Older Honda Accords

1169170172174175389

Comments

  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    ...on my 98 I did the rears at 30K and fronts at 45K. The rear pads are thinner than the front and can wear out sooner.

    I coming up on 60K now so I'm probably going to have to do the rears again.
  • johnnymurphjohnnymurph Member Posts: 35
    The best price I found - $22,000.00 off my feet and on the street. This include 5% Md. sale tax, tags and freight. Should I keep lookin'?
  • modredabyssmodredabyss Member Posts: 22
    Price the car at carsdirect.com and note the invoice price. Most people are paying in the range of $100 over invoice to $500 below invoice. If you are paying more than $100 over invoice, you should keep lookin.
  • scottie_jscottie_j Member Posts: 3
    all this, so I want to know, why would a delear be able to sell for below invoice, such as $500 below as you've stated? Maybe I just don't understand what "invoice" really means.

    I appreciate your help. I'm buying a new Accord in May, so I want to have all me bases covered.
    -Scott
  • modredabyssmodredabyss Member Posts: 22
    To get a thorough answer to your question, you should mosey on over to the "how much did you pay" discussion on this site. But, the main reason is that dealers have various incentives and rebates--including a 3 percent holdback--that reduce their actual cost below invoice.

    BTW, last Friday I purchased an Accord sedan 4-cylinder automatic with leather for $21,522, which is $400 below invoice.
  • s852s852 Member Posts: 1,051
    If I get an Accord, I would probably get an EXL w navi or a EXV6 w navi, but for now it is not worth it.
    Without navi, you can get the EXV6 or EXL for around invoice, but w navi they ae going for around MSRP, so the real price difference is over $3500. It isn't worth nearly that much especially since it doesn't add that much to the resale value. Eventually the navi models will also be heavily discounted. TL's with navi are not hard to find, so Accords w navi will eventually not be a big deal either.
  • jud95accordjud95accord Member Posts: 58
    I went to the Houston Auto Show 2 weeks ago and the TSX was on display but roped off so you could not look inside nor get inside. The car was nice looking but definitely looked smaller than the 03 Accord. I also sat in the Acura TL and felt that the car is ready for a major update. I have an 03 V6 and I love everything about the dashboard. The larger knobs, etc., make it easier to see and adjust while hardly taking your eyes off the road. I sat in the new Mazda6 and was not impressed. It had strange circular vents on the dashboard and I thought it was geared toward 18 to 25 years olds in styling. I was checking out all of the competition (a little late since I already bought my Accord) - I came away feeling that my Accord was the perfect choice.

    Just my two cents!
    Judy
  • diploiddiploid Member Posts: 2,286
    My RAV4 has those circular ventes. I like them, but I have to admit, they do look puerile. But very functional, nonetheless.

    Anyways, I just read the Edmunds review of the new Maxima. I *love* that Skyview.
  • stretchsjestretchsje Member Posts: 700
    It had strange circular vents on the dashboard

    My favorite part!!! To each their own...
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    Sounds a little too early for the brake pads. My 98 Accord with 78K miles has the original pads, and the estimated replacement is 90-100K miles.
  • juliano1juliano1 Member Posts: 9
    my buddy just bought a 2003 accord ex-v6 and plans on changing the tires and mags for bigger and wider? please give suggestions. he's thinking about going 225/45 18". is this ok, or too wide, or what?
  • james583james583 Member Posts: 3
    Hey just ordered a new v6 w/Navi and reading all the comments sounds like a good decission. Has anyone used the hands free phone accessory?
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    "Sounds a little too early for the brake pads. My 98 Accord with 78K miles has the original pads, and the estimated replacement is 90-100K miles."

    Depends on driving style, environment, stick vs auto et al. I know my 91 went 112K before needing front pads. The was a stick with lots of trips between Boston and Maine. Now I drive into downtown Boston everyday with an auto and got 30K out of the rears and 45K out of the fronts. YMMV
  • bburton1bburton1 Member Posts: 395
    Wider tires in snow is bad news-also not good for hydroplaning-probably ok on dry surfaces. Once put wider tires on an accord and it was a disaster in snow. So if u are a maple leaf person and live in snow country-wider is not good in snow.
  • diploiddiploid Member Posts: 2,286
    Wider tires create the "snow shoes" effect - they tend to flatten the snow and ride (slide) over it. You want tires that "cut" through the snow to make contact with the ground for better grip.
  • billiam70billiam70 Member Posts: 54
    Do you know if there is any special financing offers for the Accord Sedan this month? For some reason people are saying that there's 2.9 financing being offered this month.

