestones.

    Ken in Seattle
  • lvicenslvicens Member Posts: 3
    Hello,

    I want to get a second set of wheels for my '97 Legacy L Wagon so I don't have to keep paying to get my tires mounted twice a year. I did a used parts search online and it came up with a salvage yard that had 14x6 alloy wheels from a '95 Legacy LS Wagon at a decent price. Before I sping for these, I'm hoping someone on this forum that's wise in the ways of subaru wagons can confirm that this '95 wagon's wheels should be interchangeable with the ones that came with my car. Also, any tips or warnings I should consider before purchasing online from a salvage yard would be welcomed too.

    Thanks!

    Luke
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    1995-1999 was that generation, so it's very likely they'll fit.

    I have one steelie from a 2002 Legacy, also 14"x6", if it turns out you need one more (or to put in a full size spare).

    -juice
  • cptpltcptplt Member Posts: 1,075
    I know my 92LS 14 inch alloys did not fit on my 98GT but I think the GT has bigger rotors than the L.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    My cousin just traded her 2000 Outback for a Highlander, she got $13k with like 80K miles on it. :)

    -mike
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Resale is good, but it's more proof that Subaru needs a big step-up vehicle. The 7 seater can't arrive soon enough!

    -juice
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    She loved her OB but it was just too small for her needs. Too narrow and not enough storage...

    -mike
  • subearusubearu Member Posts: 3,613
    My '00 Outback only has ~33k on 'er. KBB has it at $15k and change...

    -Brian
  • mwatcmwatc Member Posts: 4
    I just test drove what i was told was a 03 L SE but i cannot find leather seats as an option. It had the options of a SE but leather seats also the GT has a STD 6 disc cd changer but this car didn't right now i've gotten a quote of 18995 otd for this car it's used with 8500 mi. My feeling is that it's an average deal for a SE but a great deal for a GT. Is leather seats an option for the 03 L spec. Ed?
  • rob999rob999 Member Posts: 233
    Looking for replacement wheels? Do a search on ebay for "subaru wheels" and you'll get a couple pages of results for both OEM and aftermarket. Interesting, lots of WRX wheels available from folks switching out.
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    They are probably aftermarket leather seat covers. Fairly common. I think that price is way too high. You can get a new 04 model for that price or lower. Check out: www.fitzmall.com

    Here's one example:

    2004 Subaru Legacy
    Body: L 35th 5spd S/W Color: Seamist Green Stock #: S301449
    Delivered Internet Price: $18,198
    Factory Invoice: $20,852
    MSRP: $22,629

    Craig
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Aftermarket leather costs about $900, so add that to Craig's example above and you could buy new for about the same price.

    -juice
  • mwatcmwatc Member Posts: 4
    I see what your saying about the price being too close to a new 5 spd but while I like 5 spds (have 2 now) I want my wife in an Auto trany(one less thing to worry about with a new baby in back)
    On Fitz Mall the lowest auto 04 legacy is $19472 plus I live in Ohio will Fitz ship the car to me for Free?? if not add the shipping to that.
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Normally, I take a printout from the Fitzmall website and use it as leverage at a local dealer.

    Craig
  • blackbeanblackbean Member Posts: 100
    Hi all,
    Just got my 2004 Consumer Reports Auto Issue. Overall, Subaru did very well, but there was one glaring exception. The 2003 Baja was the LAST on the list in terms of reliability!!! I am very surprised by this, as the Baja is really just an Outback with no back. I assume that all the mechanicals and underpinings are the same, correct? Any insights into the dismal showing for this vehicle?
    Matt
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I expected about average, but not this poor showing. I can't explain it, our Baja thread has a few problems but certainly nothing out of the ordinary.

    -juice
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    But did you notice that engine problems from '96-'99 are starting to show up? Head gaskets, I assume.....

    Steve
  • rob_mrob_m Member Posts: 820
    I believe that CR indicated more problems with the 96 engine well over 3 years ago. No details or explanation, but that one rating just stuck in the back of my mind until the day I traded the car.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Was the first year of the 2.5l motor in the legacy outback IIRC.

    -mike
  • nygregnygreg Member Posts: 1,936
    Statistically will show up differently since the number of Bajas on the road is relatively small. CR does, however, try to factor this out.

