Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Less than one week after I got it (July 2001), a large nut fell from a tree while I was driving and put a small indention in the roof, right in front of the sunroof. No paint was chipped, so it wasn't too bad.
Four weeks ago, I was driving on the Interstate when all of the sudden a spray of some sort hit my windshield. Wipers wouldn't remove it. When I got home, I looked and saw what looked like black paint spots splattered across my grille, hood, windshield, and side mirrors. I cannot remove these spots, and they are all over the front of the car. Someone said it could have been tar, but I suspect paint - don't know how it would hve gotten in the air on an interstate highway.
Last week, while driving on the Interstate again, I was following a few cars in the left lane when a huge piece of a truck tire tread came at me from under the car in front of me - it looked like the entire tread from an 18-wheeler tire, folded in half. I couldn't avoid it and chose to straddle it the best I could. When I got home, I checked under the car and everything was fine (Hyundai did a great job in making the underside of the GT fairly flat). However, the front end sustained some scars from the tire impact. There are several black smears across the bumper as well as some deep cuts (probably tire belt ends) in the lower front panel.
Sigh!
Being new to the US South myself (Houston) I can't say I am impressed in the least with the detritus that is on the freeways and the mess that can damage one's property, such as the paint-like substance that sprayed your car.
Then there is the garbage that people like to fling out of their windows ...
Yikes!
Well, at least we are most of the time. A few weeks ago I accidentally left my sunroof open overnight and it rained! I was just sick! My poor baby! To think what could have happened! I'm just not used to having a sunroof I guess.
Fortunately is was just a light rain and I was able to quickly and thoroughly towel-dry the leather. Then the next day I followed up with a leather cleaner/conditioner. Everything still looks and smells like brand new. Leather is the best interior for a car and I don't think I'll be able to live without it ever again.
A little wiser,
Jacky
Goes to the dealer tomorrow. Will post the results when I get back.
"My airbag light has come on a few times while I'm driving. Wondering if anyone else has had that happen. My clock hasn't come on a few times either lately."
Did you have the underbody of the car washed at a car wash?
The reason I ask this is that sometimes the powerful jets shooting straight up can wet your electrical connections and cause a short. This goes away after the engine has had a chance to thoroughly dry out -- say a day or two. I have had this flickering clock experience with my Grand Caravan. Otherwise, the clock works just fine.
Sorry to hear about your interior getting wet but chalk it up to another learning experience, eh?
Yes, leather is easy to live with and care for. I believe that the trick is to keep it conditioned, or else it will get dried out and cracked up with age. The steering wheel is not to be overlooked either. Mine is getting shiny, and I will have to wash/condition it soon.
I picked up my 02 in late December and now have 2991 on the ODO. I'll be taking her in for her first oil change today. I haven't decided if I'm going to the dealer or not. I guess it depends if they can get me in 'cuz it has to be done today. We'll see.
As to the GT's manual saying not to use leather conditioners, I'm wondering if it has something to do with the lower grade of leather used in Hyundais. I've heard from furniture people that the finer quality leathers have a smoother surface and are more supple, but are more delicate. All thing being equal, the lower quality leathers are a lot tougher (great for those of us with kids!) and maybe don't benefit as much from leather conditioners. I did use the Lexol on the steering wheel though, and it really helped to reduce the hard, slippery feel.
Thanks
Jim
Consumer Reports did an article on auto polish in their November 2000 issue that had some good general info and some recommendations. I've never been a huge fan of CR's auto reviews, (they never met a Volvo they didn't drool on) but their tests of smaller consumer products are usually quite helpful. Here's the gist of their recommendations:
"If a shiny finish is your paramount concern, first consider Zymol CleanerWax liquid and Nu Finish Car Polish paste. But be prepared to make some compromises. The cleaning ability of both products was so-so, and Zymol's durability was just middling. Also, the Nu Finish tended to scratch or haze somewhat, a problem especially with dark-colored cars. The Zymol is also quite expensive, at $16 a pint. The Nu Finish costs about $6.20 for a 14-ounce can.
Among the high-rated polishes, the Prestone Bullet Wax, about $7.25, and Armor All Car Wax, about $5.55, lasted the longest. But neither one quite matched the gloss that the Zyml and Nu Finish paste produced. The Armor All scratched or hazed more than most."
IMHO, the most important thing about waxing your car is doing it regularly. Better to have cheap wax on the car than none at all.
Frankly, I'm shocked to see a Hyundai featured in AutoWeek, and I'm almost having a stroke seeing two of our favorite cars given such a high profile in a magazine that I've enjoyed and respected for years.
Now, as long as our friendly dealers don't raise the prices along with the newly raised journalistic profile... aw, who am I kidding? They'll try to jack the prices up.
Autoweek has mentioned the GT before only in passing. Good to see a full review. I hope to get my copy by the weekend. The new Tiburon gets 4 pages and we get 1? The 2003 Tib does deserve the coverage, nice design.