    Thanks for any info you can provide.
  • daevendaeven Member Posts: 28
    I got my EX V6 with navigation for dealer invoice ($25472). The only extra charge was a $90 "documentation" fee, and TTL of course.

    You can get the nav for invoice if you look around. I started with a dealer locator web site, and used that to visit the web page of the closest 80 Honda dealers. I sent an Email from each of their web pages telling them what I wanted, I am a serious buyer, blah, blah. Three of the dealers cam back at dealer invoice with cars available. Several others came back within $500. I ended up having to drive to Milwaukee from the Chicago suburbs to get the car, but it was worth it!
  • s852s852 Member Posts: 1,051
    That's good, as long as it wasn't made up somewhere else such as an undervalued trade or a bunch of dealer packs, warranties etc.. $90 for documentation fee seems like about double what it normally is, but not a big deal on $25000.00
    Carsdirect still shows near MSRP on navi models in my area, while non-navis show near invoice.
    If I were to get and Accord, I want to wait for the 2004s anyway so I can get the factory XM radio instead of dealer installed XM radio, plus avoid first year teething issues.
  • daevendaeven Member Posts: 28
    There was no trade-in, and I got 4.5% financing when the best I could get anywhere else was 4.99 at People First.

    I agree that the doc fee was too much but I wasn't going to argue over $50.
  • bowke28bowke28 Member Posts: 2,185
    i asked my sales manager about the 2.9% rumor, and thats just what it is (for now, anyway), a rumor. the accord was the best selling car in the world in january, so there's likely no reason for honda to push them like that.

    the navi system can be commanded in the radio or climate screens, but just for those applications. ie: if you are on the radio screen, you can only use radio commands. it takes awhile to get all the cammands down pat, but its soooo worth it. IMO, if you have to pay a bit extra for the navi, do it while you can. its an amazing piece of technology, and you wont regret your decision.

    doc fees...feel lucky you dont live in KY. the state takes something like 1.2% of MSRP per car from all dealers. doc fees here range anywhere from $200-$500. people are so used to it now, though, that its not often a huige issue in the buying process.
  • redkey1redkey1 Member Posts: 270
    http://www.hondacarsboston.com/spec.htm

    Only good Feb 13th - 18th. No mention on length of contract.
  • bowke28bowke28 Member Posts: 2,185
    thats a dealer offer. its a rate buy-down. in other words, they take money from the mark-up to pay the interest difference. we do it once in awhile here, but usually its for short term only (24 or 36 months).
  • billiam70billiam70 Member Posts: 54
    I just received pre-approval from Honda Financial Services. How is the interest rate of the loan determined? Is that up to the dealership?
  • bowke28bowke28 Member Posts: 2,185
    sometimes, but usually it's capped by the bank. the dealer has a "buy rate", and they can mark it up a little. usually .25-.5%, and they get a portion of the rate profit. try not to beat them up over it though, because a finance manager will just as soon boot you out his/her door than negotiate rate more than a little. (personal experience). usually, AHFC will say "dont mark it up more than x%, so the dealer has a limit in most cases.
  • diploiddiploid Member Posts: 2,286
    "the accord was the best selling car in the world in january, so there's likely no reason for honda to push them like that."

