Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Acura RSX (All years/types)
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Now to go work numbers, but I think this does sound a better option than the lease, where I end up paying more if I decide to buy.
Also, I think someone on another board mentioned they thought the '04s came out in August. . .
I have white and I love it. Always looks clean....except for those times after driving on the highway during a snow storm. And since it's not metallic, you never have to worry about trying to match the paint if you do need to touch-up.
I do have one or two chips along the leading edge of the hood, but I guess that is to be expected with 38,000 miles....not sure though.
Price sounds fair to me.
Base minus 8% (dealer profit), minus $1,500 rebate, minus 5% depreciation + $500 for the dealer's profit. And I would never pay the so called PDI, etc.
Also, if any of you are interested in having an RSX Owners Club here at Town Hall, let me know. Basically what this does is set up a special area for you, linking all the RSX discussions together, and adding new discussions... as needed.
This will also make it easier for you to communicate with other RSX owners/enthusiasts on a lot of different subjects. You can post your responses here, or send me an email if you'd like. revka@edmunds.com
Thanks for your participation! ;-)
Revka
Host
Hatchbacks & Wagons Boards
Where did you hear that? I don't see it listed here:
http://apps.edmunds.com/incentives/step1.jsp?tid=edmunds.h..faird- eal..2.*
Anyway, I hope Acura does a reskin to it for model year (MY) 2004, otherwise, RSXs will be a tough sell for the dealers.
But I'm not sure if a bra will have unintended consequences, such as damage from the water that may get under the bra, a line at the edge of the bra where the rest of the paint fades from the sun, etc.
What are the long term consequences of using a bra? Are there any hidden maintennance issues?
I'm not opposed to the idea of a black bra on a silver car due to aesthetic issues.
I also see reference to stongard.com, supposedly a clear and more expensive equivalent to a bra. Does anyone have experience with StonGard?
I bought mine here: http://www.xpel.com
Stereo: unagidon, if it's the lack of bass you're upset about, get a subwoofer. I recommend the Infinity BassLink as a cheap, simple, effective, no-frills solution. I have it and love it.
Many thanks - Vic
I can't emphasize the handling traits on the celica enough - "corners like it is on rails" is an understatement. That car weighs 300 pounds less than RSX - a very significant difference in this class.
Yes, if you base your decision STRICTLY on accessory content and SAE horsepower numbers at a given price, RSX comes out ahead every time. But this is a very limited way of making a decision between two cars.
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
A test drive is all fine and good, but since I have never owned a car like this, I am interested in how owners feel about driving an RSX everyday. I imagine the base model is somewhat easier to live with. How is it on long trips? Does it get tiresome and uncomfortable? Is noise a problem? I expect and want some road feel and feedback or I would have bought a Camry (shudder). But are the negatives enough to offset the obvious fun nature of the car in day to day use? I really don't see that being the case, but I wanted to hear what owners think before I sign across the dotted line.
I obviously do not have the kids for long hauls , just short trip to preschool so I was really hoping to keep my Rsx-s.
Any ideas or suggestions (short of strapping them to the roof) I would appreciate.
You don't have a bigger car you can drive the kids around in?
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
31K miles, and nary a problem with the car - loved the interior and the typical wind-it-up Honda/Acura driving experience, disliked the tire and wind roar. I think if you follow that link, you can get to the whole story.
I am a little curious as to why they had to put in two quarts of oil at 8000+ miles, then never had to put in any more after that...
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
Our other car is a Mini van , this is my commuting car and I will need to have all three kids very rarely.
Thanks, Kurt
40,000+ miles and loving every minute of it. True there is more road noise than your average car (Camry etc...), but I feel that's part of it's charm. I also love feeling the undulations in the road surface...makes me feel connected to the road and enhances the driving experience.
I've taken my car on several "2 hour one way drives" and never had a problem with being uncomfortable. I think the seats are very comfortable. I also used to commute 40 miles (one way) to work every day and enjoyed every mile.
One thing I wish I had (or could get for that matter) is heated mirrors. They would come in handy on those icy mornings and on those mornings when there is dew all over the mirrors. I'm tired of wiping the mirrors with my hands in the morning only to have streaky mirrors after the dew dries.
I test drove an RSX-S and the 350 Z back to back two days ago and never stopped thinking of the Type-S since then. I mean, the Z is great with its muted rumble from those 286 ponies and RWD but, the Type-S has a far more exhilarating ride, with "flick of the wrist" gear shifts and a far better cockpit feel, more so with the way the driver's seat wraps around you. To me, it's a lot more fun pushing the throttle to the firewall on a lower displacement, High HP, high revver than driving a more powerful, bigger engine that's low on RPMs. Just my personal opinion - not trying to rufle any Z feather here ;~) And for those who could afford a "Z" AND be able to live without the additional seating, Good for you!!!!!
