Chevrolet Impala Audio

1356731

Comments

  • ronf4ronf4 Member Posts: 9
    In Post #107 I said I had a brand new 2000 Monte Carlo manufactured on March 7th and my RDS CD/tape system worked great as well as the radio reception. My point was that maybe GM had identified and fixed the problem on their later models. I received an e-mail from one person asking me for the information on my amplifier so he could check it against his. Since I provided this data to him, I figured I'd also post it here on the forum for anyone else who might like to check it against their amplifier. I'm not sure this will prove anything, but here it is:
    Model # 10432571
    Ref # CY-BG2912ZC
    Matsushita Communication Industrial Corp. of America
    Assembled in USA from foreign & US components
    12 VDC
    Serial # 332033

    Ron
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    My radio model number and ref number DO NOT MATCH
    ronf4's "good" amp.

    How about the rest of you?
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Please post your Amp information, that way I can compare it against yours and the guy with the MonteCarlo. Thx.
  • maxx8maxx8 Member Posts: 2
    I picked up my new fully loaded LS one week ago on April 12th; build date was April 4th. After reading the postings for the weeks leading up to getting my car, I was expecting to be more disappointed in the "premium" sound quality than I actually am. Not that I am fully satisfied - no question it's not what it could or should be, but my bass output seems fairly decent, not window shattering, but sufficient for my tastes (which cover the spectrum). If anything, as in an earlier post, I am more disappointed with the lack of clear treble. Sounds like a blanket is over the speakers; the music has no "presence" that makes you feel you are in the middle of a live concert, even when playing a CD. For the record, I checked my amp and it is identical to the one listed on post #18: Model #: 10432572, Ref.#: CY-BG2911ZC. These are each only one digit off of #113 post with the Monte Carlo. Also for the record, my reception is actually not bad. I don't have much trouble picking up stations even some distance away.
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    ronf4's duraflex's
    Monte Carlo Impala LS
    external amp external amp

    Model # 10432571 Model #10432572
    Ref # CY-BG2912ZC Ref # CY-BG2911ZC
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    Unless they've changed the speakers in the
    "8 speaker" premium sound system or you have an
    undiagnosed high frequency hearing deficiency
    (no offense intended and not uncommon in men over 35), there is a lot of treble there.

    Try switching to MANUAL tone and adjust your
    treble knob to make the indicator move to the far
    right.

    I even stuffed my front door tweeters with small rags to minimize the high end - it's that bad on my system.

    Hope this helps.
  • nosirrahgnosirrahg Member Posts: 872
    The radios in both my Impala and my wife's Prizm have those music-type specific tone settings, and I've never found them to be very useful; opting instead to use the manual settings. I have found on the Impala that once I get things set manually the way I like, and cursor through their pre-set tone settings, that oddly enough, their "Country" setting seems to come closests to matching my settings.
  • maxx8maxx8 Member Posts: 2
    Thanks for the advice, but adjusting the treble to the max on manual was the first thing I tried. My beef is that while there seems to be plenty of treble there, to my ear it sounds muffled. Although I am over 35 (42 actually), I've got a good idea of what it could sound like, for on the self-installed stereo on my old Toyota it was clear as a bell. But then again, everyone has their own personal taste, and what sounds good to one person may sound lousy to another. But after 120 posts and counting, we all seem to agree that the system in lacking in one form or another.
  • jojo28jojo28 Member Posts: 11
    YES--You cannot compare the MOnte Carlo sound system with the radio sytem on the IMpala with an amplifier. The Monte Carlo has a different Amp. AND speakers. I have checked this out with the parts department.
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    Now I understand what you meant - yes, although the high frequencies are there, they do NOT sound clear or natural at all. We've had our Impala for 2 months now and the sound does not get any sweeter with time.

    The radio is my biggest complaint with the car.
    I was so stupid not to even listen to the radio before buying the car. I had heard the Buick radios and assumed the Impala would be the same - NO WAY!

    I even bought a pair of Kenwood 6-1/2" speakers for the front doors. They didn't fit. I'm not sure if 6-1/2S will do it but I'm thinking of trying a pair of those.

    Getting to the door speakers involves nothing more than removing the speaker covers. Wiring is simple with a $15 "harness" that fits the GM plug to the standard speaker lugs.

    On the other hand, I understand that replacing the 6x9s in the rear is quite a deal.
  • nosirrahgnosirrahg Member Posts: 872
    Has anyone bought/installed the rear speaker enclosures mentioned in an earlier post? I haven't spent too much time checking out the trunk area, but from what I've seen there shouldn't be any obstructions to keep one from trying these out.

    I've also noticed that on some music (primarily CDs), I can get the bass so strong that it vibrates the rear-view mirror pretty good; yet the bass doesn't "feel" as strong as in my other cars. I'm sure if you put some type of monitoring device in the car, it would register strongly; but to the ear things seem just a bit fuzzy at the ends of the spectrum.
  • mattlcmattlc Member Posts: 13
    I repleaced my rear speakers with Boston Acoustics (and did the job myself). I remember the type of speaker boxes that you're talking about, but it's been a while since I have actually seen one. My feeling is that the boxes will not fit snugly to the speakers, but will probably need to be fitted (glued) to the bottom of the rear speaker deck.
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    mattlc is right, you will have to juryrig (and modify) any enclosures you use under those rear 6x9 speakers.

    However, such box enclosures are available through Crutchfield and Radio Shack catalogs.

    Undoubtedly the boxes will have to be modified but they will make the speakers sound better - louder with better bass. My previous car had them as standard equipment.

    mattlc - what model BA's did you install? Price?
    How hard was it to do?

    Mounting them will be a bear.
  • mattlcmattlc Member Posts: 13
    I installed the BOSTON ACOUSTICS RM9. These were the top of the line model and were not cheap ($300). The sound is much sharper and vibrant than the factory speakers, but I still have the bass problem.

    Doing the installation was fairly easy, but time consuming. The rear seat (back and lower sections) needed to be removed. The decklid cover could then be removed, and then the speakers. At that point there was one sticking point...the speakers were actually enclosed in a black plastic enclosure that was held on with a strong adhesive. I did manage to remove it and then replace it (with some more adhesive) to the new speakers.

    This enclosure is there so that sound will not be lost into the space between the back dash (cloth on cardboard section that the speakers site on) and the metal dash under it. I think that the front speakers have this same type of enclosure. So when people say that you can just take the old one out and throw a new one in, it is misleading.
  • mattlcmattlc Member Posts: 13
    If you don't want to pay an arm and a leg for speakers (like I did), do yourselves a favor and DON'T LISTEN TO THE BOSTON ACOUSTCS RM9's. In the showroom the difference between those and any other speaker (at Tweeter, Inc.) was so dramatic that I could not have purchased another brand, or model.
  • luckyjdrluckyjdr Member Posts: 10
    crutchfield sells foam speaker baffles LOOK http://www.crutchfield.com/cgi-bin/S-FsvLsHi3oN5/ProdView.asp?bid=570&store=0&sid=S-FsvLsHi3oN5#237xt60 and I am going to try them. I was thinking of trying some new rear speakers from WALMART. they carry pioneer and sony. I could try them and if they don't sound better, I would return them. they take anything back, just say they didn't fit and have your reciept.
    WHAT ABOUT THE SPEAKER WIRES, WILL THE CLIP WORK OR DOES IT NEED TO BE CUT FOR THE NEW SPEAKERS.
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    I've also checked out the speakers at WalMart and
    the 6x9 Pioneer TSA695's @ $70./pair sounded loud and clear - not as good as mattlc's BA's I'm sure but a definite improvement over what GM installed.

    If you don't want to cut wires, you can buy a Speaker Wire Harness Adapter" by Metra Dash Works at Circuit City. (Part # GM DW-4568SH $15.)
    Much easier than soldering in tight spaces.
    This worked for the front and the rear looks the same.

    According to
    buts sounded
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    I am convinced that Chevrolet will not be replacing our speakers so I'm biting the bullet and buying my own - as much as I resent having to do so - mostly on principle.

    So, if anyone with a Impala/GM repair manual is willing to xerox, fax or e-mail to me the page(s) on rear seat removal for accessing replacement of the rear speakers, please post here.
  • mattlcmattlc Member Posts: 13
    If everyone has made the decision that it is the amplifier and not the speakers, why aren't you replacing the amp?

    If you want tyo replace the speakers, the removal of the back seat is fairly simple. Start by taking the lower portion of the rear seat out. This can be done (with some muscle) by pushing the seat down and towards the back of the car. This releases a clamp-like mechanism (for lack of better wording) that holds the seat in place.

    Next, remove the seat-back. By pulling down the seat-backs, you will reveal several bolts that are holding the seat's frame in place. Take out the bolts. Since you already have the seat-bottom out, you will also see bolts at the bottom of the seat-back that need removal.

    Also note that there are several of the plastic push-in "bolts" that need removal to take up the back dash. By removing these (with a screw driver, or putty knife) you will cause them some damage, but not enough that they can be reused.

    The rear dash is in tight and actually needs to be slightly bent in the middle for removal. DO NOT try to remove the speaker grilles from the the rear dash. You don't need to.

    The speakers and their plastic enclosures are held to the metal deck with adhesive. If you work around with a screw driver, you will unstick them.

    Replace the old speakers with the new in the plastic enclosures. Reverse procedure to replace.
  • mattlcmattlc Member Posts: 13
    "By removing these (with a screw driver, or putty knife) you will cause them some damage, but not enough that they CAN'T be reused."

    ALSO...Please note that I did this a couple/few months ago, and this is from memory (i.e., don't hold me responsible if you screw it up).
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    mattlc - I realize it's both the amp and the speakers but the speakers seemed an easier thing to tackle. All those wires and special connectors on that amp - ugh. I'm not looking for perfection - just a tolerable improvement. I'll tackle anything video or audio in the home but the car is a different story.

    Did you replace the amp as well as the speakers?

    Did you also replace the front speakers? If so, with what? I tried using 6-1/2" Kenwoods - sounded good but did not fit the odd plastic frame. Is the right size 6-1/2S ?
  • mattlcmattlc Member Posts: 13
    No, I haven't done the amp, but the installation guy at Tweeter took a cursory look at it and said it should be possible.

    I looked at the front speakers, measured them, and found it to be a strange size (as you found out). Have you taken the car to a Tweeter-like shop and had an installer size them? I think that this would save you time, instead of doing the work in the hopes that it will fit and finding out that it doesn't.

    I am comfortable doing the work myself. My problem is cost. Obviously an amp is going to run about $200 and if I match the BA speakers to my rear ones, that will cost me another $250. As you can imagine, I had a tough time justifying the rear BA speakers (at $300). I'm trying to buy new golf clubs too. If the wife finds out about all of these toys, I'm a goner.
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    The big credit union in our neighborhood is
    having a yard sale of rental cars from a large rental car company. Just to make sure I was not imagining how bad I think our radios sound, I tried the radios of 3 different cars on the lot.

    The 99 Buick Regal with 22,000 miles sounded absolutely GREAT. Standard radio, no apparent
    external amp in the trunk. WARM, RICH, NATURAL
    SOUND with clear highs and more than enough bass.

    2000 Buick LeSabre - almost as good as the Regal.
    Very nice cushy leather interior.

    99 Olds Aurora - bad, really bad sounding radio.
    The tuner didn't even work properly. Station
    numbers were erratic. Much worse radio than the
    Impala. Incidentally, our Impala seats are much
    more comfortable than the Aurora.

    I know I'm on a soap box about this radio thing
    but I think we've all just kind of stupidly
    adapted to the lousy sound and forgotten what a
    decent car radio is supposed to sound like. It
    really spoils the car for me and I think GM owes
    us.

    Has anyone had satisfaction with their dealer in replacing the amp or speakers?
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Haven't heard or received any remedies from GM as of yet. Based on my quality control/product development experience these "Bugs" (Speakers and Amp namely)are the kind of issues that take time to fix from the manufacturer standpoint. True, GM should have excercise extreme care when selecting the audio components for the Impala (Otherwise, I think they did an excellent engineering job with the rest of the car)but things of that nature can easily "Fall thru the cracks" and create situations like this.

    At this point in time I believe GM is well aware of the problem with the upgrade Impala/Montecarlo sound systems (Due to the large number of complaints)and I am sure they are currently looking into worthy replacements of these components to be able to successfully initiate a recall campaign (Very costly endeavor)and of course to replace the OEM components for the assembly of new cars as well. Again, remedies could take a long time to produce (Months, years)but I am sure that we will have corrective action taken sooner than later since GM/Delco doesn't manufacture the Speakers or Amp units. Mitsushita does and I can guarantee you that they can't afford to miss such a huge business relationship with GM due to product design problems.

    Hang on tight and let's wait and see.

    I agree with you to some extent as the Radio performance diminishing the ownership experience. Same as yourself I am an "Audiophile" but I haven't had much luck with my car radios either, may be except the radio that came with my '97 Acura TL, which was a far cry from the usual deficient and crappy Honda Radios (The Impala radio sounds much better for starters).

    Other resolution avenues would be (If this radio bothers you to the point of no enjoying the car)to be willing to spend anywhere from $500 to $1000 on new equipment and replace the speakers and amp. If excellent sound quality is so important to you, may be spending that cash will mark the difference between you keeping the car 5 years down the road or trading it in for a new Buick next month. Of these options, I think replacing the key audio components will be very much worth for you and of course less expensive than say trading your new car for another one.

    Personally, I am going to hand on tight for another few months and see if GM comes up with a solution to this. Is important to me, but I still enjoy the car, pop a CD and drive into the sunset!.

    Cabello, (Another Impala forum regular) sent me some interesting pics of his new Amplifier/subwoofer installation in his impala. He spent around $1200 to revamp the system and he is one happy camper. One problem that I see with his installation is that the Subwoofer has taken half his trunk space. I'll E-mail him to ask him if is OK to send you the pics. May be you can gather some ideas from them.

    Good luck Dura...I'll keep you posted.

    My .02 cents
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Tomorrow morning I will also be heading to the dealer for my "Gold Bullet" first oil change (2,150 Miles on the clock). It seems we took delivery of our cars right around the same time. I did so on 2/22/00 (Build date 1/00)....on what date you bought yours?

    Anyway, on my "Service Mission" I will take the opportunity to listen to the Montecarlo radio as well as the standard Radio/Tape 6-speaker system on the base Impala and the Upgraded LS stereo on a more recently made car. I want to "fine tune" my hearing and establish some definite sound quality differences there. I will bring in one of my Favorite Tape and CD to aid in the survey.

    The dealership's General Manager is a friend of mine (Although in the end I bought my car from CarOrder.com)and may be he can "Hook" me up with some of his "Top Dog" friends there at GM. I am sure he knows something about the radio issues or at least can get me the scoop as to what Chevy plan of attack will be.

    You bring an interesting possibility with the "6x9" Delco made speakers that you saw installed in the Buick. Do you think they can be swaped for the OEM stuff we have in the Impala? Will their shape fit the plastic frame of our cars? The sore point continues to be the shape of the front speakers as it appears that virtually nothing else will ever fit in that space. It would certainly be worth looking into that.

    Delco radios have always been well regarded as well as systems from Chrysler's Infiniti line. Problem is that GM essentially "Let Go" of Delphi Electronics last year and they are now a more independent company from GM, so that could explain the sudden switch over to OEM sound parts. But the real reasons why, sure it is beyond me.

    Have fun tomorrow, I guess we will make some interesting discoveries in our dealerships missions!
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    mattlc put in Boston Acoustic 6x9s (as posted earlier) so I'm fairly certain that any 6x9s would fit. Why GM designed it as they did requiring rear seat removal to replace speakers is absurd.

    The fronts are still a mystery to me. They are NOT standard 6-1/2". They MAY be 6-1/2S or even 5-1/4. I just don't know and I don't really want to venture into one of those specialty car audio stereo stores.

    teo- taking a known tape and CD with you is a great idea. I did that when I bought my last VCR. I knew exactly what it should look and sound like. Also, if you pass a Buick dealer on the way, check out a Regal with standard CONCERT II sound -
    NOT the Monsoon audio system which some posters say is overdone and problematic.

    Finally, what is "Delphi" Electronics???

    Post your Saturday findings here on this forum and I'll do the same. Take care.
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    No Monte Carlos on my dealer's lot today.
    I really wanted to hear what ron's radio with a
    different external amp and speakers sounded like.

    Instead, I checked out 2 Impala radios.
    Both had radio/cassettes - NO CD in either.
    One had an external amp. The other did not.

    I took a tape with familiar music on it and
    played the same FM stations in both cars,

    The results - The one WITH the external amp
    sounded somewhat better than my notorious unit
    with radio/cass/CD and external amp. A little
    more bass and greater range on the tone with
    the high frequencies being less shrill than mine.

    Another difference on that Impala with the
    external amp, although the Ref # was the same
    as mine, CY-BG2911ZC, the Model # was
    entirely different 10289187. Car manufacture
    date on door was 09/99! My amp Model #
    reads 10432572. My car manufacture date
    is 01/00.

    EVEN BETTER was the radio/cassette
    withOUT any external amp. It sounded
    VERY SWEET. Full, rich tone with clear
    highs and ample bass. Even when I isolated
    just the front speakers, it still sounded very
    good. Also, the rear 6x9s WERE
    DIFFERENT than mine.
    They were marked UX7/UG2 Rear, Chevy 4 door.
    Mine are marked UQ3 Rear, Chevy 4 door.

    That is what a car radio should sound like.
    What a colossal effort to remedy something
    so simple and basic. I will never again buy
    another car without FIRST checking out
    EVERYTHING including the radio.

    So teo - what did you find?
  • humahumahumahuma Member Posts: 17
    (mattlc) back on post 134 you mentioned that a rep from TWEETER thought it would be possible to replace the Amp. I only have a Best Buy close to my home and they don't know if the Impala amp can be replaced so....
    Could you ask the guy at TWEETER... What amp model he thinks we could use to replace the factory amp.
    I'm would think a wiring conversion harness would also be required.

    THANKS
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    I apologize for not replying earlier. It was crazy around my office here yesterday. When I went for my oil change on saturday, it was very early in the morning (Around 7:30 am) so I couldn't get to sample the radios of other Impalas in the lot. (Sales people start right around 9:30 am on saturdays). The Chevy dealer (Dadeland Chevrolet) is one of the smallest lots in town and therefore they only stock a few cars per model line. As far as Impalas go, they had a Base silver with the RDS AM/FM and CD Player only and also, they had a Torch Red LS with the light oak leather interior (No Spoiler on this one)and also the RDS AM/FM radio with CD player only as well. Both of these sound systems claimed to have the "Premium 8-speakers" and the external amp. I was not able to verify the build dates of either car, but they certainly looked factory fresh.

    They only had one Galaxy Silver Montecarlo (LS) with the same radio configuration as per the above. Although I am also interested in testing a car with that particular sound system setup, I still wouldn't have been able to sample the vaunted 8-speaker system CD/Tape system that you and I own as well as the 6-speaker Tape deck only system found on base Impalas and LS cars with the 1SA preferred package.

    Later that day (as well as the entire day sunday) I was caught up doing errands with my wife and visiting her family and mine, so I couldn't go to another dealer.

    I still carry a tape and two CD's in my car as tomorrow afternoon I will have some time to spare and plan to visit a new "Mega" Chevy dealership that opened in the west end of the city as well as my neighboorhood Buick/Olds dealer (Angel Buick/Olds)to sample the Concert II system in the Regal.

    During my "Eye" survey I also noticed that the Malibu comes equipped with a very nice standard issue Delco AM/FM Tape/CD system which I think is the same radio that comes in the Blazer truck line. That radio sounds very sweet, based on my experience when I rented a 4 door Blazer LS on my last trip to Denver, Co.

    Your results are indeed very interesting and confirm the claims that the base 6-speaker Tape/no amp system delivers the best sound. I agree with you that GM has a simple fix in their hands....just swap the OEM speakers and AMP with Delco manufactured units. I am still holding my hopes high...remember don't give up just yet.

    Delphi Automotive Electronics was a GM owned subsidiary until a couple of years ago. They are responsible for the development and manufacturing of all electric and electronic components in GM cars and trucks (As well as other global brands such as Opel, Holden and Vauxhall)such as Delco stereo systems, Instrument clusters, In dash climate control and A/C switches and buttons, electronic climate control units, engine computers and so forth. They are a big supplier of other automotive components as well. Now they are independent from GM.

    Here is a link on Delphi Electronics for your reading pleasure:
    http://www.delphiauto.com/

    I'll keep ypu posted on my findings

    Enjoy!
  • radiohelpradiohelp Member Posts: 3
    Just bought a new 2000 Impala with CD/Cassette Radio/amp and received delivery of this car on 4/25/00. The bass response on the radio is awful. Took the car back to the dealer, they compared it to other cars with the CD/cassette/amp and said that there is no problem. I compared it to one without a CD/amp and the sound was great. I gave GM a call regarding this, they called the dealer then me back with the message that the sound is working as designed and is not a problem. My questions are: 1) What are my next steps with GM, 2) It sounds like other folks have had this problem - Does anyone know what the cause of this poor bass response is?, 3) Any recommendations on what to do? Type of amp, speakers, etc. Many thanks
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    You're just the latest one to be caught in this nasty radio quagmire.

    The cause is MOSTLY a bad amp and secondarly, bad 6x9 rear speakers in the 8 speaker premium (gag)sound system.

    If you take some time to read all the posts on this Impala radio forum (which I started out of my disappointment), you'll see you have plenty of company.

    "teo" keeps encouraging me that GM will eventually concede and replace the amps and/or speakers.
    I'm hoping he's right. I'm leaning on my dealer and I am about to write GM, AGAIN.

    Although some owners have put out hundreds already to replace rear speakers, trunk amps or install subwoofers - is that what you want to do?

    Your car is just one week old and you paid well over $20,000 for it. Do you really want to lay out hundreds more right away for speakers or an amp without even knowing exactly what they will sound like?

    Keep complaining - if we all do, maybe GM will actually come through for us. This is a legitimate problem that the company should correct.

    (There you go teo - I'm beginning to sound like you- optimistic!)
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    I fully share your renewed sense of optimism! I hope that from this day forward you (and others in this topic)make the best possible attempt to fully enjoy this otherwise fine car until GM comes up with a satisfactory solution to the sound quality woes. I know Dura, you are a "Hardcore Audiophile" but let's be honest...you just spent $25,000 for a new set of wheels...then concentrate on the other positive aspects this machine has to offer. But then if you will not be 100% happy in the long run, then your list of options will come down to "Bite the Bullet" in two very distinctive ways:

    1) Revamp the Speakers and Amp (More $$$ to lay out)

    2) Trade-in the car for another and lose your head in the process. (Dura, you are very young at heart...can't picture you driving around in a "Miss Daisy" Buick...sorry but Buicks don't appeal to me...well the Regal GS is great but aged compared to the Impala LS).

