Post Your Van Gas Mileage Here

13133353637

Comments

  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Mine is a 2006 LE with the JBL and it does have the in glass antennae. Reception is quite good. Maybe it was a change for 2007, although that seems to be moving backwards.

    Check the features list on the Toyota web site, and print it out and take it to the dealer if you got the wrong thing. Does seem like a strange thing to change. I can see the wrong wheels etc.

    If you keep your speed to 65 mph you should be able to hit 30 mpg pretty easily. Amazing for the amount of room.
  • joe131joe131 Member Posts: 998
    Hey, my Sedona's gas mileage has improved! Maybe they get better with more miles on the odometer?
    Recently, it averaged 21.9 mpg during a 1,600 mile round trip from 1,100 ft. above sea level to 11,300 ft. above sea level and back. The 1600 miles includes 100 miles of all in town driving at 10,000 feet. New air cleaner element, 850 lbs. of people and cargo, A/C used about half the time, nothing on roof rack, no trailer, half interstate, half rural 2-lane. Average speed during the time the motor was running, including gas stops and food stops and going through small towns on the rural highways was 63 mph for the 1500 miles of highway use. That average speed was attained by going about 8% over the speed limit as traffic permitted, usually around 70 to 80 on the highways with several spurts above that for passing. Temperature varied from 105 degrees to 50 degrees F.
    The van is rated 16/22 city/highway mpg by EPA.
    The previous long trip was 1000 miles when the odometer read 11,000 miles. The elevation change was from 1,100 ft. to 20 ft. above sea level and back again. The MPG was 16 on that round trip in 100 degree weather with the A/C on constantly.
    If this rate of improvement with mileage (and other factors?) continues, I will be averaging 30.25 mpg on the highway when I get 37,000 miles on the odometer, and by 50,000 miles I'll be getting 41.6 mpg.
    I can hardly wait. Maybe I should up my use of the van beyond 9000 miles driven per year?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    That's just it - I didn't get the JBL sound system. Mine is the standard one for the LE, still a 6CD changer.

    Some time I wish I had sprung for the built-in entertainment system, because it comes with that JBL system, plus you can fit a Solara's NAV system right in the dash, plug-and-play.

    It was $2300 more for that package, plus $1700 or so for the NAV, so that would have been $4 grand more.

    I could have afforded it, but I decided to spend less and go aftermarket. Got a 12" Jenson movie player (kids love the huge screen) and a Garmin portable NAV.

    Any, I am supposed to get an antennae, so I called the dealer and they said they'd get me one. Haven't had time to go in yet but I will this week.

    Let me drift back on-topic - my mileage has crept up to 24mpg! :shades:
  • joe131joe131 Member Posts: 998
    This is so neat! Have you all noticed yet?
    The EPA website now has converted all the EPA mileage estimates for vehicles all the way back to 1985 so they are directly comparable to the new 2008 standards.
    As most of you know, the 2008 numbers will be adjusted downward from earlier years to more closely approximate the actual MPG that average drivers are getting in city and highway driving.
    http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bymake/Hyundai2006.shtml
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Interesting, now the Sienna is rated at 17/24, same as the higher-end Ody with VCM. The Ody LX and EX get 16/23, as do most other competitors.

    The Sedona and Entourage actually match the Ody LX now, too.

    This all may be due to rounding errors.
  • joe131joe131 Member Posts: 998
    While I too (and for good reason) often automatically assume the government is making errors , here I am not inclined to think it made any rounding mistakes. It is pretty simple math any 4th grade school kid should be competent to do.
    So a number on any particular car should be an accurate estimate (oxymoron?) within one half mile per gallon of the number it would have been if carried to the tenths place, right? So even between two different cars the MPG figures should be no more than nine tenths of a MPG off from the more accurate figures carried to the tenths place. No big deal really.
    I like that EPA has made the numbers directly comparable again. Good job government! Hahaha! Hardly makes up for any of the myriad of past blunders though, eh?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Yep, but if one gets EPA combined of 22.4 and another gets 22.5 (not a significant difference), one will round up and the other will round down.

