Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
But what is the difference between a wagon and a hatch? 5 vs. 3 doors, respectively? I think it has more to do with the style. A wagon is more vertical in the rear door/window. A hatch has a more horizontally placed rear door/window. That's just my opinion.
Yeah, the TSX is the European Accord but I disagree that it isn't a performance sedan. It's relatively light, nimble, has a 6MT and a high revving 4 cylinder VTEC engine. Additionally, it handles pretty good for a FWD sedan.
If one loves to drive and is unimpressed by lesser machines, then one is likely to desire a BMW.
"BMW isnt offering anything exclusive for me that can justify spending thousands extra."
I agree - save your money. You'll make one fewer poseur driving a BMW for the wrong reason.
Amen.
I used to call my annual (really long, solo) road trips "sanity breaks." That was when the kids were small. Since my wife doesn't see much merit in this sort of thing, I now call them. . .
sanity breaks.
Thanks.
Regards:
OldCEM
Here's the thing -- I want an RWD vehicle with a manual transmission that will carry my bicycle inside.
When the research is done, it becomes apparent that the list is really (really) short. Oh, BTW, I appreciate fuel mileage.
I'm locked into a BMW, unless I throw RWD under the bus, in which case, the A3 pops up. The C-series is (sorta) in the discussion, but not really (haven't mentioned electronic reliability yet, but will now).
3-series, A3 or CTS? Oh, wait, I forgot to mention that I've already been burned to the bone (& beyond) by buying an American Sports Sedan that left me holding the bag. CTS -- not gonna happen.
So, will it be: 1) BMW 3-series, 2) A3, or 3) my present (now beater) Lincoln LS that does what I want & doesn't cost one additional penny, month over month?
Regards:
OldCEM
Regards:
OldCEM
Regards:
OldCEM
They are all ELLPS.
-Cj
2 things I have noticed as of late: The BMW exhibit is ALWAYS mobbed. Lots of people checking out 3 series. You hear them talk about how they like the way the car looks and they like the feel of the interior. Then they look at the starting price and list of options and I hear them say "yeah, but that's just for the base model with a stick shift & fake leather." People think AWD should be standard on all BMWs (NO THANK-YOU). I try to explain and enlighten, but it falls on deaf ears many a times.
Cadillac as lousweis said had the all new CTS on a display! They need to get thast car out on the floor. GM needs all the help and buzz they can get.
2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2022 Wrangler Sahara 4Xe, 2023 Toyota Tacoma SR 4WD
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/FullTests/articleId=48463
"The X-Type shares its chassis with the Ford Mondeo and..."
A simple google of "mondeo x-type and chassis" turns up quite a bit.
Regards:
OldCEM
Are you for real? The Mondeo was available with an AWD system too. Regardless, do you get why your Monde...oops X-type is AWD and not the RWD setup Jag would have preferred? Yeah, the Mondeo chassis that's the basis for the car made RWD impossible.
"One significant design element is that all X-Types will be equipped with standard all-wheel drive-a Jaguar first. This stems from the fact that the X-Type shares certain platform components with the new Europe-only Ford Mondeo, which is a front-drive car. A FWD Jag would never do, and the transverse engine layout precluded a RWD-only version."
--Motor Trend review of the X-type in 2002. http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedan/112_0102_2002_jaguar_x_type
"If you care to look for it, there’s a fair amount of Ford in an X-Type. The platform of the new Jag can be traced to that of the Ford Mondeo, a compact sedan not sold in the U.S. With that chassis came the X-Type’s MacPherson strut front suspension, with the bushings, springs, shocks, etc., and the geometry customized for the Jaguar, as was the steering. Rear suspension pieces carry over from the Mondeo wagon, with a reworking of the upper forged arms and lower stamped arms, shocks, coil springs and anti-roll bar."
-- Road and Track review of the 2002 X-type. http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?section_id=3&article_id=111
"One source of doubt about whether people would like X-Type has been knowing that the Jaguar's underpinnings are derived from those of the European Ford Mondeo, the latest generation of the car once sold here as the Ford Contour."
--Autoweek regarding the 2002 X-type. http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20010507/FREE/105070708&SearchID=- 73275611480017
But they all got it wrong, right? Every magazine in America, every reviewer, every person that mentioned the mondeo was wrong.
