Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see May lease deals!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
That's your opinion.
" And Nissan can add 10-45HP whenever they want to their 3.5L V6. Honda won't because they will lose their cherished ULEV rating. "
Um .. ULEV is a good thing. Lower emissions is a good thing. Do you care about breathing?
" Nissan's "cheap interior" (you want cheap, look at Pontiac Grand Am/Prix, now THAT'S CHEAP!), can be fixed quickly. Not Honda's Suzuki Aerio exterior treatment. "
If the Altima's interior can be brought up even to the 93-97 Accord's quality that would be great. Please tell Nissan to do it .. Do they really want to have the Altima compared to a Grand Am? Geez.
1. Why after all the build up do I look and say "Well, it looks like an Accord." To me this is neither good nor bad but if they are looking to lure the Passat crowd over I think they laid an egg. It still looks fine to me but not breathtaking by any means.
2. What the heck is it with Honda and manuals only available on 4 cyl engines? I'd buy a V6 in a minute if it had a stick. So my 4 will do for now. I know they say they offer a V6 with a 6 speed (!) later - but only on the coupe! I'm a sedan guy. Don't they think we can drive?
3. I haven't seen a review so I'll reserve judgement but if this has the same basic feel as the current generation the question is why does Honda feel you have to make a choice between a noisier but good handling car like the Accord and a quiet as a church spongy thing like a Camry? I test drove a Passat and it outhandled the Accord and was very quiet indeed. Only reasons I didn't buy it were the requirement of premium fuel and the fact that VW had not proven at that time that they really meant to clean up their reliability act on this one. I had a Rabbit once and am very sensitive to this one. This is my third Accord so I guess I played it safe.
I was waiting on something that was so much improved that I'd go against my better judgement and trade the current car in for the new one. From what I see so far I won't be doing that. I do like my current one just fine.
I believe that every engine/transmission/body variant requires testing and approval from the regulatory bodies. If research/analysis shows that sales of a certain combination would not be worthwhile, then it's not made.
Personally, I would love it. I've been in an auto for 4 years now and am itching to get back into a stick, but I really want a 6 cylinder if available.
fezo: you wondered why no V6 sedan with stick? No enough demand to make it commercially viable.
I just read the Edmunds review. I have no doubt a lot of it is correct. It was my first impression just looking that they have clearly come down more on the side of keeping current owners than rather than attracting new buyers. That said it looks better to me all the time....
The supersizing is one reason why I won't be getting the new "Saturnized" Accord. The new Latitude (66.7" wide) out next year will be the right-sized Honda for me.
One more thing. This never ending thirst for more horsepower has me convinced that there is a gas crisis around the corner. I think we are overdue for one.
i'm only 6'1" and can easily count on one hand the number of cars where i can sit in the back seat and be very comfortable with plenty of legroom and enough headroom (a precious commodity in very low supply if you want a sunroof). now keep in mind i'm talking about sub 30k cars, not your typical s-class mercedes or 7 series bmw.
so, even though i'm no fan of the new accord's styling, i'm glad they are trying to make a comfortable car; and not just for front seat passengers, but also for those back seat drivers!!
The Camry's interior is very drab, and think the Altima's interior is a little classier. Even the Leather option on the Camry is a low quality Leather!
O.K., I started the Camry bashing (had one, loved it). What do you guys think?
BTW, the new Accord's interior looks amazing.
Bottom line is that trying to be all things to all people can be a tricky thing to do. There has to be a compromise in design to ensure most of those desirable traits get engineered into a vehicle where cost is a major concern, especially in such a competative market segment as the midsize sedan. I think Honda has made all the right compromises with the new Accord. Besides, if they made it TOO good, then why pony up more ca$h for an Acura??
As for size, I like bigger cars for convenience. But like the nimble feel of a smaller car. which is one of the reason I am driving an accord.
Btw- I am NOT a fan of the new Mazda 6's interior-a bit too much of the "sports" look cliche (same goes for Camry SE), and I dont like the stereo/HVAC display separated from the actual controls.
~alpha
"'The V-6 was built to beat Altimas,' says Charlie Baker, head of Accord development."
I don't know Charlie...the manual V-6 Altima is pretty quick.
