By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I have never been happy with the MXV4s. After 5K or so, they become noisy. And they don't seem to last very long either. My first set only lasted 28K. I have heard alot of good things about the Michelin X-one and the Goodyear Aquatread III. But not every tire performs the same on all cars.
I would like to hear from owners who replaced their energy MXV4 stock tires on their Accords with either Aquatread IIIs or X-ones. Did you notice any difference in performance, treadwear, noise and ride? I would appreciate any opinions. Thanks
~alpha
Pirelli persists in using a lot of nylon in their carcasses and treads, and thus flat-spotting and vibrations are always a risk with them, if you are sensitive to this stuff, as I am.
or dunlop sp sport 5000's for all seasons. those were my other choice, heard pretty good things about them too. about $93/tire from tirerack..
I'm just curious because each Plant probably has their own level of build quality. Does anyone have an Accord built from Japan? The 11th digit of your VIN number will be a "C" instead of "A".
As to the white smoke--- I would say it was something connected to the 60K service, most likely a throttle body cleaning. You would have to look at the paperwork to see what they did.
On the other hand, if the smoke had been continuous and fairly thick, then yes, the head gasket would be the prime culprit.
In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the catalytic converter replacement was probably a coincidence. The chemicals used on throttle-fuel system flushes are not harmful to converters.
For most models and option choices, you are not going to have much say about where your car comes from...all the Civic hatches, when they reappear next year, are going to come from the UK. The redesigned CRV will come from both Swindon and Japan. The Odyssey will be either Canadian or Alabamian, depending on when you buy it. The SUV [based on the Acura MDX] will be strictly from Cambridge, Ontario....and so forth and so on. Each plant does NOT "have its own level of build quality"...there is only one acceptable corporate standard. That doesn't mean every car will be perfect, but it does mean the benchmark is not a variable.
Many thanks
East
I was thinking about getting an Accord because of its reputation, but after lurking in this group for a while, I think that the difference between Honda and GM cars is in the owners minds... :^/
I'm not sure which part of the reputation you are referring to; no part of Honda's reputation has it that they are perfect. In the things that matter to most car owners, they are very often less imperfect than any other manufacturer out there, and that's enough for me.
and-- Foreign parts content: 25% Japan"
This suits me fine, but it would still be cool to have a machine built in the western Pacific... just to be different.
http://www.autoinsurancetips.com/vin.htm
Besides, EACH AND EVERY car has the fabric protected with ScotchGuard by the manufacturer and I doubt that they protect the paint better than the couple of original transparent coatings...
IOW, a rip off!
However, I was told a lie by the salesman (shock!): the V6 is only available on the EX... I was pretty sure that it was available on the LX too, which I confirmed when I got home and studied the brochure. :^/
Now, I don't care about passenger's power seat, sunroof, etc, that are standard on the EX. Am I missing something that's a must have in the EX that would make the mark up worth from an LX?
TIA
I think the extra goodies in the EX justifies the higher price over the LX since just leather seats and moonroof on most cars will cost you at least two to three grands.
Try them out and you'll be pleasantly surprised!
The Draw-Tite hitch bolts to the tow hook underneath the rear bumper and also to the bottom of the spare tire well. 2 holes were drilled in the spare tire well to accomodate the bolts. I am concerned that this is not a great setup and have seen better devices used on other sedans, which are bolted to the "frame" of the car on either side. Is it possible the tow hook can break with this type of unit?
By the way, the speedometer and odometer in the '01 were right on the money in a quick test the other day on the highway.
Have you seen the version from Hidden Hitch? I wonder if they make anything different.