    I think you got it backwards - it was the best selling car in January because of incentives. By the way, how can it possibly be the best selling car in the world for January when it's only available in America and Canada? The correct answer, sadly, is the Ford Focus.
  • eptraileptrail Member Posts: 2
    I just bought a EXV6. I never gave the navi much thought until now. Does anyone know if it is possible to add the navi aftermarket? Does anyone have a price range?
  • gee35coupegee35coupe Member Posts: 3,387
    On the Camry and Taurus? I haven't heard of any factory backed incentive since the 3.49% in December.
  • diploiddiploid Member Posts: 2,286
    The Taurus was already on incentives way before this automotive incentive war broke out. I think it even comes with free (instead of charging as an option)leather upholstery now. Toyota throws around the 1.9-3.9% APR "Toyota-thon" almost every other week. I believe the last round expired just last week.
  • juliano1juliano1 Member Posts: 9
    yep, im from canada, but here in vancouver where i live, we dont get snow that much like in toronto or winnipeg. heck, i dont even remember if it snowed here this year so i dont have problems about it, although it rains alot but again no problem about it. so please, some inputs from people who have their '03 accords regarding bigger tires and wheels? im thinking about the same size as the altima's 17"s? will those be a good fit? the standard tires are just smallish and look undersized. i think most honda cars are like that.
  • outrunoutrun Member Posts: 539
    While I don't have first hand experience, but I seriouly doubt the Honda Navi can be added afterwards (different dash design, steering wheel, electronics up the ying yang). You might be able to add an aftermarket Navi system (Alpine for example). But it wouldn't be integrated like the Honda Navi.

    -Craig
  • outrunoutrun Member Posts: 539

    try not to beat them up over it though, because a finance manager will just as soon boot you out his/her door than negotiate rate more than a little


    Bowke28, I wouldn't want to buy ANYTHING from your dealership. The finance manager would take a sale away from a salesman because he's too pig headed to work with the customer? Wow. That's pretty poor.

    -Craig
  • jud95accordjud95accord Member Posts: 58
    I just sat in a 03 EX Navi car at the dealership and the whole radio/dashboard is different from the regular EX and the steering wheel is different also.
  • atlantabennyatlantabenny Member Posts: 735
    Juliano1: Based on personal experience and research, largest practical size for an 03 or older Accord is 17" because 17" tires 1) are still reasonably priced, 2) have longer lifespan or treadwear vs 18" or larger, and 3) provide enough (especially 215x50x17) sidewall height to minimize risk of rim damage.

    So the rims don't scrape the fender or struts, rim offset is best within 55mm (original) and 50mm. Width-wise, I wouldn't go beyond 7." Careful with rim & tire vendors - many aren't conscientious about these things.

    Eptrail: Putting info together, one telling us about the Accord's 3-piece dashboard, looks like the whole center piece needs to go - to be replaced by the navi module. Then the electronics need to be installed (separate DVD unit in back ?), etc. Maybe a unit from a totaled car thru Ebay will be reasonably priced.

    Hope this helps.
  • redkey1redkey1 Member Posts: 270
    They are offering it for 60 months.

    Got quoted 20,970 on an EX 5spd coupe with leather. I would like the 6spd but not sure if it is worth the extra $4k plus to get it. Any observations on the 4 vs 6cyl?
  • bowke28bowke28 Member Posts: 2,185
    i cant disagree with you, as ive lost a deal or two for this reason, but usually, our quoted rates are good enough that the issue doesnt arise. however, i didnt say they WOULDNT work with customers...they just wont give away a wholesale rate. they WILL negotiate...just not all the way.
  • bowke28bowke28 Member Posts: 2,185
    i, personally, would take the 4 with a 5-sp. the v6 is great, and with a 6-sp, should be outta this world, but you'll be lucky to pick your own color, and pay less than $2-3k over msrp.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    The manual tranny 4-cyl is plenty fast (faster than the previous generation V-6 with auto tranny), and will get better gas mileage. It may also be a little bit more nimble since it is lighter and less nose heavy. It is probably also cheaper to insure. Plus think of everything you could buy with the $4,000.

    On one hand a car that is a little bit faster.

    On the other hand everything I mentioned above, plus a nice HDTV and a killer surround system for your home (with the $4k saved).
  • stretchsjestretchsje Member Posts: 700
    Will get you better handling, too, and has enough power for a FWD car.

