Toyota Camry 2006 and earlier

13132343637165

Comments

  • ravvie4meravvie4me Member Posts: 110
    The only way a Camry SE is going to be under 24K is with limited options, a 4-cylinder and a manual transmission. But that's not necessarily a bad thing, because the SE already comes well equipped.
    But there is no way that a V6 SE Camry will come in under $24 grand, regardless of how little options it has.
    But again, as mentioned by others in previous posts, the Camry is likely to be more refined, have higher quality materials (IMO), and have lower NVH (Noise, Vibration, and Harshness) than the Nissan. Probably not enough to sway from the Altimas power.
    I think the 2002 Altima will be a strong seller, but probably not as well as Camry.

    -RAVvie4me
  • ludacrisludacris Member Posts: 185
    "I think the 2002 Altima will be a strong seller, but probably not as well as Camry."

    Well, Nissan only expects to sell 180,000 Altys compared to the Camry's 10,000,000,000 lol.

    Canc: What do you expect him to say, he works for Toyota and developed the car. Of course he's gonna defend the engine and say any negative comment he can about producing more power because the Camry lacks it. And even if there is a noticeable gain in NVH, it's not something some extra insulation couldn't fix. It's as though you expect the Altima's engine to buzz like a Chrysler or something. Why would it be that our 3.0L 222 bhp V6 Maxima is quieter and smoother than my friend's 2.2L 136 bhp Camry?
  • canccanc Member Posts: 715
    "Why would it be that our 3.0L 222 bhp V6 Maxima is quieter and smoother than my friend's 2.2L 136 bhp Camry?"

    Well I seriously doubt the Maxima has more noise insulation than the Camry. In any case, I think what one perceives as being "smoother" is very subjective. I, for example, found the Sentra's engine to run rather rough at idle, but think that the Corolla and the Civic both run extremely smooth at idle (the Civic even a bit more than the Corolla, perhaps). Either that or your Maxima's engine blew out and the mechanic secretly replaced it with much better, more reliable and fuel-efficient Toyota V-6? ;)

    Seriously though, you're not being fair here again by comparing a 4-cylinder engine with a large V-6. Instead, compare the Toyota V-6, which runs very, very smoothly, against your Maxima engine. Then tell me what you think.
  • fredvhfredvh Member Posts: 857
    Can several Camry V6 automatic owners advise me of what kind of gas mileage they are getting? Thanks
  • vivian3vivian3 Member Posts: 8
    Actually, I do want all the bells and whistles that come with the XLE, EXCEPT the sunroof. But I guess there's no getting around that?? Thanks.
  • coolguyky7coolguyky7 Member Posts: 932
    Concerning that article posted earlier about the Camry's lead designer....they chose the engines because they best suit the Camry and its owners. If Toyota felt that it was necessary, they would put a 400 horsepower engine in the Camry. But since they don't feel it is needed, they don't do it. What is available now is plenty of power for the Camry. The ECHO only has 108 horsepower....but it's plenty for that kind of car. And by all means, the car isn't slow. It has been called "zippy" by many owners and car review sources.
  • p51_mustangp51_mustang Member Posts: 7
    There are tons of photos of the new Toyota Camry at http://www.geocities.com/o2_camry_photos . Plenty of pictures of both the interior and exterior.
  • jimxojimxo Member Posts: 423
    1990 was not that long ago and I can recall when the Lexus LS400 arrived at a MSRP $31-35k. A Camry with V6 was 12-13K and now a V6 Camry is 25K. I certainly understand safety features have been added and the research cost money so cars increase in price.

    I also think cars are rubber tires, combustion engine, trans, steel and plastic. Today we part with 30K for mini vans and 40K for SUV's, can we get real? I think the "average" life expectancy of a car is 12 years. Like everyone else I like new cars and want all the extra's, but car makers have us believing that v6 power is something reserved for people who are willing to spend extra to have this "Luxury". Yeah I will most likely drop 25k on a new car soon, but gee wiz if I cant get everything a Camry has to offer with out spending another 5k that's not value to me.
  • mackabeemackabee Member Posts: 4,709
    Then don't do it.