Altima-My aunt has a new 2.5S that she just got back in April and I have about 200 miles of experience with it. I wanted one at first but as I drove it more I realized that it wasn't the car for me. I couldn't get comfortable in the driver's seat so I'd find myself squirming around a lot. The tilt/telescopic steering wheel aided my discomfort somewhat but I still couldn't get comfortable enough. I was impressed by the gauge cluster at first, but after several miles of night-driving I found it to be irritating because it was either too dark or too bright, depending on the setting. The interior materials were not that bad but there was a slight feeling of cheapness in some areas. For example: 1)The headliner was like peach fuzz glued to cardboard, 2)certain plastic pieces weren't low quality but they were cut very sharp and didn't look like they were cut exactly the way the designers intended(the trim piece around the power window switches on the driver's door)and 3)the sunglass storage compartment and center console were flimsy and felt like they would probably break easily. The cloth upholstery was of decent quality and everything else seemed okay.
strager- That is true. I think you can randomly pluck a European and he/she will be just as big as an American. But more realistically, the majority of Americans are bigger than Europeans, as well as the rest of the world.
i'm not sure what the dimensions are of the euro spec accord, but from sketches it definitely better fits my personal definition of stylish...
does anyone know if there is a huge difference between euro and north american accord interior measurements...?
Hoping you can buy side air curtain on all models...
RE : SUPERsizing : I think it's good. Cars were getting too small in the 80's. Who wants to be cramped?? As longs as mileage/ performance doesn't suffer.. bring on the big!!
not too many recent reports of seeing how many college students can fit in a VW bug either.
Sure, styling sells. But trouble-free and long-term ownership of a car demands more.
I first want to share some thoughts about your forum. It helped me greatly make a final selection on a new car. I had two cars narrowed down, different in scope, but both met my needs. I logged on to the model’s forums and read the threads. What a difference. One car was larger and better looking, but the enthusiasm, questions about small issues, dealer concerns, and longevity were so different from the threads in the Accord forum. The information was truly between the lines, and extremely valuable. Better than could be obtained anywhere.
Today’s topic is tires. I am looking to replace tires on both a 2000 Accord EX V6, and a 2001 Accord EX V6. Naturally we are replacing Michelin MXV4 Energy 205 65 R15. The size is the easy part.
I like the energies, but they are expensive. Not only that, they come in H and V ratings with prices to match. I had a grand prix with BFG Touring TA’s (H rated) that I was very pleased with. I found that there is also BFG Touring TA’s that are V rated at a very reasonable price. Another alternate is Michelin Pilots, or Goodyear Eagle Aquatread III’s. Michelin X-Ones are also on the list due to great ratings and long life, even with only a T rating.
My driving is mostly in North Eastern Ohio, mostly highway. This means cruising at 70 to 75 mph, four seasons, flat highway, hilly twisty back roads.
So . I have a few questions for the powers that be.
1) Thoughts on any of the above tires?
2) Thoughts on V rated vs H rated for the driving type?
3) Alternate tire suggestions for an Accord EX V6?
4) Sources for tires that balance price and services?
5) Alternate widths and profiles, such as 215 or 60 series tires, or 215/60 tires?
6) Good web sites that review this sort of thing?
I appreciate any feedback the forum provides.
you may be the only person in the world with this opinion.
dindak:
in terms of problems per car, GM is closing the quality gap with Honda. I believe they're achieving this by not updating their designs (Buick in particular) and they should eventually get it "right". however the quality gap in terms of engineering is still significant. items such as quality of materials, fit/finish, panel gaps and evenness, engine refinement, interior design and so on ...
Altima to upgrade their cheapo interiors and for the Camry to increase their HP's.
The New Accord is a balance of the three (passat, camry, altima).
~alpha
http://biz.yahoo.com/djus/020730/200207301610000828_1.html
interesting read.
I would think that with the intense competition (Camry, Altima-which is supposed to have improved interior materials for 03, Passat, and new 6) all of the midsize makers in this segment will be competing to win car shoppers' dollars (and most importantly it seems, hearts!)
