Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
We still didn't like it, and the dealer finally changed the alternator and the problem was corrected.
Our dealership is Toyota of Walnut Creek and the guy who came through for us (finally) was Jim Totah, General Sales Manager. For further edification, here's the letter that prompted his quick response to us:
"Mr. Totah:
In July of this year my wife and I purchased a new Sienna from Toyota Walnut Creek. We worked with Tom Bridges who was very professional and pleasant leading up to and during the sales transaction (we even referred our friends to him who also purchased a Sienna). Unfortunately, we received one of the Sienna's to come out of the Toyota factory with the incorrect torque converter installed. As you may know, this condition caused the Check Engine light to come on less than a day after we picked up the car.
When we learned that repair for the code condition was the removal of the transmission from the vehicle and replacement of the torque converter we were both alarmed and dismayed since we had previously owned Toyota vehicles that ran for many years without ever having the transmission removed from the engine.
I called Tom with my concerns over this repair to our new Sienna and told him I was very unhappy with paying for a new car only to find it came from the factory with a significant defect. I requested from him an extension of the powertrain warranty beyond the standard 60 months/60,000 miles because I felt that a repair involving the removal of the transmission from the engine could cause problems down the road due to the complexity of the job and the components affected before and during the repair. We did in fact have to return the car to your service department less than two weeks following the T/C replacement because the vehicle came back to us with a steering drift and a clunking noise coming from the steering rack. While we appreciate the speed with which the repairs were accomplished, as well as the use of the loaner car both times, my confidence in the car's powertrain and front end has not been restored.
I phoned Tom twice last month and the time he returned my call he said you were trying to get Toyota to share the cost of the extended powertrain warranty with Toyota of Walnut Creek and that I would hear from you soon. My last message to Tom was not returned and have yet to hear anything further on the status of my request. I am simply asking for the courtesy of a response from you Mr. Totah so that we can both get on with our lives. I don't believe my request for an extended warranty to be unreasonable given the relatively small cost to your dealership when compared to the price I paid for the vehicle. If the repairs have been entirely successful, there will be no further costs to you and no more headaches for me. I'm sympathetic to you as a dealer because from the sound of things, Toyota has not stepped forward with any answer to Sienna owners other than "Sorry, bad luck, you got one our defective ones". I also realize you are not required to do anything further for us but please consider my request and give me a call or write me an email. I look forward to hearing from you soon."
So, as I said before, Toyota Corp. is not looking as if they want to do anything nationally or at least not publicize any extension of the standard warranty. If I'm the dealership owner or manager, I do what's right to preserve my excellent reputation despite Toyota's screw up and then think twice about Toyota's support of its dealers. Toyota seems to be saying "Hey, you dealers should be overjoyed that we allow you to sell our highly marked up vehicles. Take it or leave it but making good on defects is on your dime." Sad thing is, they can do that; Toyota dealerships make great money in California. The name alone is still worth a great deal. Time will tell if that holds.
Sorry for the length of this post. Hope it helps someone get an extended warranty for their defective Sienna. By the way, 3000K on the new TC, things are great. I'm watching out for the tires and sludge though and we don't have leather or auto doors ;-)
Thanks....
I could not start the van this week. I have not driven it since. There was a strong odor from the front of the van and inside the van....a gasoline smell, rather noxious. I see the stream of white smoke pouring out of the tailpipe is thicker these mornings (not simply cold start smoke, IMO).
I have bragged on my Honda Odyssey, a 1995. Since having it serviced at the 60,000 mile mark, the ABS light is shining permanently. We have just been told that we need a new accumulator and modulator!! Been there and done that with Chrysler minivan....no more praises for Honda. I see that I am not alone with that problem either.
What is is with the POOR QUALITY of these vans. Are we fools for accepting the costly repairs or major warranty repairs at low mileage??? WHAT can be done??
I have two vans and neither have any long term quality to date. Is it asking too much to have a reliable van??
I may have to have the Sienna towed back to the dealership if it won't start again. It has 22,000 miles on it. This is RIDICULOUS!!
Please share any similar problems. The Sienna also has the metallic clunking noise on backing up, the battery corrosion, the creaking seats, the premature tire wear, etc. I don't feel I have safe or reliable transportation in this less-than-two-year-old van. Now faced with the holiday travel, I have two vans under 5 years old that each have major problems. I am FED UP!! Are you, too??
cblake@erols.com
Glad you're enjoying your van!