    Since they round to the nearest whole number, we should pretty much assume a +/- 1 mpg error.
  • hansiennahansienna Member Posts: 2,312
    2006 Sienna LE 29.2 MPG on last round trip of 1386 miles. Cruise set at 70 MPH but had to drive faster in California on I-15, I-210, and CA 57 (prevailing speed at least 80 MPH).

    Question for other Sienna owners: Have you used the MP3 connection? Will your stereo controls work as described in the owner's manual?

    I have tried both MP3 and a genuine iPod and the dash controls do NOT do anything but change volume. I think the fine folks at Toyota have deceived us by the fancy write up of the Sienna stereo system. :sick: :lemon:
  • joe131joe131 Member Posts: 998
    That's great mileage for a van rated 17/24 under the new '08 test measure.
  • hansiennahansienna Member Posts: 2,312
    Proof that the old system was accurate for highway driving. Too many people confuse "Highway" mileage with all types driving between refills and "City" ratings with idling to warm up in the winter or running A/C in the summer in addition to the actual driving within a city.
    We can easily exceed Highway ratings but when there is little or NO driving except idling and short trips of less than one mile, the mileage drops to the mid-teens on a tankfull of gasoline...lower than the 17 rating under the new system.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    I have never had a car that could not exceed the old numbers. Most of them could actually achieve the really old numbers - current old numbers times 1.28 for highway. The only exception being a Taurus. It could never break 30 mpg on the highway even being babied.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    29.2mpg?

    OK, you're officially not allowed to complain any more. ;)

    That's great, though. I was up to 24.0 but I'm doing a lot of city driving lately so it's inched down a tad.
  • hansiennahansienna Member Posts: 2,312
    Overall average for 13,600 miles is now 24.4 MPG. Highest was 34.7 mpg at refill while lowest was 15.3 mpg in January winter driving.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    30 mpg is not that hard in a Sienna. Just keep the speed down and stay on the highway. Also avoid hills and headwinds.

    My best is about 33, but I had a nice tailwind pushing me. The new 3.5 liter engine is a little better still.
  • hansiennahansienna Member Posts: 2,312
    I always get 33-34 MPG on one 300 mile portion of our long round trips....but I also get only 24 - 26 on the return portion of the same trip due to elevation change and prevailing winds (or inaccuracy of gasoline pumps in St. George, Utah?).
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I'm now at 930 miles so I haven't been able to use cruise control at all (break-in period).

    I'll see what the steady-state mileage is once I get on a flat surface. I'll see how it does at 55, 65, and 75. Bet it does better the slower you go, though.

    Nice thing is this van is geared TALL so at times the engine is chugging along at just 1200 rpm it seems. :shades:
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    The Sienna is geared very tall. That is one reason I chose it over the Ody. The speed limit is 75 in SD, so 80 mph cruising is the norm on interstates. The tall gearing helps with economy and quietness.

    Suprisingly the Ody with VCM is geared shorter than the standard Ody. This is supposed to help it stay in eco mode for longer. The problem is that pushing a 4,500 lb box at 80 mph is not conducive to eco mode, so the VCM would rarely be used on the highway here.

    I would be curious to see how the new 3.5 does at steady speeds. I know the 3.3 will get 40 mpg if you drive it slow enough. I imagine the 3.5 will push 35 mpg at 55 mph maybe even better.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Well I'll have to report back, in that case! ;)
  • hansiennahansienna Member Posts: 2,312
    NO, it will NOT. The best MAXIMUM possible mileage I could eke out of my 2006 Sienna LE on a round trip controlled test, 50 to 55 MPH fairly level stretch of I-80 between SLC toward Wendover Nevada and back with no wind and no A/C was 36.0 MPG. ;)
    On the same test 4 years ago with my 2003 PT Cruiser, it got 37.2 MPG which proves the much heavier Sienna with a 3.3L V6 is exceptionally frugal compared to a 2.4 inline 4 cyl PT cruiser....but it has only a 4 speed AT with gearing too much toward performance at the expense of fuel economy.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    I think I said if you drive it slow enough - 50-55 is just not slow enough. ;)

    45 is probably about right - suburban driving, not interstate stuff.

    The 3.5 should do a little better though.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    This engine is a gem, the 3.5l. I think the code for it is 2GR? Something like that.

