Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
New S40/V50
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
This coupled w/ the S40 T5 running on all season tires is probably why the "tuned for speed" comment was made.
My R is "tuned for speed" yet handles bad weather very well. Obviously, if you live in Colorado you may want to invest in snow tires no matter what you drive.
On the Original OSD purchase order, the letter head is Volvo Car Corporation, which is Sweden.
Also, on page 2 there are instructions for wire transfers directly to Sweden. The OSD dept runs out of Volvo headquarters in Irvine CA, and uses VCNA's facilities. Does VCNA get something out of this? Yes. But they are not the importer. You the owner are. The cars MSO(Manufacturers statement of Origin) will have your name, not VCNA's on it.
All of our new cars have VCNA's name in the MSO.
Both over bumps & fwy.
My immediate impression from the back seat of the S40 sport is the that I don't want this car due to the tight-ride alone so the test drive's over. The Mazda3 only rides a tad worse w/ a little more harshness & quicker rebound. Then as I floored the 2.4 5-cyl onto the fwy, the 5-cyl growls in an agonizing way compare to 6-cyl's. As abrupt lane changes were done at 60 mph & lower speeds, the rear tire grip was absolutely unaffected, unlike the Mazda3.
Then as I switched to the T-5 std(only $2050 more than the 2.4i sport), the engine worked far less hard &, therefore, less noisy. The power curve change/lag is not obvious like the Passat 1.8 turbo's "2-stage feeling", & is not even easy to pin point where exactly the "stairway change" is, but rather, a fairly gradual change. So there seems to be enough time for the driver to adjust the throttle even w/ stick shift.
The ride is more tolerable & reasonable, but still not a deep feeling like the C240 Sport. No Focus ever provided a deep long-travel feeling before anyway.
The handling is actually fine w/o the sport suspension. It's not like when you push it hard the roll/pitch will happen instantly & use up the travel, since the car remains stable w/ all the body movements still in slow motion so you have time to adjust.
Overall, this car wins my heart pretty well, as it does everything pretty well. & I believe the driving position/posture & the seat played a big roll. But I still suspect that, in order to compete w/ the non-sport 325i's handling & ride comfort, the S40 needs the sport suspension's handling & the std suspension's ride comfort.
Quietness on the concrete fwy seems ok & above average.
Ventilation noise is reasonable if you disperse the outlets, & changing to the recirculate-mode does not blast loudly like typical cheaper Japanese cars do.
Steering wise, I didn't notice anything. In other words, neither good nor bad, neither too quick or too slow, neither brimming w/ feeling nor numb, & works pretty intuitively. The 325i's steering doesn't have that much more feel, at least in routine handling. But I didn't test the "at the limit" feel, as I only barely squealed the tires cornering both S40's.
I believe the 16" T-5 std(w/o sport suspension) is the best S40 combo.
Premium sound system is already nearly $900, & the factory subwoofer, available as dealer-install only, costs another $1100! So I was advised to find aftermarket alternative. What I hate about the Volvo system is the lack of adjustable mid-range besides the std bass/treble. The Mazda3 does but premium upgrade isn't available at least for '04.
I am wondering about the following statements though, and wondering if you could clarify them:
"As abrupt lane changes were done at 60 mph & lower speeds, the rear tire grip was absolutely unaffected, unlike the Mazda3.", Does this mean the rear end held on BETTER than the Mazda3? I've found the Mazda's grip to be very good.
"Then as I switched to the T-5 std(only $2050 more than the 2.4i sport), the engine worked far less hard &, therefore, less noisy. The power curve change/lag is not obvious like the Passat 1.8 turbo's "2-stage feeling", & is not even easy to pin point where exactly the "stairway change" is, but rather, a fairly gradual change. So there seems to be enough time for the driver to adjust the throttle even w/ stick shift." Were you able to find out the engagement point in the RPMs for the turbo,a and if so, what is it? Likely, since you were driving the stick, you managed to keep the RPMs high enough to keep the turbo engaged full-time. I wonder if an auto would be different?