Drew/aling
Townhall Community Leader/Vans Conference
In addition to the VSC problem, the heater did not work (no heat at all). Dealer did fix the problem, but this is a brand new van.
My Sienna has averaged about 18 mi/gal on mixed driving (two tanks of gas so far). I expect this would get better...
Another thing about the van is the JBL stereo system. It produces sub-woofer like bass (very low freq.) that hurts my ears on both low and high volume... I'm not sure how other people feel about it.
2000 LE purchased in July 2000
At 2700 miles the van consistently gets 12 to 13 mpg. No excessive idling, no jackrabbit starts either.
I broke in the engine according to the manual. Any thoughts as to when this condition should improve? 10K? 20K?
Anyone else with gas mileage this bad?
Otherwise the Sienna is a dream (no rattles, no clunks, no tire or brake problems)
considerable wind noise coming in to the cabinet. It seem like it's coming from the front windshield.
I'm going to take the car in to the dealer for the VSC problem (light stays on) and have them check out wind noise as well.
Just wondering if anyone feels his or her Sienna has exceeded wind noise?
The wind noise is much more than the car I replaced which is 1995 Nissan Maxima. I also own 1996 SVX and used to own 1993 Subaru Legacy Wagon. Both Subaru has less wind noise than Maxima and Sienna.
All minivans/SUVs/pickup trucks are affected by this, but some surpress the wind noise better/much better than others.
Drew/aling
Townhall Community Leader/Vans Conference
I was concerned with the gas mileage of the SUV's, but there seem to be gas mileage problem with these minivans, also. From reading these postings, it may be best just to stick with a car?
MJ
Good luck!
Perhaps I'm just not as picky, or maybe I'm just one of the vast majority of satisfied Sienna owners. Oh - & don't forget the safety ratings...I would recommend this van to anyone.
LOL
Just want to give an update on my 01 Sienna VSC problem (VSC light and TRACK Off light stays on). Well, the dealer replaced the "Steering Angle Sensor" and it looks like they finally fixed the problem. Wow, no warning lights for couple days now .
As far as the wind noise goes, I pushed the roof rack's front cross bar back and it helps a little. I agree with Drew/aling that Sienna is a minivan. It’s bigger and taller than my Subaru SVX. Hence, it might produce more wind noise.
I also experience rattles. I think it's related to back seats. If I have people sit on the back seats, the rattle would go away. It does not bother me as much as the VSC problem I had...
Finally, I have to say that I do like my Sienna. It has smooth ride and very comfortable.
Apparently, these dealerships are under orders from Toyota to cast the blame on the owner and deny any problem. Unfortunately, I too will become Toyota's worst nightmare. Both The Missouri
and Kansas State Attorney General's and Insurance Commissioner's offices will be receiving my documentation of this unfair business practice of Toyota's failing to stand behind their warranty.
Furthermore, after reviewing this site, consumer advocates in the local media, of which I am a member, will also be informed of this issue.
In the meantime, The Sienna is going to auction
through a friend who owns a local GM dealership. I can only hope it ends up back on a Toyota lot
and they create more bad will for the next Toyota
consumer.
Note: If anyone is interested in forming a coalition to challenge Toyota's unfair business practices, please feel free to contact me at this address.
How often did they change it?
Did they change the filter?
What kind of oil?
Reason #1 to have Toyota do all the service on my vehicle. Yep, it costs a few bucks more but then they have an exact record of maintenance and can point the finger to nobody but themselves.
Does this mean I don't believe them? No, I fully believe there is sludge in their engine. I also fully believe that there is a *reason* for it being there (Running low on oil for extended periods of time, not doing scheduled oil and filter changes, overheating multiple times, crappy oil, crappy filters, etc...)
"cblake" probably has all kinds of trouble with her Toyota and that's unfortunate. But the "chicken little" syndrome that comes with it is ridiculous (IMHO).
Scott
I bought a 12" clip-on mirror and clip it onto the original one. Wow, I got an amazing rear vision from this new mirror. I tested drive it to the highway. It reduced a lot of blind spot, and of course I was still turning my head to double check before I changed lane. I am just wonder why Toyota won't put a bigger rear view mirror for Sienna.