    In regards to wheel size, 17x7" tires is probably a good bit. If anything, that's conservative, but conservative is a good thing :)

    Be sure to find a high-offset wheel! I'm not sure what the factory offset is, but it's probably +50mm. Anyone want to confirm?
  • s852s852 Member Posts: 1,051
    It would cost too much to put in after the fact. The Honda dealer may not be capable of doing it for ANY price. They cannot even install cruise on a Civic DX, so I doubt it is even possible to install the factory navi.
    The cheapest way would be to sell you car and buy another and that would still cost you thousands in depreciation and taxes.
    You probably do not want the navi that much or you would have thought of it before you bought your current car.
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    One guy did it to his Odyssey that I know of. He pretty much had to remove/replace the entire dashboard, replace many wiring harnesses, make connections to his transmission, et al. After a week he was still trying to figure out some connections.

    His take IIRC was that it would have been easier to buy a new van even though he was able to do it for about $1000 by purchasing the parts from a totaled van.
  • atlantabennyatlantabenny Member Posts: 735
    Stretchsje, it's +55mm; saw this stamped on the factory wheel when I put another rim on the car.

    The other rim, a 17" x 7" Konig Imagine with +40mm offset and 215x50x17 tire, extended beyond the wheel well lip; with rear passengers, the tire would surely scrape.

    For this reason I recommended in another thread that offset be kept within 47-55mm, and now think that 50-55mm would be a safer bet.

    I can see that 18" would definitely look better but the tires for this size are pricey, have lower treadwear ratings (good for about 15-20k miles max) and could damage rims more easily due to the short sidewall height (low profile/aspect ratio).

    If those considerations aren't critical to the user, then 18" would be the way to go.
  • stretchsjestretchsje Member Posts: 700
    The Mazda6 has an offset somewhere between 50 and 60mm (I think 55mm, but I've heard different things). It's hard to find wheels with that high an offset!!! Now that I know the high-volume Accord has the same offset, I'm confident more wheels will be available soon.
  • chillenhondachillenhonda Member Posts: 105
    im about to buy a 1999 or 2000 Honda Accord EX 5-speed sedan. I drive a lot of miles per year, about 40,000 or so, and I'm interested in anyone who has had this generation with a lot of miles, or has anything to share about long term wear & tear, servicing, mileage, costs, etc. Thanks.
  • atlantabennyatlantabenny Member Posts: 735
    Chillenhonda, I had a 98 (LX) and 99 (EX) both with 4cyl/auto.

    I sold both cars at 37k miles and 57k miles, respectively, and the only unexpected maintenance item was on the EX whose rear-disc pads and rotors were replaced & turned at an early 28k miles (probably due to off-spec pad material).

    Otherwise, never had auto tranny or other major and even minor problems. The 5-speed, in your case, should be even less prone to potential tranny issues.

    If you hear any groaning noise that increases with speed, it's probably just poor tires as in my case (replaced Michelins with Continentals and got that effect).

    In the absence of previous owner service records, and if the car is not Honda-certified, the usual used car precautions are in order which you probably know about already.

    Last tip: have in mind a low-APR 03 Accord for comparison. Pre-owneds normally have higher APRs especially with private lenders. Unless it's a cash purchase.

    Good luck.
  • s852s852 Member Posts: 1,051
    Some credit unions have used car rates for late model cars that are only slightly higher than new car rates. You need to check around. Resale value is good, but a 99 will still be much cheaper than a 2003 even at a slighly higher APR.
  • juliano1juliano1 Member Posts: 9
    although my buddy wants to enhance his car's appearance, he sure doesn't want to sacrifice a lot on both comfort and treadwear. i guess we won't hear this kind of comments at a tire store and that's why its better to be very well informed or have some knowledge before making a final decision. we also went to tire store this afternoon and coincidentally, were leaning at the size you just suggested. just to be sure, thats the 215/50 17" right? also, regarding the offset, forgive me, im not familiar with this! is this the camber setting? if so, you mentioned that the factory offset is +55mm, and the safer bet is that setting. does that mean i dont have to worry about reminding the tire dealer making adjustments on anything when they install the new tires? thanks guys...you've been very helpful and hope to hear from you two again.
  • juliano1juliano1 Member Posts: 9
    i have a '93 accord sedan equipped with 17"x7.5 wheels in 205/40 rubbers and soon need to replace it. im just wondering if it would be fine to replace it with 215/45s since the tire shop told me it wouldnt matter whether it be 205s or 215s because the wheels' width of 7.5 would stretch it anyway. any truth to that? cause i want to increase the aspect ratio (is that what its called?) to 45 for added comfort, even for a little bit. i dont know if there are 205/45s but if there are, its hard to find. my concern is will there be any rubbings of the tire's sidewall with the body or something once i upgrade to 215s? i hope you understand my predicament.
  • atlantabennyatlantabenny Member Posts: 735
    1) Offset: If you removed a wheel, you'd see remaining the mounting hub and 4 studs. Offset is the distance between that mounting hub's surface and the midpoint of the rim's bead or width. It's a specification of the rim that informs folks what rim type clears the fender, brakes and suspension components.