Next week Motorweek will review the 2003 Honda Civic Si. I cant wait till they get to the 0-60 times and its the same as the Elantra GT. Even with 160 hp its a little too heavy
2001 Elantra GT
PIAA Xtreme White low beam
K&N Filtercharger
B&M short shift kit
I test drove a Suzuki Aerio last night and it's 2.0L 141hp 4-banger is noisy and annoying (both in sound and feel) at all speeds, which really killed it for me. I'm hoping the Elantra GT will be better.
"How do people find the engine sound?"
I like the sound actually. The car is generally a quiet car, and the engine is quite refined with a smooth quiet idle. When pushed hard, there is a valve in the exhaust that opens up and allows for a freer flow, and this results in a more aggressive sound. Get it up to 5000 rpm or so, and it really sounds nice!
Cruising at 70 mph (115 kph) it is pretty quiet. See more reviews linked to my Elantra GT website at:
http://www.gwebworks.com/elantra_gt/
The Elantra is a much nicer looking car than the Aerio, and I bet you will be far more impressed by another of its strong suits -- its handling.
"When pressed it does get very noisy. Maybe that is one of the reasons people give when comparing the refinement of the GT to its Japanese competition. The GT is noisier when pressed."
Well I don't know. There is noise and there is a "racket". Some [exhaust] noises are nice, and most performance cars have exhaust notes that are tuned not only for performance, but also for the sound it makes.
The Elantra GT does a great job of being nice and quiet when it needs to and being somewhat growly when you wind it up. It befits the GT badge.
Way to go Hyundai! It's interesting that they are again looking at a N.A. manufacturing plant - the last one was in Sherbrooke, Quebec I think.
I am just graduating college and am looking to buy a new car. I am very interested in the GT, because it is a very well equipped car for the money (I won't need to sell my soul to a bank to get it, just my left arm). I have a Subaru Legacy sedan right now, but want something a little more youthful, and something that I can put miles on without being too concerned about the warranty expiring, due to miles. I have several questions about this car, and I would GREATLY appreciate any answers, help, or advice that any of you could offer.
1. Is the traction control very helpful in the snow/bad weather.
2. Any major reliability problems?
3. Is it easily upgradeable (I would consider upgrading the stereo, K+N filter, spoiler, new alloys, etc.) and are the upgrade products readily available?
4.Since this would be my first manual, is it an easy manual to learn, and after I learn, is it smooth to drive?
5. Is the manual quicker than the auto? (I drove the auto, and it seemed a little sluggish.)
Thank you in advance for any help you can provide.
Rich
Seriously, it is a fun car to drive and it holds its own in the luxury appointments as well with cars costing thousands more. I have the traction control and ABS and used them both during the winter. They work as advertised. Have over 20,000 great miles on an automatic. I test drove a manual and thought it was easy to drive but needed a car fast and wanted the traction control and the ABS which I could only find on an automatic at the time. Good luck!
>1. Is the traction control very helpful in the snow/bad weather.
Others who have had the chance to use it have said so. I have not personally had that experience being in Houston.
> Any major reliability problems?
Based on previous Elantras I have had and also on comments from others and in the literature, there are no reliability problems -- major or otherwise. This is a very reliable and successful car for Hyundai -- their best-seller actually. The GT is a step up, although it uses the same platform.
> 3. Is it easily upgradeable (I would consider upgrading the stereo, K+N filter, spoiler, new alloys, etc.) and are the upgrade products readily available?
Yes. There are many sites on the Internet which showcase what people are doing to sport-tune Elantras and Accents. The aftermarket might not be as accommodating as for Hondas and Acuras and so forth, but there are quite a few performance products to be had. All of the parts you mention above are easily available right now.
> 4.Since this would be my first manual, is it an easy manual to learn, and after I learn, is it smooth to drive?
One of the best manuals made by Hyundai and on par with anything Japanese, IMO. The clutch is light and smooth so it would be easy for you to get it right after a bit of practice.
> 5. Is the manual quicker than the auto? (I drove the auto, and it seemed a little sluggish.)
With *very few* exceptions, the manual transmission in most cars is always quicker than the automatic version. This i not exception. I expect there to be a 2 second difference in 0-60 times. The difference would be a bit smaller in the 1/4 mile.
For more information, visit my Elantra GT website
http://www.gwebworks.com/elantra_gt/
The article that others have mentioned on this forum can be read at
http://www.autoweek.com/cat_content.mv?port_code=autoweek&cat_code=reviews&content_code=01329730
It is one of the most condescending articles I have seen about this car, and I have read pretty much all of the reviews out there.
When one reads this "review" and the others I have linked to on my page, it is easy to see which one is the "oddball".