02 Accord/03 Accord/02 Camry
Length 189.4/189.5/189.2
Width: 70.3/71.5/70.7
Height: 56.9/57.1/58.3
Wheelbase: 106.9/107.9/107.1
Weight: 3075.0/2989.0/3142.0
Front Head Room: 38.5/38.3/39.2
Front Hip Room: 54.9/54.6/54.4
Front Shoulder: 56.9/56.9/57.5
Front Leg Room: 42.1/42.6/41.6
Rear Head Room: 36.0/36.8/38.2
Rear Hip Room: 54.1/53.5/54.1
Rear Shoulder: 56.156.1/56.7
Rear Leg Room: 37.9/36.8/37.8
Trunk Area: 14.1/14.0/16.7
The Camry actuall appears more efficent with its size based on some of these measurements. For reference, the European Accord's exterior dimensions are about the same as a NA VW Passat, except that it is 8-inches shorter (euro bumpers). There aren't any interior measurements on the euro Accord on the UK website, and I'd be to lazy to conver metric to english anyway.
I mention that people are paying MSRP for the Odyssey, MDX, CR-V and Pilot because the demand outstrips the supply and even at MSRP, they are a good value. When the MDX came out, we considered it and even at sticker was comparably priced with the RX300's negotiated price. If not for the 8 month waiting list, we may have gone with the MDX instead.
Now the Accord can't command MSRP for long, perhaps for the first few months or so due to over-eager buyers, but it will taper down. After 2/3 years in production, the Odyssey is STILL selling at MSRP ... and now it's really simply due to supply/demand, with no ridiculous forced options.
If you can't figure out what "cheap plastic" is, ask Consumers Guide... they made the comment, not me. I don't think that most people would have trouble figuring out what they meant, because I've seen similar comments (such as the Automobile editorial) that say exactly the same thing. Just because you don't understand the concept doesn't make it irrelevant or "pathetic".
The interior and build comments were for all models, so your big concern about I4 vs. V6 is unwarranted about those comments, which are to me the most key.
Yes, the engine noise comment was about the I4, which Nissan predicts will be in 80% of Altimas. So it has great relevance. I even went the extra mile to note that they made a different comment about the V6, so you seem to be REALLY hard to please.
I know what I was driving, and it WAS a V6, thank you. I have enough knowledge about cars to know that, so please spare me the patronizing remarks. My initial comments were not targeted specifically towards an drivetrain (check it out yourself if you doubt me), just the Altima in general. The article I quoted (Consumers Digest) dealt with both the I4 and the V6... how do you think I came up with the additional remark about the V6 otherwise???? At any rate, your concern about that comparison is just a smokescreen. I wasn't comparing V6 engines, just Altimas in general.
So, the refinement comments, the interior comments and the ride comments all apply, regardless of engine. The only comment that applies only to the 4 is the engine coarseness comment, which applies to 80% of Altimas. Regardless of what you thought, my comments were not intended to be limited to Altima V6 models. So my research is very applicable... if it makes you feel better to call it pathetic, knock yourself out. Just shows how transparent YOUR wrap is.
Finally, since this is now about Altimas exclusively, that makes it off topic. What is an Altima enthusiast doing spending so much time in a Honda forum anyway, when the sole intent is obviously to rip on Hondas? I'm not spending any time in any Altima forums... perhaps you should do us the same courtesy.
At any rate, since it's OT, I think we should end this. If you feel compelled to "put me in my place" one more time, go for it. I'm done.
I agree - brand new models that are high in demand will get customers willing to pay MSRP if the price is reasonable. I do think Honda has done a lot of great engineering in the MDX, Odyssey, Pilot and CR-V to the point where they sell at sticker in sustained rates. Evidently there are a lot of satisfied Honda owners. My neighbor just got an Odyssey too - nice minivan. Even at MSRP, the Honda prices are still reasonable because they undercut the competition to begin with, yet offer high value content.
acmeroadrunner:
Cheap plastic can be hard to define - you shouldn't get on talon's case for it. I can offer you comparisons:
The plastic in my 1990 Legend feels better than in the 2002 Altima. The 1993 Accord's plastics were similar in texture to the Lexus of the time. The plastic in the 02 Altima is cheaper than in the 01 Altima or the current Maxima. It's actually comparable to the plastic that surrounds the seat rail in my Legend, except my plastic is molded better with no sharp edges.
I don't see how you can question the Altima's quality considering the Altima owners themselves complain on the Nissan boards and sites. And that Nissan quite plainly said it was cost-cutting on materials.