By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
can't quote the actual scientific reasons, but something about tires.....i am almost positive i heard that somewhere. that said, Vocus, your tires couldn't be more different than mine, and i don't get shocked either. and i have leather as well. so maybe you are on to something...
Having had vehicles with both interiors, I have to say that has been my experience as well.
So it is not a matter of car vs. car, it is a matter of leather vs. cloth.
Okay??
My belief is that the vehicle is insulated from the ground by the rubber tires. A charge is built up on the metal body of the vehicle or a large slippery surface as my Tonneau Cover as you drive. When you get out and step on the ground you are creating a path for the static build up on the vehicle from your finger tips to your feet on the ground which is not always as insulated as vehicle tires are. If power lines are down on top of your vehicle you are safe inside as long as any tires are blown out. Airplanes have static discharge sticks coming out of trailing surfaces of the plane to rid of the build up continuously especially in stormy weather...
http://www.howstuffworks.com/lightning11.htm
I'm a new driver, and I've been wanting to buy a '96 Jetta GLS for my first car. I'm buying the car with my own money, therefore I need something cheap (and ofcourse, being that I'm a teenager, something sporty
I've managed to find a Jetta for about $4,000...and it has 105,821 miles on it. Which I know is quite high, but I heard Jettas have good mileage. The car I'm looking at also has an unlimited miles warranty on it.
Anyway. I was just looking for some input. Do you recommend the Jetta, or should I be looking at something else?
Thanks for your time
However, the 'skin effect' of the Faraday cage (although interesting)cannot help reduce static shocks in your car. The Faraday cage effect comes into play if LIGHTNING were to strike your car... not for static electricity.
Back when muscle cars were common on the roads and spinning the rear tires was almost inevitable. (Causing all kinds of static buildup and ignition source for gas tank explosions) The static buildup was often eliminated by the use of 'grounding straps' One would often see conductive straps hanging down from the frame to the ground on vehicles.
There are other ways to reduce ESD. The most common is to make EVERYTHING slightly conductive. (10-50 Megaohmes per inch) In an automobile, you can use a spray (such as scotchguard) on all the seats, carpeting and other interior cloth items. This causes the static to discharge itself as fast as it builds up making the overall potential voltage very small... presto, no static buildup!
BOTTOM LINE: One cannot prevent static electricity, but one can discharge it before it builds up to a potential that may cause a spark.
the "skin effect" is the fact that the current is circulated only on the thin outer layer of the conductor. Unfortunately, the thickness of the skin in invertly proportional to the square-root of the frequency of the excitation. Lightning almost happens instantaneously, therefore the frequency contained in the lightning is extremely high -> thin skin depth. Electro static has only zero frequency (by definition), thus the skin depth is infinity. There is no such thing like Faraday cage for static electric or magnetic.
As stated previously, I would look into the maintenance history. That would actually be the deciding factor. Also, get a private mechanic to look over the car. This will cost you about $100, but it is well worth the money....TRUST ME!!! Good luck
I eagerly await ridicule!
Also, these seats are a little older, since her kids are 3 and 4 and she got the seats when they were first born.
With both of these types (front/back convertible seats for the toddlers and booster seat) there is plenty of room and the tether anchors make installation very easy. I can't think of any reason a particular brand wouldn't fit.
toddlers in the backseat? bring it on - i have a feeling that would be cake compared to this past weekend...haha.
How about 7 in a Chevy Monza?
That si one of the most dangerous things you could eever do to your child in a car...
(stupid laws!)
Middle is ideal, but may not work, considering I need the drivers seat all the way back.
Now if I could only put the child seat in the trunk - just joking.
target: Gotcha...now I understand. I put my 16 mo old son in his child seat in the middle of the rear in my '02 Jetta. It fits fine. Though i do have to pull the front passenger seat up guite a bit so his legs don't get crushed. Also, I don't push my drivers seat all the way back.
i would say buy the car if you like it, but don't bet on the warranty being there when you need it. i personally would not buy any car, except for a Miata or LS400, with over 100k miles on it, unless it was like $500 or something like that.
Or at least, I'm not embarrassed to be seen in it.
My wife NEVER cleans her car, and I hate driving it. It makes me feel icky.
They are pretty salty now.
I hate when the car gets really dirty, so I have to keep it looking clean.
The car seats today seem like they could withstand re-entry into earth's atmosphere from space. We had my niece strapped into a top-of-the-line one this weekend, smack dab in the middle of my dad's Excursion and still my sister worried that the torrential downpours in northern california made travel unsafe. If you can die in an 8000 lbs Ford Excursion while in the very center inside a car seat somebody was out to get ya...somebody in a tank or an Amtrak train!
I went and saw the car over the weekend for the first time. It turns out that it's a '96 GL (not GLS) and I don't know HOW - but has like 115K miles. My dad and brother checked it out with me. I was suprised how incredibly clean the interior was, and everything under the hood as well. Alot of the parts were fairly new looking. I drove around in it, and I think my brother said that the only concern was the suspension, but it wasn't anything major. It also turns out that it doesn't have power windows...that's good right? I've seen complaints about broken windows here.
And fish8, thanks for the suggestion. My uncle is a mechanic and we're going to bring him down with us probably tomorrow to see the car again.
This whole process is starting to aggrivate me
:-/ lol
I posted on my test drive of the Mazda 6 ( blueguydotcom "Mazda 6" Dec 17, 2002 7:54pm ) and now people are saying I'm a shill for of all cars the ungodly altima! I don't recall ever endorsing the altima.
Please tell me I'm not the only one...
You just gave them an honest review of the car. It's not your problem that they don't like it.
when i am in another discussion group, the only thing i do is ASK QUESTIONS. not offer stupid and completely unfounded opinions on something i have no real-time experience with. and no, a car that you have seen at a car show or at the dealer does not mean you have experience with it! PAY MONEY FOR IT, then come talk!
but, these boards are for everyone i guess. even people with a questionable amount of integrity.
HO