Sounds like you started off hating the car, and then ended up changing your mind. Exactly what about the car made you do so?
I think one reason the std 325i never won my heart is b/c the shape of the seat & driving position, as I have to re-contour myself to fit this Beemer. The Volvo adjusts for my body, even the fixed headrest isn't too far off from Beemer's nice adjustable one. I just checked w/ the BMW parts -- you need to spend $2500 to buy ONE power sport cloth seat to include the lumber feature, albeit a good one w/ 4 ways.
Road-holding very high, & very good even on uneven surface. But this zoom-zoom tuning is too neutral that it even oversteers. Every time I made an abrupt lane change, the 3S, w/ both 16" & 17", always broke loose the tail a little.
Yes, the S40's rear end held on BETTER than the Mazda3. None of today's S40's got the optional $695 DSC.
The only time I oversteered-some in the S40 was when I did the maniac provoking of the DSC in the wet during the All Access drive.
"Were you able to find out the engagement point in the RPMs for the turbo,a and if so, what is it?"
Not really, that's why it didn't seem obvious.
"Likely, since you were driving the stick, you managed to keep the RPMs high enough to keep the turbo engaged full-time. I wonder if an auto would be different?"
The only turbo stick I tried was at the All Access drive. There was a one-time "2nd-stage power curve" being added way after I took off from stop. & nothing like that happened for the rest of the 60-second lap(all in 2nd gear).
Today's auto car, as I repeatly lift off the throttle to search for the lag/boost-built-up-time, only shows a gradual change of some sort, fairly vaguely.
Does the Volvo feel like the Mazda and Focus, or does it feel like a Volvo-tuned car that perhaps may be using a supplied chassis?
The S40 sport has a fairly tight tuning, although still free from harshness, as if it's the std sport tuning from everywhere such as the '91 Sentra SE-R but w/ longer springs. Getting a Mazda3 isn't too much different from the S40 sport, either.
The T-5's std suspension is the non-Japanese "everything's in slow motion" type of fun, as if you always have time to think & decide whatever next you want to play. ;-)
For example, what happen when you add more front sway bar to restrict the front body roll? The car dissipates that energy as MORE understeer. Ditto the rear w/ the swaybar change. So as you make VERY abrupt lane change on the S40's std suspension & the body starts to roll slowly AND continuously. & before that travel stroke stops, you already finished the transition & corrected the steering back the other way to straighten the car. The whole process never pushed the the tires in any way, as if the elastic-but-still-calm suspension took the beating forces! Sure, you can't operate the car at the higher limit the sport suspension allows, but you actually got time to decide how you can provoke the car & choose different combinations while your passengers are being entertained by the comfortable & smooth transition that's also as fun like some sort of the mild amusement-park rides.
npaladin2000 Apr 11, 2004 4:03am
"Creakid, we already know your suspension preferences run closer to Buick than Mazda. "
I drove a Buick Regal from the '90's several times, &, no, I don't like its ride comfort at all. This FWD Buick didn't have much spring travel & there's not much STABLE slow motion to play around.
The C240's non-lowered sport suspension fits my taste a whole lot more than Buick's, although might still oscillate a little too much if I push it hard.
Since the 2.4i's 5-cyl isn't silent enough, the T-5 engine seems to be a must for a compact luxury. That's why it's available w/o the sport suspension(a $750 difference including the pretty 17" wheels).
I am hesitant to contradict your statements, but...
OSD is run by Volvo Cars of North America.
See the quotes from the Volvo Cars of North America, LLC corporate site:
"Chicago, IL (February, 2004) --- For the first time ever, Volvo Cars of North America, LLC (VCNA) reports that its Overseas Delivery program outpaced the competition by a significant margin. With 2028 deliveries for 2003, Volvo topped second ranking BMW by 280 units, Mercedes-Benz by 1256 cars and Saab by 1956 deliveries. Year over year, the program has grown an astonishing 22.3 percent."
