Options
Subaru Forester (up to 2005)
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Bad day @ work? :P
I wonder if there is a less expensive way around it. Maybe there are cheaper aftermarket side mirrors one can recommend?
TIA
warrantydirect.com has good coverage, deductables and prices, and they advertise on Edmunds. Compare Subaru's with theirs, and the price.
Have you checked the exhaust heat shield.....a common rattle problem!
-Frank
I have a Subaru Gold, because they guarantee OE parts and also include roadside assistance. So you are towed to a dealer and get good parts, not cheap knock-offs. Plus they're not gonna go out of business like Warranty Gold did.
-juice
For the read window, one needs to twist and hold the actuator for that.
Remember, the only stupid questions are the ones not asked!
My '97 Outback is the same way. Guess how I know.
TIA
Jeff
Warrantydirect.com (CLICK HERE FOR THEM) offers one that actually wraps around the existing, much longer, original powertrain warranty, so you are not paying twice for the same coverage. That is what I purchased for my 2006 Forester, after I was directed to them from the edmunds.com site.
It is called Powerwrap Plus, when you check out the prices.
Jeff
I think the "best" strategy would be to just save your money. With your Forester being driven that little, the likelihood of you having a repair issue during the time period of the extended warranty is pretty remote.
-Frank
On a Saturday I took the Subaru up into the Jemez Mountains [New Mexico} on National Forester "roads." No, the Forester is not billed as an off-road banger [and it is not one], but it handled those "roads" [such as they are] with aplomb. You certainly wouldn't want to go there in, say, a Camry or Accord or Mazdaspeed3.
On the other hand, on the following Monday the Forester took a 300-mile trip to and from the Very Large Array via interstate and secondary [paved] roads -- mostly at extra-legal ["legal" being 75 mph] speeds with equal aplomb [quiet enough to enjoy Mozart on the satellite radio while drinking the hot coffee from McDonald's.
As a bonus for Continental Dividers, the turbo motor handles the 5,000-7,000 altitudes with nary a hiccup.
Complaints? Needs another gear on the auto box; brake pedal is way too soft; 91-octane gas. For all-round use, though, it's priceless.
Ha! That's only because you haven't taken the same drive in an XT :P
Don't get me wrong, I had a 2001 non-turbo and while it did okay in the mountains, there's no arguing that the XT is in a different power class. In fact, driving in the mountains offers the perfect example: you're climbing a mountain pass in over-drive and go to accelerate. In the non-turbo you've already got the pedal floored just trying to maintain your speed and you have no choice but to down-shift. With the turbo however, all you have to do is give it some more gas and you're pressed back into your seat from the turbo boost enabled acceleration :shades: That being said, there's also no arguing that you'll pay the price at the pump for having a turbo.
-Frank
I think we are mixing apples and oranges here, as that wasn't the question or my post. Some 4 bangers will indeed feel sluggish driving the area you posted about. The Forester X does not. And I didn't have to floor it to maintain speed. Not even driving I-70 over the pass to Denver.
Obviously a turbo anything will give you better, easier acceleration, although my 2006 Murano SL might leave you in the dust without having it, and certainly my Viper would. All of those come at a cost, one way or another, eh? Most won't want to pay for Premium gas and loss of MPG, or endure the extra mechanical maintenance most turbos come with.
Me, I like turbos, but most buyers of economy cars will be, and usually are, put-off by the extra costs, that are not always apparent to the first-time turbo buyer. They get caught up in "feeling the power"....and like you said, nothing beats that feeling when climbing a mountain road! :P
As a bonus for Continental Dividers, the turbo motor handles the 5,000-7,000 altitudes with nary a hiccup
While your response was to contend that the non-turbo performed equally well while using cheaper gas:
I have made the same trip, without my Forester feeling at all sluggish, 80MPH, and it isn't a turbo, using that cheap(er) regular unleaded
Since I've climbed the same mountain pass in both, my personal experience with their climbing capabilities seems to provide an ideal comparison. The bottom line being that the normally aspirated engine gets the job done but without the sizeable power reserves that the XT brings to the table and therefore the non-turbo does indeed feel sluggish in comparison.