    Maybe it's the Direct Injection, but I don't think there is another naturally aspirated engine on the market that can match its performance/economy balance.
  • ivan_99ivan_99 Member Posts: 1,681
    Something has “loosened-up” at 30,000 on our 05 Quest SE…normally city driving we’re mid 17’s (average speed 20mph) and the highest highway was 23.

    I just had a 20mpg city…and we took a 480mi trip (960 total)…on the way there we had 24mpg and on the way back it was 25.6.

    Speed plus 5mph (70-80mph) – on the way back we averaged 65mph
    Hilly for part of the trip
    35 psi tires (read 41 on the highway in Austin)
    AC full time
    2 adults 3 children and cargo
    Ambient temp 80 – 95 F.
    87 Octane
  • joe131joe131 Member Posts: 998
    I had a van. It started running really well. Better than ever.

    Then the motor self-destructed. Cost $3800 to replace the motor.

    Maybe you should drive close to home for a while?
  • ivan_99ivan_99 Member Posts: 1,681
    heh...thanks for the advice. I have to make the trip again in two weeks.

    I'm sure it'll be fine :)
  • peraltaperalta Member Posts: 94
    180 miles total on my 2006 Sienna LE 8 passenger (rated 26 MPG highway). I Average 30 mpg with speeds up to 75 MPH. No grandma style driving. I used cruise most of the time including acceleration and deceleration. I incrementally tapped the cruise to increase or decrease speed. One tap up or down equals a speed change of 1 MPH. If you space the tapping far enough, the transmission will stay in 5th gear (it will not down shift).

    I also noticed that I can do highway mileage of 33 MPG on my highlander hybrid (rated at 27 MPG highway).

    I can also do a similar 30-33 MPG on my outback on the highway (rated 28 MPG highway).

    I think the bottom line is how sensitive your are in conserving energy when driving and take advantage of gravity and hills. If I see a downhill anywhere in front of me, I wait until I arrive at the start of the downhill before I accelerate to speed.

    If I am about to encounter an uphill and I drive an automatic gear box, I press the gas but not far enough to cause a downshift. If the top gear is too tall, I don't press further since it will downshift, I will just let the speed decrease to its terminal velocity in top gear.

    If I am driving my Highlander hybrid (CVT), I just set the cruise control to the speed limit on uphill climbs and then go back to just above the speed limit on level roads.

    I used the car's trip computer, scan gauge, and compared them to actual hand calculations. So my trip computer readings and scan gauge readings are corrected based on the hand calculations for each of my cars.

    All my 3 cars have scan gauges. 2 of them have trip computers. None of them are perfectly accurate. The toyota's tend to be conservative in their readings. The Subaru tend to be very optimistic.

    Another thing, aerodynamic drag is a fuel economy killer above 55-60 MPH. Fuel consumption increases exponentially above those speeds.

    I usually begin the trip with speeds above the speed limit just like everybody else. Then I gradually slow down to the speed limit near the end of my trip.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    On a weekend trip to Six Flags. I was quite happy with that as it's not even broken in yet, just 1300 miles!

    This is a 2007 Sienna LE model, package 3. A/C on nearly the whole time. Cruising mostly ~65 mph.

    Edited for details on model and driving conditions.
  • joe131joe131 Member Posts: 998
    make, year, model?
  • rolojroloj Member Posts: 12
    I have heard MANY folks stating they are getting 16+ miles city & 27+ highway per gallon. As we know that it depends on driving habits and where you drive. I live in NY and my various test results (no hard accelerations or hard stopping, no speeding, etc) on multiple tanks of gas gave me the most 15 MPG city driving and 22 highway driving. Forgive me if I sound like a DUNCE (dont know my math) BUT HOW DO ALL OF YOU CALCULATE HOW MUCH MILES YOU GET PER GALLON? Please, the formula ONLY.

    jtvangor - I have an 2006 with 16000 miles. The dealer said my MPG will improve when at about 15000 miles. I am wondering if he meant 115,000...what you think?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Two ways: for quick data, I use a trip computer. The catch is it's usually a bit optimistic.