Also:
VCNA is not just an importer fo the Volvo it's a part of the Volvo Cars of Sweden. See quote from the same site:
"Volvo Cars of North America, LLC is part of the Volvo Car Corporation of Göteborg, Sweden. The company provides marketing, sales, parts, service, technology and training support to Volvo automobile retailers in the United States, Canada, Mexico and Puerto Rico."
You provide a lot valuable advises to the readers of this site, but please keep the facts straight.
Regards,
Lev.
"the ride on the open highway can be a little busy, especially on less than perfect concrete highways. On smoother asphalt, the S40 is quiet and comfortable. I'm perfectly willing to admit that this complaint could be the result of a personal bias toward soft-riding highway cruisers, but the fact remains there are cars like the Acura TSX that offer both sharp handling and excellent highway manners"
The TSX has an interesting tuning. It rides superficially plush due to extra-soft bushings(softer than Euro Accord's) and, therefore, misleadingly smooth most of the time. When the bumps are deeper than expansion joints, the vertical jolts coming through the TSX's taut-setting suspension into the passenger torso are more forceful than in the rather busy riding S40 sport & Mazda3. & by then, if you're not smart enough to figure it out, you'd probably still blame the road rather than the TSX's setting since the car is plush to begin with. No wonder French cars, which are deeply absorbent but not superficially plush, don't sell well in America. ;-)
Pretty much all the time, the slow-body-movement T-5 w/o sport suspension pampers the passengers more than the TSX for sure, although the TSX got the taut-&-long-travel suspension that has more capacity to take bumps during hard cornering better than just about anyone else.
I think the TSX would be an excellent car if they use firmer bushings to keep the tire-grip steering feel from completely washed out, & reduce some suspension tautness along w/ adding some slower rebound setting to relax the ride a bit. I think Acura's trying too hard to distinguish the TSX from the large Accord.
So you might wonder why not just get the Accord if you don't mind the extra length. I don't know. The Accord still drives relatively boring & still doesn't seem to have that Euro-style calm suspension movement for me to play around. I believe some old-style French cars are fun to play around not just for cornering over deep bumps, but to double as an off-road vehicle while riding calm! No wonder I saw Peugeot 504 sedans in some old video shot in Africa.
OSD is administered by Volvo Cars Sweden.
In their desire for sales #'s, VCNA last year started to count OSD cars towards their sales objectives.
VCNA has no direct responsibility for the OSD dept.
Yes, VCNA IS apart of Volvo, same way the say Volvo UK is. All that means is that I could sell a car for delivery in the UK and a salesperson in the UK could sell a car for delivery in the US.
One downer, may be a big one, anyone notice how low the rear exhaust tips sticked out below the rear bumper. Seems like you'd have to choose your parking lots wisely and make sure the exit doesn't have to much of a dropoff. Could scrape those off pretty quickly
Sorry, haven't gone through all of the posts, so maybe I'm re-iterating existing information.
I have an impression that you work at the Volvo Dealership. Is it true? It seems that you have some issues with the VCNA, as you constantly is trying to diminish it's position in the Volvo Car Corporation.
I would think, that VCNA has a major-major say there.
How about this fact?
"Ford taps N. American Volvo head as new Volvo chief
Source: Yahoo
DETROIT, June 6 (Reuters) - Ford Motor Co. (NYSE:F - news) on Tuesday named Volvo North American chief Hans-Olov Olsson as the new president and chief executive officer of the upscale Swedish car company, and set a goal of growing worldwide sales 50 percent by 2004.
Olsson, 58, takes over from Tuve Johannesson, who ran the Volvo Car Corp. since October 1995. Johannesson becomes vice chairman of the board. Ford, the world's No. 2 automaker, bought the Volvo car unit in March 1999.
Olsson said in an interview from Sweden his mission is to expand Volvo's worldwide sales volume from a projected 445,000 vehicles this year to 600,000 by 2004. At the same time, he will work to double the company's profitability from today's levels."
The VCNA, LLC is an organizational part of the VCC (Volvo Car Corporation) as well as Volvo Car UK, Ltd.
It's just one corporation with the divisions, controling major markets.