    : )

    Mackabee
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    you are so incredibly exaggerating! Our 1991 Camry 4clyinder DX with value package stickered at just over 15 grand. The V6s that we looked at around that time were 18k for moderately equipped DX V6 and fully loaded, top of the line LE V6 was about 21K. 12-13K for a V6 Camry... even in 1990... no.
    By the way, that second generation Camry (87-91) used an optional 2.5 DOHC V6 with 156hp, in other words less than the new 2.4 4cylinder.
    If you are willing to pay 25K for a Camry, you can get a perfectly nice LE V6 with a few (non-major) options. Page back to the November 1995 issue, of Car and Driver and you'll see thats very similar (especially when inflation is considered, along with advancements in technology) to what the MSRP was for an LE V6 back then, 7 years ago. Good job.
  • jimxojimxo Member Posts: 423
    I'm asking a question. Do you think a Camry LE V6 for 25K is a good value? Your response "then don't do it" was very articulate. I noticed your a car salesman for Toyota, not bias are you?

    alpha01, I also said previously that the 92-96 Camry was the best car for the money and Toyota knew it so they gave us less for more money.

    Same way food manufactures will lower the amount of product in the larger package and say this is what consumer's want. More convient. packaging less weight. OK, thats a good value!

    I paid 24K plus tax for a 2000 Maxima SE in 1999. Everything except leather (extra grand), now thats a car worth 24K.
  • mackabeemackabee Member Posts: 4,709
    Yes, I am a salesman for Toyota. And a very good one at that. I said "then don't do it" because YOU are the only one that can answer that question. If you don't see the value, then it would not be a good deal for you.

    : )

    Mackabee
  • fiery1fiery1 Member Posts: 31
    The Camry SE is way way under your $23,000 threshold. Example:

    An SE V6 automatic with "GH" package, meaning a car with spoiler, sport gauges and SE interior, power seat, 16" wheels/tires, keyless remote entry, mats etc has an MSRP of $22359. The V6 version of that same car, with ABS as standard, as well as power seat + keyless remotes as standard, is only MSRP'ing at around $25,000. Many of us are able to do special built-to-order cars too. There are those who cater to the lot lizard mentality of making you buy a car that is there just because it is there. There are other, better salespeople/managers out there who are willing to hear what you want versus shoving you in a car with the wrong stuff on it.

    Vivian, the XLE has the sunroof because it's in a "package" to make the cost of all the items more palatable. Perhaps a scan of the items separately without the sunroof might help you to see that the XLE with no sunroof is actually, when you add the items outside the packages, is actually more costly to have it all piecemeal.
  • p51_mustangp51_mustang Member Posts: 7
    For plenty of photos of the new 2002 Camry, both interior and exterior, go to http://www.geocities.com/o2_camry_photos
  • tpricetprice Member Posts: 46
    We saw a 2002 Camry XLE this afternoon. It really looks very much like the Avalon and is priced about the same. I may have missed something but the pricing seems to have gone up about 10%. We have a 2000 XLE that had MSRP of $27,500 - the 2002 we looked at today had MSRP of $30,300. Obviously it is totally redesigned car but don't see where the equip/features have changed. Witht he closeness in styling and pricing to the Avalon it's hard to see where there's room for both unless there are changes in store for Avalon??
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    that 2002 XLE probably had a Navigation System, Vehicle Skid Control, ABS w/ EBD, Side Curtain Airbags (that protect all outboard passengers), and the standard Information Center, all items that your 2000 did not offer. (Plus 16 inch P215/60 R16 tires and alloys.. yours are smaller). Those are the major features that have changed.
    ~alpha
  • coolguyky7coolguyky7 Member Posts: 932
    Although the redesign for Avalon is coming in the year 2005, I'd say that we can assume that the redesign will take the Avalon more upscale to place it between the Camry and the upgraded 2002 Lexus ES300. Upgrading the 2002 Camry and ES300 has left a gap that needs to be filled.
  • coolguyky7coolguyky7 Member Posts: 932
    Someone on my street just got a 2002 white Camry LE. Looks pretty nice.....but I still like the SE better.
  • har1bushhar1bush Member Posts: 207
    What gap between the Camry and the ES300? for about 30K, you could either get a fully loaded Camry XLE V6 or the base ES300... I think Toyota will only produce the Avalon because it would compete with the full size sedan market (Buicks and such)... Pricewise, there is no gap that was created by upscaling the Camry and the ES300, but there was always another crowd that the Avalon is trying to muster up.