How about a 2005 interview with the Jaguar VP of Marketing, Tom Scarpello:
"A very large percentage feel the Mondeo is an excellent platform to start from in the first place and that the X-Type does differentiate itself extremely well from that car. From a consumer's point of view, it's not a warmed-over Mondeo. There's so much platform sharing within the industry. "
-- Autoweek, 2/11/05 http://autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050211/FREE/502110701&SearchID=- 73275612307685
We don't have to limit the conversation to just those nine; we can talk about any car that reasonably fits into the segment, by the way. What I wish we would do is just talk about the cars themselves rather than getting all tangled up in what belongs and what doesn't. We seem to get mired in that debate every so often, and that doesn't help anyone who actually wants to read about and discuss the features of the cars themselves.
Anyway, let's see how it goes.
On the CTS, here is another example on how NOT to introduce a new car...keep it out of reach and make sure everyone can get into the competition. Same old, same old.
Regards,
OW
Agree. I don't mind they put a newly-introduced-not-yet-in-the-dealership car on display but at least invite those whom have shown any amount of interest to go up and take a closer look. I was dissapointed that even after I politely asked the Caddy representative to see if I can touch the door panel to see what kind of material is used she still turned me down and re-direct me to the current model. Nicely done, Caddy.
However, in all fairness, Caddy is NOT the only manufacture to follow this exercise. This year in Atlanta Auto Show Toyota also put the new Highlander on display with the "Look Only" sign to it. Also, other examples come to mind are: Acura with their TSX and Pontiac with the GTO (of course, these are several years ago).
Who doesnt do this at an autoshow? They do not let you get inside of or touch turntable models. This is nothing new and hardly exclusive to Cadillac. What do you propose they do? Not show the car at the autoshow since they arent going to let you put your hands on it? I dont think that would be a smart idea at all.
There is not proof that the cars being discussed are lesser machines, they are just different from BMWs. If they were clearly inferior they wouldnt be selling. They appeal to plenty of people, just not BMW fans.
"You'll make one fewer poseur driving a BMW for the wrong reason. "
I am much more into driving than the majority of people who drive BMWs. If I did own one it surely would be to drive it fast and hard when possible, not to appeal to badge snobs. Cant say thats why most people buy BMWs though.
Cars that are 6 months from on sale date are not going to be on the show flow. I fail to see why people feel GM should not adhere to this rule just because they "need all the help they can get". GM has been generating more positive buzz recently than anytime in my memory. They are not fully recovered but they are on the way. Putting the CTS show car on the floor would mean nothing. The car isnt for sale so why would CAdillac tease people at autoshows?
I've been to the NYAS several times and its so crowded that almost every display area is mobbed. I didnt find BMW's area to me any more crowded than other luxury brands.
ED invoice (Munich pickup): $27,720
so ED cap cost w/ $1000 profit to dealer: $28,720
residual: 73% for 12k/yr
MF: 0.00125 for 24 or 36-mo lease
A decent lease caculator would show $276.63/mo based on these numbers.
BTW, there is one thing going for Hyundai Sonata in comparison to BMW 3 series though: Sonata is a midsized car whereas the 3 series is a compact. A more approriate entry for comparison in the Hyundai lineup would be Elantra.
And they would have a hard time explaining the theory to the professional drivers who won road races in RSX's and Integras against several generations of 3 series cars.
Don't talk about any car you don't feel belongs here. Do talk about any car you do feel belongs here, within reasonable parameters of course.
What seems senseless to me, as I tried to say earlier, is wasting bandwidth and keystrokes telling other people what doesn't belong. Ignore the cars you feel are not part of this segment and tell us what you like or don't like about the cars you do find relevant. It's easy enough to do, trust me.
And let me be clear: I'm talking to everyone, not to any individual poster.
This is getting really annoying...
By the way, FYI, last year in the Atlanta Auto Show the Saturn Aura was on the display and wasn't yet in the dealership but they have allowed people to checkout the interior one by one under supervision. That, my friend, should be the way to go. Last I checked, Saturn is also part of GM just like Caddy is right?
Somewhat agree about appeal but consider that Suzuki sells cars too. They are clearly inferior to their main competitors, yet people buy them. Heck the largest producer of cars in the world makes awful vehicles... quality and quantity sold are rarely connected.