I brought my 2000 LE to the dealer for a diagnostic on the poor gas mileage. I provided them a log of my exact figures for the last four fill-ups, along with the gas station credit card receipts:
12.11 mpg
13.26 mpg
13.4 mpg
12.71 mpg
All diagnostics: Normal
The word from Toyota national HQ service people was that 12 - 13 mpg is within normal ranges for around town driving.
Is there *any* truth to this whatsoever?
I live on Long Island (suburban-type driving). It is not a particularly congested area. Thus, we do not have the "city"-type stop and go traffic.
From previous experience with a new car (1994 Saturn), I found that the car did not reach the EPA *lower range* for city driving until after 5 years (40,000 miles).
Is this what I have to look forward to?
It's not so much the money, rather, I get the unsettling feeling of trashing the Earth more than I had anticipated.
You say all diagnostics normal which sounds like they hooked a computer up to your car. But... that won't tell you if the brakes are binding or alignment is bad or tire pressure low or bad wheel bearings or clogged air filter (well maybe it might on the air filter).
I was one of the "lucky" torque converter problem Siennas, which has been repaired (about a month ago) and everything is fine. Haven't noticed any rattles, but maybe I'm not as aware?
Also haven't noticed wind noise. The fan is very loud on the 3rd setting and up, though. Overall, extremely happy with the comfort and ride.
I'm going to take it to the dealer for all oil changes. They recommended 5000 mile intervals, which I may shorten up to 4000 just for insurance.
Good luck!
However, I can't put up with the oil problem. At 30,000 miles, despite oil changes at Toyota's recomendation of every 7,500 miles (non-turbocharged, over 5 miles per trip, temperate weather) - the van started smoking. Toyota says its just steam. At 33,000 miles the oil light flashes only when I break. Toyota provides an oil change, which I am billed for. At 35,000 miles - still smoking & flashing - Toyota tells me I need a new engine as oil is leaking from the valves or rings. Never before 30,000 miles had I seen any smoke or had the oil light come on. Never before had any oil change facility said I was low on or leaking oil.
So Toyota (Parker Toyota - Coeur D' Alene, Idaho) says it'll take 2 & 1/2 days to arrange the repair with Toyota National. I wait. Parker calls & says they need my oil change proof. I don't have receipts so I give them the name, number, & date & mileage of each change - which I get by calling all over many cities in several states. However, one facility has no computer and so no record of me going there, although I know I did. The owner tells me "Honey, we ain't got no fancy computer here, sorry bout that". Plus, my husband did 2 or 3 himself & I don't know where the receipt is - after all, we've moved several times now.
Parker informs me that the repair won't be covered as I have failed my duty under the warranty by not having the oil changed & keeping the receipt. I am thoroughly peeved, & I get copies of all receipts but one - I even locate me receipt for the do it myself oil change. I provide these to Parker with a nasty letter. I also call Toyota National - the man on the phone acts shocked at my treatment, but simply turns the matter over to Parker. Parker calls me & says he has a solution, but it is too late to call the manager back as it is now Friday at 9 pm & he won't be back till Monday. I have a feeling that it is going to be some deal where Toyota "generously" pays a small portion of the repair & I pay the rest.
The bad news for Toyota is that the internet exists, & consumers like us now know there is a defect! The worse news for Toyota is that I happen to be an attorney who is not afraid to stand up for consumer's rights - particularly in cases where big corporations take advantage of consumers. And that is exactly what Toyota is doing. Rather than acknowledge a defect, and rather that honor a warranty, they put the burden on the consumer to prove otherwise, & make the process so difficult & expensive that the consumer goes away & Toyota pays nothing for the repair. In addition, the dealers don't have to provide a costly repair under warranty (which doesn't pay for the dealer).
So please - ANYONE WHO HAS HAD THIS PROBLEM - E-MAIL ME YOUR STORY, & NAME & ADDRESS& phone. I plan to file an action in Federal Court. Time is of the essence!
Rami Amaro
Ramiamaro@hotmail.com
Rami Amaro (Oil & Sludge lawsuit)
You might want to know that other Toyota models have demonstrated the sludge problem, too. Look at Camry and Avalon posts where applicable. Are the engines same/similar?
