By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
My '04 Accord is silver which doesn't show the dirt and is more practical because I don't have access to a hose in my San Francisco apartment. S.F. is cool most of the time so the black interior isn't hot and the black leather looks better than other colors in my opinion.
Most people see more of the inside of their cars than the outside, so the look of the interior should matter more than the exterior when it comes to style.
I wanted a black interior which is available only in silver on the Accord and it looks fine to me. I have to admit that a shined up black Accord looks better but the light tan interior doesn't appeal to me. It's no surprise that black on black is popular among people who can maintain it.....Richard
In case you were wondering how I did this, I stupidly transported, in my back seat, a heavy box with some rough edges and even some staples on its edges (office chair in original box). Sure enough, when I was through lugging it in and out, I noticed some scratches or severe "scuffs" on the edge of the seat, which to me are fairly obvious and disappointing given that the car is not even one month old.
Any advice on how to minimize or vanish these marks/scratches would greatly be appreciated. Perhaps it may help others as well.
There is also some spray stuff that's used to recolor shoes or other leather items--Magix Spray for Leather. You can buy it at a shoe repair place.....Richard
Oh yeah ... no more carrying boxes on your leather seats
But if you scratched black leather down to where it's tan or gray colored, black shoe polish should darken and probably adhere to the rough, scratched area as it does to scuffed shoes.
When I tried to use the Magix spray stuff, it did adhere but wasn't durable on the seating surface.
On an area that isn't subject to friction it would surely work much better. It's like spray paint and you could spray some onto a hard surface and use a brush or Q-Tip to dab it into a scratched area. It dries very fast because it's like flexible lacquer.
Are you sure that you scratched leather? Much of the Accord's interior is vinyl that looks the same--there is leather on the seating areas but vinyl on other interior parts. If you scratched vinyl, there might be other types of fixes. Lacquer-based products could destroy the vinyl, so be careful!
I'm no expert--just thinking about what I'd do under the same circumstance.......Richard
What amazes me is what can be done now-a-days to fix almost anything. From "ding" repair, to leather tear repair, almost any blemish can be touched up or fixed to make the car look new. While I feel good about fixing it now, I hope I don't get stuck in a pattern of fixing every cosmetic blemish from now on--could start to get expensive!
Lastly, I now carry an old blanket in my car trunk now in case I need to protect my seats! Great advice!
haven't we debated this before? Hondas are "supposed" to be reliable and efficient, and European makes are built for performance and safety.
so what is the problem? i must have missed a post somewhere...
You can't say that the Accord isn't built for safety. With the curtain airbags the Accord and Camry were the only midsize cars to earn a good side impact crash test rating. Add to that the new ACE structure Honda has developed, side and side curtain airbags in all 05 Accords, etc and it's pretty obvious Honda is starting to put an emphasis on safety as well.
Honda is no worse than any other car maker when it comes to reliability from my experience. but i really don't understand this claim that they are somehow BETTER.
Honda FINALLY admitted to having a problem on Gen 7 Accords with regard to pads/rotors/calipers. i had a rather rude person called "jolene" at Honda try to tell me that if they replace my rotors (after being resurfaced 3 times in 7 months), it would be as a one time customer service issue. she then asked me, "if we replace these FOR YOU, when will you consider it NOT Honda's fault when they go bad again?" i couldn't believe it! HELLO HONDA! if something breaks on one of your cars, whose fault SHOULD it be? blows my mind....
like someone else said, i have enough intelligence to get and keep a job to make money to buy their car, but they don't think i am smart enough to know how to press a brake pedal.
on another web-site, can't mention it here, there are a lot of Honda-Techs that post. they say that Gen 7's are notorious for being underdesigned when it comes to brake system. no fix in sight. lovely.
so anyway, i wish i had problems with missing locks or ugly hoods. those would be GREAT!
I direct you to the Mercedes C-class forum for a rude awakening. I thought I wanted one.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Every time I decide I'm going to buy outside the Honda brand I check the forum and get the jitters. Such as the C-class forum where even Mercedes die-hards can't recommend the car from a quality reliability standpoint. There are members there that go so far as to say buying a C-class out of warranty is "almost reckless".