    fredvh: nice photos you posted... The more and more I look at the Camry's interior though, I can't help by see nothing but Toyota's own Sequoia and Tundra. I also think Toyota out did itself with that flip down navigation screen -- maybe keeping the stereo system in tact and moving the screen on top of the dash to pop up when in use (a la Infiniti I30 and Volvo S80). Folks will need extra care not to break it while loading a CD or cassette.
  • coolguyky7coolguyky7 Member Posts: 932
    Toyota needs to Avalon to a position that is more between the Camry and ES300, its fairly close to the Camry now. The only thing better about the Avalon is the size. The Camry now has all of those true luxury features...sunshade, navigation, etc. The Avalon is too much in the Camry's way. My mom who works for Toyota is afraid the Camry will canniblize Avalon sales which are already bad. Camry should be more of a sport/luxury...while Avalon doesn't try at sport (which is hasn't) and needs to enrich itself in more luxury. Maybe Avalon should become a true full sized car...by some it's known as only being midsized.
  • mackabeemackabee Member Posts: 4,709
    I had an elderly couple come in today to look at an Avalon. I showed them the XL with leather and moonroof that stickered around 30,500 and explained the differences between the XL and XLS. They drove the Avalon and liked the quietness and "American" feel of the car. They drove up in a Ford Taurus. Then I brought a Camry XLE and parked it right next to the Avalon. I showed them all the safety features on the XLE like the VSC and side airbags/curtain airbags and then they drove the Camry. When we got back I asked them which car they preferred and they answered in unison: The Camry! And guess what they didn't care about the 18 horsepower advantage of the Avalon over the Camry! So I think the Avalon is in trouble and Toyota better hurry up and do something about it. My gut feeling is that its days are numbered. This would leave a good size gap between the Camry and the ES300. The 2000 Avalon was originally intended to compete with the likes of Cadillac and Continental and for the last 2 years it did pretty good. We had plenty of customers trading Caddys and Continentals in. Now with this super-sized Camry, Avalon sales are going to suffer. Just my opinion but I can see it coming.

    : 0

    Mackabee
  • coolguyky7coolguyky7 Member Posts: 932
    I guess I was right...or from this one experience my view is correct. And something to add to my last post....Avalon sales could get a boost with a more powerful engine along with other refinements.
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    Obviously, I am a huge proponent of the new Camry. However, after reading the previous postings about the Avalon, then viewing Toyota's news release on the Camry which states that the sales and production of the 5th generation Camry will break down as such: 45% LE, 35% XLE, 20% SE, I too feel that the Avalon will tumble. Why would such an otherwise shrewd company move the Camry upwards without considering its effect on the Avalon? Perhaps there's something we all dont know. Hmmmn.
    ~alpha01
  • coolguyky7coolguyky7 Member Posts: 932
    I bet Toyota knows what it's doing...and they have a plan to fix the problem. It will be a good one too.
  • p51_mustangp51_mustang Member Posts: 7
    Just in case you haven't seen the new Camry yet, or missed the website, it's http://www.geocities.com/o2_camry_photos
  • s852s852 Member Posts: 1,051
    The Camry has taken a lot of styling cues from the Avalon. Not many people think the Avalon is a great-looking car, so I don't know why they were copying the look.
    The Camry came out much better in the front though.
    I think Toyota is really going have to revamp the ugly front-end styling of the Avalon as wells as the interior when they do the update for the 2003 year, plus add everything the 2002 Camry XLE has and a few features the Camry doesn't have available to become competitive again. A power rear sunshade in the 2003 Avalon instead of the manual sunshade in the Camry would be nice. Maybe they should also drop the XL model and make the 2003 and 2004 Avalons XLS-only.
  • coolguyky7coolguyky7 Member Posts: 932
    That would be XLS not XLE for the top Avalon.
  • vmaturovmaturo Member Posts: 71
    While cycling this morning I passed Toyota. I stopped to see what additional colors were in on the Camry. They had about 30 cars, but mostly silver and white ones.

    I finally saw an XLE 6cyl.....Then I looked at the Sticker............Talk about " Sticker Shock"

    I almost passed out. $31,970 USD.
    I was hoping they meant LIRA.

    Yes it was $31,970 USD orig sticker. No dealer added profit. I guess they figured they had enough profit on that one.

    A $32,000 Camry.....I think not!