    Should you have a realignment after a rim change? If going from a 15" to 17," I would say yes - the cost is more than justified to make sure tire wear will be even and the car tracks properly (camber is the angle of the wheel relative to a 90 degree angle from the road surface; it's a suspension setting that varies per car model).

    2) Tire Size: For your friend's 03 Accord, yes 215x50x17 is a size whose "revolution per mile" is nearest the factory tire's. Keeping the 17" diameter, an alternative size is 235x45x17 but being a wider tire there might be rubbing.

    For your 93 Accord, 205x45x17 is actually nearer to the original tire's (195x60x15) "rev per mile." The current tire, 205x40x17, is small and has your odo showing more kilometers than actual; you've also been less fuel efficient as a result.

    215x45x17 for the 93 will be more comfortable and fuel efficient. Your odo, however, will be showing less kilometers than actual.

    Since a car's overall dynamics are based on the "rev per mile" number of the factory equipped tires, it's best to stick to this number when upsizing rims & tires. Thus, the above recommendations.

    For prices, you'll find reasonable quotes (average $90/tire for sizes mentioned) on tirerack.com.

    Good luck.
  • crv16crv16 Member Posts: 205
    I drive around 25k per year - I'm up to 48k on my '01 Accord EX 5 speed. This replaced my '95 Accord LX 5 speed, which I put over 130k miles on. Overall, Accords with manual transmissions are tough to beat. They get excellent gas mileage (34 mpg hwy, in the warmer weather), have very comfortable seats and track down the highway well.

    Maintenance has been extremely reasonable. I don't go to dealers for the "scheduled" maintenances, they're a rip-off. This is what I do:

    Every 4k - oil & filter
    Every 15k - air filter, rotate tires
    Every 30k - trans oil, coolant flush, brake fluid flush.

    Big ticket items include tires (every 40k - 60k, depending on how aggressively you drive), brakes (I'm only half worn on mine at 48k, mostly hwy) & timing belt every 110k miles. Also replace spark plugs & cap/rotor at 110k.

    I was still on my original clutch at 130k with my last Accord.

    Bottom line is that the Accord is an excellent car to rack up a lot of miles on. I'd consider going with an '01 or newer, since that was the year they added additional soundproofing, making the car quieter on the highway.

    Clutch replacement should cost less than $500. Timing belt replacement should cost under $400. You'll probably need new struts around 125k - looking at $600 (Don't be tempted to go to midas for something like this - get the genuine Honda struts!). Stuff like alternators & starters can go at any point after 100k, you're looking at $300 & $200 respectively. If you live in the rust belt, plan on exhaust pipe replacements starting after 5 years of use. Again, don't get anything but genuine Honda replacement pipes. The cheapo stuff at Midas & the like rust out MUCH faster.
  • chillenhondachillenhonda Member Posts: 105
    thanks crv16 and atlantabenny...much appreciated. I agree with your praise of the Accord as well as the maintenance schedule you follow, i do those things right about the same mileage. AS for Honda parts, Ive heard from other owners as well as from experience that its dealers and honda parts only...the cheap places will end up costing you more in the long run. I had the distributor done on my 91 Accord at alocal garage because it was like $75 cheaper than the dealer, wound up going back 3 times for adjustments and I dont think it was ever done right. On my 99 Prelude i saved $200 from having the belts done and wound up paying $150 to have the dealer fix it after the car was running like a diesel.
    Im currently test driving (this week) a 2001 EX 5-speed in blue, it has 20K miles and the dealer price is $16800 and it is certified, which sounds decent to me. I figure i can get at least $1000 off that price if not $1500. I hope anyways.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.