    Greg
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Even with that factored in, Subaru actually outscores Honda with 5 year old cars. Long-term reliability was way up there, 5th or 6th overall.

    -juice
  • blackbeanblackbean Member Posts: 100
    and did you see VW for 5 year reliability? Dead last behind everyone!!! So glad I traded in the Passat when I did...love the Bean
    Matt
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Not surprising, read the threads here. Heck, just ask around. So many people have been burned by a VW, I'm sure you know a few.

    -juice
  • zmanzman Member Posts: 200
    I'm one (of the few apparently) VW owner who hasn't been burned--yet. I keep waiting, but the 99 NB-GLS 1.8t has had no problems (knock wood). That said, it only has 25k on it in 5 years, so I have not pushed it all that hard. Our ten-year-old Volvo 850 just got its first major overhaul (brakes) at 90K.

    Still, I'm looking into the Subaru (Forester or Outback) for the next family wagon rather than the Passat or the Volvo (now owned by Ford).

    Zman
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    VW has plenty of happy customers, in fact they have a dedicated following. It just seems to be love/hate.

    -juice
  • sebberrysebberry Member Posts: 148
    At what mileage does it become a bad idea to switch to synthetic oil? I have a 2003 Outback H6 with 32,000 Kms on it, and was considering switching to synthetic.

    Will I notice any performance difference?

    Thanks
  • rob999rob999 Member Posts: 233
    I switched to Mobil 1 at 30K miles and change at 5K intervals. I have seen no improvement in gas mileage, although I perceive less noise at startup on cold mornings. Have had no problems with leaking seals or anything. My main intent with switching to M1 was to prolong engine life.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Go as early as you can, right after break-in is what the chief mechanics told us at that one chat we hosted for them.

    That's 20k miles, so you're still at a point where you could switch and benefit.

    They recommended *not* switching on a high mileage engine because they thought it might compromise the seals.

    -juice
  • MrKablooeyMrKablooey Member Posts: 4
    ateixeira:
    what is considered high mileage? just picked up a 2000 outback with 44k, next oil change is sched for 47 but I can change it now no biggie. though I guess with a used car it's tough to know if they used synthetic in it or not, except I'm sure when the dealer did it they didn't use synthetic. previous owners may have though. the car is super clean and well taken care of, I'd like to keep it a long time.
  • jlemolejlemole Member Posts: 345
    I made the switch at 19k miles, no problems.

    High mileage is probably in the range of 60-75k miles and over. But I would also consider age. I wouldn't switch to synth on an older car, even though it has lower mileage for fear of leaking the seals. 44k miles on a 4 year old car, you're probably still o.k., but at that point the added benefits might not outwiegh the added costs over the long haul.

    Jon
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    They didn't quite pin it down, but hinted to do it as early as possible. I'd interpret their opinion as meaning that 44k miles is too late to be of any benefit. The seals are well established by now and I wouldn't change to synthetic.

    -juice
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    I changed a Corolla to Synthetic at 110,000 miles. I sold it at about 140,000, but it is still running around town and has close to 200,000 miles. Never leaked or used a drop of oil.

    Synthetics have additives these days to condition your seals. Around here when the temp is 30 below farenheit, it sure is nice to have sythetic which actually flows at that temp. Nice at the other extreme too - going over 80 on a day when the temp is near 110 into a 40 mph headwind with the A/C on full and the car loaded with family and luggage. Done both in SD, and synthetic helps w/ a little peace of mind.

    The added benefits are slightly extended drain intervals (I change every 5k miles w/ synthetic), and slightly better gas mileage. Don't expect a big jump in gas mileage it is usually only 2 to 5% better. If you drive an Echo that may register as a couple of mpg, but if you are getting 2O mpg or so it will probably be less than a 1 mpg improvement.

    My Integra has had synthetic for all but the first 3k of its 171,000 miles, and the cams still look brand new.
  • mikenkmikenk Member Posts: 281
    IMHO, I believe that much of the discussion on timing of the switch, early and late, is based on original synthetic compositions and older engine designs. I don't believe that these restrictions are valid with modern engines and oils. I switched on my Supra at 100k with no leaks. On my current OB VDC and WRX, I switched at the second oil change on the advice of the service manager.

    If you plan on keeping the car a long time, I would switch at any time and at any miles; synthetic oil is just better.

    Mike
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.