Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options
Comments
I decided to go back to Dealer #2 and pin them down to get answers, since their price was great. In addition to asking about a delivery date, I asked about mileage on the car. He couldn't tell me how many miles on the car, and did not want to commit to a delivery date. We said that we would give him a deposit with the condition that they specify a delivery date (we even offered to add additional days to whatever timeframe they gave us). A few days went by, and we got a million and one excuses from the salesman on why it was taking him a long time to get the info, from "the sales guy from the other dealer is out of the office" to "the shipping timeframes are not under our control", etc. After days of delays, I was informed that the car that they had originally located had been sold, but they had found another car. This other car did not meet the specifications that we had given the salesperson, so I was very disappointed that the he would try to persuade to get a different car altogether. Needless to say, we did not even talk about the fees because we were done with that dealer.
While this was going on, I was still in conversations with Dealer #1. I finally bought the 530ia from Dealer #1 for $2000 over invoice. We did the paperwork over fax and telephone on one day, and we picked up the car the following business day. They had the car ready, and gave both my spouse and I car "training" on two separate days because we did not pick up the car together.
In addition to the items listed by snagiel, I got a Technology pamphlet that describes the concept, technology and advantages of features such as Rain sensor, xenon headlights, VALVETRONIC, Automatic transmission with Steptronic, etc. I also got a flyer with info about OBD (on-board diagnostic). No pamphlet for tire warranty.
Again, thanks to all.
Also, changes to the engine always make me nervous. As many have posted before, I would want to wait a couple of years to give the manufacturer a chance to identify solutions for the issues that they find.
Now comes the agonizing waiting part (which is all too vivid a memory from when I ordered the 323 in 2000). Interestingly, my dealer was able to get me a June build date (versus July) -- because I wanted a manual transmission! Apparently the vast majority of 5s are auto, so another dealer happily swapped his (presumably) less desirable June "manual" slot for my dealer's July "auto" slot. As I wouldn't consider anything but a stick for a car like this, I'm pleased that my preference actually accelerated the process. It also provided a great rationalization to my wife and daughter as to why I ordered yet another manual car!
Thanks to all posters for the plethora of great info. I'm really looking forward to getting behind the wheel of this car. C'mon, July!!
Best Regards,
Shipo
As for the addiotional models available, let's see:
3: 316, 318, 320d, 320, 325, 330d 330
5: 520, 525d, 525, 530d, 530, 535, 540
I think I may have missed some, but they do enjoy more selections. However, most of the smaller engines may not make much sense in the states, perhaps with the increasing traffic, they may. Over on this side, you can't drive fast (in Germany, at least) in the city anyway, where you are usually limited to 30 mph. Even on the autobahn, people don't seem to care much about how fast you get to speed. They just buried the right foot and go.
If I were in the position that most of you are in now, I'd go for the current E39 (especially if you lease). I'm a fan of the body style, the 2001 facelift, and the fact that it has been out since late 1996 (as a 1997 model) and is probably close to a perfect car (as far as refinement and bugs go). I prefer "tried and true" to "new and improved."
If you lease you can get the second model year of the E60 if you like or buy out the lease on the current E39 and have a perfectly good car.
The E60 (when the styling "grows" on us) will most definitely have price gouging (at MSRP for a while or maybe even the dreaded dealer markups), waiting lists, and bugs that need to be worked out of a new car in the first model year. I'm also the type of guy who could care less about being the first one on the block to have one.
My best friend on the other hand would go crazy if he bought a car and the next model year the wheels would change or the engine pumped out 5 more horsepower (not that bad, but you get the picture). He was in the market for a new car in November and chose to lease a fully loaded Audi A4 3.0 Q 6 speed to a 525i with a 5 speed, CWP, Lthr, & SP.
Different strokes for different folks.
2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2025 Camry SE AWD
Funny thing, since that morning I have not seen another topaz blue 530 with SP.
Does anyone have one? And actually use it? I'll admit I'm an avowed gadget freak, hard-pressed to resist the temptation of this kind of thing. And besides, what's another $575 on a car that will cost nearly $50K? ;-) I just hope the #&%$ thing doesn't bug me in the long run!
2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2025 Camry SE AWD
So, let me ask this experienced group: What brand of gas do you use? Does it really matter? Do you see differences when using different brands?
I disagree. I applied Klasse All-in-One to our new 325i and our 5 year old Volvo (waxed only once). Of course the BMW looked great, but the Volvo looked like new again! I washed and "waxed" the Volvo wagon in under two hours. I see no reason to spend 4 hours on my car when this stuff is available.
See another review here: http://www.deckowski.com/wax%20off/results.htm
-murray
The 523i drivers don't want anyone to know what they don't have, and the 540i drivers don't want anyone to know what they have. Traditionally, in Italy "BMW" translates as "target".
I debadged our 540i (fishing line and 3M spray adhesive remover), and ordered our M5 without insignia (on the M5 that means plain side moldings behind the front wheels as well as no trunklid badge.) But I'm in California, so the only motivation is personal preference.
