By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Jim
I'm going to be pruchasing my first car soon and needed some opinions. I decided to get a used car and I'm trying to decide between a Sentra GXE, Protege, and Hyundai Elantra. Just wanted to get some opinions and suggestions on my choices.
2. Anyone know if GT's are available from any rental car company?
Still going strong after rolling 33K miles returning from Chicago. Seems like I always roll each 1K mark coming home from there. Incidentally, this car seems to smooth out once I pass 90, and was still smooth to 105. Don't tell.
Engine:
- VVT added
- Improved performance and fuel mileage, less emissions
Exterior:
- Slightly different front and rear styling
- Chrome door handles and chrome accent strip on side moldings
- New base and alloy wheels
- New rear spoiler
- Solar glass
Interior:
- New upholstery patterns
- New gauge cluster
- Chrome interior door handles
Equipment:
- Rain-sensing wipers
- Automatic lighting system (automatic headlights?)
- Anti-icing heating elements on lower windshield to keep wipers from freezing up
- Single touch up-down power driver side window
- Brake assist packaged with ABS
New colors:
Exciting Blue, Gold Saver, New Silver, Amabile Rose, Silver Sage, Lime Green, Triton Green, and Dark Navy Blue
If tightening the gas cap doesn't cause the light to go out within a couple of days, it may be still ok but may need resetting to get the light to stay off.
Are you still under warranty? If so, this should be covered.
On--blinking-- big deal. Shut the car down immediately.
Jeff
If the water did go over the front of the hood, it's very possible it came in contact with parts of the electrical system. Could explain the buzzing sound.
Jeff
Mileage now is 77906 KM
My driving is 99 percent highway. I drive 300 KM per day. I'm a conservative driver 105-110kph on the highway.
I have driven 49,002 KM from December 11/02 - August 28/03
From January - March (temps -30 to -10 Celsius) = 7.283 L/100KM
From June - August (temps 10 to 30 Celsius) 6.527 L/100KM
BTW I found a good personal site for conversions,
http://www.euronet.nl/users/grantm/frans/fuel.html
In my opinion, there is a small gain during the warmer months.
I have installed a K&K filter. I like the filter, but don't know if that has made a difference.
The only cost so far has been to replace the right front wheel bearing. Cost $220.00 cad.
Other than that, only schedule maintenance.
I added a cruise control after I bought the car, and have to take it in for warranty work.
Overall impression....It is a solid little car. I am 6 ft tall, and my only
major beef is I wish the tilt steering would go up another inch.
The sun visor doesn't help much either as it blocks my view of road when down (I sit too high)
Air conditioning is more than adequate.
The volume on the radio does not work right away in the cold months. Car has to warm up inside for it to work. No big deal.
The brakes have been making noise that last two months though. They stop for a day or two after I wash the car, but it starts up again right away. They squeak when you go low speeds, even when you don't press the brakes. A TSB states it happens during the warmer months.
I will wait and see this winter if this is true.
We'll keep you informed next year on the cost of the car. So far so good.
Pictures of car at www.plews.ca
The Corolla and Pro5 are good cars too. The Corolla has a different driving feel than the Civic, and for some people (like me) the driving position of the Corolla is uncomfortable, so be sure to take a long test drive before you buy. The Pro5 is an older design and the crash test ratings are OK but not tops in class like the Civic and Corolla; reliability is good however. The Pro5's handling is closer to that of the Integra (and Civic) than is the Corolla's or Elantra's. Bear in mind the Pro5 is being replaced in a few weeks by the new Mazda3.
Since you are interested in the Pro5, you should check out the Elantra GT hatchback, which has similar utility and a lot of features for the price--leather, 4 wheel discs, upgraded sound system, alloys, sport suspension etc. but still costs less than the Civic EX or Corolla.
Be sure to read the details of the IIHS crash test before deciding against the Elantra. The Elantra demonstrated excellent structural integrity. The reaons for the poor result were 1) late-deploying airbag on 2 of 3 tries, and 2) driver's seat that moved forward a few inches on its track. Hyundai has studied the airbag result and believes it to be an anomoly--they can't find any design flaw or parts defect to explain it. That's what an HMA representative told me when I asked them about it. The seat rails have been redesigned (stengthened and lengthened), but I'm not certain that they have been applied to the '03 U.S. models. As for reliability, CR's statistics show that the reliability of the Elantra and of Hyundais overall has been steadily improving in the past few years. There are some Hyundais (Sonata, Santa Fe) that are "above average" now. So it's possible the reliability of the '03 Elantra is pretty close to that of the Civic now. You may have read the C/D review of small cars last year, in which the Elantra GLS took a close second to the Protege and the Civic LX was fifth. The editors blasted Honda for the quality of the fit and finish of the Civic and summed it up as "a loser." Edumunds.com recently did a small-car comparo and the Elantra GLS came in second again, one point behind the Civic EX. They did a long-term test of the '01 Elantra and had a very positive experience.
Anyway this is getting too long, but I suspect that with your positive Acura/Honda experience (translating into brand loyalty) and your emphasis on the IIHS offset crash test and reliability, you would be happier with the Civic EX. I'm a two-time (satisfied) Civic owner myself, and my second choice back in the fall of '00 was the Civic EX. I think I made the right choice back then, but today, with the improvements Honda has made in the Civic over the last four years and the availability of substantial discounts on the Civic now (but not back in 10/00), who knows, I might make a different decision today.