/direct/view/.ee9e811/6889
I never said he was the only one. i just pointed out for a car that sells 35,000 a month, if the entire model run had bad brakes, there would be a much higher number of complaints. Heck, Honda has recalled all V6 transmissions but you haven't seen many bytes wasted on tranny complaints. Methinks Justin has bad brakes. Be mealsothinks his car is the exception and not the rule.
IMO though, it's probably best for those with continued problems to just buy a set of Brembo Blanks and Hawk pads. The total cost is priceless when it comes to having to return to the dealer three times to get it fixed.....for such a short time. Especially since the new combo is 10x better than stock stuff.
The value proposition is really just a matter of your wallet. We were able and are still able to spend $50k on a car, but my views have changed to where I honestly don't feel they are worth it. Money goes best invested elsewhere IMO. Nothing different than what we felt over the past few years, but we each tried the finer vehicles in life and have passed today.
The american car comments...I grew up in a family that owned GM dealerships (3) and there's no difference there either. The only things that I consistantly have seen with the american vs import wars which is still true....the american cars have been better out of the gate for the first couple years, but eventually turn to crap. The imports may have a few more bugs at first, but many more are less troublesome as time and miles go on.
Just my two Lincolns worth from experience.
IMO, Chrysler is pretty forward in designing nice cars, but it takes a dead stop there. I'd never own a Chrysler product based on their track record and what I've seen up to now. The new 300...butt ugly to me. I like the old style, but the new one....no thanks.
Not sure this thread will ever have a solid end as style is so individualistic, it can't really be concluded on a message board.
I like the looks of my Accord and consider it a fairly stylish ride compared to many of the other cars out there. The hood could use some nice lines to accent it, but hey...perhaps on a refresh. To me, it's a great value in this price range...not many interiors can compare. Leather, Navi, Wood Grain, good quality materials, style inside and out....it's been a good package for us.
I currently have a 2000 Accord and I only owned it for a year before they did the new redesign. I plan on buying another Accord in a couple of years but I don't want to buy it in the last year before a redesign.
Does anyone have any guesses when we will see a redesign? How often do they usually do it?
And to second tlauro, Honda has admitted to me and others that there are problems with the brake design. I sincerely doubt that the company would make such an admission if there were only a handful of complaints.
At any rate, any complaints on this board are nicely balanced by your and anonymousposts' many rapturous comments about your Accord ownership experience, so I wouldn't worry about us whiners sullying the Honda name.
"So far you are about the only one to STILL be complaining about the brakes so voraciously."
Now could ya puleezze show me a recent series of posts that compare with Justins? I won't hold my breath.
I don't know how you guys use your brakes, but mine work fine. And I drive like a bat-out-of-Hades. I know for a fact that our new EX-L will do 120+ indicated mph. And I stopped with no problems. I don't get it. If the brakes were inherently bad there would be more complaints than we see here on Edmunds. The Accord problems forum does not bear out any widespread brake issues that can be attributed to bad design.
There haven't been a ton of people complaining on this forum about their EX-V6 transmissions, but the recent recall indicated there is a problem.
I was told by the Honda Corp rep that there was a problem with the 03 pads. That's about the best evidence I can give that it affected many cars. Perhaps not yours, but many nevertheless.
If you're tired of hearing about it, imagine how tired we are of dealing with it. I'm planning to ditch this car as soon as the dealer completes its umpteenth brake job in 15 months.
Is it common for the early and mid 90s Accords to loose that much refigeration?
I'd like to know if A/C systems are (overall) problematic on Accords around this age. I know of cars going on 7-10 years of age that have hardly leaked refigeration, and after viewing two Accords, it seems this is a problem. I'd hate to buy an Accord, and find out something huge is wrong, like the compressor - which would be terribly expensive.
If anyone has any info to share, I'd really appreciate it.
Thank you.
That is not typical. The Honda "issue" involved a simple "reformulation" of the brake pads. That is not gonna cure that guys problem. Read that post then read mine and get back to me on who you think is more guilty of hyperbole. Or better yet, read back a couple of months and let me know if there happen to be a significant number of brake specific posts in the Accord problem forum. A certain amount is to be expected but for the Accord to be guilty of "crap brakes" and "underdesigned" I think there should the topic specifically devoted to this issue.