Actually, when we picked up the M5 (Euro Delivery) I bought 520i and 523i badges to retrofit our cars with, but haven't yet done it...
i am confused by the brochure and web site; it says a ski bag is an option
"Ski bag (included with split-folding lockable rear seats; requires leather upholstery)"
i was under the impression that you didn't get a ski bag UNLESS you ordered the folding rear seats
can you order a 540 with a ski bag but WITHOUT the folding rear seats?
i may have narrowed my search and paid too much, as all i need is a ski bag and not the folding rear seats which were much harder to find. too late for me now but it might help someone else.
thanks!
Under "Interior seating and trim" section of the "Standard Equipment/Optional Equipment" charts it shows the following optional for all 5 Series:
"Split-folding lockable rear seats (includes ski bag; requires leather upholstery)"
And under "Comfort and convenience" it shows the following optional for all 5 Series:
"Ski bag (included with split-folding lockable rear seats; requires leather upholstery)"
There are also two pictures in the "Interior/Equipment" section. First says "Split-folding lockable rear seats allow you to load long objects in the trunk by folding down one or both rear seats, as needed. (includes optional ski bag; requires leather upholstery)", and the second says "Ski bag helps to allow the clean, secure transportation of skis, ski poles, snowboards and other long, thin objects. (included with optional split-folding rear seats; requires optional leather upholstery)." Each picture has an icon indicating the equipment is optional.
The 1998 brochure shows same. My '98 540i6 has the optional rear split-fold seat. I've never checked out the ski bag. But I love the flexibility if I need to carry longer items (e.g., to take kid's bike to gas station to put air in tires).
Of course, my passengers love them too. No more complaints from my kids either about the sun in their faces.
and it dawned on me that on the door jamb the information posted there was
33 F and 41 R. I tried this combo and it works real fine but I do not like the jittery
bouncy ride over uneven roadways, so... I went to 33F and 36 R and it's just
perfect for me and my type of driving. I'm usually alone or at best just two of us
and no luggage . I noticed with 29 lb in front the steering effort was too high and
my wife balked at driving, she said it required too much effort. With 33 F, no
problem, steers much better and less effort is required. Just wanted to pass this
info along for what it is worth.
Does anyone have performance specs for the 540 Auto Non Sport? I have ordered one after having driven my friends 540 6 speed sport which I liked very much, but have not been able to drive one to see the difference. Seems like all the automotive tests are for the sport version.
Thanks!
C&D tested one in their 12/96 issue. This was a 4-car comparison test. BMW 540iA non-Sport came in second, behind MBE420, but did win most performance measures. 0-60 mph in 6.3 seconds. 1/4 mile in 14.9 seconds at 97 mph. Top speed governed at 128 mph. Braking from 70 mph in 175 feet. Pulled .77g on 300-ft skidpag. 58.4 mph in their lane change maneuver.
Compare this to C&D's 5-car comparison test in 11/98 issue of 540iA Sport. Came in first. 0-60 mph in 6.1 seconds. 1/4 mile in 14.7 seconds at 98 mph. Top speed governed to 131 mph. 175 feet braking 70-0 mph. Pulled .81g. Went a blistering 64.1 mph in lane-change maneuver.
Motor Trend tested a 540iA non-Sport in 10/96. 0-60 mph in 6.2 seconds. 1/4 mile in 14.6 seconds at 98 mph. 60-0 mph braking in 129 feet. Pulled .80g. 63.2 mph in their 600-ft slalom.
Road & Track has at least two published tests of 540iA non-Sport. 9/96 comparison against MBE420. 0-60 mph in 6.7 seconds. 1/4 mile in 15.0 seconds at 98 mph. Pulled .78g and did 58.3 mph in 700-ft slalom. Then again in 2/98 4-car comparison. 0-60 mph in 5.9 seconds. 1/4 mile in 14.3 seconds at 99.6 mph. Pulled .79g and 60.0 mph thru 700-ft slalom.
I learned, I guess from Consumer Reports, that it was a waste of energy to wax a modern car. But when I turned by BMW in, I parked it next to a bunch of new cars and they shined while mine looked kind of dead. The car was always garaged so I don't think the painted deteriorated.
Any opinions? What kine of wax do you use, if any?
Klasse All-In-One
Followed by:
Klasse High Gloss Sealant
Best Regards,
Shipo
P.S.
When I turned in my 328i (39,800 miles), it shined like the new cars around it, maybe it was the extra 200 miles on your car. ;-)
3.15 diff (sport)
zero to ...
30___2.06
40___3.02
50___4.54
60___6.06
70___8.18
80___10.34
90___12.94
100__16.58
110__20.46
120__24.94
130__30.70
140__37.70
150__43.90
160__52.34
1/4 mile 14.64 @ 95.4
2.81 diff (non-sport)
zero to ...
30___2.26
40___3.22
50___4.78
60___6.30
70___8.16
80___10.66
90___13.20
100__16.32
110__20.68
120__25.52
130__31.22
140__38.68
150__50.38
160__61.16
1/4 mile 14.80 @ 95.4
Well, assuming that I ultimately learn to love the looks of the E60, there may be hope for me yet regarding the next generation car equipped with normal components AND a manual gearbox. ;-)
Best Regards,
Shipo
TIA,
metmdx
http://www.autopia-carport.com/
Best Regards,
Shipo