P.S. You might want to post your question in the Honda Civic vs. Hyundai Elantra board, as that would be an ideal forum for discussions like this.
My 2001 GLS rolled 34,000 miles a day or so ago (not returning from a trip to Chicago, as usually happens on the thousand-mile marks). As I have posted several times before, this car has been wonderful: comfortable, roomy, quiet, very reliable.
I knew the day I bought it that it was not just very inexpensive but a remarkable value. Many useful amenities and features abound, some of which were not offered in other little cars (side airbags, for example).
Lady9, I also had concerns about reliability, but those were addressed by the good warranty and also by all of the reading I had done. At that time, there was very little reliabilty data but I could tell that the company was trying very hard to improve their products. In my opinion, Hyundai had large reputation obstacles to overcome, and they have worked very hard to do so. That impresses me, and I was very skeptical before adding this car to my list of choices.
So now I have proof that their efforts paid off, because I have a very good car that does not get babied on the road (but is very well-taken care of when maintaining it), and can take what I give it. An "average" reliability rating (I am guessing you have read Consumer Reports) is good, since it is the average of ALL cars surveyed, and cars have been improving year after year.
Finally, the crash testing. I know about the "poor" rating for this car, due mainly to the movement of the crash dummy within the vehicle. I also know that the tested Elantras were able to maintain the cabin structure well during the crash, as you can see in the pictures on the NHTSA web site. I am a very good and defensive driver, so my concerns may be less than yours, and I truly believe that any crash over the tested 35 mph will result in serious injury in ANY vehicle.
You should strongly consider the Elantra GLS or GT, because you will get more than your money's worth. I have really loved mine after two years.
Jim
The '03s are such good deals, I don't know if they will continue to be the same price as the '04s.
My son paid $9895 for his GLS 5-speed with floor mats, side airbags, cruise, A/C, power everything. Obviously, if the '04s come in so the dealers can charge near that price, the '04s would be the way to go because of depreciation of '03s vs '04s. If the dealers don't have the manufacturers incentives on the '04s like they do on the '03s, then expect to pay $1.5K-$2K more.
As for you all experiencing the headlight issue it kind of freaks me out. I blew a bulb at about 25k miles in the left headlight. They put the bulb in at no charge and I was spotting aircraft the next night. I drove back and they did the whole thing over again correctly and it's going strong still. Everything works great and the car is very tight. I moved to CA a few years back and drove that car in searing heat mid-day (101) loaded to the roof with the AC running on level 2, stereo (upgraded) blasting and the cruise control set at 85. He never missed a beat. Went right up the 'Grapevine' with cruise set at 70 AC blowin and up and over we went without dropping 1 mph. Stopped at the top and a guy in a Camry asked me if I was crazy. Said I made it no problem and drove away.
My Toyota ($30k experiment in frustration) was a nightmare. My car prior to that was a 96 Civic which wasn't nearly as comfortable, quiet, fast or fun to drive as my Elantra. Trust me, I feel very safe in this car and I drive comparitively fast and to some very fast. My thinking is this, I'm going to live if I hit someone because the car is built very well and the safety systems in place are designed to work together.
Okay, this is getting long. Sorry. I can't say enough good things about this car. I've owned 12 cars in 22 yrs and have to say that this is one I will be hard pressed to let go of when the time comes. But be sure that it will be replaced with another one. The best thing about this car is that I paid $11,888 for it and have not regretted it for one minute. 1/3 the price of my Avalon and 3x the fun.
Miles on oil 4070, Miles on Engine 48590 (ST filter)
Aluminum 2
Chromium 1
Iron 5
Copper 13
Lead 3
Tin 1
Moly 2
Nickel 0
Manganese 0
Silver 0
Titanium 0
Potassium 0
Boron 3
Silicon 13
Sodium 4
Calcium 1951
Magnesium 6
Phosporous 816
Zinc 934
Barium 1
SUS Visc.@210 f 59.2
Flashpoint 385
Fuel .5
Antifreeze & water 0
Insolubles .5
Blackstone's Comments: Carl: No problems showed up in the initial sample from your Hyundai. All wear read well below averages for this type of engine, which is a very good indication of normal wearing parts. Insulables were fine at .5% showing good oil filtration. No fuel dilution or anti-freeze was found. The TBN read .8, on the low side, but still showing active additive present in the oil. We probably wouldn't go too much longer on this oil, but 4000 miles seems to be a good interval for the way this engine wears. Nice Engine!
Inside, there's lots of little improvements but basically it's the same interior. The seat cloth has an embossed pattern to it and looks a little richer than the old cloth (also looks more "Buick" to me). The instrument cluster is new and has a 3-D look to it, with the dials raised a bit--looks more upscale. As do the new HVAC controls--big round knobs, should be easy to grab. The center vents get shutoff switches. The "H" on the steering wheel is highlighted in silver. It looked like there were two 12-volt power points: the cigarette lighter and another power point right below it. The ash tray said "Push" on it, so it's probably damped.
Coincidently I happened to see Motor Trend's 2004 preview mag today. They said the Elantra loses HP, which isn't exactly right. The SULEV engine option does lose 3 ponies, to 132, but the ULEV engine gains 3 horses to 138. And the EPA highway rating has gone up one, to 34. So not the big power increase we hoped for with the VVT engine, but lower emissions and higher mpg with a slight increase in power for most people is all good.
All in all, I don't think these changes will make a current '01-'03 Elantra owner want to run right out and buy a new one (at least not me), but it should be enough to keep the Elantra competitive with other compacts until its next redesign.