By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
That is just your opinion based on some numbers that are erroneous. You need to get out and sit in these cars yourself and you will see the numbers rarely reflect reality. The Accord has good numbers and a horrible head room in reality. Are the measurements made from the front of the seat or the rear. BIG DIFFERENCE MY FRIEND. No substitute for going out and sitting in and test driving a vehicle.
I agree with that completely.
But the numbers are not erroneous - they are there just for this purpose - to help drivers in advance decide which cars might meet their required "interior dimensions" so that they can eliminate certain cars without making the trek to the dealership.
Some drivers have long torsos, and need seats which adjust lower, etc etc.
Base on his or her body shape, a Jetta might or might NOT seat them more comfortably.
But the inside for the driver is slightly smaller, measuring apples versus apples.
I stand on my contention that you cannot believe the numbers posted on a spec sheet. Both had sun roofs. Go drive the car is the only sure way to know. In the case of the Accord hybrid, they were not allowing test drives. We know how that joke of a car ended. It did not take a recession to send it to the scrap heap of bad ideas.
Anyway, my friend has a 2009 Prius - I'll go measure the headroom and report back.