Speaking of mixing apples and oranges what does a Nissan Murano much lees a Dodge Viper have to do with comparing different Forester models? :P
-Frank
You want to make an argument here, as you obviously feel some need to "defend" your turbo, which isn't under "attack" I merely said my X model didn't feel sluggish, as some 4's do. I believe I stated I liked Turbo's, and recognized nothing beat the feeling of extra power. But it is all realitive, since the non-turbo vehicles I own can wipe most turbos.
People looking here for information usually like comparisons, therefore my comment. If someone is looking for an affordable car, and might think they must buy a turbo if living in the Inter mountain West, IMO they would like to know Subaru's regular Boxer 4 will handle the hills better than most 4's....without the extra maintenance of a turbo, and the need to buy Premium Unleaded.
Yep, that's why I provided one without confusing the issue by throwing in totally unrelated models. I'm happy for you that you have a Viper that can "wipe most turbos" but fail to see what that has to do with the forum topic :confuse:
I could just as easily argue that it appears you feel it necessary to "defend" your non-turbo even though I agreed that it performs adequately when climbing. I also agreed that the turbo comes with a financial penalty (both premium gas and lower mpg). In fact I tell anyone who cares to ask that the Forester X provides the best value for the money of any small SUV/CUV
-Frank
Among the discussions you'll find are:
New Subaru Forester Owners - Give Us Your Report!
Subaru Forester: MPG-Real World Numbers
Subaru Forester Tire/Wheel Questions
Subaru Forester Transmission Questions
Forester Body Work: Fixing Dents and Dings
Forester Interior & Passenger Comfort Questions
Subaru Forester Engine Issues
Subaru Forester Brake Questions
Subaru Forester Electrical/Lighting Issues
How Much Can The Forester Carry?
Please be sure to check the discussion list for an appropriate discussion whenyou are ready to post. If you have a question or issue that doesn't appear to fit one of the existing discussions on the list, please feel free to start up a new discussion.
Thanks for your understanding and assistance as we move through this reorganization of the forums.
I can't tell you how much I dislke this splitting. Edmunds will lose out, as will the owners. We often have several issues that need answers and this will create posting and response inefficiencies.
I was hoping that what happened in the Mazda board would not happen in Subie land. This is NOT improving the Forums.
John
I personally liked the 04 gray plastic sides, OK performance... They have retuned the suspension. To go along with the more "refined" looks, it is subtly not as stiff as the 04. In no way is it loose, but there is definitely a very slight lean in the turns I didn't have and is perhaps just a tad softer in the ride but not soft.
It does seem a little more responsive on the throttle, I assume that is the fly by wire throttle and perhaps the extra 8 horsepower. Over all, it appears to be as I noted abover, just a bit more "refined." Now the goodies on the Premium Package are definitely more that way, but the looks and handling are...different also.
As I look at the body panel and front end differences and then the slight performance differences, my first thought is that they were trying to appeal more to the "soccer mom" market. This is not a good thing or a bad thing (although I personally liked the 04 handling better) just different.
With the deal I got, I can live with it...heh heh heh...
Oh and for those waiting on the new re-design, it appears that the Impreza gets a whole new design in 08, but they are now going to wait till 09 for the Forester. Apparently it is still moving well enough to stretch it out and not overload their design and engineering staff???
Mileage: 22 mpg, slightly disappointing as I have the 5-speed manual (but keep in mind most of my driving is non-highway).
Maintenance costs: less than $100, for a few oil changes.
Problems: all minor stuff. The right front door sometimes doesn't open when I use the remote unlock on the key fob; the beige cloth upholstery stains easily; the carpet in front of the pedals is showing some wear.
All in all, except for the mileage issue I'm highly satisfied.
I normally can notice difference even between 2 almost identical cars (the same model, the same trim, the same year).
In case of slightly different handling between 04X and 07Premium, my prime suspects will be rims (alloy on 07 vs steel on 04) and tires. Check the tire pressure on 07. My dealer recommends running Foresters with a bit more PSI than recommended in the manual (but definitely not to exceed max indicated on the tire wall). It does give it a bit sportier feel and handling plus improves mileage.