And the US market is, by far, the biggest Volvo market in the world.
My question to you is - Why do you want to separate the VCNA from the VCC?
(Same as I still can not get why do you want to separate the DSTC from STC and ABS?)
I also would like to have your e-mail, as it might be more comfortable for you and for me, if we can discuss some of the issues off-line.
lev_berkovich@hotmail.com
This brief test drive includes the so-so surface-quality streets & concrete fwy plus 3 lengthy speed bumps(not the short ones, though, unfortunately), which I did accelerate & braking plus cruising diagonally over each one of them. The T-5 std's ride is not just less taut than the TSX but also has that luxury Euro-style slow motion not found in the TSX, although might not have the ultimate depth of travel the TSX can eventually provide in some extreme situations.
your sort like the pink rabbit for that battery company when it comes to phrases that come out of left field. what's next?
It is still a compliment that these large TSX front seats are almost Volvo like. Ever wonder why even the 325i w/ better ride/handling/steering compromise doesn't seem to win my heart as well as this new S40? I think it's because the Volvo lets me sit like a king.
$319/mo
48 mo lease. $0 due at signing. $0 security deposit. $0.18 per mi over 12k mi/yr.
4th yr & post-36k-mi maintenance not included.
Compare to last weeks advertised '04 325i auto(MSRP under $30200) lease:
$299/mo(x 35)
36 mo lease. $2528 due at signing including $350 security deposit. $0.20(?) per mi over 10k mi/yr.
All 4 yrs of maintenance included including wiper blades & brake pads.
Both cars are quite comparable if you equip the S40 w/ the quiet-enough-to-compete turbo engine & DSC, while the charcoal filter(std in 325i) is not available for N.A. at this moment. The 325i also has fog lights & audio controls on the steering wheel std, just like the S40 T5.
Our 325i w/ MSRP of under $31200 to be built has optional pwr seats w/ memory, which is only available on the S40 if you also get the turbo, leather & moonroof at MSRP of under $30400 including DSC. In the U.S., the 325i neither offers fabric interior nor available w/ lumbar adjustment, which might be seriously lacking according to BMW owners.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '08 Charger R/T Daytona; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '08 Maser QP; '11 Mini Cooper S
I do work for Volvo, and so I am fully aware of who works for who, and more importantly who reports to whom.
Fact is, VCNA and Volvo Sweden don't always see eye to eye on alot of issues.
They operate as separate entities without the ability to do much to influence the other.
I'm not going to sit here and go into huge detail, I hope you'll take my word for it.
As for the ABS,DSTC,STC discussion. They are separate components that don't always influence each other. They have separate tasks and responsibilities.
Again, speaking directly with the engineers we sometimes get a different explanation than you get from the PR hacks who write the website.
Sorry for any confusion
Just as an FYI, I am an engineer, and happend to become familiar with the corporate law and general relationships.
Some of your answers did strike me as a typical PR pep talk, and, sorry for having that opinion, not quite factual. That's it.
But, I am quitting. The continuation of this discussion does not have any value.
I am not confused, I just use that word as a manner of speech.
Volvos have impressive seats in being ultra plush yet supportive, excellent fit and finish, better than Mercedes. Saabs are close, Lexus have good seats as well. The new 5 series BMWs aren't bad, though firmer. Audis are good also. The big Volvos hold their own, the new s40, IMO, doesn't work that well inside.
Sounds like a good news to me! So when is the rebate coming out? ;-) One Passat advertised at $17988 on the newspaper w/ std height & lumbar adjustment on both front seats! & the new S40 is only roomy enough to compete w/ the new '05 Jetta V!
The best kept secret is that only I noticed the high door armrest height that lets me postured like a king when driving -- something the S60(& everyone else except the C-class & S-Type) lacks!
On the cover sez "How Volvo's all-new S40 crushes rivals" & eventually ranked 1st place ahead of the Honda. But I don't see why, since they couldn't find any single reason to bash this Honda other than more road noise on the express way than the S40 & rides too harsh at low speed. Otherwise, it sounds like this Honda beats everyone else hands down.
The 9-3 loses big time "With vague steering, Saab handling offers very little involvement" "...while body roll is well controlled in the corners, the damping is not up to Volvo or Honda standards, and over uneven roads the 9-3 takes longer to settle and displays far more vertical movement. Unfortunately, the low-speed ride is also harsh...In short, the Saab is not as involving as the Honda, nor as refined and effortless as the Volvo."
So the Volvo is not as involving as the Honda!
& "New Focus platform gives livelier handling than is usual for Volvo models", that's not saying much!
"While it retains the good grip levels of its bigger brothers, the S40 is more adjustable and fun, and won't disappoint enthusiastic drivers.", ok, doesn't sound bad.
"It may not have the steering sharpness of the Accord, but it turns in positively and displays very little body roll in the corners. Furthermore, the more precise handling has not come at the expense of refinement, as superb damping ensures that the S40 remains very composed on undulating A-roads. The low-speed ride quality is impressive, and on the motorway the Swede is very well insulated, although the ride does become slightly more jittery and uneven." What does this mean? It's well insulated on the motorway as far as the noise goes, while the ride is a little unsteady due to excessive softness for the amount suspension travel available? Sounds like this base-model S40 is not equipped w/ the sport suspension despite wearing these alloys, as "The low-speed ride quality is impressive" does not apply to the N.A.-spec S40 w/ sport suspension I test drove.
(Honda)"Yet, in spite of the car's sporting orientation, it's a COMFORTABLE CRUISER and returned 28.2mpg in our hands. However, motorway refinement can't match the Volvo's, as there's more tyre noise." Again, they probably mean noise when describing the motorway insulation/refinement.
"Unfortunately, the low-speed ride is no rival, either, with the Japanese saloon unable to isolate rough or urban roads nearly as well.
But in every other respect Honda's engineers have done a fantastic job. With light but accurate steering, a nimble front end and LOTS of FEEDBACK, the Type-S feels like a hot hatch in saloon guise. Grip is excellent, too, and there's loads of feedback. The body control is also spot on and it remains exceptionally well COMPOSED AT SPEED, SOAKING UP BUMPS with EASE. Add in superb brakes and a snappy shift, and its rivals are nowhere near as much fun to drive."
Are they trying to tell you that this Honda rides steadier & better than the "slightly jittery and uneven" Volvo at speed on the motorway?
Sounds like, compare to the TSX, this softer-suspension but firmer-bushing Euro Accord w/ 16"s has more road noise & low speed harshness as well as steering feedback.
Our TSX's over-soft bushings to compensate for the std harsher 17" tires(to look cool) isn't worth trading off the steering-feedback. & despite free from harshness at any speed, that extra 10%-firmer suspension setting still rides too taut for comfort even at fwy speed.
This Brit report provides interesting & useful data. Sounds like the S40 T-5 w/ std suspension has the best balance of comfort vs driving fun. Can't wait to see it compare directly to the 325i std.
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/pic.mv?imagenum=5&num=1899
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame.mv?file=car.mv&num=1899
http://www.pbs.org/mpt/motorweek/search.shtml
click "Volvo 2004.5 S40" under "Recent Road Tests"
"Handling, with or without optional Electronic Stability Control, is a big improvement over the first S40. The strut front, rear multi-link suspension in Sport Package trim is European taut without being stiff. Body roll is modest, and while the electro-hydraulic STEERING LACKS ROAD FEEL, it does have a good weight to it. Like the powertrains, there is a much sportier, nimble feel with a low level of front plow, much like a good rear-wheel drive European sport sedan. But the price for that prowess is a car that transitions to oversteer quicker than most front drive sedans."
So, at least w/ the 17" sport package, there's enough oversteer for you to play with. I wonder if the std T-5 w/o sport suspension can stay neutral enough for fun?
MSN:
http://autos.msn.com/research/vip/jedlicka.aspx?make=Volvo&mo- - - del=S40%20(2004.5)
"...T5 to 60 mph in 6.7 seconds with the automatic transmission."
"While somewhat heavy, the QUICK STEERING lets a driver precisely place the car exactly where he wants it to go and provides GOOD ROAD FEEL. Handling is above-average, although the base sedan doesn't handle as sharply as the T5, with its firmer suspension. The ride—helped by the car's solid structure—is generally comfortable, but allows major road imperfections to be felt."
creakid1 Apr 11, 2004 3:43am
Like I said,
"Steering wise, I didn't notice anything. In other words, neither good nor bad, neither too quick or too slow, neither brimming w/ feeling nor numb, & WORKS PRETTY INTUITIVELY. The 325i's steering doesn't have that much more feel, at least in routine handling. But I didn't test the "at the limit" feel, as I only barely squealed the tires cornering both S40's."
Is that clear?
-juice
I'll concede that it is very, VERY difficult to make a tall boxy vehicle look good. Look at the BMW 1 series hatches.
-juice
The MX is actually 3 based...they need to tweak the styling a BIT but thay should give it the same "Mazda" look that the 3 and MPV share (and the Tribute and Truck are missing because they're not Mazdas...hehe)
Volvo V50 is long enough that it doesn't look stubby like that Bimmer does.
-juice
BTW, that's a good thing, cargo space is amazing.
It's like comparing a Vue to an Equinox, the Chevy has a much longer wheelbase but the squared off Vue looks just as roomy.
-juice
http://apps.volvocars.us/V50/specs.asp
I'm 58 now - so I have to look at long term planning - does anyone have any suggestions on how to make a decision. I am looking at the new S40.2005 as a replacement.
Thanks for any info....Michelle
Safety and utility have come a very long way since your GL was new. You don't have to buy a Volvo to get both. The number of good choices is almost endless - pick up a copy of the April issue of Consumer Reports, which is currently on the newsstands, and read it from cover to cover, carefully. You will see dozens of choices that are going to be more comfortable, reliable, safe, and enjoyable than the car you are currently driving. You can almost close your eyes and point in the family sedan category that is characterized by the Accord, Camry, Mazda6, etc. If you must have a complete airbag package, your choices are more limited, but CU spells out what your choices are there, too.
The point is that IF you can afford an S40, then you have a wide variety of choices, any one of which is going to seem like paradise compared with an '84 GL. If you can't, there are a number of new cars priced $10k less that will still be a huge improvement over every aspect of the car you're in now. If you can afford $2000-$4000 a year in initial depreciation [for the first few years], you're better off buying new. Otherwise look for a good certified used car - CU can help you make a choice there, as well.
If you don't mind getting a used '98 Lexus LS400 w/ reasonably small turning circle not much larger than your old Volvo... It's also a reliable car that pampers you.
But then a brand-new 4-cyl Accord assembled in Japan is very well built, reasonably comfortable & easy to drive.
To slow down the engine wear by several folds, after the first 10k miles, start using Prolong oil additive every time with the 0W-40 Mobil-1 synthetic oil. Synthetic oils are also good for those of you who drive too few miles per year.
A worn engine floods deposit on the catalytic converter to fail the smog-test even worse! Then frequent replacement of the catalytic converter also costs $.
Also use the Prolong transmission additive for the transmission to last.
If the car still doesn't last a very very long time, then it's a poorly engineered car.
A van is a like a bus w/ high floor. Ever wonder why the '05 Dodge mini van's seats can disappear into the floor? Even some of today's rear-engine city buses don't have high floor like our old school bus, since there's no drive shaft running from the front.
Even the new Civic provides a low FLAT floor. So as long as the vehicle is FWD, there's no excuse raising the floor height & thus the center of gravity to turn the car into an SUV-like loser! Even w/ the 3-point-star badge, the A-class Mercedes compact couldn't get away from tipping over when avoiding a moose. Why? 'cause it's got floor high enough to store batteries underneath. Mercedes than had to add ESP plus cutting down the body roll by stiffen the suspension & ruined the ride comfort. This car never made it to the U.S. shore, but the next A-class w/ lower center-of-gravity might.
Lately, I discovered that the much more expensive new RX330 SUV cannot absorb the speed bumps as well as the C230 sedan!
This Mazda4's folded seats already cleared the bottom of the rear-hatch opening. So it's really a wagon, not a van. Remember the '76 Olds/Buick full-size wagon w/ all 3 rows of seats facing forward?
click "2004 Mazda3" under "Recent Road Tests"
With only 5 gears:
“2004 Mazda3
Engine 2.3-liter twin-cam 4-cylinder
Horsepower 160
Torque 150 lb feet
0-60 mph 7.7 seconds
1/4 mile 16.1 seconds @ 90 mph
60-0 mph 118 feet
EPA Mileage 25 mpg city
32 mpg highway
MotorWeek's
mileage loop 27 mpg
mixed city/highway”
“The Mazda3's front MacPherson strut/rear multi-link suspension was developed by Ford. It gives the 3 an extremely tight, nimble feel. Turn-in is quick, grip impressive, and balance superb. There's almost no front push or plow, and very little body roll. The power rack-and-pinion STEERING is very precise, delivering HIGH LEVEL OF FEEDBACK. It's an impressive performance, and well above the levels of the Protege and its competitors.”
Compare to the Volvo sibling also wearing sport suspenion & 17"s, I wonder why? Could it be Mazda's firmer bushings?
(S40 T-5)“Handling, with or without optional Electronic Stability Control, is a big improvement over the first S40. The strut front, rear multi-link suspension in Sport Package trim is European taut without being stiff. Body roll is modest, and while the electro-hydraulic STEERING LACKS ROAD FEEL, it does have a good weight to it. Like the powertrains, there is a much sportier, nimble feel with a low level of front plow, much like a good rear-wheel drive European sport sedan. But the price for that prowess is a car that transitions to oversteer quicker than most front drive sedans.”
“2004.5 Volvo S40
Engine 2.5-liter twin-cam I-5
Horsepower 218
Torque 236 lb feet
0-60 mph 6.9 seconds
1/4 mile 15.2 seconds @ 97 mph
60-0 mph 119 feet
EPA Mileage 25 mpg city
31 mpg highway
MotorWeek's
mileage loop 27 mpg
mixed city/highway”
“2004 Acura TSX
Engine 2.4-liter DOHC 4-cylinder
Horsepower 200
Torque 166 lb feet
0-60 mph 7.6 seconds
1/4 mile 15.9 seconds @ 90 mph
60-0 mph 126 feet
EPA Mileage 21 mpg city
29 mpg highway”
What a waste of (premium)gas! That’s why cars w/ weak low-end suck. Even though the S40 2.4i revs loudly like a vacumn cleaner, at least it doesn’t need to rev as often as the TSX or even the Mazda 3S.
mileage loop 27 mpg
mixed city/highway”
“The Mazda3's front MacPherson strut/rear multi-link suspension was developed by Ford. It gives the 3 an extremely tight, nimble feel. Turn-in is quick, grip impressive, and balance superb. There's almost no front push or plow, and very little body roll. The power rack-and-pinion STEERING is very precise, delivering HIGH LEVEL OF FEEDBACK. It's an impressive performance, and well above the levels of the Protege and its competitors.”
Compare to the Volvo sibling also wearing sport suspenion & 17"s, I wonder why? Could it be Mazda's firmer bushings?
"(S40 T-5)“Handling, with or without optional Electronic Stability Control, is a big improvement over the first S40. The strut front, rear multi-link suspension in Sport Package trim is European taut without being stiff. Body roll is modest, and while the electro-hydraulic STEERING LACKS ROAD FEEL, it does have a good weight to it. Like the powertrains, there is a much sportier, nimble feel with a low level of front plow, much like a good rear-wheel drive European sport sedan. But the price for that prowess is a car that transitions to oversteer quicker than most front drive sedans.” "
Maybe it is just the overall feel of Volvo vs. other cars. There's no reason why the Volvos steering should feel different *that* much different. Maybe it is just the way Volvo sets up suspensions that things subjectively feel filtered. I don't know. Maybe the Volvo actually has more road feel than the testers perceive. The Volvo is going for a different ride, less sporty. Like I said, Volvo is essentially a grand touring car, they don't really make sports sedans.