The pulling issue is well documented in the archives of Sienna owners here. Premature tire wear and brake problems are noted as well. Sticking sliding doors are common as are leaking rear washer lines.
As for the sludge issue, I still think the problem will just be delayed if oil is changed every 3,000 miles. The problem is a slow-developing one. Keeping the oil "new" will only decrease the immediate problems. There are *definitely* some larger issues with the engine itself. No on has satisfactorily addressed a possible head gasket issue either.
FACT: Toyota has a major head gasket problem which resulted in a major recall on some of its models in the last five years. Head gasket problems cannot possibly be "OWNER BLAME" problems (but Toyota might think of a way to try it!).
"Readytobuy" wanted me to defend my information as if I were on trial. If you don't mind, I'll save that for the *real* trial if needed. I think that instead, Toyota needs to PROVE beyond any doubt that this is NOT a manufacturing defect inherent to many, many Siennas, and other models (crosses year models, too).
Pending the resolution of my own case, I would be VERY INTERESTED in linking with "bburns965" and "ramiamaro" to pursue these matters further. And, as John Paul Johns said in a U.S. battle, "I have only just begun to fight..."
I have not had much time at all to pursue these matters publicly. However, if Toyota forces me to, so be it. Everyone has free choice. No, there is no "chicken little" issue (as indicated by one poster). There is a David and Goliath issue. The difference? This time, the automaker will be David and the consumers will be Goliath. Get enough of us together and LOOK OUT!
I left the U.S. vehicles and turned to Honda and Toyota. I am not a previous import owner aside from my current '95 Odyssey and '99 Sienna. With my ever-increasing Sienna problems and my recently failed ABS (quote of $1400 for repair) on the Odyssey, I have NO FAITH in those automakers either.
The situation with new vehicles is at a crisis level. Take the FORD Windstar and Explorer issues, the Chrysler minivans, the Sienna, the new Odyssey, also. GM is plagued by problems, too. We, the consumers are asked to POUR our hard-earned money into KNOWN and WIDESPREAD DEFECT repairs. IS IT FAIR???
I like "bburns965" idea about a coalition. I think it is time to enact stronger laws to protect us. Just as Rami Amaro stated, we have the burden of proof as if WE are on trial. The dealerships ALWAYS say they have never seen the problem...I see it time and time again!
Owners need to realize that by going quietly away (to make life easier in some cases), the automaker has ABSOLUTELY NO INCENTIVE to stop the unfair treatment. You also must put pressure on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Center for Auto Safety to protect you by investigating defect patterns. YES! It IS a hassle. But, generating the paperwork HELPS lead to action by consumer and government agencies.
Will the automaker force you to go to extreme measures to get a resolution? Most likely. However, it would be wise for automakers to heed consumers' promises to get justice. Where there is a will there is a way.......
(Consumers Unite: "http://www.businessweek.com/1996/27/b348212.htm")
Having said all this, I am going to be optimistic that Toyota will be fair. My dealership, while initially quite frustrating to deal with, did make repairs and take steps to correct the problems. The problem? Some problems are *not resolved* despite repairs made. With a defect, oftentimes you get the "Band-Aid" treatment, only to return later with greater problems. This is NOT FAIR!!
Don't forget to use thecomplaintstation.com,
cartrackers.com, and alt.autos.toyota (newsgroup) to post the problems you have!
Charlene Blake
cblake@erols.com
cblake@erols.com
Regarding the dealer diagnosis: I check the tires myself at every other fillup, which rules out that factor. The service advisor pooh-poohed the idea of rubbing brakes, since there was no noise nor overheating of the pads/shoes.
Indeed, the dealer service facility is even less inclined to do anything further because of two pieces of supporting "information" that they got from Georgetown, KY:
1. 12 - 13 mpg is normal for around town.
2. Gas mileage will be expected to worsen with the drop in temperature (in my area it has hardly dropped below freezing yet).
What I really want to challenge is the contention that 12 - 13 is normal. Is there *any* support for this? The lower EPA range on the sticker (for city driving) is 15.
I am very surprised that some other owners are getting 20 mpg around town. My results of 12 - 13 has to be indicative of some problem ? I question whether the service people did anything at all after having spoken to national HQ.