Also, ALL ED cars are subject to a boost in mf of 0.0003. So the real MF is 0.00155.
Finally MSRP went up March first by $200 - $190 on ED cars and shipping is now $775.
At 3257 pounds, the 6MT TSX is quite a bit lighter than a 328 - by several hundred pounds. It's a featherweight compared to the TL, G35, IS350, CTS and 335i.
We could always combine the IS350 and IS250 into one entry...
Yeah, why's that both 3-series and C-class has one entry but the IS has 2?
If you let potential customers "see and feel" a new offering well before it is available, my guess it will just add to the potential for those customers to come back just a little bit closer to a future sale. As opposed to just getting a far away look.
Why do something different than everyone else?
But I assume GM is being arrogant as usual. I am used to that now.
Regards,
OW
It's called satisfaction.
Called BMW Customer Relations after I dropped the car off on Monday. Relayed info concerning the issues I had with my 328xi. Here is a review,
1. Took delivery of new 2007 328xi Loaded Sticker 45,000.
on Dec. 27
2. Jan. 6 in shop till Jan. 22 for valvetronic and relay
3. Jan 24 back in shop till Feb. 5 for a new DME
4. Feb. 16 to Feb. 17 for oil sensor
5. March 19 to March 20 Software issue
Molly at customer relations was unbelievable she understood my utter frustration with this car, she spoke to dealer and regional rep. Tuesday afternoon I get a call from my servive rep that regional approved taking back the car and getting me into a new one. Going today to order. Thank You
Molly and BMW North America.
Yes, this unit was a lemon, but corporate made the right decision. Let me know if this would be the case with, say a CTS, gone bad.
Regards,
OW
I drove the G35 and E90 back-to-back, and I can confidently say that the Infiniti is a lesser machine. But if you don't believe me, then just try to find ONE magazine columnist that has reviewed these cars and stated that any one of them drives better than the 3-series.
"If they were clearly inferior they wouldnt be selling."
They sell because they have more buttons on the dashboard for less money.
"They appeal to plenty of people, just not BMW fans."
They appeal to plenty of people, just not uncompromising driving enthusiasts.
"I am much more into driving than the majority of people who drive BMWs."
Really, I know several hundred people who disagree...
Does that make sense?
... two items were missed in your example: $695 destination charge and $625 lease inception fee (assuming rolled-in). My calculation based on:
- $28,415 ED invoice for base 328i sedan 6MT no option
- $1,000 dealer profit + $625 lease fee
- zero cap cost reduction
- single security deposit
- 2 yr / 12k miles lease
- MF .00125 + 0.0003 for ED
- 73% residual
Using lease calculator from leaseguide.com the monthly payment comes to $354.55 with 7.75% sales tax. The March price bump probably adds $2 or $3 to the payment.
In addition, doing ED for a base model may not worth it because there is not that much price gap with US prices, especially nowadays you can get the 328i for around $500 over invoice at local dealers. When you factor in the travel cost for ED and one month payment without your car (overall 2 months without car but BMWFS pays for the second month), the true monthly cost is about $400/month, which you can get from dealer lots without too much haggle.
Again, I agree that the 328i lease deal is very attractive, but it can't be had for $277/mo with no cap cost reduction. IMO, the $123 (44%) difference is significant for cost comparison purpose.
Is ED mf boosted by 0.0003 or 0.003? That's a sizable difference considering the vanishingly small base numbers that we are talking about :-)
So, the coveted CTS is off limits in an Auto SHOW! No show, NO GO!
I believe you can place orders on cars at the show. I am sure GM will not/did not take any orders for this new mega-car. To priceless! Might as well leave it a concept.
Regards,
OW
Of course, personally I agree with you that a loaded car is even better deal with ED; personally nothing short of a 335i convertible is really worth my time taking the trip (I'm actually planning on picking up two cars to make flying the Mrs worth it) . . . but we have to compare the cheapest deals avaiable just for the sake of argument.
Delivery time for east coast is one month, and BMWFS pays for that one month. $400/mo is worse deal than what BMW advertises on its own website. I'm sure if you are willing to over-pay, say $100,000 for a Sonata, the dealer won't haggle with you much either ;-)
As for the 3-series vs. Sonata cost discussion? Are you guys serious?!!! :confuse: