Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I'm surprised that the new 6-speed tip also shifts at 3~5 mph. It appears that the Audi engineers do not want the average driver to "rev' the engine in 1st gear any more than is necessary to get the vehicle rolling.
Tip shifting into 6th on the new model must be exhilerating on the open road!
The slight lag one may feel in either the 2.7T or the 3.2 (or especially in the "old" A6 4.2) is, IMHO almost entirely one of transmission or "tip" lag. Yes, the 2.7T equipped with a tip could be induced to turbo lag (if the shift from first happened below 1800 - 2000 rpm, you immediately fell out of the torque sweet spot -- but the absolute worst at lag were my two A6 4.2's with the 5 spd tip.)
If you ever got to drive an S6 or an RS6 then you know it "MUST HAVE BEEN" the software that made it shift early and "pause" to figure out how to do your foot's bidding as cheaply (fuel wise) as possible. Very troubling.
I did not notice this "feature" on the three new A6 test drives I took -- but I know that this "feature" is actually a learned feature and perhaps I did not train my testers to be sluggish.
When I test drive I do tend to be a bit spirited.
I did try S mode -- but other than raising the shift points (which I expected) there were no surprises.
For "the record" the "old" 2.7T equipped A6 was quicker to 60mph than the 2005 A6 4.2 V8. Indeed, there was a time in 2000, I recall, where the quickest US Audi of them all was the 2.7T equipped A6 with a claimed time of 6.0 seconds -- to 62mph.
The S4 (also with the 2.7T came along and changed things -- but, remarkably, just a little).
When I got my 2003 allroad 2.7T with it's 0-62mph time claim of 6.8 seconds, I could not tell any difference over my 2001 A6 4.2 with its 0-62mph time of 6.7 seconds.
Of course those who bought the 2004 A6 S-Line with its bumped HP and torque, did indeed have a quicker car, by far (in relative terms, but not in absolute terms) than the 2004 4.2 equipped version.
Said it before -- at the price point, Audi should have brought out the new A6 3.2 with a "sub 7 second" mfgr's data point for the 0-62mph sprint.
The argument I heard was that we are supposed to compare the new 3.2 to the previous 3.0 -- unfortunately, price makes this comparison seem rather unlikely.
Nothing but praise for the new A6 3.2 -- silky smooth, plenty peppy and great "pipes."
In other words, would the average driver be able to observe any difference driving the 2 vehicles in a side by side comparison?
Any feedback?
Someone brought up a momentary lag when you press the gas pedal, and I noticed it too. It was slightly annoying. Otherwise, the driving feel is excellent.
My other minor complaint is, the cruise control pod is very small and hard to reach. Also, the XM station does not seem to take any commands except 'previous' and 'next station'. FM works fine.
However, these are only minor problems. Overall, the car is heavenly! I was lucky to get it. I happened to call the dealer at the right moment, who apparently had just taken a 'sold' sign off, because the original buyer could not come up with the money!
"Tiptronic® transmission
When the transmission is in Tiptronic® mode (if so equipped), it will automatically shift into second gear at three miles per hour unless the accelerator is depressed by at least 80 percent (this only applies to A6 2.7 T, S4, A6 4.2 and A8)."
"Tiptronic® transmission
When the transmission is in Tiptronic® mode (if so equipped), it will automatically shift into second gear at three miles per hour unless the accelerator is depressed by at least 80 percent (this only applies to A6 2.7 T, S4, A6 4.2 and A8)."
And NOT the new 3.2?????
- Ray
Thinking this odd, as the suggestion of higher EPA MPG would seem to apply here as well - perhaps more so, given one typical expectation when choosing to buy a model with a "smaller" engine . . .
Me, I still prefer the old 2.7T with the 6 speed manual. But if yo must have a tip, well, get the Sline version.
My 2000 A62.7T has a nice "indentation" on the front bumper that "blends" in nicely. It will be interesting to see how a standard US plate adds or detracts from the look of this car.
http://www.northtexasaudigroup.com/forums/attachment.php?attachme- ntid=2387&stc=1
LIY
FWIW, I've heard (from a salesman) that the voice command system doesn't work all that well, but I've never tried it myself.
Audi's, according to him, have knock sensors that, when activated, modify ignition to prevent premature detonation. However, this is intended to prevent catastrophic failure in the event that either poor fuel is utilized, or a lower octane grade is all that is available. It is, in essence, a stop gap measure. The reason that lower octane fuel must not be employed, on a regular basis, is what occurs when the sensor/ignition fails: detonation will result, unchecked, resulting in severe damage to the engine. While it is likely that one could drive for many miles with no problem, why take the chance? First, engine performance is somewhat reduced. Second, and most important, I question if Audi would honor a warranty claim if the A6 had a tankful of mid-octane or regular gas. An Audi, as we know, is no bargain to repair.
I know that Kirstie, our host, said a transcript of that chat will be available. Kirstie how do we access it?
I signed off of the chat prior to Trahan mentioning octane grades. However, if I had a 2005, and was going to use regular fuel, I would use whatever Audi recommended: So long as it was in writing.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
In all dark colored cars (black,dark blue,etc) you do not have a choice of wood.you must get the light birch which didn't appeal to me. i actually wanted the dark blue with beige with the dark wood interior but they said it couldn't be done..argh!
I had to upgrade to the amarretto with the black car (have only seen this color combo in an A8..so i am hoping the A6 will look just as nice)
LIY
That said, I know from experience that you can order the trim as a part and have the old piece replaced. So, while you may not be able to get the exact color you want from the factory, there is a work-around.
I have not seen the A6 amaretto in person. I'm not sure if the dash and the carpeting is black or grey. Different pics show different color colors. I have been told the headliner is grey. If anyone has seen it in an A6 I would like to know what it looks like. The A8 ameretto is not the same color combo.
Fair warning, though--when I had the wood trim crack on my A4 (covered by AoA), it took MONTHS for the replacement part to come in (but only about an hour for the dealer to make the change).
thanks ahead for feedback
LIY
Two technical questions-
Anyone with XM radio? Does it utilize the MMI display to give you title/singer/etc? The Acura's use their whole screen, and it's pretty cool. Other setups I've seen give you a scroll, and while the sat radio is great it is a little more difficult to master.
The Audi site says bluetooth is available. Is it? Can I pay Audi dealer a fee and have Bluetooth available on this vehicle? That would be a huge option, though I haven't seen it discussed.
Thanks!
As for bluetooth, I believe it is standard on all cars. I have just upgraded to a bluetooth phone but have not received yet.
The new A6 is outstanding, BTW.
Bluetooth is standard in all cars, and there is a "shoe" in the front armrest for cradles for certain phones. Be advised, however, that Bluetooth is only standard in theory. In practice, you take your chances. Your best bet is to ask around here for somebody with the same phone as you have to see if they've had success pairing it with the car.
In other words, when you're in FM, you see as many stations as the car has picked up, and any associated RDS broadcasts. In satellite, you see as many stations as can fit, plus full data on the one you have selected.
I haven't ever seen what the screen displays for a pre-set on any band.
Anyway, thanks for the XM info. Not a MAJOR deal, but a curiosity.
The Bluetooth is something that does concern me, however. I'm a current ATT customer with no contract. I have a dated phone, but have been waiting until my next car purchase to determine my next phone. Essentially, I'll tailor it to my car.
What phones are working out there with the A6 Bluetooth? How is the interface? Solid connections, or does it sound like the early analog phone connections from years ago (I've heard poor reception in some of the Acura's)?
Thanks again.