    I am faithful that GM won't let us down on this one, but we will have to pantiently wait some times that's the only way.

    I'll let you know about my Chevy/Buick dealership field trip tomorrow on the radios.
  • sweetpollysweetpolly Member Posts: 99
    You might just play CD's. They sound pretty good!
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    To contact GM about the lousy radio:

    The web address is:
    www.chevrolet.com

    Click on "CONTACT US" at top of screen
    Click on "CUSTOMER ASSISTANCE" along left edge in next screen
    Click on "E-mail us..." within text.

    Fill in the blanks and spell out your complaint

    The 800# is there too if you'd rather call.

    Be polite but firm in your dissatisfaction.
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    In post 110, you suggested bypassing the external amplifier in the trunk by jumping wires.

    While I doubted that would work because I did not think there was an amp in the Radio/cass/CD, I have some reason to think otherwise now.

    Because I am unwilling to give up my car and get no results, I PHONED the auto audio shop my dealer said they would send the car to.

    Although the Delco specialist was not in today, another guy looked it up in some manual and his info was that all the head end units (the things in the dash) were interchangeable! Now does that just mean in terms of size or what? He didn't know.

    In the meantime, I might experiment with jumping speaker ins and outs on the plug as you suggested.
    Can you please post that info from your manual or e-mail me a scan from the manual? If I think I can do it, I'll try.

    I just cannot stand that radio - especially after hearing how really good the standard Impala radio/cass sounds without the external amp.

    Thanks
  • mahler1mahler1 Member Posts: 3
    Does anyone have the option (MX9) for a trunk mounted CD-CHANGER. This option consists of having the RDS radio with cassette only (ULO). I have been unable to find a changer that works. Has anyone been successful.
  • radiohelpradiohelp Member Posts: 3
    Duraflex, could you let us know how you made out bypassing the AMP? Sounds like a good 1st step
  • humahumahumahuma Member Posts: 17
    In response to your post # 149. I don't have a scanner but I could fax you the page from the shop manual so you could try by-passing the amp.
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    RE: Radio/CD/cass unit with external amp in trunk

    Totally disgusted with this audio system,I finally
    and reluctantly took the car to the Chevy dealer
    and also to their auto audio sub-contractor.

    It went as badly as I knew it would.

    The audio guys said they had no substitute for the
    Matushita amp in the trunk.

    At the dealership, I persuaded the service manager
    to order another amp. It will be identical to
    what's in there but I seriously doubt that it will
    sound any better.

    At both places they just listened, shook their
    heads and said it's performing the way it's
    supposed to. That's little comfort when it sounds
    like XXXX.

    It was like a trip to dumb and dumber.

    As I contended from the outset, the solution has
    got to come from the top down - a recall from GM.
    Frankly, I don't see it happening.

    In 3 months and 2700 miles, I have had NO
    significant problems with our LS. A little
    stuttering at start up a while back which I
    attribute now to bad gas, but that's it. It's a
    pleasure to drive.

    I feel for those of you you have had engine
    shutdowns and engine cradle weld problems.
    There's no excuse for that. Although the audio
    has nothing to do with safety or performance, it's
    a valid issue too.

    The RDS radio/amp is an integral part of this car and unfortunately it is not readily replaceable.
  • 2k_impala_ls2k_impala_ls Member Posts: 311
    anyone knowhy the site is frozen and can't post
  • humahumahumahuma Member Posts: 17
    If you can read this then this we can still post to this site.
  • nosirrahgnosirrahg Member Posts: 872
    If you're referring to "Impala IV", it was frozen because it reached critical mass (something like 700 posts). We're now all over at "Impala V", already pushing 75 posts there, though.
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    I am still willing to try bypassing the amp if someone will just e-mail me the appropriate pages from the service manual so I know which wires to jump on the plug. There are at least 16 of them.