    I guess a $25,000 Corolla is just around the corner.
  • inexcessinexcess Member Posts: 2
    dont know about you guys but with that price, i would look elsewhere. I mean are they nuts? Its a camry for heaven's sake. The new Camry pricing is on the near luxo range. I wonder if Camry is hallucinating to be in one. Oh well. I guess thats business. Buy it if you can, not if you dont. that's how simple it is.
  • jimxojimxo Member Posts: 423
    The salesman from Toyota would have you believe its a good value, even 25K for LE with a V6 and no major extra's is a good deal.

    No thanks Toyota, I think the new Altima will be a better bank for the buck!
  • bpbbpb Member Posts: 2
    My wife and are looking to buy a Camry or Accord. We like them both but it has come down to price. We want the V6 model of both but the not the XLE or EX, the level below. We're looking to get the best price with the factory apr (4.9 Camry, 5.9 Accord). I'm leaning towards the Camry because of the flexibility on options. What kind of deals are people getting on 2001 V6 LE's?
  • mirthmirth Member Posts: 1,212
    Does anyone else think that the wheels look too small for the car? Maybe it's because the wheel wells are cut so big.
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    an LE 4cly with no major extras is about 20k. add the ABS,keyless,pwr drivers seat, and JBL audio, and its 21,500.
    you can easily get a LE V6 decently equpipped for 25K.
    good job.
    ~alpha
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    Depending on the part of the country you live in, you may be too late to pick up a deal on a 2001. My dealership is selling its last 2001 today and we sold our last V6 about 2 weeks ago. It may be different where you live though.
  • diploiddiploid Member Posts: 2,286
    But I thought the new Camry's were supposed to be cheaper?
  • topgun7topgun7 Member Posts: 412
    We went to see the camry last wednesday. We really like the bigger size, the new dash layout, and the material in the SE. The $31k that some mentioned here include the nav, the vsc etc. These are new options as compare to the last generation. If you take these options out, the sticker is about $28-29k. This is in the ball park of a TL and I think the car is competive to the TL also. I guess I don't see what is so shocking. If we don't like those options, just don't order them. You are back to more or less last year's sticker with more room and better design. The real test is 4-5 months from now, whether it will discount toward the invoice or not... I would be happy to get an SE V6 $800 to $1000 over invoice some time down the line. Will see.
  • carnut_robcarnut_rob Member Posts: 6
    I just got back from my local Toyota dealer. They already have 2 new 2002 Camry's on the lot. I thought they weren't supposed to be available until next month.

    Well, I really think the new design is much better. The dashboard looks better, a better layout of everything.

    -Rob
  • coolguyky7coolguyky7 Member Posts: 932
    They are. The lowest grade LE comes standard with lots of features that would had to have been bought previously. AC, power windows, doors, mirrors are examples. The XLE is pretty low...and it has a good amount of features...but if you are buying an XLE, I'd assume you have the money to pay for the sunroof, leather and navigation. More standard features at a similar or lower price. That's what it really is...and it's not too bad.
  • starrlaystarrlay Member Posts: 1
    My 93 toyota camry has 178,000 miles on it and i havent had any trouble except the water pump and timing belt, but when i go to stop at a stop sign or stop light i find that i hear a cracking or squeeking sound and it's not the brakes i just had those done. Also i've noticed that the hubcaps wont stay on tight...one part seems to become loose on the driver side front. I had new tires put on about 30,000 miles ago so what could be the problem?
  • har1bushhar1bush Member Posts: 207
    I think a lot of people are thrown off by the top-end Camry stickering for over 30Gs... If you put an Avalon name on the Camry and put it out there for the same price, people wouldn't even think of complaining. On the other hand, when some of the Camry-defenders have stated that it is cheaper than the last Camry or that the LE is a bargain, I disagree with that as well... Consider the competition: Honda Accord EX V6 can be had these days for less than 23K and the Nissan Altima SE V6 will probably go for less than 25-26K, both loaded. With that amount, you can just squeeze in the LE V6, which has no leather or automatic climate control. I don't think Toyota made this Camry any cheaper than the last one and you can hardly call it a bargain. However, Toyota is not going overboard with these prices either...
  • sputnikxxxsputnikxxx Member Posts: 5
    literally. i had lots of mystery smells out of it when it was brand new. anyone else have that problem?? i also think it's very poorly built compared to previous toyotas I've had. in fact, I got so disgusted with this muscled-up & sized-up version that I'm selling it in 3 months when my new PRIUS comes in. anyone interested in buying a 2000 5-speed??
  • chris4o1chris4o1 Member Posts: 9
    whats up with the hp drop? 194 to 192 for v6 models? thats a stupid thing to do. if a top of the line model is 32k then i would go for a much more powerful and nicer acura tl type-s.but i've already purchased a new 2001 maxima se for just 22400, beat that camry!
  • snowchiefsnowchief Member Posts: 16
    Does anyone have any idea how long it will take Edmunds to do their review and establish the TMV on the new Camry? I'm a Honda guy that is thinking very seriously of converting to Toyota after seeing this beautiful new Camry.
  • regfootballregfootball Member Posts: 2,166
    remember also the Maxima for 2002 get a 260 hp motor upgrade and I think in Addition to the new Altima the Maxima will also be a better buy than the new Camry's. Wow, decent looking rig but man why did Toyota jack the prices up so high???