I'm happy to report that my GT has reached the 3000 mile mark and it's lifetime mpg is up to 31 mpg. Of course I drive like an old granny around town, except for a top speed run I made last week. Got it up to 115 mph before traffic came up (Rather quickly as you might imagine. Wish those pedestrians would stay off the sidewalk). I don't recommend that kind of activity and I probably won't go that fast again, but the car seemed relatively stable at that speed. I've heard talk of an engine governor that kicks in at 115, but I guess I didn't go quite fast enough to experience it.
"How did the PBS people over at Motorweek manage to get a 8.0 second 0-60 out of the 5spd GT, when it took the Autoweek enthusiasts 9.0?"
Good question, although I believe the MotorWeek numbers based on the fact that I saw the show and heard John Davis say the 0-60 time, so it is not just a typo on the website. Also, I have seen other reviews where they quote 9+ second times, meaning that ability to do a proper acceleration run (or series of runs) varies from person to person, technique to technique.
MotorWeek, IMO, gives fair reviews of the vehicles that it test drives and does not bring preconceptions to the table the way AutoWeek seems to have done.
Lets just be glad, as Hyundai Elantra GT owners, that Consumer Reports don't do the acceleration numbers. Their well-known bias along with their questionable technical ability would certainly see even slower elapsed times. Just my $0.02...
Thanks in advance
I been subscribing to Autoweek for years and I have to agree that the GT review was one of the most biased I have read. Its like he made his mind up before the review. I insist my engine is not raucus and loud above 4000 rpm. Whats noise to one person is a song to another.
They also said that the new Tiburon weights 3028 pounds. Wow is that baby heavy. Where did they put the weight?
Yes. Because it is a Hyundai. Hyundai is still shorted by some auto journalists. I thought Edmunds review of the 2003 Tiburon focused too much on subjective criticism on cosmetics i.e. the headlights were overdone etc.
Too often a review of a Hyundai product ends with "it does not reach the refinement of its Japanese counterparts..." or "Hyundai is a step closer to being taken seriously." Blah, blah, blah. Step closer my rear end. They are there. I would take a GT over any other car under 17K out there. And I would even take the Hyundai over some cars costing more than 18K.
I grew up and lived in N Ohio and S Michigan for over 40 years before coming to CA, and I can tell you two things: my Dad was UAW and I subscribed to AutoWeek for a very long time. While my Dad and his buddies tolerated European "automobiles" they despised Asian "cars," and when AutoWeek first started to give any real press to Hondas, Nissans, and Toyotas, there was a lot of hell to pay for some of the AutoWeek staff.
A number of those early AutoWeek pieces on Japanese cars were pretty condescending, and my Dad's UAW brethern were still steamed that the cars were even in the magazine. Now AutoWeek regularly uses Japanese "automobiles" as the standard of quality.
So, while it's true that the Tiburon and the GT (especially) got less than objective coverage, I'm stoked that they got covered at all. I've already voted three times with my dollars for Korean Hyundais, so I don't need AutoWeek to tell me anything, but I do like to be able to tell my gearhead friends, "Yeah, the Tiburon and the Elantra GT were featured in AutoWeek--FOUR pages for the Tibby, plus the cover." They respond, "Really?" I say, "Yeah, really. AutoWeek took Hyundais seriously enough to drive them, what the heck is stopping you?"
So far, three accepted the challenge. One bought a 5-speed 2001 Tiburon and will be making SharkRacing some money, and another just brought home an Elantra GT instead of the Mazda his wife wanted. Once they try the cars, the value and quality equation speaks for itself.
"Once they try the cars, the value and quality equation speaks for itself."
I think that is the whole problem with some people and their attitudes towards today's Hyundais. They are _scared_ to try one because if they do, they would be very surprised, pleased and shocked -- all at the same time. Then the value and warranty will kick into the equation, and the left side of the brain will tell them that it just doesn't make sense to buy something else. And if they end up buying this Hyundai, what will their "conventional-wisdom" friends think ... they will be subject to ridicule and have to defend themselves, etc ...
Nah ... better to leave them Hyundais alone, and not try any of them, in case it up and bites their wallet. Scared, I say. ;-)
We know better.
This functionality lives in the "consumer opinions" area of the new vehicle detail page, and allows users to rate a vehicle on a number of different criteria (1 to 10 scale), as well as add his/her own free-form comments.
Here's a direct link to the 2002 GT Elantra Consumer Ratings & Reviews. Also, if you own a GT Elantra, we look forward to seeing your review there. ;-)
Revka
Host
Hatchbacks & Station Wagons Boards
"I just plain love this car!". The third review says: "I'd give it a 4.5 if the scale allowed" for
a very positive review, which seems to indicate the author is looking at a 1-5 scale.
Also, the last review is for an Elantra GLS sedan, not a GT hatchback.
Erik
Revka
Host
Hatchbacks & Station Wagons Boards