    The other way is to zero the odometer when you fill up the gas tank. Then, next time you get gas, read the trip odometer again to see actual miles traveled, and divide by the actual fuel used to fill up the tank again (taking it back to roughly the same level it was when you started).

    The catch is it's hard on one single tank to get a perfectly accurate measure because you can't be sure if the tank is filled up to the exact same level as last time. I usually fill to the first stop, and do not top off.

    What makes it more accurate is to measure several tanks in succession, then take a weighted average for those many tanks. That starts to get quite accurate.

    To answer your question, no, I think he did mean 15,000, not 115,000.
  • rolojroloj Member Posts: 12
    Thanks for responding.....
    F.Y.I. -
    1) Topping off would not make a difference between 13.256, 13.51... and the 17+ others are saying. (I am getting between 13.2+ and 13.5+. city)
    2) I do know how to do the math. My question was to see the responses I would get. I am VERY CURIOUS to know if people really know the calculation because I am not getting those numbers. I was in Georgia for a week and still did not get 17+.

    If you do own an Odyssey, what is your mileage? Where do you live.
  • tinyguytinyguy Member Posts: 44
    Used to get 20.5mpg with city/hiway mixed (I'd say 60/40) on 2002 Venture. With 2004 Sienna, I get 22.5mpg. I am happy with Sienna mileages.
  • beeman4ubeeman4u Member Posts: 34
    I have a brand new, 2 week old Sienna XLE AWD and I'm avg 12/mpg city and hwy combo. I am seeing other posting numbers @ 18, 25, 27+ mph. What a huge diff... any comments?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    You do have AWD so I'd expect about a 2mpg drop overall, but that still sounds lower than normal.

    Make sure the tire pressure is 35psi or higher. The manual calls for 35psi, higher than I'm used to.

    I just did another trip (FWD, 2007) and got 28.8 going to the beach and then 29.8 coming back. Keeping speeds down I could break 30, even for the average. MPG dropped by about 2 when speed limits increased by 10mph.

    In the city my average plunges but I'm still around 23 mpg or so.

    I do combine trips, and use only the front A/C (not on max) when that's adequate. I park in the shade when possible. Tire pressures are at 36. I'm light on the throttle unless I really need the power. I tend to go about 10 mph over the limit, around here any slower and you're a serious target for road rage to be honest.

    Make sure you're also not carrying around an unnecessary weight. Get all the junk out of the trunk! :D
  • beeman4ubeeman4u Member Posts: 34
    This is amazing but yet confusing. My new 2007 Sienna XLE AWD package #7 is also not broken in yet (2 weeks old) and with the a/c on, driving ~50mph I avg 11/12mpg. This is sickening!!!
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Another thought - make sure you don't slide the shift lever past D and into 4. That shuts out the overdrive 5th gear. You should always be in D.

    Yet another tip - mine only seems to go in to overdrive at speeds above 46mph or so. So setting cruise at 46-50 mph actually results in better mileage than 42 mph, where it will only use 4th gear, and not overdrive.

    Just trying to help figure out what's bringing your mileage down...
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    420 miles at 75 mph 5 people and luggage, even drove around the city for a day - 26.5 mpg. 2006 LE FWD
  • joe131joe131 Member Posts: 998
    What make and model is an LE FWD?
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Toyota Sienna
  • vannervanner Member Posts: 47
    05 Sedona.

    Recent trip with a couple of long highway legs -500 miles each, this Sedona with 27K miles got about 20 mpg with four occupants and probably 300 pounds of "freight". Speeds usually at or just over 70 mph and fairly distributed terrain.
    Not that bad for what came to about 6000 pounds all together.

    Anyone have any success or even strong opinion about how to remove the crossbars on a 2005 Sedona roof rack? I seldom use the rack, and if I do, I know in advance. I'd like to take them off entirely and even on long trips just stash them inside in case I need them. I have to believe they're worth about 2 mpg at US highway speeds.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I doubt you'll gain 10% efficiency, but maybe 2-5%.

    Consumer Reports tested mileage with roof top carriers and large soft ones did create significant drag, about 2mpg IIRC. Hard ones only a little.