    I have no intention of laying out $120 for a service manual that I'll never use for anything else. I am not that mechanically inclined.

    Ab aside - My wife had a basic Buick Century on a one day rental during routine maintenance of her car. That simple radio/cass sounded so much better than ours with cass/CD and the dreaded external amp.

    Highlight my name on header to access my e-mail address. I'll post results.

    Thanks.
  • humahumahumahuma Member Posts: 17
    I don't understand how I can get your e-mail address by "highlighting your name on header to access your e-mail address". Please explain in more deatil or respond to this with your e-mail address.
  • humahumahumahuma Member Posts: 17
    Duraflex, forget my previous post #159. I figured it out. One has to login before highlighting your name on the header to get your e-mail address.
    I got your e-mail address. I'll e-mail the page to you this weekend.
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    Thanks for your reply. I'm sorry to see that others have apparently lost interest in the rotten sound of the radio/CD/cass with external amp.
    It's easy to do over time. You just sort of get used to it and adapt to the lousy sound with poor bass, shrill highs and little control over the tone. (I also found that my tape unit plays a little fast - by almost 2%!)

    On 5/16. my dealer supposedly ordered me a replacement amp for the trunk. (See post #153) No word yet. I'm going to call him on that today.
    In the meantime, I look forward to jumping the wires on the plug. I have such little confidence in most mechanics, I dread them poking around in a new model car they are unfamiliar with and possibly creating new problems.

    If you e-mail me TODAY just a note with YOUR return address, I'll provide a couple other options for getting me the info from the service manual that might be easier.

    Also, what is the Model # and Reference # on your amp? Mine is:
    Model # 10432572
    Ref # CY-BG2911ZC
    My car build date is 01/00 from the sticker on the edge of driver side door.

    I heard one Impala with radio/cassette ONLY (no CD) that sounded noticeably better.
    Model # 10289187
    Ref # CY-BG2911ZC
    Build date 09/99.

    Such a headache over something so basic. Radios have been in cars since the 1930s. In my 6 cars over 30 years, this is the worst sounding thing I ever owned.

    Let's hope we can get it straightened out without spending a fortune.

    Thanks.
  • nosirrahgnosirrahg Member Posts: 872
    We're all still lurking out here, hoping you turn something up. After spending $20k on a car, I'm not ready to shell out more $s to improve the sound reproduction at this point. However, I'm interested in what you turn up, as I'm sure others are as well. It was either here or on Impala IV/V where someone posted that the amp seemed to be doing its job of avoiding distortion at high volume levels. I tend to agree with this - at low volume levels, the sound does sound flat; but crank it up to the top end of the volume scale, and things sound pretty clear.

    I'm generally either listening to "Radio Disney" on the AM band with my kids, or by myself listening to tapes/CD at high volume, so I don't do much "normal volume" listening.
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    Car audio should sound good at any volume. In most cars, it does.

    I never blast the thing - for one reason it's simply not safe. It's distracting and you can't hear other cars and people around you - not to mention sirens and the like.

    Listening at high levels also destroys your hearing. I know guys in their 40s who have played in rock groups or worked in video tape editing and their hearing is shot from high levels of audio.
    The same thing happens to factory workers and others exposed to high decibel levels over prolonged periods of time. Even my lawn guy (about 25) has enough sense to wear ear protection to save his hearing as he mows.

    AM radio sounds acceptable on the Impala radio/CD/cassette with external amp because of AM's limited frequency range. When I listen to business, news and talk radio on AM, it doesn't sound bad at all. Distant reception could be better but that's a seperate issue.

    Final note - my neighbor has a subwoofer in his car. We can always hear him coming down the street. He wears a hearing aid and is only 30!
  • radiohelpradiohelp Member Posts: 3
    Duraflex, we are still out here...
  • humahumahumahuma Member Posts: 17
    I just e-mailed the wiring page from the shop manual. I might try my little expierment too (if I ever get the time).
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.