I stand by my statement that there is nothing wrong with the design of the brakes. There may have been a few cars built with bad components, but that does not mean the design is bad as he asserted.
justin: Go to all the Accord discussions here and search for brakes starting in September 2002. There's a pattern. Despite the Clintonlike denials about not a design problem, there is a problem with 'something' in the brake system, materials of rotors/pads, balance/proportioning front to rear, suppliers delivering subminimum materials, etc.
You're not going to be made whole in this unless Honda puts on corrected rotors, corrected pads, and balance/proportioning valves, perhaps new calipers. You might be happier to see what aftermarket parts some people have used. Note, cutting the rotors down is not good. It removes an amount of metal and reduces the rotor's ability to serve as a heat sink/dissipator for the great heat generated turning kinetic energy into heat to stop that car. New rotors are needed. One cut on rotor that is light may not affect the rotor much, but not two or three times...
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
however since there are three TSB's for the brake system alone, one could argue that Honda could have done a better job at designing and building a brake system.
TSB 04-012 - Brake Pedal is Hard to Press at Start-Up
TSB 03-069 - Front Brake Noise or Judder
TSB 04-026 - ABS Light Comes On
I can email you the official Honda TSB's from the dealer if you need them.
In either case, the evidence is anecdotal and not indicative of the Accord (or any other vehicle) population as a whole. Anyone who surfs internet message boards knows that they tend to be populated by enthusiasts (whatever the topic) who typically are quite passionate about their area of interest. They also tend to extrapolate from their experience to the population as a whole. Guys, you can't do it.
We're never going to get Justin and gee35coupe to agree so let's move on...
however, if you go to the actual HONDA TECH website, where Honda aficionados post, you will see a different pic that the Honda lovers here provide. on that website, the transmission problem is not really a problem - because there is a fix for it. the brake issues are a known problem, but Honda is not willing at all to even investigate. they are fine with "it is the owners fault".
people are confusing the earlier brake pad issue with 03 models with the real brake issue. i have the updated pads. still have had to have front brakes resurfaced 3 times in 7 months, as well as REAR rotors resurfaced.
there are people on the other site that have had ROTOR replacements, and 1000 miles later, the vibrations are back. that is what i feared - replacement of one crap part with another crap part doesn't solve the problem. or, something with the way the calipers hold the pads or yadda yadda...
again, i realize that lots of people refuse to believe that Honda is no better than other cars. when i bought the Accord, i defended it tooth and nail against the "haters" that bought Camry's and Mazda6's.
i keep posting here because for all of the "love" that is spread about Honda's, people that are looking to purchase one need to know the truth. if i can save one person from making a mistake, or at least get them to at least THINK about what they buy, i will have better car karma on the next car i buy...;)
And I agree - it's time to move on.
It was part humor part truth. I was only trying to point out that the same complaints that he had about the Accord could be said about the vehicles he preferred just phrased differntly. No insult was intended to him or anyone else.
I would also question if they actually resurfaced your rotors or actually replaced them. I don't think turning them according to specifications would leave them in a tollerance range that is acceptable to drive on.
If the dealer indeed changed the pads to the correct compound, then again, your issues lie elsewhere than with the overall design of the brakes.
I'll agree that many folks have the initial issue with the brakes warping, but as you said...that TSB is from Oct 03 and the 04's are on the new pads already. However, I don't see too many having an issue a second or third time. Again, the system is fine, and I doubt its a flaw throughout the line/design.
Lastly, I've said it before, in your case, go spend a few bucks on Brembo Blanks and pads....the dealer will likely install them for free given your situation. In my case, I have already prompted the service manager that if mine goes in a second time, I'll bring the parts if he puts them on.
Just my last two lincolns on the matter. It's been beat to death.
I've never had a problem like this with any previous cars. It's not your driving style.
My advice is to ignore these comments on your driving style, sell the car, and find something else.
Strange...There's also not a NHTSA recall on the Accord brakes even with a whole 40 reports. Go figure.
I have no problem admitting Honda has a problem if there is one. I just don't see the problem being as bad as the original post that started this discussion.