    So cross bars alone probably won't have nearly as much impact overall. Maybe 0.5mpg.
  • beeman4ubeeman4u Member Posts: 34
    WOW! I'm floored... I'm pulling down a TERRIBLE 9-12mpg with 2 babies, my wife and myself. City and Hwy, conservative A/C at various speeds. This vehicle is BRAND NEW. I just dropped it off to the dealer on Tues to investigate the problem.... They called me and said, they ran some diagnostics and test and everything said OK. They were going to drive it around to validate my claim.. validate what? The display clearly shows 12mpg
  • beeman4ubeeman4u Member Posts: 34
    Ateixeira Thanks. I'm in the correct gear. I took it back to the dealer on Tues, still there, they are looking into it.
  • ivan_99ivan_99 Member Posts: 1,681
    What vehicle?

    What is your average speed?

    When we idle through drive-throughs or sit idling waiting for a table...we average a speed around 19-20mph...that turns into 16-17mpg.

    Taking a few longer trips (over 10 mins) will take it 18-20mpg.

    A recent highway trip (all highway) returned 26mpg.

    and...for some reason my wife ALWAYS gets really bad mileage...I'll be averaging 21mpg and she'll go out for the afternoon and return it showing an average of 16mpg (maybe secret auto-crossing :) )
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Well, when I got mine the readout was 13mpg. Before delivery, they sit around idling a lot. It crept up slowly, but it broke 20mpg before the first tank was empty.

    You should reset the trip computer once you get it back from the dealer, if you haven't already, that is.

    One thing that scared me off on a Kia Sedona was that the Trip Computer was reporting 7mpg. Even during my test drive, we drove for a while, it still didn't break 10mpg. I saw that as a bad sign.
  • beeman4ubeeman4u Member Posts: 34
    When I got mine it was ~12mpg+ but it NEVER went above 13...

    But I just got it back from the dealer, I was told a bunch a crock, but I'm not 100% sure. Dealer told me, the car is still new, at the time only 500 miles on it and the cylinders, engine, blah, blah still needs to be broken in. Told me after about 1,500 miles I should see significant increases. Computer read out is showing 12.9 to be EXACT! Just filled up again, the 3rd time. Once by the dealer, on delivery. My wife is taking a nice road trip tomorrow, to Va, told her to PAY CLOSE ATTENTION to the gas outlay. I set the Trip O to Zero and the tank is Full or thereabouts due to I had to drive home from the gas station. I've also been reading the manual and I rest the Computer AVG. ie Hold the Mode and EM together. When she returns, the vehicle should be @ 1,300-1,500 miles. Then I'll have something substantial to complain to the dealer, if they are wrong "although I'm not sure what they can do"
  • beeman4ubeeman4u Member Posts: 34
    I have an 07 XLE AWD... even at 16-17, "I'll take it because I'm not getting over 13. Idle, hmmmmm we've been doing some local city driving and I guess we idle when we stop at lights but even so, isn't this a big drop from 18 (MSRG suggested) to 12/13? Also, doesn't everyone pretty much have idle time when they are driving in their local towns?

    My wife is about to go to Virginia (highway) so I'll be checking on the Highways MPG.
  • newtovansnewtovans Member Posts: 3
    Joe131's warning may have merit. When mpg increases without reason, this could be an indicator of decreased internal resistance in the engine due to a low oil level or a viscosity breakdown of the oil. If either of these two happened, you would feel your engine turning more freely temporarily but at the expense of your engine parts grinding away. I would check your oil level and condition right away.
  • ivan_99ivan_99 Member Posts: 1,681
    Interesting theory...I have to think about that one for a bit ;)

    I did get an oil change right after the "increase" and it still seems the same...took a similar trip (Austin to DFW) and I got 24.5 mpg (I was going a little faster than last time...80+ or so...then stopped for construction...then 80+ etc.).
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    bobistheoilguy used to hang out in these forums and can do an oil analysts. Several Subaru Crew members have done them, and they're relatively cheap.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Was getting 21.7 mpg around town.

    Trip to the beach, all highway, got 30.6mpg. My personal best for a complete trip.

    Driving in town at the beach, and then back, we averaged 27.3mpg.

    Notes: 07 Sienna LE, light throttle, speeds mostly below 65mph.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.