    Most of the new Camry's I saw on the lot stickered from 28-30k. A lot of money....too much for a mid size bread and butter sedan I don't care if it has leather or whatever.

    Nissan is in position to really exploit this if they are smart. On one end is the cheaper Altima which may actually outperform the Camry and also the existing Maxima will be priced to move and has a killer new powertrain as well.

    Keep in mind also the cheaper Accords and nicer Acura TL's for about the same as a loaded Cam.

    And hey folks you can get a fully loaded Diamante for 24k (which looks classier) and you can probably score a 300M, LHS or Aurora for less money than the new Camry.

    I'm sure the Camry is a well built appliance but no Camry should sell for more than 24-25k.
  • fredvhfredvh Member Posts: 857
    Here are some of the best photos I have seen of the new Camry and some valuable information:


    http://www.familycar.com/RoadTests/ToyotaCamry/Photos.htm


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • diploiddiploid Member Posts: 2,286
    The hinges in the trunk do not press down on groceries when you close the trunk.

    Very clever.
  • har1bushhar1bush Member Posts: 207
    agree with everything u say... but would anyone considering a Camry or any of the other cars be convinced in spending their money on a Mitsu or a Chrysler?? Sure they pay less, but Mitsu is probably even worse in long-term reliability and quality than a Chrysler! and that's saying something b/c Chrysler isn't too great in those things to begin with. And of course, the Aurora... it's an Oldsmobile... need I say more?

    I think that the Camry DOES fall short of the TL, Maxima, and even the Altima and when Toyota notices this soon enough, it might give some good deals.
  • 3pointstar3pointstar Member Posts: 45
    I saw and test drove the new Camry XLE V6 a week ago listing at $30K. Salesman told me LEs will start at $22K. At first I thought, that's a pretty big jump in price for the Camry, but when you realize the quality of materials used in the car, it makes a lot of sense. The dash is high quality plastic...the steering wheel is leather covered...the leather seats were soft...sound dampening is terrific.

    Realize that when they redesigned the last Camry '97-'00, Toyota had to minimize cost to keep it in line with the previous generation Camry '92-'96 prices. They did it by decontenting the car. Door lock and window switches became narrower; the odometer became LCD; seat head rests were less complicated, the dash plastic became harder; the grill became integrated with the front bumper; no more lighted ignition keyhole; the tail lamp failure dash indicator was gone...I could go on. Basically, less parts, less cost, almost the same price.

    To expect Toyota to continue maintaining the same price range for the Camry would be a major mistake. They already cut cost so much in the previous generation Camry it would've made the car really, really CHEAP. I was out of town driving an AVIS Rental Ford Taurus this past week and looking at the dash it looks as if it is painted. Instead of having separate plastic panels, you can see paint overspray in the gap line under the front passenger airag. Now that's CHEAP.

    So folks, $30K is a lot for a 2002 Camry, but looking at the quality car Toyota has managed to produce, it is very reasonable.
  • aimanaiman Member Posts: 61
    It'll be interesting if buyers considering a $30k Camry will go to Acura TL or Infiniti I30/I35 instead.
  • topgun7topgun7 Member Posts: 412
    I priced out a TL with NAVnd the msrp is $31360 (invoice $28314). An SE V6 with all the options is $30865 MSRP (invoice $27056). Cardirect.com think that they can sell the TL with Nav @ MSRP. If you think TL/NAV is a better car than Camry/Nav then may be camry will be selling @ about $29K after the initial rush. I would be interested in an SE/Nav if it drop to $28k or so. If not, an honda accord EX/V6 @ $23k would be very tempting.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.