I've never stopped thinking of the type-S since the moment I got off the car; I drive a V4 Camry and a CR-V, both AT, extremely reliable, but, when it comes to the Department of Driver Involvement and Fun, :-( , well, you know now why I flipped all over the type-S. I drive a 110 miles a day (mostly hwy) and I think I could certainly use some fun.. I AM going in for the S in the near future. I have a few questions for the Gurus in this forum: 1)We got a baby coming in the next few months and I am concerned as to how easy it is to fit a baby seat at the rear. I will have the CR-V but, I still would need to be able to use the rear seats for the baby. 2) I don't remember seeing a thermometer - Could someone please confirm if there is one? 3) Type-S owners with extra long commutes, I would appreciate your comments...
Thank You!!
1)$$$ in Z territory which is definitely one of the reasons I love the RSX-S all the more; Also, even if I waited another 9 months, I doubt if I could get one for Invoice + $500
2)Reliability of the Blue Oval Vs Honda/Acura.
3)Licence plates of RX-8 in front ;~)I drive between NJ and PA and they are mandatory in NJ...
Thanks for the response!
Saying the RX-8 is a Ford product is akin to saying the RSX-S is just a glorified Honda riding mower. If you know anything about either car, you also know that both comparisons are baseless.
I've been a fan of Honda/Acura products (and their reliability) for 17 years, but that wouldn't keep me from buying the RX-8 if it does what I need.
Yes, Sphinx, value is my primary concern.I firmly beleive that most cars can be negotiated and bought for based off the invoice. Personally, if it is sticker or sticker plus, it is just not for me.
Himiler, I totally agree with you on the counts of "Different suspension, platform, brakes, steering, engine..." part, but, to me, it just doesn't make sense to compromise on reliability and drive the car every day with even a trace of doubt at the back of my mind when I could have bought the RSX-S for at least 5 K less, not to mention my love for the car at first sight... Again, I definitely agree that it is a compromise on features, HP, trouble fitting the little sambino in the rear etc... but the Acura pretty much suits most of my needs and I guess If I have to skimp on those 5 grands, then I will have to live with those two less doors plus, my rear passengers if any will have to stick their legs into their own ears, unfortunately :-(
I have never owned a Mazda and I haven't test driven the RX-8 myself, but I know enough about Honda / Acura to feel totally comfortable buying an AUTOMOBILE from them :-) Plus, as one approaches the 30's, somehow, it suddenly seems important to have a "luxury badge" parked in the dive way...
As to the Child seat issue, it does look like at least one poster has been using the car to transport his childREN. So, I guess all I have to do is to go to a delaership with a borrowed child seat and try it on myself.
Could anyone please confirm if the car has a thermometer and twin trip meters please?
Thanks once again and Have a good day!
LOL.
I don't seem to spot that many RX-8s, may be I am not looking at the right place?!
But, since I got another comfortable 3 months to go, with the Camry just into 76K and still it's good old library quiet self, guess I could really afford to drag my feet and cross shop my heart out.
Thank You!
I take the train to work on most days, but occasionally I have to drive my RSX to the office in downtown Chicago, or to O'Hare or Midway airport on days when I travel. Commuting in Chicago traffic during rush hour in this car is an unpleasant experience. The constant shifting between first and second gears in stop and go traffic for an hour or more is a crummy way to start and end my day. Road surfaces are noisy even at slower speeds, and the stereo system doesn't offer much (yes, it's as mediocre as everyone says).
Long drives on interstates aren't as bad, but this isn't the right car for those, either. The RSX is a hoot on expressways with turns and onramps.... for generally zooming around and having fun with the wonderful gearbox and outrageous handling. But for a five-hour drive at 75 mph on a straight-line interstate, the road noise and less-than-stellar stereo once again mar the experience.
I've had fun with my RSX type-S for the last 18 months, but will likely replace it soon with a 4.2 litre loaded Jaguar S-type.
I admit that the RSX does have a hard ride for city driving. In Toronto, the roads are rather crummy with street car tracks, cracks from snow/salt, cheapie Canadian government not fixing pot holes, etc. So it's not a "great" ride, especially when in rush hour traffic. But I think the "fun-factor" outweighs the "ride quality". This is totally subjective though...
I've never test driven the Accord V6 coupe. But with 240 horses, a slick 6 speed shifter and a more "livable" suspension, I am sure it is one sweet machine. Although I too, like smaller, more nimble cars...
The stereo does suck. A decent upgrade on the Type S will run you between at least $800 - $1,000.
keybdwizrd - why don't you keep your RSX for the traffic free weekends, and buy a TSX or Mazda 6 or even a Honda Accord V6 for the weekends? Wouldn't that be still in the ballpark price range? Also, I'm sure you would get a heck of a lot more mileage... Don't know how reliable Jags are these days, but in the past...yikes!