Mazda has stiffer bushings?
This T-5 is already w/ sport suspension & 17" wheels, not the regular touring T-5.
As I test drove the Mazda3, which has sport-tuned suspension std, w/ 16"s vs the S40 2.4i w/ sport suspension & 16"s, I found them both fairly similar except the Volvo has less harshness along w/ less road noise. So it's pretty obvious that the Volvo has softer bushings like the Focus II. Thank God the steering feedback didn't become completely washed out like the TSX.
Also, the Volvo's sport suspension has slightly less abrupt rebound in the shock setting than the Mazda3, which always bounces right back after each bump as if there are only firm springs & no shocks.
Interestingly, my experience w/ both Mazda & Volvo is that both steerings feel natural & allow me to steer intuitively despite limited steering feedback, although the Mazda somehow feels too light(especially for its quicker ratio) while the Volvo feels a tad less on the surface details but still changes weighing nicely upon tire-grip change. The TSX's lack of tire-grip feel went too far & bugged the hell out of me. Part of the reason the TSX's steering feels artificial is due to some disruption of the strong centering action & that further covers up the weighing change due to tire slipperage.
During intentional abrupt twisting of the steering wheel on the drive-event track, the Mazda's steering pump couldn't catch up & created intermittent "freeze", & that sucks. It didn't happen on the Volvo, but then the Volvo was on a wet track, which might not demand as much power assist.
are you implying the mazda 3s has better low end torque than the TSX? you got to be kidding. this engine is probably more lively in the 3 than the 6 but it's lacking compared to honda's 2.4l.
the maxda 3 lineup is probably the cream of the crop in its class, but i don't think too many people are cross shopping this car despite its track numbers with the S40 or TSX.
The S40 needs the $750 sport-suspension sport package in order to include the fog lights & 6.5"-wide alloys outside, & the T-tech fabric & aluminum trim inside. Except the (busy-riding & less-comfortable)sport suspension, the T-5 has all of them std plus leather shift knob, audio controls on the steering wheel, trip computer, dual-zone auto climate control & power driver seat even w/o the "hot in the summer & cold in the winter" leather! The manual seat-height crank actually wears out pretty fast, as the Mazda3's w/ identical parts at the drive events already...
The TSX offers 6-sp manual as a no-cost option over the 5-sp auto.
So if a 6-sp manual is worth as much as a 5-sp auto, & the T-5 actually gives you $1200 back for getting the 6-sp...
Counting the $450 metallic paint, a 2.4i auto w/ sport package(but no $2k sport body kit) is already $400 shy of a white(or black or red) T-5 6-sp w/ all those std equipments!!!
Unlike the 2.4i, the T-5 can also get the wood trim free of charge w/o upgrading to the premium package.
The $22-23k premium package is actually a good deal for those of you who like leather & moonroof, both of which I hate.
The $850-900 premium sound does not include the $1100 trunk subwoofer. I'll skip the latter & put the $ on the $700 bi-xenon & $695 DSC.
"are you implying the mazda 3s has better low end torque than the TSX? you got to be kidding. this engine is probably more lively in the 3 than the 6 but it's lacking compared to honda's 2.4l."
Wouldn't it be nice if Mazda & Honda merge so they can just drop in the 2.4(even the regular-gas one from the Accord) into the 3? ;-)
Between 6-7k rpm, the TSX is mighty powerful but still churns out similar overall track number as the 3S. So that means at lower rpms, the lighter-weight 3 must have some edge over the TSX.
Does anyone have a link to a recent foto ???
The convertible looks sweet.....but the coupe is supposed to be different, according to reports.
A sporty looking hatchback ????
http://www.volvocars.co.uk/showroom/v50/_campaign/opendoors/defau- lt.htm